All Activity

It's been over a year that Trudeau has been gone. You need to get over it, and get over liberals winning again. Find better part leaders and you might have a chance. What has he done to make you think he doesn't care, and what strategy is it that's cost jobs? Cite where he said 'SO tariffs are not that bad of a deal' You're probably right that a lot of Canadians didn't care about our military spending. Admittedly there were a lot of my years where I didn't either. So be it, that's the past and again, fair to say it's changed. We're spending more, recruitment is up, and we're creating jobs. Try having a positive outlook rather than a negative one.... can't do anything about it anyway, and makes the day a little better.

Lol. It wasn't a crocodile Dundee knife. It was a cheap, Walmart multi tool. You're all for people walking around daily with handguns, but a Black kid with a $13 multi tool is suspicious-- looking for trouble. See how pervasive it is? You don't even realize your doing it. And your bullshit narrative about sports culture is just nonsense. It was a track meet. A non contact sport. And it's common for the athletes to mingle. Metcalf's Coach "Defense attorney Mike Howard asked him if he was aware of any policy or expectation that prohibited students from sitting under other team tents. The coach said no and testified that his athletes would mingle with their friends from other schools during their downtime." Anthony didn't show up to cause terrible. He was there to say hi to a friend. Metcalf's teammate told detectives that another teammate (Anthony's friend) called him into the tent. Invited him in. He sat down and talked about the weather. Metcalf was apparently feeling particularly territorial, and was probably a 17 year old boy about it. You've constructed an imaginary narrative about what Anthony was doing and why he was doing it. Wonder why?

LOL wow you can't even say more than one letter of my nickname? Have i scared you that badly? ROFLMAO!! sorry to make you wet your pants Lxx ! BWAAHAHAHA!!!!

You mean you brought it up exactly the way I said you did. And then freaked out when I answered that yeah he does have magical answers. I assumed you were being somewhat rhetorical and didn't actually think that magic existed but now I realize that you're just that self delusional As to the rest yes he does have absolutely solid ideas how to resolve the issues and turn the economy around. He's not vague about it. I listed a bunch of really good ones . He's produced many results in his life and has had a successful career in the government. Which mark carney cannot claim And I can absolutely prove that Mark Carney's promises and platform were built largely on promises and ideas that poilievre had already made and everybody has commented on this. Is beyond childish that you are attempting to claim otherwise And I'm happy to provide evidence and proof Did Carney steal conservative ideas for his election - Google Search While the Liberals argue that Carney is simply steering the party back to a pragmatist, "political centre", critics point out several major conservative policy planks that Carney adopted or adapted: [1, 2] 1. Housing and GST Cuts Poilievre pledged to eliminate the GST on new home builds under $1 million. Carney subsequently introduced an identical platform policy to cut the GST for first-time homebuyers on new or heavily renovated homes under $1 million, drawing direct accusations of platform theft. [1] 2. Immigration Restraints Under Justin Trudeau, the Liberals oversaw historic peaks in immigration. Poilievre repeatedly criticized these targets as unsustainable. During his leadership bid and subsequent election push, Carney broke from his predecessor by publicly conceding that immigration levels had gotten out of control, later introducing the Safe Borders Act to scale them back. [1, 2] 3. Capital Gains and Middle-Class Taxation [1] Following aggressive Conservative pushback against Trudeau-era capital gains tax hikes, Carney's Liberals moved to scrap those very increases. Carney also admitted the federal government had overtaxed the middle class, adjusting his economic platform toward middle-class tax relief—a narrative long dominated by Poilievre. [1, 2] 4. Natural Resources and Pipelines Carney shifted the Liberal approach on resource development closer to the Conservative stance. When former Greenpeace activist and Liberal minister Steven Guilbeault spoke out against constructing new pipelines, Carney publicly overruled him, explicitly stating his administration would support pipeline creation. [1, 2] 5. Fiscal Deficits and Spending [1] Carney openly criticized the "lost decade" of his own party's past rule, agreeing with Tory talking points that runaway federal spending, bloated civil servant hiring, and heavy deficits had severely weakened the domestic economy. [1, 2] OOOOPSIE!!!! YOU WERE WRONG AGAIN YOU LYING FREAK LOL I always provide proof, you always lie, and then always accuse me of lying. Pathetic And yeah trudeau takes the platforms from the conservatives and simply says the same thing but more. For example he waited till Erin put out his platform and then took the housing numbers and added 200 million to it, took the other spending and just added some money to it, it was very blatant. The media called it 'overlap' As to the recession, you don't understand at all. We are in a recession and that's just the way it is. It's like a technical pregnancy or a technical break and enter. Putting the word technical in front of it doesn't change it Some economists having to gated that they believe it's probably going to be shallow and short and that's great but they follow up by saying even if we recover from a recession we're going to be at miserably low growth rates far below other countries and far below what we should be So your entire argument is that we shouldn't say that we're doing terrible we should just say that we're doing really bad. There is nobody who isn't partisan who is suggesting we're doing well. At best they might say there are a few positive indicators that suggest things aren't completely crashing You've embarrassed yourself again.

Damn... I forgot about 'Obama' in what I just sent Fxx. Trump's your guy, isn't he... 🤡

So you don't have a problem with carney being involved with slavery, your problem is that it was a conservative that brought it up If you didn't have bad morals you'd have no morals

You minions are pieces of work... I said Trump perpetuates political divisiveness (fact) and the same right wing clowns rush to his defence with the usual 'what about Biden' so-called arguements. Couldn't care less about Biden, inflation, the economy, Stormy Daniels, Epstein, or his 34 felony counts because that wasn't my comment. Why do you like Trump so much. What's his most endearing quality for you?

Sure kid. Kid it's what you do. You constantly accuse others of what you do. When i say you're a liar i can prove it with facts the majority of the time, but you NEVER can. Simply not true and you know it. I constantly post facts, and you left wing twinkies constantly demand i repost them again and again. Your problem is you can't cope with reality so you just prefer to lie about it. Morality and logic are both real, sorry for reality butting into your echo chamber like that. And here you are lying proving my point 100%. I very specifically said above that it would be perfectly normal for you to criticize republicans, or even be angry at them. I used those words only a few posts ago And here you are claiming that I have said that you couldn't criticize them. A 100% contradiction to what I actually said. You couldn't have proven you were the liar here more effectively than that. Criticism, fine. Anger fine. Commentary about failed policy or the like, fine. Being happy and excited that people are hurt and dying because it lets you win points on the net? Not fine. I can't believe this needed to be explained to you. No that's still your side. THRILLED when kirk was killed, OVERJOYED when a medical exec was shot, ELATED when trup was shot but disappointed the guy's aim wasn't better... Conservatives see it necessary to kill people who slaughter innocent women and children without cause. Conservatives don't' have a problem enforcing laws and understand that when someone drives a car at a cop and hits him the cop is right to defend himself. They're not gleeful, they just recognize sometimes that has to happen. You on the other hand were excited as HELL that people were getting killed!!!! Yaaaayy!! Makes trump look bad so war is great!

If a person robs people they deserve to be vilified by those robbed and those robbed naturally feel detestation as a result but is not hatred.

My post said Trump perpetuates political divisiveness. What part of that is untrue? I have no idea what you're trying to say, and neither do you. I've struck an automatic defence nerve by talking Trump haven't I... Oh well.

Obama Says If He Had A Son Who Stabbed Someone In The Heart With A Knife, He Would Look Just Like Karmelo Anthony | Babylon Bee Obama Says If He Had A Son Who Stabbed Someone In The Heart With A Knife, He Would Look Just Like Karmelo Anthony

Lol... you're a certified idi0t. Out of the too many to count pull it out of your áss 'facts' this one may be the best! First, your pint sized mind could have at least thought of a more believable 'quote' than that, and second, if those were my words I'd have at least said 'because OF Trump'. If it's in b&w it shouldn't be a problem for you to cite with my tag on it. Why so defensive of Trump, Kiddo?

Sure, Obama invented racial tension in America. 🙄 If only he hadn't humanized a dead kid who was targeted because he was Black, then Black Americans wouldn't have any resentment. It's not the fact that Zimmerman targeted Martin and faced no consequence. Or that it happens again and again. Or the obvious disparity in the justice system and throughout most systems. Nope. Obama acknowledging it is the real problem. .wowza

The Carney said the moon is not made of green cheese. It is actually made of blue cheese. Was he correct.

That's exactly what he did. His entire Davos speech was about how nobody needs the US and the middle powers should all band against US hegemony. He declared our relationship with the US - specifically economically & militarily - OVER. "We can give ourselves more than the US ever can." I know you like to play this game that he didn't say THOSE EXACT WORDS. That's why the words are in quotes in that post. But he most certainly said those exact words - in different words and the impression he wanted to give was clear.

Karmelo's response was neither proportional nor reasonable. Not from "the way it sounds to us", and not from "the way it appeared to all of the witnesses at the scene." You're talking about sports, and tradition, in the USA. Talk to the other team's bench and see what happens. Celebrate too much after scoring and see what happens. Throw a couple pitches too close to opposing players' heads and see what happens. Skate across the center line during the pre-game and see what happens. Throw a jersey for your own team on the floor and see what happens. If you just get a push, consider yourself lucky. Athletes are territorial, and pushing is accepted. Even in soccer, the biggest b1otch sport of all, people can push. But you can't stab in soccer. Not even in lacrosse, and that sport is crazier than hockey. I ask you: could a Yale rower just walk in and hang out in a Harvard tent? Guys from those schools are theoretically America's foremost gentleman in that age group, but there will absolutely be a push. 100%. That being said, the chance that there won't be a stabbing is also 100%. And if by some miracle there was, even the whitest stabber killing the blackest victim would be found guilty of murder. You just can't murder people for a push. Even in Texas. And honestly... who brings a fkn crocodile Dundee knife to a rowing event, or a track meet? It seems a bit pre-meditated, even if that's notwithstanding the fact that it's just "100% legal".

Where I live won't change anything. We both lived through The Rona. I even had it. I knew for sure it was all a political and financial gimmick when I heard that we couldn't go outside. You bought into one of, if not the biggest scam ever. Oh sure, people got sick. Some even died. Mostly old, fat, or those with weak immunity. I asked my doctor about zink and the other treatments. He said get the vax and told ne he couldn't discuss other things. Huh... What i know is that they scared the shit outta weak people who did 1diotic crap out of fear of a bad cold with congestion. I also know a lot of people made a shit-can of money in the process.

Well looky here angry man is angry again and even more incoherant.

Hodad: you're being a bit of an acceptance filter for everything from the Martin/Karmelo POV and a total rejection filter from the Zimmerman/Metcalfe POV. The stories weren't the same at all, yet you're trying to draw a 100% parallel. 1) Zimmerman didn't shoot Trayvon because of a light shove, he was (allegedly) surprise-attacked while he was walking back to his car. That's the only version of the story in existence, so a jury had no choice but to rule based on that (aka - the only) version of the story. 2) Karmelo had every opportunity in the world to choose a less murdery path, and his response to a shove was the exact opposite of proportional, or reasonable. If his standard became the rule, then people with concealed knives and guns could run rampant on society. Any kid that had two friends with him could say "Hodad shoved me", and if his witnesses agreed, they could get away with killing you. Your standard is just ridiculous. Obama's quote: "When Trayvon Martin was first shot, I said that this could have been my son. Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago." That's his quote. Verbatim. And it's what's known as a snuck premise. Only in this instance, it's more like a "diabolically divisive snuck premise that laid the groundwork for racial violence that was justified in advance by the president." Think about it: if Obama's version of the story was correct (which 99% of demonrats would assume) that means that if a younger version of himself was really just out buying Skittles, and then ran into Zimmerman while he was just humming politely to himself of the way home, he couldn't possibly have survived because he was black, and Zimmerman was out looking for a black to shoot. I don't buy it. I think that if a young Barack Obama was walking through that neighbourhood, minding his own business, he would have been fine. His risk of ending up being shot would have been zero. Was it safe for white people to walk around in the US after Obama's racially divided presidency? Four individuals were convicted and sentenced in 2017 and 2018 for the racially charged kidnapping and torture of an 18-year-old white man with special needs in Chicago. The January 2017 incident drew nationwide outrage after a 28-minute video of the abuse was broadcast on Facebook Live. A 28-minute torture video. Think about that. Where did the justification [in their minds] come from? Do you think it had nothing to do with the BS M Brown narrative? Or Obama's assertion that Trayvon was just killed by a racist and white folk didn't care? I think that's impossible, because "the BS M Brown narrative and Obama's assertion that Trayvon was just killed by a racist and white folk didn't care" caused years of violent racial riots, which were still going strong in the month that attack happened. And that's not a snuck premise, it's an undeniable fact.

Jeebus. We've had this exact conversation multiple times. I gave you the information. I gave you timestamped screenshots. CNN broadcast the robbery footage on the day it was released, just like everyone else. They reported that friends and family described Brown as a "gentle giant" because that's literally how friends and family described him. No one at CNN knew Brown. It's called reporting. In all seriousness, this is representative of your recollection of most of these political issues. You have the facts wrong, remembering twisted versions of events, but with absolute certainty. And you absolutely refuse to adopt new information and update your narrative. You hate CNN with a passion for reasons that are, at least to a large degree, fictional.

I said PO Doesn’t have magical answers and you said yea he does. LOL And no he doesn’t have “solid ways” to turn the economy around quickly. Of course he claims he does like all politicians but his ideas aren’t that original and aren’t any more certain to produce results more than anyone else’s and he has neither the education nor the work experience for anyone to believe his ideas have any credibility. LMAO PP has never produced a single result in his entire adult life! Like literally He’s never had a real job or real responsibilities….other than last year when he had ONE JOB to not blow a 20+ point election lead, which he FAILED SPECTACULARLY. That’s the opposite of reality like what you’re claiming. . You can’t deny the FACTS that PP’s platform came out AFTER Carney that’s just a fact. And that’s because his campaign had totally ignored Trump and was just a broken record of “just like Justinl” LMAO FAKE NEWS ON BOTH COUNTS You the one who hilariously just claimed on another thread you back up your claims with evidence so go show some proof. PP only released his platform 6 DAYS before the election. 6 DAYS!!! And how can you say lefty Trudeau stole conservative ideas that’s hilarious like what exactly???? NDP maybe but there’s miles of daylight between Trudeau and conservatives. Your BS reminds of those people who nervously blurt out stupid things and a party except those people are usually embarrassed afterwards whereas you have absolutely no shame lLOL. Statcan only reports the numbers the commentary that we are all going to die is all yours. Holy shit kid I understand fine clearly and the explanation has been posted here multiple times including in the right-wing National Post. But as usual you just ignore and delete from memory any inconvenient information. Specifically the inconvenient news you’re ignoring is that the previous quarters weren’t consistently negative they were up and down and flat and mostly ended up negative because of the 1 month in each quarter. It also said negative growth of 0.1% can easily end up revised into flat or even positive growth once final numbers come in. It also said there’s no formal definition of recession and economists consider the depth and duration of negative growth before deciding ther is one. As usual you ignore all the facts I still find it hilarious that won’t blame Bush for the massive recession he caused or Harper when it spilled into. Canada or the COVID crisis that started under Trump’s first term or the crisis that Trump is causing now. For all of those you republitards are like “oh hey shit just happens the government doesn’t control the economy these things just happen like bad weather you just have to wait them out“ But then when Obama inherited Bush’s recession, Biden inherited the COVID and supply chain crisis which spilled over to Trudeau, and when Carney is enduring Trump’s dual economic crises suddenly you’re like “they’re in charge! It’s their job to come up with solution and they’re failing! They caused it or they should have some how figured out a way to immediately stop it! It’s all their fault” Its the same hypocrisy you people pull with Bush’s failed war in Iraq and the global wave of terrorism he unleashed. His years of constant failure, deaths and false promises of victory meant nothing to you until Obama took office and then all of a sudden every day you people screamed that the the president has blood on his hands for not immediately winning the war and ending terrorism Your just partisan internet trolls who can’t discuss issues honestly.

He was just changing the topic, tbh. The main point in my post was that leftists were destroying cities with racial riots on a MASSIVE scale long before Trump was even a blip on their radar, contrary to Linksoul's assertion that they were new under Trump. Racial riots were new under Obama, but to be more precise: massive, destructive, artificially ginned-up racial riots became a a thing under Obama, and he was the main instigator of all that. Linkie has run away. This thread didn't go well for him.

That's possible, I guess. I don't know if I found out about it on the exact day it happened. It's possible that news of that incident never made its way to BC for 6 days. However; on the day that I found out about that shooting, Fox was showing the video, and CNN was saying that they weren't showing the video "out of respect for the deceased and his family." More importantly, CNN ignored Brown's crime, kept the video from the public, and carried on with the BS gentle giant narrative for MONTHS while the country was being destroyed. They were constantly talking about "racist cops, the number of white/black cops in various areas, arrest rates for blacks (it was supposed to be important because allegedly whites don't get arrested when they commit crimes lol), slavery, Jim Crowe laws, oppression, poverty, etc" as if those things were all more important than the fact that the Gentle Giant narrative was total bullshit. CNN acted like the protests were for a legitimate cause and the cop was most likely just another racist pig out shootin' kind, innocent black folks. That was the only impression they gave. "It's pretty much carved in stone that this is the way it happened." That's why the whole CNNiverse was astounded when the verdict didn't back all of CNN's "facts". Honest to God, I considered CNN a news source until I saw their coverage of the M Brown story, and by the second day I was fully aware that they were absolutely not a "news" channel. I'll ask you now... At the conclusion of that story, with all you know, and all that CNN should have made apparent early on, do you think that CNN handled that story like a legitimate news organization? Do you think that they handled that story in a way that fuelled racial division and hatred?

Do you? You hope that any and all fraud is prosecuted? This is new.