Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sure thing, Mr Conspiracy.

:lol:

I assumed this was just an exercise in what if's not what is, but maybe this thread is a little of both - about revisionism in other words.

Are you suggesting the Bin Ladens in the US following 9/11 were actually expelled because of their ties to Osama Bin-Laden?

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Hey...I was awake for 9-11 and yes I recall the non-Osama Bin Ladens being rushed out of sight. You'd have prefered they be lynched? I think the Administration feared for their safety.

Have you ever asked yourself why the hell didn't they fly them to Guantanamo Bay and interrogate them instead?

I can only imagine your own apoplexy if Obama or even worse the Clinton's had been on watch and Bin Laden's relatives were simply allowed to fly home without anything even remotely resembling a concern for the potential information they might have.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Guest American Woman
Posted (edited)

Probably because you've always got so many other's on the go but in that spirit try following this one.

Imagine the uproar if Bin Laden family members had been allowed to fly out of the country immediately following 9/11 on a Democrat's watch instead of George W. Bush's.

Except they weren't flown out of the country "immediately following 9-11." The FBI conducted an investigation first, interviewed them, and concluded that they were in no way involved and didn't have any knowledge of the attacks; and they didn't fly out until airspace had been reopened.

Compared to the Bin Laden's, Iran's suspects were so run-of-the-mill as to barely rate a mention - which probably explains why they're only surfacing now after all this time.

You're the one who brought Iran up, as if what they did for the U.S. was a big deal.

Edited by American Woman
Posted

Except they weren't flown out of the country "immediately following 9-11." The FBI conducted an investigation first, interviewed them, and concluded that they were in no way involved and didn't have any knowledge of the attacks; and they didn't fly out until airspace had been reopened.

Okay (insert a rolleyes here) I guess it was a whole three days or four days afterwards, all the same you think this would still be every bit as acceptable if it happened on a Democrats watch? All I'm saying is the contrast between the way Bin Laden family members were treated so soon after 9/11 compared to how harshly many suspects with far less tenuous ties to Osama Bin Laden or al Queada have been since then is at least a little remarkable and definitely remarkable enough that if Democrats had been in charge at the time, Republicans would be apoplectic. Maybe that just goes without saying.

You're the one who brought Iran up, as if what they did for the U.S. was a big deal.

Actually, GostHacked did.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted

Okay (insert a rolleyes here) I guess it was a whole three days or four days afterwards, all the same you think this would still be every bit as acceptable if it happened on a Democrats watch?

Absolutely...what's the big deal? They weren't related to Maher Arar!

All I'm saying is the contrast between the way Bin Laden family members were treated so soon after 9/11 compared to how harshly many suspects with far less tenuous ties to Osama Bin Laden or al Queada have been since then is at least a little remarkable

Not at all.....since your timing was already wrong as reported by AW, what kind of instant ramp up to Gitmo did you expect?

and definitely remarkable enough that if Democrats had been in charge at the time, Republicans would be apoplectic. Maybe that just goes without saying.

Or it goes in the nonsense bin laden.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

no one ever brings up the fact that Bush admitted they gave up on trying to find Bin Laden and that he doesn't think much about him, isn't worried (6 months after 9/11)

Clearly that was not the case....just ask Bin Laden's wife.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Hey...I was awake for 9-11 and yes I recall the non-Osama Bin Ladens being rushed out of sight. You'd have prefered they be lynched? I think the Administration feared for their safety.

Uh...

I think they feared for the safety of their BUSINESS PARTENERS within entities like the Carlisle (sp) Group...

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

Clearly that was not the case....just ask Bin Laden's wife.

watch the video, I don't believe it took them 10 years to find the man and kill him ... no chance, they knew where he was the whole time

Obama decided to use this to get re elected so he gave the orders

Posted

watch the video, I don't believe it took them 10 years to find the man and kill him ... no chance, they knew where he was the whole time

Obama decided to use this to get re elected so he gave the orders

You can think whatever you want...there were plenty of other perps sent to "heaven".

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Guest American Woman
Posted

Okay (insert a rolleyes here) I guess it was a whole three days or four days afterwards,

Which is quite different from saying it happened "right after," wouldn't you agree? First of all, "right after" insinuates that they were given special privilege to fly during the time when our airspace was closed.

Secondly, "three days or four days afterward," and in some instances more, did give the FBI time to investigate and conduct interviews. You implied that they simply all immediately boarded planes and left the country without so much as an afterthought on the government's part - and that simply did not happen.

all the same you think this would still be every bit as acceptable if it happened on a Democrats watch?

Acceptable to who? I think it would have been acceptable to more than a few Democrats who criticize the Bush administration for it.

In other words, I think it would have been just as acceptable - and unacceptable - as it is now; we'd just have some people from a different political faction accepting it while some people from a different faction would be critical; ie: the reverse of what we are seeing now; and of course there would still be some people who wouldn't see it through partisan eyes.

All I'm saying is the contrast between the way Bin Laden family members were treated so soon after 9/11 compared to how harshly many suspects with far less tenuous ties to Osama Bin Laden or al Queada have been since then is at least a little remarkable and definitely remarkable enough that if Democrats had been in charge at the time, Republicans would be apoplectic. Maybe that just goes without saying.

"Republicans" don't hold the monopoly on "apoplectic." There are some Republicans who will stand behind whatever Republicans do regardless - as they criticize everything Democrats do, just as there are some Democrats who will stand behind whatever Democrats do regardless - as they criticize everything Republicans do. Maybe that just goes without saying.

Posted
Obama decided to use this (the Osama killing) to get re elected so he gave the orders

I am no admirer of Obama whatsoever. That being said, I think the holdup was more that Osama had powerful friends for a while. When he was pitiful and marginal they killed him.
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,021
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...