Jump to content

Racism on the reserve


Recommended Posts

I'm surprised this hasn't been raised already; as it's a First Nations matter, I think it falls under the category of federal politics:

In modern-day North America, anti-racism has become ensconced as a dominant creed. Canada has a whole apparatus of human rights commissions ensuring that even the slightest public expression of racial animus is censured and punished. In our enlightened time... blatantly racist policy - or any set of rules segregating individuals because of their race - would be utterly unthinkable.

Or maybe not. This week, the Kahnawake native reserve on Montreal's South Shore sent out eviction notices to 25 residents - most of them whites involved in relationships with local Mohawks - telling them that their skin was the wrong colour. According to a spokesman for the Mohawk Council of Kahnawake, the whites are fair game because "they are people with no native ancestry at all."

The best part is, the so-called "Human Rights" tribunals have ruled this racism to be accepatble.

In 1981, the community announced a moratorium on mixed marriages, which meant that non-natives who married Mohawks after that year would no longer have the right to live on the reserve.

In the 1980s, some Mohawks contested the policy before the human rights tribunal, but lost. The courts have ruled that Mohawks can make any membership policy they deem necessary for their survival as a people.

Ain't it grand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 389
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When I heard the term blood quantum laws my first thought was only a colonialist mentality could dream up something so sinister sounding.
The blood quantum law or "Indian Blood law" was a racially motivated law, created by European Americans.

Yes, European Americans; note where the concept originated and through where its history is tracked in the article you linked to.

Who came up with it, though, is of no importance right now. The real question is: why is it being adhered to in this country, today? Colonial minds of the 18th century can't be blamed for the actions of contemporary First Nations band leaders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colonial minds of the 18th century can't be blamed for the actions of contemporary First Nations band leaders.

Oh, but they'll always find a way. It seems like nearly everything that happens to aboriginals is the fault of non aboriginals some how. Now it's true, that the things that were done in the past may have some impact on some situations, but the idea that everything is the fault of everyone else gets tiring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was this other guy who believed in keeping his race pure and wrote a book about it called Mein Kampf.

As long as we have reserves natives will be kept in poverty and ignorance by their leadership. Let my people go should be the rallying cry and scrap the Indian Act. It is a cruel failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was this other guy who believed in keeping his race pure and wrote a book about it called Mein Kampf.

As long as we have reserves natives will be kept in poverty and ignorance by their leadership. Let my people go should be the rallying cry and scrap the Indian Act. It is a cruel failure.

This is starting to happen, mostly in the west. The government will waste no time celebrating this point in the upcoming olympics. But it's not the case in so many other first nations like the mohawks of Kanesatake and Kahnawake, who haven't yet recovered from the Oka crisis.

I do agree, repeal the Indian Act and renegotiate all treaties toward an agreement for semi-autonomy within the framework of canadian society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government doesn't celebrate the current condition on reserves. The Liberals tried to scrap the Indian Act at least once.....and they faced so much opposition that they had to quit.

I'm talking about the end of the Indian Act. Like the Nisga'a Treaty and the formation of Nunavut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, but they'll always find a way. It seems like nearly everything that happens to aboriginals is the fault of non aboriginals some how. Now it's true, that the things that were done in the past may have some impact on some situations, but the idea that everything is the fault of everyone else gets tiring.

I wonder: does the fault always end up with everyone else? Consider the conundrum that an apologist like eyeball sets up in this example: the white people being evicted can place fault with the First Nations reserve leaders for their racist policies, but the First Nations reserve leaders can place fault with the white people for racist decisions people not even related to them came up with nearly three centuries ago. Ergo, people with a certain skin colour are always to blame, merely because of their skin colour, even for their own evictions!

I think that's the point the National Post was trying to highlight: the glaringly evident hypocrisy of people who always claim to be victims of racism making others the victims of racism and a system that allows such racism in the name of forbearance. How people can function with such contradictory notions in mind is beyond me.

[+]

Edited by g_bambino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see of doggieonporch etc can even grasp these terms:

  • Bill C-31 Non-Status, Status, Blue Card, Enfranchisement, off-reserve/on reserve, treaty etc etc

Before you blabber on about historic wrongs define these and try to say it has nothing to do with the past? Some of you can't even comprehend the word precedence and how all the laws etc pertaining to aboriginal people originated from commonwealth laws that also came in a boat from Europe font

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all the announcement that Kahnawa:ke will be evicting certain people from the reserves is not racism or prejudice. It is part of a procedure of enforcement under a community sanctioned membership code. Secondly we here in Canada have a similar code called the Canadian Citizenship Act which prohibits citizenship and residency on the the basis of various criteria. Lastly, the Indian Act prohibits non-native people from living on, buying, renting or converting property on reserve.

Your hysteria over nothing is unbecoming to us as Canadians. You are an embarrassment.

Edited by charter.rights
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all the announcement that Kahnawa:ke will be evicting certain people from the reserves is not racism or prejudice. It is part of a procedure of enforcement under a community sanctioned membership code. *

So in other words no different from community sancioned laws in Georgia in the 1930s....

Thanks for cleraring that up. The georgians were worried they were racists and woul;d be mistaken for mohawks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in other words no different from community sancioned laws in Georgia in the 1930s....

Thanks for cleraring that up. The georgians were worried they were racists and woul;d be mistaken for mohawks.

It's a policy of 'ethic cleansing'. That's all. Same thing at Caledonia. Fantino helps them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in other words no different from community sancioned laws in Georgia in the 1930s....

Thanks for cleraring that up. The georgians were worried they were racists and woul;d be mistaken for mohawks.

Of course you haven't a clue and I never expect much more of you than a straw man argument. That seems all you are capable of. Maybe it is wet brain?

The Code is based on their matrilineal society, and the rules surrounding their Great Law. A pretty good system as far as I am concerned.

Few people are capable of determining 100%, who their fathers are. However, it is fairly simple to identify their mothers, if they have been with them since birth. So according to Haudenosaunee law, anyone may claim to belong to the Confederacy, if they can establish their matrilineal line. Those who can't must undergo an application process where they might be examined of their worthiness of being considered for entry into the Confederacy under Haudenosaunee law.

Kahnawka:ke residents apply the same Code. They are requiring proof of citizenship and under their Membership Law, residents are required to either prove their line through their mothers, or complete the other application criteria set out to determine residency qualification.

This is not different than the Canadian Citizenship Act which requires that certain criteria be proven, and condition not met must undergo rigorous scrutiny. The CCA actually refuses citizenship on a number of points. This is no different than than the Kahnawa:ke Membership Law.

The media has made a big issue out of this by using terms such as "non-native" and "blood quantum", neither of which are accurate and misrepresenting the issue.

People are refused residency on the basis of solid membership criteria. And all of it is consistent with the Indian Act which prohibits non-members, non-Indians etc from residing, owning law, renting or leasing property or converting lands or resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First Nations reserve leaders can place fault with the white people for racist decisions people not even related to them came up with nearly three centuries ago.
Western expansion and the Canadian imperialist theft of not only land, but an entire peoples culture and way of life, the broken promises of agricultural aid and government assistance, which almost caused an extinction of First Nations people, and the horrifying abuses of residential schools all took place in roughly the last 100 years. You say decisions people came up with three centuries ago like everything has been just wonderful since then, and that's certainly not the case.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • User went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...