Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 1/13/2026 at 9:32 PM, Radiorum said:

1-16.200 - USE OF DEADLY FORCE AND PROHIBITED RESTRAINT TECHNIQUES

  1. Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.

https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force#1-16.200

From your link. The very next paragraph-

"Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force."

  • Like 3

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Why are you lying? Every video shows that is not true.

Saying she pointed kind of implies it was intentional, so lets take that out of the equation. The facts, which are on video from multiple angles, show that she first attempts to back up away from the Officer ordering her out of the vehcile. As she backs up she turns the vehicle and it does in fact then point directly at the ICE Officer who shot her. About the time she puts the vehicle into drive and accelerates, that ICE Officer is still in front of the vehicle and he draws his firearm as she is driving towards him and the first shot is about at the moment she is hitting him with her vehicle. This all happened in a matter of seconds. 

Fact: The ICE Officer was in front of her vehicle
Fact: She accelerated forward with the ICE Officer in front of her vehicle. 

Those are facts. They are on video from multiple cameras and angles. 

That alone is enough to justify the use of deadly force. 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Why are you lying? Every video shows that is not true.

Get your eyes checked. You're watching through the lens of a left wing bottle bottom.

Posted
5 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Why are you lying? Every video shows that is not true.

Every video shows it's absolutely true and it's you who are lying.  He is not in front of her car she backs up and turns the car and it's pointed at him and she accelerated into him causing him serious injury

Those are the simple facts. They are undisputable.

You are starting to get pathetic. What kind of loser has to ignore obvious facts to try and keep his narrative? You will forever be made to look stupid in your life if you can't accept basic facts and deal with them instead of pretending they're not true

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 hours ago, User said:

Saying she pointed kind of implies it was intentional, so lets take that out of the equation. The facts, which are on video from multiple angles, show that she first attempts to back up away from the Officer ordering her out of the vehcile. As she backs up she turns the vehicle and it does in fact then point directly at the ICE Officer who shot her. About the time she puts the vehicle into drive and accelerates, that ICE Officer is still in front of the vehicle and he draws his firearm as she is driving towards him and the first shot is about at the moment she is hitting him with her vehicle. This all happened in a matter of seconds. 

Fact: The ICE Officer was in front of her vehicle
Fact: She accelerated forward with the ICE Officer in front of her vehicle. 

Those are facts. They are on video from multiple cameras and angles. 

That alone is enough to justify the use of deadly force. 

And while i appreciate that you're trying to remove any emotional charge from the language, it is ALSO still a fact that he was NOT in front of the vehicle until she backed up and reoriented her car and it faced him directly.  I'm trying to think of terms other than point or the like but regardless of her motive, that IS what happened.  SHE maneuvered her car and when she started the vehicle was not pointing at the officer and when she stopped and then accelerated forward it was, and she hit the cop and sent him to the hospital with serious injury. 

She's the driver, she's responsible for making sure there isn't something ahead of her when she drives forward, it's a little hard to think she DID NOT notice the cop just a few feet ahead of her. 

 

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
21 hours ago, CdnFox said:

she backs up and turns the car and it's pointed at him and she accelerated into him causing him serious injury

Oh, I get it now. You're blind. Well, sorry for that, but it also explains the constant voice to text, and the typo-riddled gibberish you post.

Posted (edited)
On 1/15/2026 at 11:09 AM, User said:

Fact: She accelerated forward with the ICE Officer in front of her vehicle.

Fact: As she drives ahead, she cuts her wheels to the right, away from the murderer.

Edited by Barquentine
grammar
Posted
2 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Oh, I get it now. You're blind. Well, sorry for that, but it also explains the constant voice to text, and the typo-riddled gibberish you post.

The day you get anything will go down in the annals of history.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Fact: As she drives ahead, she cuts her wheels to the left, away from the murderer.

And?

She still hit him. When she started accelerating towards him her wheels were straight. 

41 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Oh, I get it now. You're blind. Well, sorry for that, but it also explains the constant voice to text, and the typo-riddled gibberish you post.

Blind?

The problem is that you are not blind and still sit here being dishonest. 

 

 

Posted (edited)

Ashley Babbit was an unarmed woman shot and killed without actually attacking anyone. Liberals were okay with that

Renee Good literally gets shot only after hitting the cop with her car. Liberals want to start riots over it.

Edited by Fluffypants
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Barquentine said:

Fact: As she drives ahead, she cuts her wheels to the left, away from the murderer.

The fact is she hit the officer and got what she begged for.

You go try it. Let me know how that works out for ya...traitor.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Fact: As she drives ahead, she cuts her wheels to the left, away from the murderer.

Lie. For one, she turned right. Two, she hit him. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Oh, I get it now. You're blind. Well, sorry for that, but it also explains the constant voice to text, and the typo-riddled gibberish you post.

Awwww triggered leftie muffin is triggered :) 

Hey, even the mayor and other radical lefties have admitted what I said was true.

At this point in time all you're doing is just out and out lying and it makes you look like a complete tard. It proves that your position and the position of people like you on the left is based on lies and hatred not facts, so you take everything that you're going to say over the next year and casting in doubt by ruining your reputation because you can't tell the truth.

Biatch Back to your car up and drove forward and ran over a cop. Cause serious injuries. Had she lived she would have been charged with assault at the least and attempted murder at the most. The police shot her defending themselves and she deserved it

We all get that you'd rather see the cop dead but that's because you're sick in the head lunatic lefty who can't cope with facts and that would be your problem not mine or the cops

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
On 1/15/2026 at 5:21 AM, Barquentine said:

Why are you lying? Every video shows that is not true.

Every video shows Good either jawing at ICE or attempting to flee the scene. Either way she's guilty of sedition. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Fact: As she drives ahead, she cuts her wheels to the left, away from the murderer.

Fact. She hit the "murderer" and caused him Serious injury and he wasn't in front of her vehicle till she started backing up and turning

Which would make her the attempted murderer and she Was justifiably shot

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

Every video shows Good either jawing at ICE or attempting to flee the scene. Either way she's guilty of sedition. 

She hit the cop and put him in the hospital, the other one was treated for injuries too. That is assault on a police officer with a lethal weapon you just can't get around that

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

She hit the cop and put him in the hospital, the other one was treated for injuries too. That is assault on a police officer with a lethal weapon you just can't get around that

Oh, I wasn't aware that she hit somebody - I thought they were able to get out of the way

Then yes, precedent has been set: accelerate your car in front of ICE at your own peril. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Oh, I wasn't aware that she hit somebody - I thought they were able to get out of the way

Then yes, precedent has been set: accelerate your car in front of ICE at your own peril. 

Not only hit him, but he was treated for internal bleeding at the hospital immediately after.  He was genuinely injured, not just a scuff or the like. 

The officer who had his hand in the car was also injured slightly as his arm was twisted, so there's that as well ,but the  guy who shot her was absolutely right to fear for his life. 

 

  • Thanks 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
18 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Not only hit him, but he was treated for internal bleeding at the hospital immediately after.  He was genuinely injured, not just a scuff or the like. 

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/jan/15/cbs-news-ice-officer-injuries
Some CBS News employees expressed concern after the network cited two anonymous “US officials” on Wednesday to report that the ICE officer who fatally shot Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis “suffered internal bleeding to the torso” after the incident.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/bari-weiss-cbs-ice-agent-injuries-b2902022.html
Bari Weiss pushed story on ICE agent’s alleged injuries after shooting - despite CBS staffers’ concern, report says.

"anonymous"  "Bari Weiss" Just how gullible are you?

Posted
18 hours ago, Deluge said:

Every video shows Good either jawing at ICE or attempting to flee the scene. Either way she's guilty of sedition.

Exactly! Then he murdered her! Find a dictionary and look up sedition.

And tell Cdnfoxnews she was "attempting to flee the scene". Poor guy's blind and doesn't know left from right.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Yes. My mistake. She did cut her wheels to the right, away from him.

So far away from him that it hit him. 

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 2

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted (edited)

Here are the FACTS.]

She was obstructing ICE- Felony

She was told to get out of the car and refused and tried to flee- Resisting Arrest also a crime

She hit the cop period it doesn't which way her wheels were turned or if she meant to. The ICE agent literally had less than a second from the bumper hitting him to react. He doesn't have time to analyze if she meant to hit him and which way her wheels were turned. All he knows is her wheels spin out on the ice and he was in the process of being hit and he reacted as he should of, how anyone else would of reacted if they had a gun pointed at someone and they hit them with their car.

 

Edited by Fluffypants
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...