The forever war in Iran is over in under 90 days

[Legato]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

Nope never  

 

LMAO!!!!  You can’t honestly believe that!

Sorry constant false accusations of “liar” is something you and a couple other right wing kioks do multiple times day, you are one of the WORST offenders for doing it and you get called out on it all the time. 
 

You RARELY prove ANYTHING you ever say on here, which is also something I have called you out for repeatedly. MAYBE 10% of the time you will actually back up what you claim with proof or a link mostly you just ignore demands for evidence and repeat your unproven claims. You’re NOTORIOUS for it. 
 

Spare us  fake morality and twisted logic 

 

Your bizarre logic is we are not allowed to criticize Republicans for killing people and getting them hurt because that would somehow be “taking glee” in the people Republicans are killing and hurting therefore if you really care about the people Republicans are killing and hurting you allow republicans to continue killing and hurting them without criticism. . 
 

Add to that taking sadistic joy in killing hurting and humiliating people theybhate (Palestinians, immigrants, liberals, Iranians etc etc) is a new Republican trademark. 

Well looky here angry man is angry again and even more incoherant.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Nope never  

Sure kid. 

 

Quote

LMAO!!!!  You can’t honestly believe that!

Kid it's what you do.  You constantly accuse others of what you do. When i say you're a liar i can prove it with facts the  majority of the time, but you NEVER can. 

Quote

You RARELY prove ANYTHING you ever say on here, 

Simply not true and you know it. I constantly post facts, and you left wing twinkies constantly demand i repost them again and again. 

Your problem is you can't cope with reality so you just prefer to lie about it. 
 

Quote

Spare us  fake morality and twisted logic 

Morality and logic are both real, sorry for reality butting into your echo chamber like that. 

Quote

Your bizarre logic is we are not allowed to criticize Republicans for killing people and getting them hurt because that would somehow be “taking glee” in the people Republicans are killing and hurting therefore if you really care about the people Republicans are killing and hurting you allow republicans to continue killing and hurting them without criticism. . 

And here you are lying proving my point 100%. I very specifically said above that it would be perfectly normal for you to criticize republicans, or even be angry at them. I used those words only a few posts ago

And here you are claiming that I have said that you couldn't criticize them. A 100% contradiction to what I actually said. You couldn't have proven you were the liar here more effectively than that. 

Criticism, fine.  Anger fine.  Commentary about failed policy or the like, fine.  

Being happy and excited that people are hurt and dying because it lets you win points on the net? Not fine. 

I can't believe this needed to be explained to you. 
 

Quote

Add to that taking sadistic joy in killing hurting and humiliating people theybhate

No that's still your side. THRILLED when kirk was killed, OVERJOYED when a medical exec was shot, ELATED when trup was shot but disappointed the guy's aim wasn't better... 

Conservatives see it necessary to kill people who slaughter innocent women and children without cause.  Conservatives don't' have a problem enforcing laws and understand that when someone drives a car at a cop and hits him the cop is right to defend himself.  They're not gleeful, they just recognize sometimes that has to happen. 

You on the other hand were excited as HELL that people were getting killed!!!! Yaaaayy!! Makes trump look bad so war is great! 

[SpankyMcFarland]

The lesson of this war is clear. If your regime is strong enough and your country big enough, you can withstand Trump’s bombs, drones and missiles. Such an assault won’t be followed up with troops on the ground. 

[User]

3 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

The lesson of this war is clear. If your regime is strong enough and your country big enough, you can withstand Trump’s bombs, drones and missiles. Such an assault won’t be followed up with troops on the ground. 

So... you wanted Trump to keep bombing them more?

I am not sure how the lesson here is that great as most of the leadership was wiped out in the initial strikes, the rest left to flea underground, while they watched helplessly as the US bombed whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted, as much as they wanted. 

Until we got tired of it and stopped ourselves. 

Oh yeah, lesson learned. 

We certainly learned that our so-called NATO allies will stab us in the back and won't help when we need them. 

[robosmith]

On 6/10/2026 at 2:29 PM, Legato said:

Oh looky here, angry man is angry and incoherent.

Yes you are often an ^incoherent CLOWN. LMAO

[Legato]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Yes you are often an ^incoherent CLOWN. LMAO

What was that you said?

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

What was that you said?

....and ILLITERATE.

[Legato]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

....and ILLITERATE.

You're still not making sense, try harder. 

 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

You're still not making sense, try harder. 

 

CLOWN failure to understand does not mean I'm not making sense. Duh

[Legato]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

CLOWN failure to understand does not mean I'm not making sense. Duh

Then do try to make sense, it's not that difficult.

 

[eyeball]

9 hours ago, User said:

We certainly learned that our so-called NATO allies will stab us in the back and won't help when we need them. 

Define help? Do you mean the ground troops required to achieve total victory, annihilation or whatever it was that Trump had in mind?

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Legato said:

Then do try to make sense, it's not that difficult.

 

Been there, done that. 

[robosmith]

10 hours ago, User said:

We certainly learned that our so-called NATO allies will stab us in the back and won't help when we need them. 

It's unfortunate that you cannot comprehend the difference between a defensive alliance like NATO, and a demand to join in to aid an OFFENSIVE WAR OF CHOICE.

NATO members NEVER signed up for the latter. Now you know.

[SpankyMcFarland]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

It's unfortunate that you cannot comprehend the difference between a defensive alliance like NATO, and a demand to join in to aid an OFFENSIVE WAR OF CHOICE.

NATO members NEVER signed up for the latter. Now you know.

Yes, the comment is so bizarre. NATO is a defensive alliance. European NATO members were under no obligation to join a mad war on another continent. 

Edited Saturday at 12:21 PM by SpankyMcFarland

[SpankyMcFarland]

A famous ecologist is killed by an Israeli airstrike on her house:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/20/mona-khalil-turtle-ecologist-lebanon-killed-israeli-attack

[User]

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

It's unfortunate that you cannot comprehend the difference between a defensive alliance like NATO, and a demand to join in to aid an OFFENSIVE WAR OF CHOICE.

NATO members NEVER signed up for the latter. Now you know.

It’s unfortunate you presume I don’t understand this. 

[User]

1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

A famous ecologist is killed by an Israeli airstrike on her house:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/20/mona-khalil-turtle-ecologist-lebanon-killed-israeli-attack

Tragic that Hezzbolah hides among the civilian population. 

[User]

2 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Yes, the comment is so bizarre. NATO is a defensive alliance. European NATO members were under no obligation to join a mad war on another continent. 

Join?

No, just don’t block use of our infrastructure throughout Europe. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, User said:

It’s unfortunate you presume I don’t understand this. 

I made no presumption; you clearly stated you don't understand here, by complaining about something NATO members never signed up for:

21 hours ago, User said:

We certainly learned that our so-called NATO allies will stab us in the back and won't help when we need them. 

LMAO

[User]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I made no presumption; you clearly stated you don't understand here, by complaining about something NATO members never signed up for:

LMAO

I never said I was invoking NATO alliance clown.

 

[CdnFox]

11 hours ago, robosmith said:

Been there, done that. 

Been there? You haven't even read the online wiki or looked it up on googlemaps!!

[robosmith]

59 minutes ago, User said:

I never said I was invoking NATO alliance clown.

 

YOU DID, by B!tching about NATO NOT HELPING Trump wage HIS WAR. 

You can deny that all you want, but it is clear as day until you backtrack. LMAO

[User]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

YOU DID, by B!tching about NATO NOT HELPING Trump wage HIS WAR. 

You can deny that all you want, but it is clear as day until you backtrack. LMAO

No, I didn’t. That was your presumption.

You can complain about them not helping as allies without talking about literally invoking NATO defense.

Clown. 
 

 

[CdnFox]

58 minutes ago, User said:

No, I didn’t. That was your presumption.

You can complain about them not helping as allies without talking about literally invoking NATO defense.

Clown. 
 

 

While it is true that rebel smith is a clown, it is also true that if you want your allies help you talk to them before you go to war. You don't start a war and then turn around and cry "I'm losing i'm losing please come help!"  

If you pick a fight on your own then you finish it on your own. If you want your allies help then you talk to them before hand to say I may need you here. But if you start a war on your own you finish it on your own you don't drag your friends in

[SpankyMcFarland]

On 6/20/2026 at 12:16 PM, User said:

Join?

No, just don’t block use of our infrastructure throughout Europe. 

They are under no obligation to do that. If you start a war without discussing it with your allies, expect this to happen. 

Edited yesterday at 04:08 AM by SpankyMcFarland