All Activity

Oh right, communist. I forgot.

That's right, it didn't say a thing.

Oh? https://www.ctvnews.ca/saskatoon/article/saskatchewan-premier-says-2-people-charged-for-setting-wildfires/ Seems it's easier for them to blame Scott Moe, who is white, than the a holes deliberately starting the fires

Of course I do, it's not your money. LMAO! You let me know that works out.

Hypocrisy? ==== If I were Poilievre, I would make strongly the point that we Canadians get along.

Trash? I strongly believe that this crazy federal Liberal TGV idea is: -Mirabel -California

Hypocrisy? These same Canadian/Quebec voters who vote for the PQ/NDP decry Trump. Yet they are nationalists themselves. No different from Trump.

Trump is a buffoon. True. But many Americans vote for him simply because he stands for America. ====== In Quebec and Canada, There are many such people/voters.

Disagree. 1. Trump/America are not in a downward spiral. 2. Canadians primarily deal with Americans. We Canadians would be foolish to break our ties. 3. China? Canada China deal? Gimme a break.

These guys actually think they are clever! "Taco! Hahah got'em!"

I'm not sure detestation of a person or group is not hatred. But I know one thing, hatred is increasing and becoming a serious problem. People get addicted to hate, they want something to hate. Also I believe foreign influence is causing division among us, making us argue over something where there is no need for argument. To the point, it is dividing our society. Canada was once a bastion of tolerance and acceptance. But you can't just let things go on the way they are now. We've brought in hundreds of thousands of people from nations that do not cherish tolerance. So what we already believed in, not to hate shit, needs to be made a law for these people. That is, specifically and primarily, the islamic Jew-haters.

You wouldn't know humour even if it smacked you in the face with a cow pat.

LOLOL so now you're ANNOUNCING that you're having a mental health break down and you'll be repeating yourself?!? ROFLMAO!!! 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

Okay I need it, so give me your bit, just make sure you remove all the Palestinian sympathiser bullshit first.

So you've never heard of cousin paste? LOL What the hell are you even talking about? It's bad enough you dredge up a post from the better part of a year ago but to do it just to make a stupid statement it's kind of weird

Except you don't have the right to say if a portion of my taxes goes towards it So you won't complain if I decide to support something that our taxes go towards that you don't like right? I believe Donald Trump is doing that with ice right now

Morals and legal outcomes are often wildly different. You're right, and I did say "it takes a lot of contradictory evidence to say that it was not "self-defence". 23-yr-old Mike Tyson couldn't say "I feared for my life" about a 79-yr-old man in a movie theatre who threw popcorn in his face. Could Karmelo have said it? With so many witnesses going against him? Maybe not. But if he had Johnny Cochrane type money, probably. I'd say that if he hadn't asked the cop "Was it self defence", and he got a good lawyer who could get the case on TV, and then drag the case along for a few months, while Anthony cried, and the lawyer talked about racism, slavery, and Jim Crowe laws ad nauseam... Forming an angry mob...

At least you're right to note the report you referenced in your thread title didn't contain a single thing about the arson, natives or free trips to the city you're otherwise blathering about.

I'm going to attach a flash light, a laser and a tape measure to an AR and call it a multi tool. "It slices! It dices! It's a level and a pointer. It can see at night and it can turn your enemy into a pink mist!"

Makes sense. They say the least trusting people in the world are the people who are the least trustable themselves

That'll be the day... LMAO!

Your assessment is your OPINION and not FACT.

This is only partially good advice. Yes, you should say you were in fear for your life... BUT morally speaking, you damn well better actually be so too. However, to say a jury has no choice but to acquit is wildly wrong. The legal standards are for what a reasonable person would feel in that moment under the totality of those circumstances. If someone pokes you with their finger, that doesn't mean you can get away with killing them with a gun just because you say you were in fear for your life.

By some of your 'morals' or lack thereof, sure! Trust me it's far more disturbing to hear you supporting terrorists raping women and children, murdering, torturing, and hostage taking But sure I'm certain the Kirk thing must be very disturbing for you🙄🙄🙄

It's also disturbing to hear you talk like Captain Kirk.