What Is Climate Change?

[eyeball]

37 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right ... In science, consensus is irrelevant."

After all this time and with the level of science at hand, where is this individual, when will they  emerge with the evidence that proves there's no crisis?

Economically it would be like the 2nd coming of Christ in terms of saving us. And as always, there will be a Nobel...millions in cash...renamed high schools everywhere...Steven Tyler blushing at their mountain of panties.

Is this saviour among us now, even as we speak? 

 

[Goddess]

15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Is this saviour among us now, even as we speak? 

Well, you believe it's Fauci, so......

In 1931, 100 scientists got together and wrote a paper on how Einstein was wrong.

Ooopsy-doodle.

Science is not decided by voting.

Edited 5 hours ago by Goddess

[eyeball]

17 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Well, you believe it's Fauci, so......

Nope, but millions of you still know climate change isn't a crisis. How? Because the UN dialled back a couple of predictions?

17 minutes ago, Goddess said:

In 1931, 100 scientists got together and wrote a paper on how Einstein was wrong.

How's that worked out for them?

18 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Ooopsy-doodle.

Science is not decided by voting.

That's right.

[Goddess]

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That's right.

Thank you for finally seeing this point.

Previously, you've been a rabid proponent of "consensus science", often citing some generic "the vast majority of scientists say......"

Glad you're finally cluing in.

[Goddess]

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature - Astrophysics Data System

We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991-2011 matching the topics ‘global climate change’ or ‘global warming’. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

After all this time and with the level of science at hand, where is this individual, when will they  emerge with the evidence that proves there's no crisis?

Economically it would be like the 2nd coming of Christ in terms of saving us. And as always, there will be a Nobel...millions in cash...renamed high schools everywhere...Steven Tyler blushing at their mountain of panties.

Is this saviour among us now, even as we speak? 

 

 

[Deluge]

Climate change is every bit as dangerous as the boogeyman. 

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

Previously, you've been a rabid proponent of "consensus science", often citing some generic "the vast majority of scientists say......"

Correct. You OTOH always interpreted or lied or spun...or whatever it is you do, into me concluding someone took a vote. That's nuts. 

I expect the vast majority will flip the other way if they're presented with evidence that proves AGW is scientifically incorrect and nullified.

But no one is going to hold an election over it...that's nuts.

It'll just be what it is.

Perhaps someone can make a prediction when that will be given how much is at stake - I'm a little surprised nothing seems to be moving the scientific consensus needle at all.

It's almost like a conspiracy or something.

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Deluge said:

Climate change is every bit as dangerous as the boogeyman. 

Then why do the vast VAST majority of scientists say otherwise?

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Then why do the vast VAST majority of scientists say otherwise?

The vast majority say the climate is changing. So what? It does that, you can come out from under your bed now.

They also say things in this article. 

https://clintel.org/

And this one.

"More than 30,000 scientists have signed on to a paper saying that we're not facing a climate emergency."

https://www.newsweek.com/yes-climate-changing-no-its-not-emergency-opinion-1615632

And this one.

"There's no climate emergency. And the alarmist messaging pushed by global elites is purely political. That's what 1,609 scientists and informed professionals stated when they signed the Global Climate Intelligence Group's "World Climate Declaration."

https:/cdm.press/analysis/2023/09/15/meteorologists-scientists-explain-why-there-is-no-climate-emergency/

so you see...and will probably try to deny...man kind has much more pressing issues right now, than the dust bunnies under your bed.

Edited 37 minutes ago by Nationalist

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Then why do the vast VAST majority of scientists say otherwise?

Probably because they've all been paid off by the same people. Or threatened by the same people. 

All we really know is that you hysterics are full of shit. You haven't given us anything that the Earth isn't capable of doing all by itself. 

[eyeball]

24 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

The vast majority say the climate is changing. So what? It does that, you can come out from under your bed now.

Seriously...why do you engage in discussing this topic when it's so painfully obvious you're as thick as a brick about it?

28 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"More than 30,000 scientists have signed on to a paper saying that we're not facing a climate emergency."

Well let's hope they're right and they can convince the other 8.5 million scientists.

30 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

man kind has much more pressing issues right now,

You got that right - nothing makes AGW denial more of a crisis.