Why You Can't Get Through to a MAGA CULT Member

[robosmith]

 

Simple brain washing is why Trump loves the poorly educated.

[Fluffypants]

 

[User]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

 

Simple brain washing is why Trump loves the poorly educated.

You hide like a coward and run from your lies. 
 

You can’t get through to anyone. 

[herbie]

And YOU are living proof of the first post.

[User]

2 hours ago, herbie said:

And YOU are living proof of the first post.

How does it feel to both think so lowly of me and be so afraid and unable to competently engage with me? LOL

[John Stone]

Fairly safe to say that those that subscribe to MAGA are not objective in their critique. Haha.

Akin to any cult they have a fused identity – which is crucial to their group dynamics and motivations.

 Self-righteous, MAGA members believe themselves true patriots and self righteous,  vigorously opposing any perceived threats to their identity.

MAGA  members  have a very strong bent for authoritarianism,  with group loyalty being far  more important than individual expression that is contrary to MAGA’s opinion,  – any critique or objective opinion contrary  to MAGA is viewed as Left, non-American, traitorous.

MAGA leaders are extremely manipulative with rhetoric,  invoking divisive issues that promote strong emotion within the group with the real target being outside - the  non-aligned audience?

The MAGA movement has been classified as fascist - those that know anything  about history would  likely draw a parallel. 

Edited April 13 by John Stone

[Deluge]

16 hours ago, robosmith said:

 

Simple brain washing is why Trump loves the poorly educated.

This coming from a brainwashed democrat. lol

[John Johnston]

1 hour ago, John Stone said:

Fairly safe to say that those that subscribe to MAGA are not objective in their critique. Haha.

Akin to any cult they have a fused identity – which is crucial to their group dynamics and motivations.

 Self-righteous, MAGA members believe themselves true patriots and self righteous,  vigorously opposing any perceived threats to their identity.

MAGA  members  have a very strong bent for authoritarianism,  with group loyalty being far  more important than individual expression that is contrary to MAGA’s opinion,  – any critique or objective opinion contrary  to MAGA is viewed as Left, non-American, traitorous.

MAGA leaders are extremely manipulative with rhetoric,  invoking divisive issues that promote strong emotion within the group with the real target being outside - the  non-aligned audience?

The MAGA movement has been classified as fascist - those that know anything  about history would  likely draw a parallel. 

Much of this "movement" started with Newt Gangrene and his Tea Party bullshit. 

[WestCanMan]

17 hours ago, robosmith said:

Simple brain washing is why Trump loves the poorly educated.

So your theory is that Trump brainwashed people into thinking that:

1. men shouldn't go into girls' bathrooms
2. men can't get pregnant
3. teachers shouldn't be having secret conversations with other people's 8-yr-olds about gender transition therapy
4. when you tell kids a story about "trees and rocks helping muslims to kill Jews who are just trying to hide", that's called a 'parable'

etc? 🤣

Listen to the little brainwashed twit trying to call other people cultists 🤣

 

Quick Cultist Quiz for robobigot...:

1. Can men get pregnant? Y/N ___
2. In a modern society with a healthy, functioning justice system: Should a woman have to be able to name what year they were allegedly r4ped, provide proof that they at least met the accused in one of the years that it probably occurred in, and provide at least one flimsy piece of evidence, in order to get a man convicted of r4pe? IOW, does she need to nail her time frame down to 1 calendar year and have more than just a story to get a man convicted of r4pe? Y/N __

Results:

• Get 0/2, you're a cultist. Get 1/2... you're still a cultist.

Honestly, 100% of average 8 year olds can answer both of those question correctly. So if you're an adult with an IQ above 70, and you somehow have the wrong answers lodged in your brain somehow, they did not get there from any combination of facts and common sense. Those answers have to have been forced into your pathetic little brain by a process commonly referred to as "brainwashing". Which means that... you - are - a - cultist. 

 

Ohhhhhhhhh SANP!!!!!!!!!!!

What are you gonna do now, robobigot? Admit that men can't get pregnant, or that you're a cultist? 

[John Stone]

1 hour ago, John Johnston said:

Much of this "movement" started with Newt Gangrene and his Tea Party bullshit. 

Indeed.

Gingrich’s revolution rewired the circuitry of American politics – he saw the potential in his strategy.  His anti-government messaging transformed congressional procedure into a weapon, discarding the norms of collegiality, deliberation, and institutional restraint that once underpinned legislative life.

Although Gingrich was the father of a new, combative political strategy, it is Trump who perfected the technique through personal magnetism, divisive rhetoric and populist ideology.

Trump saw the U.S. as an apple ripe for the picking, and he was correct – he picked it twice.  

Whether American governance can recover from this transformation remains uncertain (doubtful).

A simple election will not reverse the changes in institutions that have been implemented by the Trump administration – Judicial, fiancé, oversight, health, Department of War (ha-ha), FBI, DOJ, Fed?.

Let’s just say the changes introduced by this Administration weren’t based on meritocracy ………. far from it. The stench of corruption, grift, oligarchy is strong with this one.

The changes are enough to make the toad, Mitch McConnel blush.🤪

 

[John Johnston]

1 minute ago, John Stone said:

Indeed.

Gingrich’s revolution rewired the circuitry of American politics – he saw the potential in his strategy.  His anti-government messaging transformed congressional procedure into a weapon, discarding the norms of collegiality, deliberation, and institutional restraint that once underpinned legislative life.

Although Gingrich was the father of a new, combative political strategy, it is Trump who perfected the technique through personal magnetism, divisive rhetoric and populist ideology.

Trump saw the U.S. as an apple ripe for the picking, and he was correct – he picked it twice.  

Whether American governance can recover from this transformation remains uncertain (doubtful).

A simple election will not reverse the changes in institutions that have been implemented by the Trump administration – Judicial, fiancé, oversight, health, Department of War (ha-ha), FBI, DOJ, Fed?.

Let’s just say the changes introduced by this Administration weren’t based on meritocracy ………. far from it. The stench of corruption, grift, oligarchy is strong with this one.

The changes are enough to make the toad, Mitch McConnel blush.🤪

 

Well said indeed. 100% on all points. 

[John Johnston]

The MAGA dimwits are pricing themselves out of House and home. On purpose for some reason. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

So your theory is that Trump brainwashed people into thinking that:

1. men shouldn't go into girls' bathrooms
2. men can't get pregnant
3. teachers shouldn't be having secret conversations with other people's 8-yr-olds about gender transition therapy
4. when you tell kids a story about "trees and rocks helping muslims to kill Jews who are just trying to hide", that's called a 'parable'

etc? 🤣

Listen to the little brainwashed twit trying to call other people cultists 🤣

 

Quick Cultist Quiz for robobigot...:

1. Can men get pregnant? Y/N ___
2. In a modern society with a healthy, functioning justice system: Should a woman have to be able to name what year they were allegedly r4ped, provide proof that they at least met the accused in one of the years that it probably occurred in, and provide at least one flimsy piece of evidence, in order to get a man convicted of r4pe? IOW, does she need to nail her time frame down to 1 calendar year and have more than just a story to get a man convicted of r4pe? Y/N __

Results:

• Get 0/2, you're a cultist. Get 1/2... you're still a cultist.

Honestly, 100% of average 8 year olds can answer both of those question correctly. So if you're an adult with an IQ above 70, and you somehow have the wrong answers lodged in your brain somehow, they did not get there from any combination of facts and common sense. Those answers have to have been forced into your pathetic little brain by a process commonly referred to as "brainwashing". Which means that... you - are - a - cultist. 

 

Ohhhhhhhhh SANP!!!!!!!!!!!

What are you gonna do now, robobigot? Admit that men can't get pregnant, or that you're a cultist? 

I agree that you agree with 8 year olds, cause you're that simple minded.'

There is no one in the Democratic Party comparable to YOUR CULT LEADER. Duh

[WestCanMan]

17 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

The MAGA dimwits are pricing themselves out of House and home. On purpose for some reason. 

Rampant inflation for ten+ years under the LPoC and record-level inflation under Biden, lefta4rd cutists: "I don't see nothin'."

3 weeks of genocidal dictator blasting in Iran, left4rd cultists: "OMG WE NEED TO STOP KILLING GENOCIDAL DICTATORS NOW BECAUSE GAS COSTS ALMOST AS MUCH AS IT DID WHEN BIDEN WAS PRESIDENT!!!!!"

Also:

You can try answering this as well:

1. Can men get pregnant? Y/N ___
2. In a modern society with a healthy, functioning justice system: Should a woman have to be able to name what year they were allegedly r4ped, provide proof that they at least met the accused in one of the years that it probably occurred in, and provide at least one flimsy piece of evidence, in order to get a man convicted of r4pe? IOW, does she need to nail her time frame down to 1 calendar year and have more than just a story to get a man convicted of r4pe? Y/N __

Results:

• Get 0/2, you're a cultist. Get 1/2... you're still a cultist.

We already know that you're a cultist, this is just a wake-up call for you personally.

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, John Johnston said:

Well said indeed. 100% on all points. 

 

1 hour ago, John Stone said:

Indeed.

Gingrich’s revolution rewired the circuitry of American politics – he saw the potential in his strategy.  His anti-government messaging transformed congressional procedure into a weapon, discarding the norms of collegiality, deliberation, and institutional restraint that once underpinned legislative life.

Although Gingrich was the father of a new, combative political strategy, it is Trump who perfected the technique through personal magnetism, divisive rhetoric and populist ideology.

Trump saw the U.S. as an apple ripe for the picking, and he was correct – he picked it twice.  

Whether American governance can recover from this transformation remains uncertain (doubtful).

A simple election will not reverse the changes in institutions that have been implemented by the Trump administration – Judicial, fiancé, oversight, health, Department of War (ha-ha), FBI, DOJ, Fed?.

Let’s just say the changes introduced by this Administration weren’t based on meritocracy ………. far from it. The stench of corruption, grift, oligarchy is strong with this one.

The changes are enough to make the toad, Mitch McConnel blush.🤪

 

 

2 hours ago, John Johnston said:

Much of this "movement" started with Newt Gangrene and his Tea Party bullshit. 

What a great example of how the left gaslights. This last post was a lie. Gingrich was out of office by Jan 3 1999. The tea party did not start until 2007. 

What Gingrich did was all marketing. He took the top issues that right, right leaning and populist voters liked, packaged them as a "contract" and then campaigned on that idea. It was a smashing electoral success but fell short legislatively as most did not pass. And that is the problem with the ruling class. They talk the talk and don't walk the walk.

There in lies the biggest difference with Trump. While Trump also packaged policies under MAGA, he has attacked the ruling class and liberals while actually doing the things he said he would do. That last part is why he has been so welcomed by the right, leaning right and populists (aka moderates). 

It is also why the left hates him so much. He did the things they don't want done. Because they are emotionally centered, they feel attacked and so they lash out. 

Like this: 

https://x.com/i/status/2043094019052282016

 

Edited April 13 by gatomontes99

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

What a great example of how the left gaslights.

It's actually an example of left4rd echo-chamber BS.

Ironically, in the thread where they're calling conservatives "cultists", they're overtly circling their wagons around their cultist talking points. 

[eyeball]

On 4/13/2026 at 8:22 AM, John Johnston said:

Much of this "movement" started with Newt Gangrene and his Tea Party bullshit. 

The Tea Partiers are descended from the followers of George Wallace. The Republican Party deserves them.

[User]

On 4/13/2026 at 8:22 AM, John Johnston said:

Much of this "movement" started with Newt Gangrene and his Tea Party bullshit. 

You people are so ignorant. 

Newt Gingrich did not start the Tea Party. Newt Gingrich was out of Congress a decade before the Tea Party. 

 

On 4/13/2026 at 10:10 AM, gatomontes99 said:

What a great example of how the left gaslights. This last post was a lie. Gingrich was out of office by Jan 3 1999. The tea party did not start until 2007. 

They are both patting each other on the back for what a brilliant point that was. They are both ignorant clowns who have no idea what they are talking about. 

 

[John Johnston]

1 hour ago, User said:

You people are so ignorant. 

Newt Gingrich did not start the Tea Party. Newt Gingrich was out of Congress a decade before the Tea Party. 

 

They are both patting each other on the back for what a brilliant point that was. They are both ignorant clowns who have no idea what they are talking about. 

 

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich accepted the title of “father of the Tea Party,” during an interview with an Iowa newspaper, saying that he had advocated Tea Party principles and participated in a Tea Party rally as early as 1994.

“To some extent, yes, I think I probably had something to do with the resurrection of the Tea Party model,” Gingrich told the Des Moines Register when asked if he “accept[s] a role as being the father of the Tea Party movement.” Gingrich said that he “actually participated in a Tea Party in Boston [in 1994] as part of the Contract with America campaign.”

[John Johnston]

2 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich accepted the title of “father of the Tea Party,” during an interview with an Iowa newspaper, saying that he had advocated Tea Party principles and participated in a Tea Party rally as early as 1994.

“To some extent, yes, I think I probably had something to do with the resurrection of the Tea Party model,” Gingrich told the Des Moines Register when asked if he “accept[s] a role as being the father of the Tea Party movement.” Gingrich said that he “actually participated in a Tea Party in Boston [in 1994] as part of the Contract with America campaign.”

https://nickwade.substack.com/p/from-minority-whip-to-political-architect

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/11/newt-gingrich-says-youre-welcome/570832/

https://history.princeton.edu/about/publications/burning-down-house-newt-gingrich-fall-speaker-and-rise-new-republican-party

All Y'all might learn to read something once in a while. 

[John Johnston]

And now America is Fu*cked. I don't feel sorry for ya. 

[User]

4 hours ago, John Johnston said:

https://nickwade.substack.com/p/from-minority-whip-to-political-architect

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/11/newt-gingrich-says-youre-welcome/570832/

https://history.princeton.edu/about/publications/burning-down-house-newt-gingrich-fall-speaker-and-rise-new-republican-party

All Y'all might learn to read something once in a while. 

You didn’t even read these. You are just spamming links because you are a lazy troll.

 

4 hours ago, John Johnston said:

And now America is Fu*cked. I don't feel sorry for ya. 

How so?

Can you ever post anything of substance? 

[User]

4 hours ago, John Johnston said:

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich accepted the title of “father of the Tea Party,” during an interview with an Iowa newspaper, saying that he had advocated Tea Party principles and participated in a Tea Party rally as early as 1994.

“To some extent, yes, I think I probably had something to do with the resurrection of the Tea Party model,” Gingrich told the Des Moines Register when asked if he “accept[s] a role as being the father of the Tea Party movement.” Gingrich said that he “actually participated in a Tea Party in Boston [in 1994] as part of the Contract with America campaign.”

This was Gingrich after the fact trying to align himself with the Tea Party movement during his 2012 campaign.

You are beyond ignorant.

 

 

[CDN1]

11 hours ago, eyeball said:

The Tea Partiers are descended from the followers of George Wallace. The Republican Party deserves them.

Well, the Democrats made sure those segregationists were proven right. Everything they warned about has come to pass, but that's the point.

The left is an an open anti-White, anti-West revenge cult, totally enabled and normalized by mainstream "moderate" Democrats and the liberal establishment.

Edited April 15 by CDN1

[John Stone]

6 hours ago, User said:

You people are so ignorant. 

Newt Gingrich did not start the Tea Party. Newt Gingrich was out of Congress a decade before the Tea Party. 

 

They are both patting each other on the back for what a brilliant point that was. They are both ignorant clowns who have no idea what they are talking about. 

Ignorant is not knowing ........ curable.

Stupid is forever. 

Are u forever?

 

Edited April 15 by John Stone