eyeball Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 One more time: Unless you're off on some other completely irrelevant topic, what is "heavy-handed manner" but a euphemism for "enforcing racist policies"? I haven't got a clue, you're the one who's making it not me. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
eyeball Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 (edited) I mean, if someone said that they objected to the US declaration of indendence and the constitution and bill of rights....naturall they would deny the US right to self government. And just as naturally the people claiming the right to self governance would put their internal differences aside and rally around their common cause. This phenomenon is common in other cultures where self government is either challenged, denied or otherwise interfered with. Moderate or contrary ideas often don't have a more neutral environment in which to develop, not while an often extreme entrenched isolated leadership is dealing with the denial of their culture or countries right to self-determination. Eyeball is denying the legal articles to Indian self government. Complete utter horseshit. Edited February 17, 2010 by eyeball Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
M.Dancer Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 Complete utter horseshit. make up your mind lad, either the laws that give mohawks self government or bad or they are good. If they are bad and you approve, or they are good and your don't approve. Alternatively, the laws are good and you approve or they are bad and you don't approve. You can't have it both ways. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
M.Dancer Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 And just as naturally the people claiming the right to self governance would put their internal differences aside and rally around their common cause. This phenomenon is common in other cultures where self government is either challenged, denied or otherwise interfered with. Moderate or contrary ideas often don't have a more neutral environment in which to develop, not while an often extreme entrenched isolated leadership is dealing with the denial of their culture or countries right to self-determination. Could I get some bullshit dressing for that word salad? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
M.Dancer Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 As others have pointed out, our own government sometimes makes similar decisions that divide families according to race and nationality. When in the last 60 years has Canada told sopmeone they couldn't live somehwere because of race. That's right, you lied through your teeth. The only reason I can fathom that you would consider my interpretation of your argument a lie is that you only have a passing familiarity with reality. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
eyeball Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 make up your mind lad, either the laws that give mohawks self government or bad or they are good. If they are bad and you approve, or they are good and your don't approve. Alternatively, the laws are good and you approve or they are bad and you don't approve. You can't have it both ways. These propositions are a product of your mind Morris, not mine. Even worse is the indifference of the Act. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
eyeball Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 Blah blah blah blah blah? Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Oleg Bach Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 Not just the hells angels but all known criminal organizations. The oppression that criminals face from the law enforcement organizations is a black mark on Canada!! AS a kid going to court in a small town run by colonialist judges..we were always approached by the crown and told to gift them with a guilty plea and they would go easier on us--- at least a thousand spirited young people who were innocent were sullied with criminal records that barred them from good employment or taking a job in public office...it seems I was a victim of what was a judical system left over from colonialist times- where the elite criminalized and marginalized everyone they could-- there are the convicted and yet to be convicted was the old saying. Quote
eyeball Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 When in the last 60 years has Canada told sopmeone they couldn't live somehwere because of race. I said that too did I? The only reason I can fathom that you would consider my interpretation of your argument a lie is that you only have a passing familiarity with reality. Actually it's my familiarity with you that leads to that conclusion. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
M.Dancer Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 These propositions are a product of your mind Morris, not mine. Even worse is the indifference of the Act. Yes I know, your famous for not acknowledging the illogic of your illogical ramblings. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Oleg Bach Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 Let then run off all non-natives and unfortunate spouses of whites who live on reserves- let them have their hateful revenge- a little uselessly late I might add. Quote
charter.rights Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 (edited) When in the last 60 years has Canada told sopmeone they couldn't live somehwere because of race. First of all Kahnawake is not in Canada. Second of all if you were not so ignorant to the issue you would realize that it is not about race but about national citizenship. There are those who do not quality for Kahnawake citizenship and therefore are being deported back to Canada. Lastly, the Indian Act prohibits trespass, owning, leasing or converting land on a reserve except by members of the Band, so the actions taken by Kahnawake Council are fully compatible with Canadian law. So if you want to discuss an expose on how Canadian law is inherently racist then maybe we have a worthwhile thread. The only reason I can fathom that you would consider my interpretation of your argument a lie is that you only have a passing familiarity with reality. Ad Hominem. The only reason you post anymore. Edited February 18, 2010 by charter.rights Quote “Safeguarding the rights of others is the most noble and beautiful end of a human being.” Kahlil Gibran “Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” Albert Einstein
DogOnPorch Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 First of all Kahnawake is not in Canada. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
M.Dancer Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 There are those who do not quality for Kahnawake citizenship and therefore are being deported back to Canada. The only criteria for mohawk membership is race. The place is being subjected to ethnic cleansing.... ..yoiu would think marrying a mohawk, having children with a mohawk would be a fast track for *cough* citizenship....but it is not...there is only one way and that to be born mohawk. It's all about race. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
g_bambino Posted February 18, 2010 Author Report Posted February 18, 2010 I haven't got a clue. Well, if you haven't a clue what your own words were intended to mean, then... Well, what can one do? Quote
charter.rights Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 The only criteria for mohawk membership is race. The place is being subjected to ethnic cleansing.... ..yoiu would think marrying a mohawk, having children with a mohawk would be a fast track for *cough* citizenship....but it is not...there is only one way and that to be born mohawk. It's all about race. Ah...ignorance again. In fact the Haudenosaunee have a Constitution that allows ANYONE to become Haudenosaunee, providing that they meet the criteria. Their constitution holds that citizenship is gained through the mothers of the nation - the same place they derive their clans from - and provides for adoption and emmigration just we do here in Canada. Children born out of the nation do not automatically become Mohawk, just like children born out of Canada when one parent is not Canadian are not automatically included in Canadian citizenship. Another fact: The Mohawk see all people as equal, regardless of race. They just do not have an open door immigration policy like we do here - and they are perfectly within their right. BUT (another important fact) Canada DOES distinguish between races and that makes our government inherently racist. That is what the Indian Act is about and we use that to determine who can be an Indian, simply on the basis of skin colour (aboriginal blood lines quantum). Quote “Safeguarding the rights of others is the most noble and beautiful end of a human being.” Kahlil Gibran “Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” Albert Einstein
M.Dancer Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 Their constitution holds that citizenship is gained through the mothers of the nation - the same place they derive their clans from - and provides for adoption and emmigration just we do here in Canada. Please link the citizenship forms... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
g_bambino Posted February 18, 2010 Author Report Posted February 18, 2010 Please link the citizenship forms... It's in the same place as their make-believe passport, of course. Quote
charter.rights Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 Please link the citizenship forms... The Great Law http://www.indigenouspeople.net/iroqcon.htm 68. Should any member of the Five Nations, a family or person belonging to a foreign nation submit a proposal for adoption into a clan of one of the Five Nations, he or they shall furnish a string of shells, a span in length, as a pledge to the clan into which he or they wish to be adopted. The Lords of the nation shall then consider the proposal and submit a decision. Furnish a string of wampum shells and it will be considered. 75. When a member of an alien nation comes to the territory of the Five Nations and seeks refuge and permanent residence, the Lords of the Nation to which he comes shall extend hospitality and make him a member of the nation. Then shall he be accorded equal rights and privileges in all matters except as after mentioned. Any other questions, Chum? Quote “Safeguarding the rights of others is the most noble and beautiful end of a human being.” Kahlil Gibran “Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” Albert Einstein
eyeball Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 Well, if you haven't a clue what your own words were intended to mean, then... Well, what can one do? We can't do anything I guess until you face the fact that these enforcing racist policies are your words and your euphemism for heavy handed manner not mine. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
g_bambino Posted February 18, 2010 Author Report Posted February 18, 2010 We can't do anything I guess until you face the fact that these enforcing racist policies are your words and your euphemism for heavy handed manner not mine. Actually, we can't do anything until you explain what you actually meant by "heavy handed manner" in the context of this discussion, if not as a euphemism for "enforcing racist policies". Quote
eyeball Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 Actually, we can't do anything until you explain what you actually meant by "heavy handed manner" in the context of this discussion, if not as a euphemism for "enforcing racist policies". The discussion is about an example of heavy handed leadership that has resulted in a race based decision. The latter is the result of the former which is not a euphemism for anything. Given that you have tried on several occasions now to characterize for everyone else where I'm coming from allow me to do the same for you. Simply put I think you're a racist with a really threadbare disguise, and like most racists I know you probably hate non-racists even more than you do other races. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
M.Dancer Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 Simply put I think you're a racist with a really threadbare disguise, and like most racists I know you probably hate non-racists even more than you do other races. You're projecting again Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
DogOnPorch Posted February 18, 2010 Report Posted February 18, 2010 The discussion is about an example of heavy handed leadership that has resulted in a race based decision. The latter is the result of the former which is not a euphemism for anything. Given that you have tried on several occasions now to characterize for everyone else where I'm coming from allow me to do the same for you. Simply put I think you're a racist with a really threadbare disguise, and like most racists I know you probably hate non-racists even more than you do other races. M.Dancer hates his kids...now g_bambino is a racist. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
g_bambino Posted February 19, 2010 Author Report Posted February 19, 2010 The discussion is about an example of heavy handed leadership that has resulted in a race based decision. The latter is the result of the former which is not a euphemism for anything. The latter being the result of the former does not in any way separate the two from each other; the bearing of the policies is intrinsically tied to whether or not people decide to enforce them. The Kahnawake leaders have obviously chosen to enforce them, making a "race based decision" as part of their heavy-handed leadership, which you have said is the fault not of the leaders themselves and their free will to make decisions, but of an Indian Act that can't reign in the evidently inate racism of Kahnawake heads. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.