The insane Left's vicious antisemitism on full display at Guelph

[Goddess]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

And what policies?

You've been directed to his policies.  Many times.  You have refused to look at them.

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

He's done nothing.

He's not been in power.

[eyeball]

18 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

There is real concern about free speech here.  

We should also be concerned about how freely people open their minds to the nonsense.

The infosphere is like a modern casino - more dazzle and cacophony and the house always wins.

Here, have another drink. How about a Dexedrine?

[Moonbox]

25 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I'm not bothering because it's not rocket science finding committee meetings and hearings from all over the world.

Riiiiight.  Out of the thousands upon thousands of committee meetings and hearings from all over the world, I'm supposed to find the ones you've vaguely hinted at and on which you've offered absolutely zero specifics.  That makes so much sense. 

You're just like Fox on this.  "Here's my wild claim.  In support of it I offer NOTHING.  Now it's your job to disprove it."  🫠

 

[Michael Hardner]

11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

1. We should also be concerned about how freely people open their minds to the nonsense.

2. The infosphere is like a modern casino - more dazzle and cacophony and the house always wins.

3. Here, have another drink. How about a Dexedrine?

1. My last 20 years has been a long slow dawning about how easy it is to get people to suck up nonsense if you package it correctly.  I'm past concerned - we are doomed if we don't find a way to deal with this.

BUT.... it's a different matter when serious institutions, which I stand by, fall into subjective moralizing or whatever we want to call this.  Objectivity is like gold these days and we need objective institutions to keep trying, because they might help us climb out of this.

2.  Sure, but Las Vegas presumably has schools too.

3.  We have far better intoxicants now.  I can eat a dark chocolate edible and enjoy my Lawrence Welk shows more.

[Goddess]

5 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Riiiiight.  Out of the thousands upon thousands of committee meetings and hearings from all over the world, I'm supposed to find the ones you've vaguely hinted at and on which you've offered absolutely zero specifics.  That makes so much sense. 

Pick a topic and seek out the committees and hearings.

Does your mommy still wipe your a$$ for you, too?

EDIT:  Since you outright reject any country's own YouTube channel or X account as a source, and also reject substacks from people recommending to watch certain committees and hearings, it will be more difficult for you to find them.  Most country's have a facebook page with links to hearings etc, but you also reject those, so.....

You've effectively painted yourself into an informational corner by rejecting every source other than the CBC.  And they're not going to direct you to any info that goes against Liberal narratives.

When a country gives you a link to watch a committee or hearing and you reject the link because they posted in on their X account, I can't really help you.

 

Edited March 24 by Goddess

[Michael Hardner]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Pick a topic and seek out the committees and hearings.

Does your mommy still wipe your a$$ for you, too?

Heads up @Goddess

 

From the site RULES 

RESEARCH YOUR POST

If you are stating a fact, be prepared to back it up with some official sources (websites, links etc). It is also important to structure your post in a way that everyone can understand. That means writing complete sentences and paragraphs with the appropriate grammar. If for some reason, you enjoy writing long confusing sentences and paragraphs riddled with poor grammar and spelling mistakes, your post, and therefore your opinions, will likely be discarded. Therefore, it is in your best interest to make sure that your post includes sufficient sources and contains a well-researched and well-organized argument.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Just a little help from me to the perpetually uninformed.

https://www.cpac.ca/en

Go take a look.

Great. Now he's going to think you're a witch.   

26 minutes ago, eyeball said:

We should also be concerned about how freely people open their minds to the nonsense.

 

So you feel their minds should be closed and you're the one who's going to do it along with your lefty friends by way of legislation?

Well I appreciate you saying the quiet part out loud anyway. But in a nutshell you've hit on it. The left wants to put an end to anything that they disagree with in any thoughts that don't match up with theirs

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Heads up @Goddess

 

From the site RULES 

RESEARCH YOUR POST

If you are stating a fact, be prepared to back it up with some official sources (websites, links etc). It is also important to structure your post in a way that everyone can understand. That means writing complete sentences and paragraphs with the appropriate grammar. If for some reason, you enjoy writing long confusing sentences and paragraphs riddled with poor grammar and spelling mistakes, your post, and therefore your opinions, will likely be discarded. Therefore, it is in your best interest to make sure that your post includes sufficient sources and contains a well-researched and well-organized argument.

Interesting that you only apply that to me.  I'm probably one of the most prolific link and source posters here.

 

 

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Heads up @Goddess

 

From the site RULES 

RESEARCH YOUR POST

If you are stating a fact, be prepared to back it up with some official sources (websites, links etc). It is also important to structure your post in a way that everyone can understand. That means writing complete sentences and paragraphs with the appropriate grammar. If for some reason, you enjoy writing long confusing sentences and paragraphs riddled with poor grammar and spelling mistakes, your post, and therefore your opinions, will likely be discarded. Therefore, it is in your best interest to make sure that your post includes sufficient sources and contains a well-researched and well-organized argument.

This is 2026.

And you constantly post without providing a single scrap of official sources of any type.

Once again all your proving is your hypocrisy. If you disagree with her post something that shows it

[Michael Hardner]

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Interesting that you only apply that to me.  I'm probably one of the most prolific link and source posters here.

 

 

I just saw your post and responded - what's wrong with that ?

I don't often see people saying that they don't have to back up what they say.  It's kind of an anti-discussion position, another way to have people talking at each other, IMO

[Goddess]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And you constantly post without providing a single scrap of official sources of any type.

Not every request for links has to be honored.

Sometimes it's obvious they're not interested and won't look at any link anyways, they're just being obtuse.  Or most common - repeatedly ask for a link, you provide it, they disappear and then pop up weeks later asking for the same link, over & over & over.

Sometimes, like MoonFace above, they want all the links to all the countries, to all the committees and hearings, to all the topics I've ever listened to.  Not reasonable.

An opinion is an opinion and doesn't necessarily need a link.  Although when I post my opinion, I usually do post links that support why I have that opinion.

Edited March 24 by Goddess

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

I just saw your post and responded - what's wrong with that ?

I don't often see people saying that they don't have to back up what they say.  It's kind of an anti-discussion position, another way to have people talking at each other, IMO

Oh yes, the patented Michael hardener "Gosh I've got everybody on ignore and don't actually see most of the posts but only the ones that i'm willing to admit to" defense. 

 

[Michael Hardner]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

1. This is 2026.

2. And you constantly post without providing a single scrap of official sources of any type.

3. Once again all your proving is your hypocrisy. If you disagree with her post something that shows it

1. Cite please 😆

2. Maybe I do.  If so, ask for a cite  If I don't, bad on me.  But you don't have to PROVIDE one, as per the note you have to be PREPARED TO BACK IT UP if challenged.  Instead of saying "Does your mama wipe you..."

3. Your hypocrisy meter is broken.  You ascribe all kinds of wild things to me, it's a strange thing.  Do you still think Lake Erie is owned by Canada or did you withdraw that one ?  I bring it up because I don't remember the ending, and it was particularly funny.  

[LinkSoul60]

37 minutes ago, Goddess said:

He knows the political system inside and out and knows how to make it work for Canadians.  His policies show that.

He came from humble beginnings and knows first-hand the damage governmental policies can be to the little person because of what happened to his parents.

Ya, why would we want a guy like that, right?

Carney got very mixed reviews in England.  A lot of overspending.  A lot of unjustified expenses.  A lot of money printing that affected the economy negatively and caused massive inflation.  Stuck his nose in policies he had no business sticking his nose in.  His wife complained that their living arrangements were not up to their standards.

He has lived a privileged life.  Admitted he doesn't shop for his own groceries, so he has no clue about that.  And doesn't seem to care.

Agreed it was not a fair fight.  The CBC banned having Conservative views on their programming.  So, during the campaign Canadians were only exposed to Liberal propaganda and constant Conservative bashing.  And then you were programmed to poop your pants every time Trump tweeted and focus on the US president and not the Liberal bad record, the economic trouble Canada is in, the immigration failures that put all our social networks and infrastructure in jeopardy, the justice file failures......you ignored all that in favor of pooping your pants over Trump.

Now we have all the same problems AND tariffs.  And the same people in power who CAUSED all the problems.

The Conservatives gave Carney the power he wanted to fast-track industry and after a year......ZERO projects fast-tracked.  But LOTS of censorship bills fast-tracked.  THOSE were prioritized.

Ya, you're real smart. 🙄

Let us know when you're done pooping your pants so we can get to work and get this country back on track.

He should know the political system, it's all he's ever done in his life!  What policies???

Ahhhh... it's a cute story that he came from humble beginnings but so what, a lot of people do.  

Overspending in England...  I always thought a central banks role was to set monetary policy?  Government is responsible for fiscal spending, and Carney wasn't part of the government.  Think about what you're saying before you say it. The rest is your usual X and Facebook fueled rant...

Good for him in living that privileged life.  He worked hard for it and needless to say, has been very successful.  

Ahhhh.... another shame that MSM is part of our news medium.  If you keep thinking your sources of 'news' are reliable, you'll continue being the only one is this convo continuing to 'poop' their pants.

How did Carney cause these tariffs?  Like I said above, think before you talk.

Yes and no... The conservatives didn't/don't want to go to the polls because they know many MP's including Poilievre would be out of jobs.  Try reading more beyond your X as to what's happening...  unless of course you believe only project is a pipeline (which I'm sure you do), See if you can Smith's comments today with her saying she'll miss the upcoming deadline for that project.  Carney's fault I'm sure...

Try to relax... Have a glass of wine if it will help calm the nerves.

 

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

Instead of saying "Does your mama wipe you..."

Since you have so many of us on ignore and often tell others here to get off the board and stop posting, you miss a lot.

And in this case, between MoonFace and I.....you've missed a lot.

I take your criticism, but honestly - I post links and sources in nearly every post.

There are others here who need your advice more but....like Moonie, you have also painted yourself into an informational corner by limiting your exposure to things here, so I'm filing your advice under "Good info from someone who doesn't really know what's up anymore."

2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

He should know the political system, it's all he's ever done in his life!  What policies???

Ahhhh... it's a cute story that he came from humble beginnings but so what, a lot of people do.  

Overspending in England...  I always thought a central banks role was to set monetary policy?  Government is responsible for fiscal spending, and Carney wasn't part of the government.  Think about what you're saying before you say it. The rest is your usual X and Facebook fueled rant...

Good for him in living that privileged life.  He worked hard for it and needless to say, has been very successful.  

Ahhhh.... another shame that MSM is part of our news medium.  If you keep thinking your sources of 'news' are reliable, you'll continue being the only one is this convo continuing to 'poop' their pants.

How did Carney cause these tariffs?  Like I said above, think before you talk.

Yes and no... The conservatives didn't/don't want to go to the polls because they know many MP's including Poilievre would be out of jobs.  Try reading more beyond your X as to what's happening...  unless of course you believe only project is a pipeline (which I'm sure you do), See if you can Smith's comments today with her saying she'll miss the upcoming deadline for that project.  Carney's fault I'm sure...

Try to relax... Have a glass of wine if it will help calm the nerves.

 

CBC drivel.

Wipe the Carney sh!t off your nose.

[eyeball]

9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. My last 20 years has been a long slow dawning about how easy it is to get people to suck up nonsense if you package it correctly.  I'm past concerned - we are doomed if we don't find a way to deal with this.

I think the only sure fire way to deal with it is at the personal individual level. I've spent the last 20 years getting used to the idea we're doomed. For 30 years before that I laboured against the inevitable thinking back on all the crap I learned in high school.

22 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

BUT.... it's a different matter when serious institutions, which I stand by, fall into subjective moralizing or whatever we want to call this.  Objectivity is like gold these days and we need objective institutions to keep trying, because they might help us climb out of this.

Yup, but I also think it's a two way street. We need a more objective population that's ready to meet our institutions part way in its shared responsibility for keeping societies shit in a more manageable pile. People have thrown out so many babies while bailing out their bathtubs...there's nothing left for them to climb on.

We're also becoming less governable at the same time our institutions are less able to govern.

In addition to bailing the tub we've also pulled the plug.

[Michael Hardner]

12 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Since you have so many of us on ignore and often tell others here to get off the board and stop posting, you miss a lot.

And in this case, between MoonFace and I.....you've missed a lot.

I take your criticism, but honestly - I post links and sources in nearly every post.

 

Ok.  I tip my hat to you then ❤️

 

[Michael Hardner]

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

1. I think the only sure fire way to deal with it is at the personal individual level. I've spent the last 20 years getting used to the idea we're doomed.

2. For 30 years before that I laboured against the inevitable thinking back on all the crap I learned in high school.

3. Yup, but I also think it's a two way street. We need a more objective population that's ready to meet our institutions part way in its shared responsibility for keeping societies shit in a more manageable pile. People have thrown out so many babies while bailing out their bathtubs...there's nothing left for them to climb on.

4. We're also becoming less governable at the same time our institutions are less able to govern.

5. In addition to bailing the tub we've also pulled the plug.

1. First of all we're not doomed.  For one thing, population decline is going to fix a lot of what is wrong with the world.

2. 

Quote

When I think back on all the crap I learned in high school
It's a wonder I can think at all
And though my lack of education hasn't hurt me none
I can read the writing on the wall

3. Metaphors, mixed... but sure.

4. The laziest and worst ones are our age, IMO.  The young folks I know will be better off when we are gone IMO.  Of course, the chuds will post a picture of a trans gal with blue hair as evidence that I'm crazy... the chud will be gone too.

5. That means we'll be naked and cold when the water runs out... like Adam & Eve.  And starting over will be easier.  Like.. 4 day work weeks, digital money that expires if you don't invest it, space station spas... don't get me started...

[eyeball]

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you feel their minds should be closed and you're the one who's going to do it along with your lefty friends by way of legislation?

No, I'm starting to subscribe to a more Wild In The Streets approach where we round up all the right-wingers and force them to take LSD.

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well I appreciate you saying the quiet part out loud anyway. But in a nutshell you've hit on it. The left wants to put an end to anything that they disagree with in any thoughts that don't match up with theirs

Naw, we just want to save the world.

[LinkSoul60]

14 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Since you have so many of us on ignore and often tell others here to get off the board and stop posting, you miss a lot.

And in this case, between MoonFace and I.....you've missed a lot.

I take your criticism, but honestly - I post links and sources in nearly every post.

There are others here who need your advice more but....like Moonie, you have also painted yourself into an informational corner by limiting your exposure to things here, so I'm filing your advice under "Good info from someone who doesn't really know what's up anymore."

CBC drivel.

Wipe the Carney sh!t off your nose.

I don't have anyone on ignore any more.  I had dumbFxx on but took him off so I could slag the mental midget for his non-stop id!ocy.  He's getting beyond stupid again though so may be time to block him again.

I haven't seen Moonbox' and your convo.  Too busy looking at what's happening today and trying to keep up with the nonsense from you fools.

I know you post links and sources.  They're just other peoples opinions, not facts.

Hopefully I'll never paint myself into the closet you fools reside in.  I get the information flows freely in there but it's the same regurgitated stuff day in and day out.... Look what Justin and the liberals did!!!!  It is fun laughing at sometimes though... 

X drivel...

😂

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

That means we'll be naked and cold when the water runs out... like Adam & Eve.  And starting over will be easier.  Like.. 4 day work weeks, digital money that expires if you don't invest it, space station spas... don't get me started...

I know right? After growing up with the Science Center, 2001; A Space Odyssey and Star Trek I figured for sure I'd be living the dream in my condo overlooking Tycho by now.

They'll probably hit the technological singularity a couple years after we're gone. It just comes with feeling doomed I guess.

 

 

[Goddess]

8 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I don't have anyone on ignore any more.  I had dumbFxx on but took him off so I could slag the mental midget for his non-stop id!ocy.  He's getting beyond stupid again though so may be time to block him again.

I haven't seen Moonbox' and your convo.  Too busy looking at what's happening today and trying to keep up with the nonsense from you fools.

I know you post links and sources.  They're just other peoples opinions, not facts.

Hopefully I'll never paint myself into the closet you fools reside in.  I get the information flows freely in there but it's the same regurgitated stuff day in and day out.... Look what Justin and the liberals did!!!!  It is fun laughing at sometimes though... 

X drivel...

😂

Yikes.

I see you're REALLY having a problem with comprehension today.  😬

Like, more than normal.

That reply was for someone else.  To the person I quoted before I wrote that.

 

[Moonbox]

38 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Pick a topic and seek out the committees and hearings.

You've made wild, ridiculous and unbacked claims and for "evidence" you've referenced...yourself...and the vague committees and hearings you've supposedly watched but can't cite.  

That about sums up what's going on here.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, Moonbox said:

You've made wild, ridiculous and unbacked claims and for "evidence" you've referenced...yourself...and the vague committees and hearings you've supposedly watched but can't cite.  

That about sums up what's going on here.

And you don't watch any.  On any topic.  Ever.

That about sums up what's going on here.

You know, the real work of government in Canada happens in committee meetings.  Not on the CBC Power & Politics panel.

Just sayin'.

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No, I'm starting to subscribe to a more Wild In The Streets approach where we round up all the right-wingers and force them to take LSD.

 

I get it, because if we were all on LSD we would think more like you

Interesting idea. I don't think I'd try it though, conservatives know how to shoot