AOC's career is over

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

sounds like you just scared of a woman who is much much above you in life in every way to me.

You realize i'm not american right? They can vote for whomever they want - it's not really something that i would be 'scared' of one way or another.   But i get that you feel the need to pretend that just to make yourself feel better about the fact she's a b*tch and you couldn't refute that  

As to someone who's much much above me in your eyes -  considering your views are completely upside down to begin with that's actually quite a compliment,  when you're standing on your head of course it'll look like i'm "below" her  

She's a twat, and of course she'll draw the "twat sypathetic" types to her. 

[robosmith]

On 2/17/2026 at 5:51 PM, Legato said:

which she excels in knowing whether to soak or scrape the dishes and no cellphones during dinner.

Do you IMAGINE you heard her talking about ^this on the news? LMAO

[robosmith]

On 2/18/2026 at 5:18 AM, Nationalist said:

AOC can be "much much" above me while she rides me. Then I'll be "much much" above her while she does what she does second best.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QdKRUbzXVK8&list=PL7ZRTv_baPRGQM7YwZOvLMhllyx7FLfu_&pp=iAQB8AUB

What does she do first best, you ask? Why...that's simple.

She can apply bright red lipstick in any position expertly.

Meanwhile you excel at lDIOTIC IRRELEVANT posts like ^this.

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Meanwhile you excel at lDIOTIC IRRELEVANT posts like ^this.

Oh NOES!!  Triggered AOC/Zucchini fanboy is triggered!

[SpankyMcFarland]

America has traditionally had an opaque policy on defending Taiwan. I would prefer unambiguous support. A reply along the lines of not wanting to usurp the president’s role in this delicate matter, which could lead to nuclear war,  would also have been appropriate. 

Edited February 20 by SpankyMcFarland

[WestCanMan]

On 2/17/2026 at 10:43 AM, Politics1990 said:

will be the 1st female president actually

How can you look at that stupid, overconfident twit and think: "She's the most capable human in the United States"?

That was a basic question, which smarmy leftist politicians like Trudeau, Clinton, Newsom and Obama could have given quick non-answers to in the blink of an eye, instead of fumbling around for three minutes like Jo Biden trying to say his wife's name.

• "What America's reaction would be to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan is a state secret, and that policy has been consistent across every administration going back decades. Of course we have action plans in place for dozens of different scenarios, but we're not sharing them here for obvious reasons. Our main focus is on peace, and we have a great relationship with President Xi and the Chinese gov't."

That's a pat answer to any sensitive question:

• "What America's reaction would be to ___________________ is a state secret, 'blah blah blah'. Of course we have action plans in place for dozens of different scenarios, but 'blah blah blah'. Our main focus is on peace, and we have a [describe relationship] with [insert leader's name here] and the __________ gov't." 

Get it?

She's a stuttering dummy, and stuttering dummies like AOC and Biden always fail their countries.

• "I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion." Alexander the Great

Edited February 21 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

On 2/19/2026 at 11:13 AM, robosmith said:

lDIOTIC IRRELEVANT posts like ^this.

With the right amount of editing, you can even find a grain of truth in some of robo's posts. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

How can you look at that stupid, overconfident twit and think: "She's the most capable human in the United States"?

That was a basic question, which smarmy leftist politicians like Trudeau, Clinton, Newsom and Obama could have given quick non-answers to in the blink of an eye, instead of fumbling around for three minutes like Jo Biden trying to say his wife's name.

• "What America's reaction would be to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan is a state secret, and that policy has been consistent across every administration going back decades. Of course we have action plans in place for dozens of different scenarios, but we're not sharing them here for obvious reasons. Our main focus is on peace, and we have a great relationship with President Xi and the Chinese gov't."

That's a pat answer to any sensitive question:

• "What America's reaction would be to ___________________ is a state secret, 'blah blah blah'. Of course we have action plans in place for dozens of different scenarios, but 'blah blah blah'. Our main focus is on peace, and we have a [describe relationship] with [insert leader's name here] and the __________ gov't." 

Get it?

She's a stuttering dummy, and stuttering dummies like AOC and Biden always fail their countries.

• "I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion." Alexander the Great

Hey, don't dismiss her,  remember the last two crazy radical lefties who hated all people who disagreed with them and who's only policy ideas were "everyone right of castro is a nazi" and "lets giggle and demand women vote for us just because vagina"?   BOTH of those two actually did go on to become Presi.....  oh wait. 

[gatomontes99]

AOC just called her constituents stupid for not knowing how snow works.

 

 

[gatomontes99]

Now Newscum is saying he is stupid and can't read, just like you Mr. black mayor.

 

 

[Deluge]

On 2/17/2026 at 1:25 PM, robosmith said:

Kamala came within 1.5pts of Trump in the popular vote, so the lDIOT yapping in ^this video doesn't know what he's talking about. AOC should know better than to believe she's ready to go on FOS LIES to answer gotcha questions.

And the US was just 1.5pts from being completely overrun by criminal invaders. 

Aren't miracles just the best?  

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Now Newscum is saying he is stupid and can't read, just like you Mr. black mayor.

 

 

 

 

 

 

He went on to say: "I just want to put it all out there. I'm not, you know, I'm not trying to impress you, I’m just trying to impress upon you, I’m like you. I’m no better than you. You know, I’m a 960 SAT guy.”
 

He added: “You’ve never seen me read a speech, because I cannot read a speech…I haven’t overcome dyslexia. I’m living with it.”

[Deluge]

2 minutes ago, Hodad said:

 

 

 

 

He went on to say: "I just want to put it all out there. I'm not, you know, I'm not trying to impress you, I’m just trying to impress upon you, I’m like you. I’m no better than you. You know, I’m a 960 SAT guy.”
 

He added: “You’ve never seen me read a speech, because I cannot read a speech…I haven’t overcome dyslexia. I’m living with it.”

It must be inspiring to you Johnny Rebs to see Newsom condescending to people of color.  

[SpankyMcFarland]

On Taiwan, I think most politicians should not be too specific. Policy on that very sensitive matter is the president’s prerogative. The Chinese are on a hair trigger on this issue. 

[gatomontes99]

22 minutes ago, Hodad said:

 

 

 

 

He went on to say: "I just want to put it all out there. I'm not, you know, I'm not trying to impress you, I’m just trying to impress upon you, I’m like you. I’m no better than you. You know, I’m a 960 SAT guy.”
 

He added: “You’ve never seen me read a speech, because I cannot read a speech…I haven’t overcome dyslexia. I’m living with it.”

He literally told a black guy he was as dumb as him and can't read either. Just like him. 

This is the racist trope that the democrat party embraces. Biden said poor kids could be just as smart as white kids. The democrats keep telling us blacks are too stupid to get an ID. They also said blacks don't know how to use the internet. 

Yawn away. We know own you ate used to the left being blatantly racist. Why else would you believe that you need to be the white savior of the black race?

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

On Taiwan, I think most politicians should not be too specific.

That is correct, and America's POLICY for decades has always been to not answer the question of "Will the US use force to defend Taiwan" directly. 

She was simply supposed to give a non-committal answer, or even say that America's reaction is a state secret or that it's US policy to not answer that question. 

The fact is, it was an ice-cream-cone question and she somehow managed to fumble the ball 8 times between the 1-yard line and the goal line.

Quote

Policy on that very sensitive matter is the president’s prerogative.

Not even. 

America has a strict policy of not answering that question, and for even Trump or Biden (last year) to answer that question directly would have opened a huge can of worms:

1. a definitive no = "China will invade tomorrow"
2. a definitive yes = "Propaganda for the Chinese and Korean gov'ts to go directly to their people with a factual statement that the Americans see themselves as the boss of East Asia." That will be seen as a huge loss of face for the Chinese, which will not long go unchallenged. 

The whole point here is that AOC is a huge dummy that can't speak in public. She's arguably worse than Kamala.

It's ok to hope to see a woman of colour as POTUS one day, but it shouldn't be your #1 priority. Your top priority should always be to "have the most capable and reliable person in the WH". Sure, you can insert a snotty comment about Trump there, but you can't argue with his track record. He has run circles around every other leader in Canada or the US of the last 40 years, aside from Stephen Harper. 

Edited February 23 by WestCanMan