robosmith Posted January 29 Author Report Posted January 29 56 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Says ANTIFA. Hey...shouldn't the FBI be notified of the terrorist polluting this site? Hey... you should STFU about your IGNORANCE of OUR First Amendment because you're only embarrassing YOURSELF. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 10 minutes ago, robosmith said: Hey... you should STFU about your IGNORANCE of OUR First Amendment because you're only embarrassing YOURSELF. You admitted to belonging to or at least sympathizing with a group that is a declared terrorist organization. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
User Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: Hey... you should STFU about your IGNORANCE of OUR First Amendment because you're only embarrassing YOURSELF. Really? You were the one pushing that you have a right to trespass and prevent people from worship in church. You should sit this one out because you have no idea what you are talking about. Quote
robosmith Posted January 29 Author Report Posted January 29 6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: You admitted to belonging to or at least sympathizing with a group that is a declared terrorist organization. You and Trump are LYING. As proven by RepubliCON Senators' inability to answer questions that might show "antifa" is an "organization." Like who is the leader of "antifa"? How many members are there in "antifa"? Where is the HQ of "antifa"? What is the charter of "antifa"? FBI struggles to answer questions about antifa designation ... The Hill https://thehill.com › policy › national-security › 56444... Dec 11, 2025 — A portmanteau for anti-fascist, experts say antifa is an ideology, not a group, making it an odd fit for a designation that is most-often used ...Read more Missing: inability | Show results with: inability FBI Leader Crumbles During Basic Questions About Threat ... The New Republic https://newrepublic.com › breaking-news Dec 11, 2025 — Well, this sure sounds like a confession that antifa's designation as a domestic terror group was based on nothing. FBI leader Michael Glasheen ...Read more Missing: inability | Show results with: inability 'Haven't read the damn thing': Republican senators dodge ... NBC News https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › congress › haven... Jun 9, 2020 — Trump said the man may be an “ANTIFA provocateur," referring to an anti-fascist leftist group, and asked if the whole encounter with police ...Read more Quote
ironstone Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 24 minutes ago, robosmith said: You cannot even specify the contrary "opinions," likely because they make no sense. On Megyn Kelly's show, she brought on two lawyers who reached different conclusions. They look at the same video and interpret it differently. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
robosmith Posted January 29 Author Report Posted January 29 (edited) 7 minutes ago, ironstone said: On Megyn Kelly's show, she brought on two lawyers who reached different conclusions. They look at the same video and interpret it differently. So post those opinions HERE. Those two lawyers disagree with each other. Edited January 29 by robosmith Quote
ironstone Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 1 minute ago, robosmith said: So post those opinions HERE. If you're too lazy to click on a link that's your problem.😉 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
robosmith Posted January 29 Author Report Posted January 29 1 minute ago, ironstone said: If you're too lazy to click on a link that's your problem.😉 You already LIED about TWO opinions which say the shooting was justified. Did you even watch the video? LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 31 minutes ago, robosmith said: You and Trump are LYING. As proven by RepubliCON Senators' inability to answer questions that might show "antifa" is an "organization." Like who is the leader of "antifa"? Mark Bray https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/antifa-leaders-flee-america-as-trump-cracks-down-on-domestic-terrorist-networks/ar-AA1O8BzL 31 minutes ago, robosmith said: How many members are there in "antifa"? Unknown 32 minutes ago, robosmith said: Where is the HQ of "antifa"? There is no HQ as they are a decentralized organization of like minded blue terrorists. 32 minutes ago, robosmith said: What is the charter of "antifa"? Anti-capitalism and democracy under the guise that capitalism suppresses people and democracy that leads to anything other than socialism is fascism. As for any terror organization, most of those questions can't be answered that easily. We didn't know where Al Qaeda HQ was. It took a snitch to find Bin Laden. We never knew exactly how many people were in AL Qaeda. It isnt like they reported hiring numbers or filed tax returns. Al Antifa os the same, in many respects. They let anyone say they are Antifa, and they only propse broad ideals like anti-fascist and anti-racist. In practice, my retelling of their charter above is far more accurate. They are an organization that is trying to bring about Marxism by creating chaos and then attempt to replace chaos with government rule. Thereby convincing the electorate to vote themselves into the slavery that is Marxism. Most of the useful idìots that claim to be Antifa.have no.idea what they are fighting for. They are grunts that are needed to sew discord and create chaos. To be honest, they are every bit, if not more, victims than the free public they target. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Hodad Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 4 hours ago, ironstone said: Now this is telling. You are insisting that Alex Pretti has been MURDERED, plain and simple. There hasn't been a trial yet. No due process. By your own words, you have already laid down a verdict of GUILTY for the officer or officers involved. In the other topic titled 'Speaking of Somali Scammers....' I had posted how suspicious it was that Ilhan Omar was able to increase her personal wealth from basically nothing to an estimated $30 million in just a few short years. This is your exact response "Suspicion is NOT EVIDENCE of a crime." No trial yet in either case, but you decided that only Ilhan Omar deserves to be presumed innocent, while the ICE officers, instantly guilty of MURDER. You watched, with your own eyes, a man getting taken down, beaten by 5 or 6 guys, and shot in the back while unarmed--and then shot in the back many more times while he lay face down on the ground, and you're not willing to acknowledge that it's murder? Regardless of what the courts say, you have a conscience and judgement, yeah? You watched a murder take place, but because of politics you're unwilling to acknowledge it. That's disturbing. 1 Quote
ironstone Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 27 minutes ago, Hodad said: You watched, with your own eyes, a man getting taken down, beaten by 5 or 6 guys, and shot in the back while unarmed--and then shot in the back many more times while he lay face down on the ground, and you're not willing to acknowledge that it's murder? Regardless of what the courts say, you have a conscience and judgement, yeah? You watched a murder take place, but because of politics you're unwilling to acknowledge it. That's disturbing. As I've already stated, I have heard polar opposite opinions about this incident. You're leaving out some important details too. It wasn't just a random guy minding his own business. It's a reasonable assumption based on the available evidence that he was there to impede ICE during an operation. He was first seen in the middle of the street. There were also other agitators present, blowing whistles, screaming. It turns out Pretti was armed with two extra mags. No indication yet that he immediately informed the officers that he was carrying a loaded firearm, or even if he was carrying identification at the time. On Michael Knowles show, he states that" according to federal law going back 35 years, deadly force is permissible if it is reasonable, objectively reasonable from the perspective of a reasonable officer who was on the scene and accounting for all the split second judgements. It's not about what's on video, it's about did the cops reasonably perceive in the moment that they were under threat" Ask yourself why this is only happening in Minnesota. 13:50-17:00 I take no pleasure from this man's death. People on the right generally do not celebrate anyone on the other side losing their lives. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
ironstone Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 This man brought up some really interesting points for all of us to ponder. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
robosmith Posted January 30 Author Report Posted January 30 5 hours ago, ironstone said: This man brought up some really interesting points for all of us to ponder. And the officer chooses whether to ESCALATE or DE-ESCALATE and NOT KILL an UNARMED MAN. Your guy is all about Pretti's obligations and says NOTHING about the officer's obligations. And he's giving a bunch of legal opinions but giving NO QUALIFICATIONS to do so. Is he practicing law without a license (illegal) or not. Quote
User Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: And the officer chooses whether to ESCALATE or DE-ESCALATE and NOT KILL an UNARMED MAN. Your guy is all about Pretti's obligations and says NOTHING about the officer's obligations. And he's giving a bunch of legal opinions but giving NO QUALIFICATIONS to do so. Is he practicing law without a license (illegal) or not. You can't argue the substance, so you attack the person. 7 hours ago, Hodad said: You watched, with your own eyes, a man getting taken down, beaten by 5 or 6 guys, and shot in the back while unarmed--and then shot in the back many more times while he lay face down on the ground, and you're not willing to acknowledge that it's murder? Regardless of what the courts say, you have a conscience and judgement, yeah? You watched a murder take place, but because of politics you're unwilling to acknowledge it. That's disturbing. Well, when you phrase it like that! Except that you are not giving all the details. Instead, you are engaged in sensationalism, calling it murder. Quote
ironstone Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 8 hours ago, robosmith said: And the officer chooses whether to ESCALATE or DE-ESCALATE and NOT KILL an UNARMED MAN. Your guy is all about Pretti's obligations and says NOTHING about the officer's obligations. And he's giving a bunch of legal opinions but giving NO QUALIFICATIONS to do so. Is he practicing law without a license (illegal) or not. The officers had obligations and Pretti had obligations too. He chose to ignore them. Pretti had a previous encounter with agents that could fairly be described as violent. He was screaming obscenities at them, he spit on them, he smashed a taillight on their vehicle, and then he resisted them in a physical altercation. I did wonder why on earth he didn't get arrested there and then but perhaps they chose not to because they may have been overwhelmed and Pretti wasn't their priority at the moment. It doesn't seem like Minneapolis PD was there at all to assist ICE. We don't know yet, but it's possible that one or more of the ICE agents remembered Pretty from that previous violent encounter and if they did, it would have heightened tensions even more on that fateful day. And you talk about killing an UNARMED man, but leave out important context like the fact that this happened in a matter of seconds among a hostile crowd of people determined to protect the criminals ICE is looking for. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
John Stone Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 (edited) .............. at the risk of sounding racist? Likely better politically if Pretti / Good were black. The shootings were a success in terms of projecting / displaying power - but clumsy! Getting control of voter rolls will be a crucial objective leading up to 2026 midterms. Noem has the potential to becoming a loose cannon - dumb beotch........ it's rumored she has a heart condition? ........... rumored to make a good sandwich. Edited January 30 by John Stone Quote
Hodad Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 10 minutes ago, John Stone said: it's rumored she has a heart condition? It's missing? Quote
John Stone Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 2 minutes ago, Hodad said: It's missing? ............haha ............. the problem is women leading men ............. they always try to act like men and men laugh at them. Stick to shooting dogs, lady. Quote
robosmith Posted January 30 Author Report Posted January 30 (edited) 3 hours ago, ironstone said: The officers had obligations and Pretti had obligations too. He chose to ignore them. They BOTH chose to ignore their obligations and you ONLY talking about Pretti AGAIN, just shows how biased YOU ARE. 3 hours ago, ironstone said: Pretti had a previous encounter with agents that could fairly be described as violent. He was screaming obscenities at them, he spit on them, he smashed a taillight on their vehicle, and then he resisted them in a physical altercation. You KNOW he was NOT violent towards the officers and that's probably why he was NOT CHARGED. Sandwich guy was charged and they learned no one would convict him. 3 hours ago, ironstone said: I did wonder why on earth he didn't get arrested there and then but perhaps they chose not to because they may have been overwhelmed and Pretti wasn't their priority at the moment. It doesn't seem like Minneapolis PD was there at all to assist ICE. And you don't know what lead to the confrontation so you don't have the full story. Spitting is NOT VIOLENCE, just like assault with a sandwich. 3 hours ago, ironstone said: We don't know yet, ... Right. You don't know. 3 hours ago, ironstone said: And you talk about killing an UNARMED man, but leave out important context like the fact that this happened in a matter of seconds among a hostile crowd of people determined to protect the criminals ICE is looking for. What we do KNOW is what the video shows. Pretti was unarmed. It doesn't show what a "hostile crowd was determined to do." Edited January 30 by robosmith Quote
ironstone Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 1 hour ago, robosmith said: You KNOW he was NOT violent towards the officers and that's probably why he was NOT CHARGED. In that previous encounter, hurling f-bombs at officers, challenging officers, spitting on them, kicking out a taillight, then resisting after that. Many are saying he was also armed at that time with a gun in his waistband. You don't see that as violent? Or is that just normal everyday behavior for a leftist? Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
robosmith Posted January 30 Author Report Posted January 30 1 minute ago, ironstone said: In that previous encounter, hurling f-bombs at officers, challenging officers, spitting on them, kicking out a taillight, then resisting after that. Many are saying he was also armed at that time with a gun in his waistband. You don't see that as violent? Or is that just normal everyday behavior for a leftist? Violent towards a non-agent SUV. No I do not. Like I said, they've learned they cannot convict the sandwich guy. LMAO Do you even read posts before quoting them? 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 56 minutes ago, robosmith said: Violent towards a non-agent SUV. Well then I guess it's not violence to shoot a protester. I mean if you're just going to lie you might as well go all the way right? Problem solved! There's no violence! 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
gatomontes99 Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 7 hours ago, CdnFox said: Well then I guess it's not violence to shoot a protester. I mean if you're just going to lie you might as well go all the way right? Problem solved! There's no violence! I mean, they just shot the jacket. Was it their fault he was in it? 1 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
CdnFox Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I mean, they just shot the jacket. Was it their fault he was in it? You add ONE button hole to a jacket and suddenly people accuse you of this and that..... It's the left's favorite game, if they can't argue the facts they just change the definitions till it fits the narrative! 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Moonlight Graham Posted February 1 Report Posted February 1 On 1/29/2026 at 2:55 AM, robosmith said: What did he do that that made him a "loon"? You believe all people protesting Trump are "loons"? If so, maybe you should acquaint yourself with how Hitler rose to power and note the parallels with Trump. He spat on an ICE vehicle and kicked out its tail light. Only a nutter would pull that against law enforcement. 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.