All Activity

He was just changing the topic, tbh. The main point in my post was that leftists were destroying cities with racial riots on a MASSIVE scale long before Trump was even a blip on their radar, contrary to Linksoul's assertion that they were new under Trump. Racial riots were new under Obama, but to be more precise: massive, destructive, artificially ginned-up racial riots became a a thing under Obama, and he was the main instigator of all that. Linkie has run away. This thread didn't go well for him.

That's possible, I guess. I don't know if I found out about it on the exact day it happened. It's possible that news of that incident never made its way to BC for 6 days. However; on the day that I found out about that shooting, Fox was showing the video, and CNN was saying that they weren't showing the video "out of respect for the deceased and his family." More importantly, CNN ignored Brown's crime, kept the video from the public, and carried on with the BS gentle giant narrative for MONTHS while the country was being destroyed. They were constantly talking about "racist cops, the number of white/black cops in various areas, arrest rates for blacks (it was supposed to be important because allegedly whites don't get arrested when they commit crimes lol), slavery, Jim Crowe laws, oppression, poverty, etc" as if those things were all more important than the fact that the Gentle Giant narrative was total bullshit. CNN acted like the protests were for a legitimate cause and the cop was most likely just another racist pig out shootin' kind, innocent black folks. That was the only impression they gave. "It's pretty much carved in stone that this is the way it happened." That's why the whole CNNiverse was astounded when the verdict didn't back all of CNN's "facts". Honest to God, I considered CNN a news source until I saw their coverage of the M Brown story, and by the second day I was fully aware that they were absolutely not a "news" channel. I'll ask you now... At the conclusion of that story, with all you know, and all that CNN should have made apparent early on, do you think that CNN handled that story like a legitimate news organization? Do you think that they handled that story in a way that fuelled racial division and hatred?

Do you? You hope that any and all fraud is prosecuted? This is new.

Even if your criminals cause a famine, their soldiers will still have enough to eat

“A Conservative MP is raising explosive allegations ..” Yep “explosive allegations” what conservatives do and what junk news sites like Juno traffic in . And that’s why Poillievre is failing miserably. Look how desperate he is getting with this nonsense.

Mark Carney is in the wrong party; he should be in the Conservative Party, but the job wasn’t available and he didn’t have any friends there.

Nope never LMAO!!!! You can’t honestly believe that! Sorry constant false accusations of “liar” is something you and a couple other right wing kioks do multiple times day, you are one of the WORST offenders for doing it and you get called out on it all the time. You RARELY prove ANYTHING you ever say on here, which is also something I have called you out for repeatedly. MAYBE 10% of the time you will actually back up what you claim with proof or a link mostly you just ignore demands for evidence and repeat your unproven claims. You’re NOTORIOUS for it. Spare us fake morality and twisted logic Your bizarre logic is we are not allowed to criticize Republicans for killing people and getting them hurt because that would somehow be “taking glee” in the people Republicans are killing and hurting therefore if you really care about the people Republicans are killing and hurting you allow republicans to continue killing and hurting them without criticism. . Add to that taking sadistic joy in killing hurting and humiliating people theybhate (Palestinians, immigrants, liberals, Iranians etc etc) is a new Republican trademark.

I've already addressed that. So do you mean do i want to know the thing i already proved? No, i already proved it He said the same thing. Which you know And you're desperately trying to dodge the simple truth by pretending you're a lawyer. "YOUR HONOUR, TECHNICALLY MY CLIENT SAID WE DON'T "HAVE" NEED SO THEY"RE COMPLETELY LYING!!!! It's quite clear he's said that we can't trust the us, that relationship is ruptured and trading with them is a weakness we have to correct, he's saying we don't need them.

Yeah, your mom's paying us all 20 bucks an hour to babysit you I hope you appreciate it, she's got to take on 3 more 'special friend' clients just to make you feel like people give a crap about you

Yes, but his incomprehension is due to your incoherence. You didn't think that one through, did you

I agree. There are no times you can correct him on the facts.

If you can’t understand what I am saying that’s due to your incomprehension

There's probably no number of times I can correct you on the facts of the Brown killing that will make it stick, but no, the police didn't release the robbery video until 6 days after. Update your list of copy and paste grievances. Like this one, most of them are false.

I understand the laws quite well. I gave you the component parts of the law. In terms of location, you do not have a duty to retreat from or avoid conflict if you have a legal right to be there. Legally, Anthony was clear to exist under that canopy. And no, you are incorrect about Metcalf as well. It is not reasonable--or legal--to batter someone simply because you don't want them to be in a public place. The reasonable response is just to ignore Anthony and get on with his own business. But kids are dumb. They think unimportant, truly petty things, are worth a physical flight. Especially big boys. Metcalf was probably used to getting his way, but he picked the wrong fight this time. And died over something as utterly pointless as someone he didn't like being under "his" canopy. Dumb.

I accept that you got permission to post LOL LOL LOL

No, you're wrong about that. Metcalfe's response to Karmelo was fair and reasonable. You're correct to say that he didn't own that tent, but he had a reasonable claim to ask Anthony to leave, and he didn't behave in a manner that was out of order for that situation by shoving him. Anthony's response to the shove was not reasonable, necessary, justifiable, or especially proportional, and therein lies the rub: SYG laws don't give you the right to kill someone for a shove. You seem to think that SYG means that you can stand wherever you want and if anyone touches you or speaks to you with a scary tone, you can murder them, and it doesn't mean that at all. What's alarming is that you seem to be trying really hard to understand these laws, and yet you have it all backwards. Think of it as "SYG from a serious threat, or unprovoked attack", not "act like an alligator at the edge of a pond." In Texas, you don't have to run: when you're behaving reasonably and someone comes and flexes on you, intimidates you, and then makes a serious threat or attacks you with actual violence. At the point where a person feels like they're in real danger for their life, they can use lethal force. They can't "start shooting during a shoving match."

I guess you'll have to ask Alberta on that one...I know most liberals are asking "we have a province named Alberta" and on another note those 13 little countries were brought to by the liberal government and their divisive policies....The only ones putting bread on the table is Quebec, Ontario...

Do you want to know why nobody can prove Carney said we don't need the US? It's because he never said it. Why do you people always have to lie to make your points?

Which conservative failures are you talking about, or are you reading out of the liberal propaganda leaflet....I was being nice when i said gullible, the fact they voted in Justin 3 times in a row is not being gullible it is just plain stupid ..or just voting for anyone but conservatives even though Justin was slowly destroying the country......they preferred destroying the country over having a Conservative PM, that sir is retarded....As for Carney, after Justin i'd have voted for my pet hamster....and while he is a million times better than justin....he is nothing more than the promise man... It is not that Carney is not satisfied, he just does not care....his strategy is what is costing jobs...we were not even at the table for 8 months...SO tariffs are not that bad of a deal according to Carney... Lack of military spend goes back well before Harper....Today there are lots of plans but very little in the ways of contracts...SO your say most Canadians knew our military was full of obsolete equipment , but did not care, or just shrugged their shoulders and had better things to worry about...Change is in the air....or should i say the promise of change is in the air...at least while trump is in power once he is gone, NATO as a whole will be back to what it once was...these spending levels are unsustainable for long periods..... Is it a problem, YA it's a problem during my 34 years of service our governments have made lots of promises and delivered very little until forced to...when soldiers are being killed because equipment sucks or just to old...it is a huge problem...

I wish I could say that: "what we are exposed to on this site is just bottom-of-the-barrel leftists, most of them aren't like this", but the sad fact is that, even the cute little pearl-clutching grannies who still think that CBC "News" is legitimate, believe all the BS narratives about M Brown, Obama, Biden, Trump, collusion, the jabs, Iran, Palestinian 'victims', etc. I don't think that a granny who's inculcating her grandchildren with ret4rded leftist drivel is any better than younger people who attend pro-genocide rallies with keffiyehs on.

I literally proved it. You know, For what its worth you could try fact checking yourself before posting crap

Nope.

Sorry kid, i get that you think it's tough talk asking that when the search engine is down but you did. You simply scream 'liar' when you disagree with someone. When i call someone a liar in can usually prove it or it's well known. Actually i spotted you a few You're taking glee in people being hurt and dying in a war. Sorry kid but that's what you're enjoying. That's the kind of person you are. I'm sure you'll claim you never said what you said 2 posts from now tho.

I accept your admission of defeat

He has made statements close enough to that. He's said that our relationship and the previous order is 'ruptured' and we have to look elsewhere to 'middle' countries to fight back and that we need to diversify away from the us trade. CTV News has quoted him: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has stated that the United States is "no longer a reliable partner" and that the old Canada-U.S. relationship—built on ever-closer economic integration and military collaboration—is over. This declaration followed the imposition of significant U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods, prompting a major shift in Canada's trade strategy. So the relationship is over. We don't need to deal with them. They're unreliable Ai notes: Canada's Strategic Pivot In response, the Canadian government has initiated a fundamental pivot to protect its economy: [1, 2] Mid-Level Alliances: Carney has actively championed alliances of mid-level economic powers to operate beyond U.S. protectionist policies. [1] New Trade Missions: The government has led a series of international trade missions (including to Asia and Japan) to diversify its markets, attract foreign investment, and reduce over-reliance on the American economy. [1] Addressing Vulnerabilities: Carney has publicly stated that Canada's heavy reliance on U.S. ties has become a "weakness" that must be corrected. Trade with the us has become a weakness that must be corrected. So he absolutely has expressed the idea that we have to move forward without the USA. That is a very reasonable paraphrase of what he's said. BWAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Holy shit kid, the fact you didn't blow up typing that is proof how deep your hypocrisy goes