Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

The New York Post has been having a field day with all of Mamdani's insane actions and stupidity.  It's been an enjoyable read:

https://nypost.com/2026/02/25/us-news/mayor-zohran-mamdani-doubles-down-on-downplaying-nypd-snowball-attack/

https://nypost.com/2026/02/25/us-news/mamdani-wants-nyc-to-spend-70m-on-feasibility-study-for-city-run-grocery-store-pet-project-sources/

This guy continues to be the biggest weapon the Republicans have, other than the twin idjuts AOC and Crockett.

The sad part is, that the more the NYPost tells the truth about Mamdani, and the more they show how much of a id10t the guy is, the more left4rds will hate the NYPost. 

They don't want to know about Mamdani, they just want the feather in their cap for voting for a pedophile who likes to see women get beaten up. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
31 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lol...still tilting at that strawman? Why? Is it because you don't have a way to explain that your side is using racist tropes to justify their opposition to a bill that is supported by well over 80% of Americans? 

You really like your strawman. 

 

You didn't say that? Are you fùcking kidding me?

Jim Crow is the defacto reference when the left wants to call a law discriminatory against blacks. Saying that the SAVE Act discriminates against blacks must imply they are too stupid or too poor. Why else would they not be able to get an ID? 

 

 

 

Do you just not know what a straw man argument is? I challenged you to do a basic debate exercise of arguing the other perspective--because it's 100% clear from your lame memey "argument" that you've put zero thought into this. You couldn't manage it. Fine. But it's not a straw man argument to ask you to do some critical thinking. Look it up. 

Again, the only straw man argument is yours, completely fabricating the idea that people who oppose voter ID are making any commentary whatsoever on the intelligence of Black Americans. "We" didn't make that argument. You made it up and want to argue against that straw man. Lame.

And I've got a news flash for you: comparing legislation to Jim Crow is, in no way, a commentary on Black Americans. It's a commentary on laws concocted by racists specifically to target and exclude minorities. Jim Crow laws didn't exist because Black people were dumb. They existed because of racists. 

You are welcome to speculate about why Black Americans are less likely to have ID. (Or, you could actually learn why by reading the really available research.) But regardless of the reasons, it's a fact that they are less likely, and it's wrong to disenfranchise those potential voters. And it's doubly wrong to disenfranchise them under the fig leaf of solving a non-existent voter impersonation "problem." 

We know what Republicans are doing. We know why they're doing it. The Jim Crow laws were undone by the Voting Rights Act in the 60s, and Republicans have relentlessly attacked that law in the courts for decades. Specifically so they could do more shit like this.  

Face it, there are no facts on your side. There is nothing to hide behind. You simply want fewer Black voters to turn out on election day because Black voters consistently break for Democrats. 

 

  • Downvote 1
Posted

Mamdani, AOC spark backlash for urging illegal immigrants to sign up for free NYC childcare in cringey Spanish ad

https://nypost.com/2026/02/24/us-news/mamdani-aoc-spark-backlash-with-cringey-spanish-ad-pushing-free-childcare-for-illegal-immigrants/

These people are retards.

As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Do you just not know what a straw man argument is? I challenged you to do a basic debate exercise of arguing the other perspective--because it's 100% clear from your lame memey "argument" that you've put zero thought into this. You couldn't manage it. Fine. But it's not a straw man argument to ask you to do some critical thinking. Look it up. 

No. It is a strawman argument to use an argument that you made up as the starting point for your opposition. This debate is not about whether or not getting a job and voting are similar or dissimilar. 

The debate is over whether or not it is racist to require an ID or say that nonwhites don't know how to get one. So yeah, you are using this strawman. 

32 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Again, the only straw man argument is yours, completely fabricating the idea that people who oppose voter ID are making any commentary whatsoever on the intelligence of Black Americans. "We" didn't make that argument. You made it up and want to argue against that straw man. Lame.

Aside from the fsct that Schumer publicly proclaimed that? How about this:

How long will deny reality? I am truly interested. 

38 minutes ago, Hodad said:

We know what Republicans are doing. We know why they're doing it. The Jim Crow laws were undone by the Voting Rights Act in the 60s, and Republicans have relentlessly attacked that law in the courts for decades. Specifically so they could do more shit like this.  

Fantasize much? You can't just make shit up. 

 

39 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Face it, there are no facts on your side. There is nothing to hide behind. You simply want fewer Black voters to turn out on election day because Black voters consistently break for Democrats. 

I have links, x posts and videos. Do you have anything besides your fantasies?

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

Mamdani, AOC spark backlash for urging illegal immigrants to sign up for free NYC childcare in cringey Spanish ad

https://nypost.com/2026/02/24/us-news/mamdani-aoc-spark-backlash-with-cringey-spanish-ad-pushing-free-childcare-for-illegal-immigrants/

These people are retards.

Typically short-sighted response to smart policy.

Regardless of the parent's immigration status, the kids live in the cities. They will go to the schools. They will be expected to function as contributing members of society. And in all of those things pre-k education pays massive dividends. 

Cities should govern for the reality in which they live, not cut their noses in service of ideological dogma. Make smart choices to get the best outcomes for the public.

 

  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

No. It is a strawman argument to use an argument that you made up as the starting point for your opposition. This debate is not about whether or not getting a job and voting are similar or dissimilar. 

The debate is over whether or not it is racist to require an ID or say that nonwhites don't know how to get one. So yeah, you are using this strawman. 

Aside from the fsct that Schumer publicly proclaimed that? How about this:

How long will deny reality? I am truly interested. 

Fantasize much? You can't just make shit up. 

 

I have links, x posts and videos. Do you have anything besides your fantasies?

Lol. Check your OP. You literally premised this entire thread on the false equivalency between voting and employment ID requirements. That, and the thoroughly stupid implication that Mamdani was a hypocrite for following federal employment law. So, yes the "debate" is about why that comparison is nonsensical. Why your meme argument isn't a "gotcha" moment. 

WTF is Ami Horowitz and why do I care? 

You may be ignorant of the persistent Republican attacks on the Voting Rights Act. That's fine. Nobody knows everything. But you could remedy that in just a few minutes if you bothered to look. Instead you just wave your hands and pretend I'm making it up. Lazy. 

And yes, it is indeed racist to create laws that disproportionately impact and damage minorities. Particularly when that is the ONLY effect such laws will have. That's EXACTLY what the Jim Crow voting laws did: pick a trait that is correlated with minority/Black voters and then legislate around the trait while pretending it wasn't about racism. 

Edited by Hodad
  • Downvote 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Typically short-sighted response to smart policy.

Regardless of the parent's immigration status, the kids live in the cities. They will go to the schools. They will be expected to function as contributing members of society. And in all of those things pre-k education pays massive dividends. 

Cities should govern for the reality in which they live, not cut their noses in service of ideological dogma. Make smart choices to get the best outcomes for the public.

 

This is your BS circular reasoning... you support the illegal immigration, so you support the illegal immigrants using our services... then argue they should get that because they are here. 

They are here because you support the lawlessness. 

That reality changes when you enforce the law. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Hodad said:

And yes, it is indeed racist to create laws that disproportionately impact and damage minorities.

This is not racism.

1. You only care about minorities. Racism is not racism just because it is a minority. 

2. No law, policy, or practice perfectly balances on race, sex, or whatever other protected status. Claiming racism because of disproportion is an absurd leftist talking point. 

Now keep hiding from me like the coward you are. 

 

 

Posted
59 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Typically short-sighted response to smart policy.

 

 

LOL - OMG dude.  Give it a rest.  The Democrats are evil garbage.

As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

LOL - OMG dude.  Give it a rest.  The Democrats are evil garbage.

I forgot. You're one of those not bright enough to formulate or respond to a thoughtful argument. I shouldn't have wasted the electrons. My bad.

  • Downvote 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I forgot. You're one of those not bright enough to formulate or respond to a thoughtful argument. I shouldn't have wasted the electrons. My bad.

What does it matter? When I routinely countered your BS on here, you ran and hid from me like a coward. 

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I forgot. You're one of those not bright enough to formulate or respond to a thoughtful argument. I shouldn't have wasted the electrons. My bad.

LOL ok mor-on.  Whatever.  It's this kind of crap that created Trump 2024.  And will create JD Vance 2028.  You fools just don't get it.

  • Like 2

As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

LOL ok mor-on.  Whatever.  It's this kind of crap that created Trump 2024.  And will create JD Vance 2028.  You fools just don't get it.

Still no argument to make. Thanks for confirming my opinion.

  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Still no argument to make. Thanks for confirming my opinion.

I could care less about your opinion.  It is the hubris and stupidity of the Left and the Trump-haters that is causing such a massive shift away from the Left and all the evil that the Left entails.  Enjoy continuing to lose elections Mr. Stupid Pants.

As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Still no argument to make. Thanks for confirming my opinion.

Says the guy who hasn't made it argument in two posts

Are you sure your nickname shouldn't be hypocrisydad?

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted

This has nothing to do with black people. That argument is nothing but a distraction to derail the purpose of the SAVE act...illegal aliens voting.

They know if they cant count on illegal ballots, that their chances of winning are reduced to freaks who wear animal costumes and dopes who think it's OK to fight with federal officers.

  • Like 2

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 hours ago, Hodad said:

Lol. Check your OP. You literally premised this entire thread on the false equivalency between voting and employment ID requirements.

No. I promised the entire thread on the notion that liberals believe that requiring an ID is racist and used the voter ID and employment ID as contrasting moments of hypocrisy. 

 

7 hours ago, Hodad said:

WTF is Ami Horowitz and why do I care? 

Because the first half of the video he shows white liberals in NYC talking about how blacks can't get an ID and the second half is blacks scoffing at what the white liberals say. His video directly contradicts your statement that liberals never said blacks are too stupid or too poor to get IDs. 

 

7 hours ago, Hodad said:

You may be ignorant of the persistent Republican attacks on the Voting Rights Act. That's fine. Nobody knows everything. But you could remedy that in just a few minutes if you bothered to look. Instead you just wave your hands and pretend I'm making it up. Lazy. 

There is no attack on voting rights. It is especially not an attack on voting rights to prevent voter dilllution through security measures like requiring an ID to vote and reducing mail in ballots. 

NYT: Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises

Just The Facts

Quote

In 2014, the academic journal Electoral Studies published a groundbreaking study by three scholars who estimated how frequently non-citizens were illegally voting. Based on data for the 2008 presidential and congressional elections, the study found that:

    “roughly one quarter of non-citizens” in the U.S. “were likely registered to vote.”
    “6.4% of non-citizens actually voted.”
    81.8% of them “reported voting for Barack Obama.”
    illegal votes cast by non-citizens “likely” changed “important election outcomes” in favor of Democrats, “including Electoral College votes” and a “pivotal” U.S. Senate race that enabled Democrats to pass Obamacare.


That is the true assault on voting rights. 

 

7 hours ago, Hodad said:

And yes, it is indeed racist to create laws that disproportionately impact and damage minorities. Particularly when that is the ONLY effect such laws will have. That's EXACTLY what the Jim Crow voting laws did: pick a trait that is correlated with minority/Black voters and then legislate around the trait while pretending it wasn't about racism. 

There you go again. Calling ot racist to require an ID because blacks are too stupid and too poor to get one. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, Hodad said:

Still no argument to make. Thanks for confirming my opinion.

You're a traitor...plain and simple.

You dont give a rat's a55 about black Americans voting. That's you're facad. Your distraction. The fact is, you know that without all those illegal votes, the Demoncrats cant win.

For those of us who know common sense and honor, you need to ignore this obvious misdirection. The Libbies know they're fcked without illegals voting. They will do and say anything to save those votes.

Over 80% of US citizens approve of the Save act. Their days of blatant cheating are withering and the Libbies are desperate to stop it.

But at this point...they cant.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

No. I promised the entire thread on the notion that liberals believe that requiring an ID is racist and used the voter ID and employment ID as contrasting moments of hypocrisy. 

 

To successfully claim hypocrisy you'd have to establish an equivalency. And, of course, you cannot. Hence the comment. 

As a reminder, still complete asinine to claim that the Mayor is a hypocrite for following federal employment law. It's preposterous. Let that sink into your brain and then move on to a real topic. 

Quote

Because the first half of the video he shows white liberals in NYC talking about how blacks can't get an ID and the second half is blacks scoffing at what the white liberals say. His video directly contradicts your statement that liberals never said blacks are too stupid or too poor to get IDs. 

 

I think I've made very clear that I don't care what some randos say, and I care even less about what randos say after the comments are edited and curated to achieve a specific outcome. 

I can show you clips of conservatives waving Nazi flags at Trump rallies. Does that mean that Republicans are nazis? Is that just how you easily you roll, or are you selectively manipulable?

I don't know whether it's age or intellect or education or what, but a lot of people out there do not seem to understand that not every idea is worthy of a platform. Just because people can publish something on social media does not mean that it's actually an idea worth sharing. Keep your algorithmic corruption to yourself, please. If I wanted to read the musings of random people I'd join the dumb platform myself. 

 

Quote

There is no attack on voting rights. It is especially not an attack on voting rights to prevent voter dilllution through security measures like requiring an ID to vote and reducing mail in ballots. 

Again, even a cursory glance at history would tell you that's an insanely statement and aggressively ignorant. 

Republicans have attacked the Voting Rights Act with, literally, hundreds of cases of the decades. And this post-Trump SCOTUS is blowing massive holes in it with three major cases over the past 5 years. Those protections were created for a reason: to end Jim Crow era discriminatory practices. Republicans want them back. 

Quote

NYT: Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises

Just The Facts


That is the true assault on voting rights. 

 

 

Let me guess, you found that "study" on Twitter? Dude, that's old news about bad science. The political science community debunked the analysis years ago. 
"200 political scientists signed a letter contesting the findings of the 2014 article. In this letter, they concluded that “the scholarly political science community has generally rejected the findings in the Richman et al. study, and we believe it should not be cited or used in any debate over fraudulent voting.[2] Yet the scientific community had critiqued this article long before Trump had deployed it to credential his claims."

The primary author, while not entirely dismissing the work, also claimed that it's being misrepresented.
"This part I completely agree with.  I’ve been trying to clarify the evidence for months as well.  My study DOES NOT support Trump’s claim that millions of non-citizens voted in the 2016 election.  My initial response was here and I have also pushed back against subsequent attempts to use that response to make somewhat more modest but still not data based claims."


More importantly, you do not have to rely on methodologically sketchy surveys and projections. The states acutally audit voting. They literally analyze the actual votes. Extensively. And every single time voter impersonation is found to be virtually nonexistent. . -- Nationwide, records from a federal citizenship verification tool show that just 0.04% of voter verification cases are returned as noncitizens.

Here are some Republican-led audits

  • Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose flagged 521 cases of potential noncitizen voting between 2019 and September 2023. But an Ohio Capital Journal review found just one case in which a noncitizen was ultimately charged with voter fraud. The review noted that this was due to a combination of accidental registration and a lag in how the department of motor vehicles updates an individual’s citizenship status after naturalization.
  • Utah performed a citizenship review of its entire voter registration list from April 2025 through January 2026. After a time-intensive, multi-step review of more than 2 million registered voters, they identified only one confirmed instance of noncitizen registration and zero instances of noncitizen voting.
  • Georgia: In October 2024, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced that a citizenship audit of 8.2 million registered voters identified 20 noncitizens who had registered to vote. Of those 20 individuals, just nine had cast ballots in prior elections, most before Georgia implemented enhanced citizenship verification through the Department of Driver Services in 2012. The cases were referred to local prosecutors for investigation.
Quote

There you go again. Calling ot racist to require an ID because blacks are too stupid and too poor to get one. 

No. I haven't said anything of the sort. That's the line you keep repeating. 

 

  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Nationalist said:

You're a traitor...plain and simple.

You dont give a rat's a55 about black Americans voting. That's you're facad. Your distraction. The fact is, you know that without all those illegal votes, the Demoncrats cant win.

For those of us who know common sense and honor, you need to ignore this obvious misdirection. The Libbies know they're fcked without illegals voting. They will do and say anything to save those votes.

Over 80% of US citizens approve of the Save act. Their days of blatant cheating are withering and the Libbies are desperate to stop it.

But at this point...they cant.

You are such a buffoon. Non-citizen voting is virtually nonexistent. Nobody "needs" your imaginary votes. 

I am actually quite concerned about a cynical, corrupt government reinstituting Jim Crow style laws to target minority voters. It's unAmerican. It's fundamentally wrong. Two things that you have in common with those laws. 

Edited by Hodad
  • Downvote 2
Posted
20 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

Mamdani, AOC spark backlash for urging illegal immigrants to sign up for free NYC childcare in cringey Spanish ad

They think that giving things away to illegals that Americans have to pay for is awesome. That just goes to show you how out of touch they are with working-class Americans.

"But we told them that we come from neighbourhoods where people cut their grass... Wasn't that enough? Kamala couldn't have said any more than she already did. What do these smelly little voters want from us?"

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
11 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You are such a buffoon. Non-citizen voting is virtually nonexistent. Nobody "needs" your imaginary cotes. 

I am actually quite concerned about a cynical, corrupt government reinstituting Jim Crow style laws to target minority voters. It's unAmerican. It's fundamentally wrong. Two things that you have in common with those laws. 

Then you're both stupid and a traitor.

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
55 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

They think that giving things away to illegals that Americans have to pay for is awesome. That just goes to show you how out of touch they are with working-class Americans.

"But we told them that we come from neighbourhoods where people cut their grass... Wasn't that enough? Kamala couldn't have said any more than she already did. What do these smelly little voters want from us?"

It's free, universal pre-K, dummy. Nobody pays for it. It's right there in the name!🙄

  • Downvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...