All Activity

Satan can read The Bible too...

STILL ^just your fantasy. LMAO I can read the US Constitution. You CANUCKS shoudl try that.

Well answering that would require significant knowledge of a product that hasn't been invented yet Well sure, if the cost is prohibitive then it's not worth it. But that was a caveat I already put in, I specifically said if we can store electricity in the same volume and price that we currently do petroleum products THEN it's exciting. Solar power is by far and away the cheapest form of electricity generation there is on the planet. The costs a lot of money to dig oil up and process it and send it places. So if it was possible to store solar electricity for about the same price and in the same density that we store petroleum products now then solar power would be insanely cheap and effective. But I mean that technology definitely doesn't exist, so it would have to depend largely on what it actually looked like if it was invented. I mean in the long run miniature black holes sound ideal but were quite a few years away from that I suspect We will have to see. There's no point in arguing which solution is best before the solutions are invented and we can see with the pros and cons are. But there's no doubt that a cheap way to store large amounts of electricity would allow us to harness solar and wind power to actually consider the possibility of replacing existing non-renewable products at least theoretically

Well, now my point is you were full of shit just claiming that the only position you have had here was that you merely do not trust Israel.

And it is true. What's your point?

Well... "In a court filing first reported by the Associated Press, the justice department said it moved to dismiss the charges "after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information". The department said the interview between investigators and Flynn in January 2017 was "unjustified" and not conducted on a "legitimate investigative basis". It also said it could not prove beyond reasonable doubt that Flynn had lied, and said that after the interview, FBI agents had "expressed uncertainty as to whether Mr Flynn had lied"." https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52584193 It looks like Flynn was setup by overly zealous FBI agent and agency. This is not new...

Nope. Lets go back to the beginning: Me: I can't watch this video, 5 seconds in, it is alredy lying. You: Appears true to me, here is a link to someone else opinion making the case, let me ask you some rhetorical questions implying this is not good.

Sure it has.

That we can...does not necessarily mean we should. Is there a reason to change the energy infrastructure? What would it cost? On both counts, the answers do not support measures that come at enormous costs to the people. That would be just mean. Use what there is, including mirrors and windmills, but understand the limits of the technology make it a supplemental source. In the meantime, bone up on global energy as cost effectively as possible, which would help solve a whole bunch of real crisis. The answer will come. Batteries may play a part. But id caution against any sort of reliance.

Well... that is what you are saying now. That has not been your only position throughout this thread.

You are now conflating a bad jury verdict with the law. Your argument now is that this jury should have let him go because another jury made a poor decision. Just brilliant. Also, in the case you are citing, the man was not just bigger and stronger; the other man was over 65, he was 71, his claim was that he was trapped in his seat, had no way to escape, as what he perceived to be a looming violent threat was coming at him which carries additional legal precedent regarding age and the ability to defend oneself. So... completely different circumstances. In this case Karmelo could leave. He had an exit. He chose to stay and he chose to taunt. The threat coming at him was not in the dark, he was not pinned with no escape, he was not elderly.

Sounds like you're assuming hia/hweer/their gender. Tsk tsk! Men can have babies you know, according to the left Did they tell you that at the time or did you 'assign' that to them? I'm a sane conservative and we simply don't have that problem We figure it out pretty easy, it's you and yours who seem confused.

LOL LOL LUUUZER LOOZZZZZER !!!! I'm WINNING!!!! DERP!!!! And the melt down continues 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

Im saying I DON'T TRUST ISRAEL. Not with military or personal data. Why is that so hard to accept?

Hey. Jack Mccoy. (or should i say dan fielding). He went to trial. They had real lawyers and judges. He's guilty of murder. You're wrong. Period. He murdered a young man. Without lawful excuse. Buy bye you murderous freak.

Holy shit, you have no clue what you are talking about. No duty to retreat from what? He was not faced with a deadly threat to his life. The law you are butchering is regarding the use of deadly force against a deadly threat. There was no deadly threat here. Once he started taunting, he is no longer just an innocent bystander who gets to react to the provocation he is engaged in. He did not merely react to violence; he used deadly force and killed someone. Self-defense must be proportional. Now, keep hiding from me like the cowardly turd you are.

What a load of shit By the way I've skinned many a moose with a three-and-a-half-inch folding knife of a similar shape and size. It is a lethal weapon. As we have seen. Your heart is about 1.5 inches below your skin. A 3.5 inch knife is more than large enough to kill someone and you're pretending it's some sort of toy. What a joke you are. Yet you'll also pretend that a 4000 lb vehicle with hundreds of horsepower is NO THREAT AT ALL if you drive it at a cop 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

I don't know who is dumber, Jasmine Crockett or Hodad.

Too many of them still believe that Austin and his brother "jumped" him and beat on him. Nothing you can say or show them will matter even if they acknowledge the truth they will still blame the victim due to skin color. Somehow just the fact that the person Karmelo stabbed was white was enough to make it just. Austin's father finally had it and the fatigue was real, having a gag order while they trashed his sons with no evidence told complete and utter lies made up and taken as reality. If you watch his response it was epic.

Oh FFS, I know you've spent your whole life pretending that 3.5 inches is big, but it's not. It's not a harpoon or a scimitar or a combat knife or even a hunting knife. It's for camping. Jeebus. And I really don't care about your softball games. You were trying to pretend that it's some egregious behavior (he was asking for trouble) by going under the canopy. You have it on record that he went to visit a friend. You have it from the dead kid's coach directly that it was common for people from other teams to mingle under the canopies. Three strikes in your made up version of events. Like I said, most people wouldn't stay somewhere they weren't wanted. If you ask someone to leave the wrong way though and they just might stay out of spite. Which he was legally entitled to do. It's not a free pass to commit battery against the interloper. Grow up. So, again, from a legal standpoint, he had no duty to retreat. He was not the aggressor. He reacted to violence done against him. In all of these things he was safely withing his rights. Correct? So the questions become whether he could be reasonably afraid of serious harm being done to him, and whether an escalation of force was necessary to avoid that harm. If he had not escalated and had simply shoved back, does that end the confrontation? Or does it end with him getting a beating from a MUCH bigger kid? And potentially that kid's twin brother and teammates? His argument is as good or better than other people who have been acquitted on the same rationale. FFS, the theater shooter literally killed the man he was arguing with because the other man was A. bigger and stronger and B. threw popcorn at him. And he walked away with an acquittal. It's not justice if it's not applied equally. And apologies for painting you as a supporter of everyday carry. I don't recall a MAGA type who isn't also a gun proliferation advocate on principle. Good on you.

As usual, a zero value post from a ZERO LOSER LOL LOL LOL A LOSER like you does not deserve anything new. I repeat so you won't forget you are a complete ZERO LOSER and need your equally ZERO LOSER buddy veradahbouy to back you up HA HA HA No meltdown...that is what happens to you when I tap dance in your LOSER head LOL LOL LOL Once again, your post only proves confux the LOSER is suffering from blatherskite HA HA HA

I knew it was the butt, I just didn't wanna say it. Where did you come up with that little misplaced nugget of stupidty?

They "went after" Flynn not for the fact of the meetings, but because he lied to the FBI about what he discussed in those meetings--substantially and materially lied. Actively undermining a sitting president's foreign policy is not a good look, but lying about it to the FBI is criminal. And, frankly, unbelievably stupid. Any person competent to hold Flynn's job would have KNOWN that those calls are monitored and that it was pointless to lie about them. He was also taking money from Turkey and operating as an unregistered foreign agent. For some reason, you people want to make Flynn out to be a victim. He's not. Just another crooked Trump crony.

Amir Odom is so awesome. He was one of Charlie Kirk's best friends. Imagine that, a young black gay man was one of Charlie Kirk's best pals.