robosmith Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 Jack Smith testimony before Congress. "The attack against Congress does not happen without Trump" https://www.facebook.com/reel/1543397686781304 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 (edited) 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: Jack Smith testimony before Congress. "The attack against Congress does not happen without Trump" https://www.facebook.com/reel/1543397686781304 Lmao...they guy that is a proven liar and has a demonstrated past of using the legal system for political gain says it is so? Why are you so gullible? Edited January 16 by gatomontes99 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Lmao...they guy that is a proven liar and has a demonstrated past of using the legal system for political gain says it is so? Why are you so gullible? My post is about Jack Smith NOT pathological LIAR Trump. You have ZERO EVIDENCE of Smith lying. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 1 minute ago, robosmith said: My post is about Jack Smith NOT pathological LIAR Trump. You have ZERO EVIDENCE of Smith lying. Jack Smith Admits Making False Claim to Court In Trump Case ‘No white knight’: Jack Smith’s record rife with mistrials, overturned convictions, judicial rebukes 2 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
ironstone Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Jack Smith testimony before Congress. "The attack against Congress does not happen without Trump" https://www.facebook.com/reel/1543397686781304 I'm going to take a page out of your book. I don't trust your source so you got BUPKIS. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 3 minutes ago, ironstone said: I'm going to take a page out of your book. I don't trust your source so you got BUPKIS. You don't even have a reason for not trusting a career US DoJ Prosecutor under oath. And you STILL have NO EVIDENCE for him lying. I always have solid reasons for not trusting Murdock and completely obscure sourced "news" reporting. Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Jack Smith testimony before Congress. "The attack against Congress does not happen without Trump" https://www.facebook.com/reel/1543397686781304 It doesn't happen if the Democrats would have been cool with 10,000 National Guard Troops BEFORE it happened. So what? This is an absurd "causality" argument, not a case of direct blame. 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: You don't even have a reason for not trusting a career US DoJ Prosecutor under oath. And you STILL have NO EVIDENCE for him lying. I always have solid reasons for not trusting Murdock and completely obscure sourced "news" reporting. His statement was a subjective opinion, not a fact, nor a legal argument. The fact that you are here touting it only shows how biased he was. Quote
Hodad Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 This is dumb. Of course he's the most culpable. It's not even a question. He lied to his slavering followers for 2+ months about a fictional stolen election. That's the only reason any of them were there. 1 Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 4 minutes ago, Hodad said: This is dumb. Of course he's the most culpable. It's not even a question. He lied to his slavering followers for 2+ months about a fictional stolen election. That's the only reason any of them were there. Except, you do not have this standard for anyone else... There is a reason why there are actual LEGAL standards for these things. Quote
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 4 hours ago, User said: Except, you do not have this standard for anyone else... There is a reason why there are actual LEGAL standards for these things. And those legal standards are WHY Smith got Trump INDICTED. Duh Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 20 minutes ago, robosmith said: And those legal standards are WHY Smith got Trump INDICTED. Duh You can never argue the actual facts, you always have to come up with some sideways comment. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 6 hours ago, Hodad said: This is dumb. Of course he's the most culpable. It's not even a question. He lied to his slavering followers for 2+ months about a fictional stolen election. That's the only reason any of them were there. How many ballots were counted without verification again? You can scream, whine, even ridicule...but you will never convince anyone but you TDS demented planks, that the 2020 election wasn't rife with fraud. So get your ID together. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 31 minutes ago, Nationalist said: How many ballots were counted without verification again? You can scream, whine, even ridicule...but you will never convince anyone but you TDS demented planks, that the 2020 election wasn't rife with fraud. So get your ID together. Speaking of slavering followers... 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 2 hours ago, Hodad said: Speaking of slavering followers... Speaking of traitors... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
John Stone Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 I believe Trump is grateful for elections Quote
Legato Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 12 hours ago, Hodad said: This is dumb. Of course he's the most culpable. It's not even a question. He lied to his slavering followers for 2+ months about a fictional stolen election. That's the only reason any of them were there. Spindizzy. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 8 hours ago, Nationalist said: How many ballots were counted without verification again? Virtually NONE. Trump challenged the count 60+ times and LOST all but one case. 8 hours ago, Nationalist said: You can scream, whine, even ridicule...but you will never convince anyone but you TDS demented planks, that the 2020 election wasn't rife with fraud. Too bad you and Trump could not prove that in court. LMAO 8 hours ago, Nationalist said: So get your ID together. You STILL don't understand voter impersonation fraud is virtually non-existent because it is an almost completely INEFFECTIVE way to swing election results. And you don't even know why because you're so IGNORANT. 5 hours ago, Nationalist said: Speaking of traitors... ^IGNORAMUS never learns 2 hours ago, Legato said: Spindizzy. ^CLOWN with NO POINT. Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 8 minutes ago, robosmith said: You STILL don't understand voter impersonation fraud is virtually non-existent because it is an almost completely INEFFECTIVE way to swing election results. And you don't even know why because you're so IGNORANT. You can never argue honestly. It is not about impersonation; it is about requiring a voter to prove they can actually vote. If you have same-day registration and voting, a bunch of illegal immigrants show up and vote... when do you figure that out? There was that mayor in Kansas who had been voting his whole adult life and was not even a citizen. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: Virtually NONE. Trump challenged the count 60+ times and LOST all but one case. Too bad you and Trump could not prove that in court. LMAO You STILL don't understand voter impersonation fraud is virtually non-existent because it is an almost completely INEFFECTIVE way to swing election results. And you don't even know why because you're so IGNORANT. ^IGNORAMUS never learns ^CLOWN with NO POINT. Over 315,000 ballots in Fulton County alone. You're a liar...a cheater...and a traitor. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Over 315,000 ballots in Fulton County alone. You're a liar...a cheater...and a traitor. IF ^this were true, you'd be able to post EVIDENCE, but IT'S NOT. And your ad hominems just show HOW DESPERATE and IGNORANT YOU ARE. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 49 minutes ago, robosmith said: IF ^this were true, you'd be able to post EVIDENCE, but IT'S NOT. And your ad hominems just show HOW DESPERATE and IGNORANT YOU ARE. Here you go...traitor. https://www.atlantanewsfirst.com/2025/12/23/fulton-county-admits-verifying-315000-votes-2020-without-poll-worker-signatures/ Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 15 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Here you go...traitor. https://www.atlantanewsfirst.com/2025/12/23/fulton-county-admits-verifying-315000-votes-2020-without-poll-worker-signatures/ Even if they didn't sign tabulator tapes, that is NOT EVIDENCE that the vote count was erroneous nor that Trump received more votes. LMAO Quote
Nationalist Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Even if they didn't sign tabulator tapes, that is NOT EVIDENCE that the vote count was erroneous nor that Trump received more votes. LMAO I see. So even if they cheated...they didn't cheat...according to you. Traitor. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 (edited) 49 minutes ago, Nationalist said: I see. So even if they cheated...they didn't cheat...according to you. Traitor. You have ZERO EVIDENCE of "cheated." People make mistakes. That doesn't prove that Trump had more votes than were counted nor that Biden had fewer. Edited January 16 by robosmith Quote
CdnFox Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 21 hours ago, robosmith said: My post is about Jack Smith NOT pathological LIAR Trump. You have ZERO EVIDENCE of Smith lying. As we know that's a lie. I guess that makes you the pathological liar? Sometimes it's hard to keep straight whether you're the liar or whether you're lying about a liar or whether the person you're quoting is just a liar. I have a white board on order Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.