All Activity

In 2015, Poilievre was Housing Minster in Harpers government, which allowed 800,000 affordable rental units to be sold off to corporate landlords and developers. In 2026 Poilievre slams Federal-BC plan to buy vacant condos, calling it a 'bail-out' for developers. Under Harper's conservatives, the average home price in Canada went up +67% (compared to +62% during Trudeau's term), who refused to do anything about it. Poilievre voted against initiatives to make housing affordable in 2006, 2009, 2010, 2013 and 2014 when Conservatives were in power; and again in 2018 and 2019 as a member of the official opposition. He must be conflicted now considering his top donors are real estate investors. That's our boy Poilievre.... a useless mouthpiece....utterly useless.

Why it's almost like you were paying attention during 10 years Of Trudeau

Brivael Le Pogam @brivael · 4h Translated from French I'm fed up with guys over 20 who still believe in Santa Claus. So I'm going to explain it to you, like to a kid, just how retarded it is to believe in socialism. You're in a class of 30 students. One kid works his ass off and gets an 18 average. Another does jack shit and gets a 4. The teacher decides it's unfair and gives everyone the class average: 11. The one who had 18 stops working. Why bust your hump if it changes nothing? The one who had 4 keeps doing nothing. Why work if you're handed an 11 for free? The next year the class average is 7. Then 5. Then 3. The teacher doesn't get it. He thinks the problem is the students aren't supportive enough. So he sets up punishments for those who don't put in enough effort. He monitors everyone. He decides who studies what. He bans switching classes. That's exactly what happened. Every time. In every country. No exceptions. USSR, China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Cambodia, Ethiopia, East Germany. 40 attempts. Same result. Every time. Socialism punishes those who produce and rewards those who don't. Everyone ends up producing nothing. And when no one's producing anymore, the government uses force to make people work. It's not an accident. It's the design. Santa Claus, at least, you stop believing in him around age 8.

A name for a God that does not exist. Shrug.

Consensus has nothing to do with science. It was once the consensus of all learned and wise people that the earth was flat. Pretty much everyone told Galileo that he was nuts when he tried to explain how far away the stars must be. Consensus is not science

This should not be a partisan issue. Prime ministers have lived there for seventy years and the house is as old as the country itself. I can’t imagine many countries begrudging the restoration of the residence of our head of government. Presumably, the restoration aspect massively adds to the price? We wouldn’t want to just gut the place although one could make an argument for that. I’m sure it would be a much cheaper option. Some of the estimates are alarmingly large. I’d like to see a fair degree of transparency about the costs as the project proceeds.

1. Who gives a shit? Ever hear of critical mass? That 4.9% is already a handful; wait till they get a few more percentage points; Sharia will be your new law. 2. Good luck then. I hope it works. 3. I disagree. Given your present course, I give it 10 years to jihad takeover.

Absolutely, and we all know you like to lie about it. In fairness I'd be ashamed If I said half the crap you say and would try and deny it as well later but you did say it. Lying about it doesn't help

Yes and if i just start reading the words in it in order it makes about as much sense as you do Your problem isn't the words, it's that you can't put them together in a way that makes sense

You disparage America because Trump and yet oddly brush off a greater threat, Ignore at your peril.

Prediction: "RCMP not allowed to investigate. CBC says "Meh" to everything. Carney gets to give the final version of the story to CBC and they will never talk about it again". I win.

5%. Thank you. Now back to the subject in question.

Muslims make up 4.9% of the Canadian population, representing nearly 1.8 million people. Islam is the country's second-largest and fastest-growing major religion, with the proportion of Canadian Muslims more than doubling over the last two decades. Ignore the binary progression at your peril.

Now THIS is hilarious!

Next week: "the sky is CLOSING!"

Well, you have certainly revealed your obsessive hate being against support for Israel. I defend Free Speech regardless if it is for or against Israel. Instead of debating facts, which you are unable to do, you try to impugn my motives.

What is the percentage of Muslims in the Canadian population? I’ve got a better idea. Let’s keep as many sensitive Canadian documents as we can under our control. We know the Americans cannot be trusted, even before Trump who made this obvious to anyone with eyes. They’ve a long way to go yet. See above.

Yeah, they can see you're hearing things again. Where did I write "I DIDNT DO IT." in the context of controlling something? You people simply cannot do anything other than attribute things you imagine to people you're incapable of communicating with. The fact you back each others delusions up as if they were also your own is just flat out bizzare.

And it turns out that Brooksfield owned companies would have benefited substantially from the bailout. And there's question as to whether or not the pm properly excused himself from these deliberations as required

Why do people allow themselves to get so nasty? There has NEVER been a prediction that has come to pass. Not even those infamous "bigger storms". Its all based off worst case scenarios wrapped in wild conjecture. Now its been admitted...finally...that real "scientists" never claimed anything but an observable slight increase of the overall global temperature. They have NOT declared... "AHHH! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!" Yet these climate freaks continue to drive fuel prices up, which drives the cost of everything else up. That's just down right nasty.

It's always "global something" lol. Today: "THE SKY IS FALLING!" Tomorrow: "THE SKY IS RISING!"

Back to topic! The disgusting commie DSA scum.

Here's the AI summary of Climategate: "Climategate" was the biggest scientific scandal of the modern climate era. It erupted in November 2009—just weeks before a major UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen—when an anonymous hacker broke into the servers of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia in the UK. [1, 2, 3] The hacker leaked over 1,000 private emails and documents belonging to top international climate scientists. Many of these scientists were core contributors to the IPCC's assessment reports. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The leaked files provided a rare, behind-the-scenes look at the exact institutional behaviors we discussed earlier: a deep resistance to outside criticism, defensive gatekeeping, and highly questionable data presentation. [] The controversy centers on three main issues exposed by the leak: 1. "Hide the Decline" and "Mike's Nature Trick" The most damaging piece of the leak was a 1999 email from the head of the CRU, Phil Jones, where he wrote about completing "Mike's Nature trick" to "hide the decline" in a set of temperature data. [1] The Skeptics' View: Critics argued this was a clear, "smoking gun" admission that scientists were actively fabricating data to hide a modern cooling trend and keep the public panicked. [1] The Scientists' Explanation: They argued "trick" simply meant a clever mathematical or statistical technique [to make the data appear to show what they wanted it to]. The "decline" didn't refer to real-world temperatures dropping, but rather a known flaw in tree-ring data. After 1960, tree rings mysteriously stopped tracking accurately with thermometer readings. [1, 2] The Deception [deception is a form of lying]: To make the famous "Hockey Stick Graph" look smooth and dramatic for a Nature magazine cover, scientists deleted the unreliable post-1960 tree-ring data and spliced real thermometer data onto the end of the line. While scientifically explained in the fine print of technical papers, doing it cleanly on a public graph without a clear warning label looked like intentional data manipulation to the public. [1, 2, 3, 4] 2. Deleting Data and Avoiding Freedom of Information (FOI) The emails exposed a toxic, hostile attitude toward independent auditors and climate skeptics who were trying to double-check the scientists' work. [1, 2, 3, 4] Scientists were caught explicitly discussing how to delete emails and data to avoid handing them over to critics making legal Freedom of Information requests. [1, 2, 3] In one email, a scientist admitted he would rather destroy his historical climate data than give it to a prominent critic who wanted to audit his algorithms. 3. "Gatekeeping" the Peer-Review System The leaks confirmed exactly what critics meant when they alleged a coordinated effort to suppress dissenting opinions. [1, 2] Top scientists discussed how to bully scientific journals that dared to publish papers written by skeptical researchers. In one exchange, scientists talked about blacklisting an academic journal, ousting its editor, and ensuring that certain dissenting peer-reviewed papers were completely left out of the upcoming IPCC reports, regardless of their scientific merit. [1, 2] At the end of the day, we all need to remember that IPCC scientists have been known to go with "regardless of scientific merit" as their guiding principal. Artificial/assumed consensus is the north star for all fascists.