Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

America will need every single friend it can find on this planet to contain China.

No it does not. Japan can contain China on its own and has decided to become bedfellows with the Americans. China has no shortage of enemies, particularly its neighbors. So not only does geography work against China but the second and third most powerful naval power are already close allies with America. Give up the ghost. Europe is a liability for America like it or not.

This century was the first century that China could export its way to wealth (and many of the third world) . Built on American back security umbrella and global free trade of the seas (yeah you all seem to forget this fact)! The world needs America , not the other way around. You all would rather raid and pirate each other shipping if left to your own devices like the 19th century.

And to drive the American point, you NATO deadbeats have the least to contribute and everything to whine about America.

Edited by paxamericana
  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/18/2026 at 8:33 AM, paxamericana said:

The problem with this thought is that you assume America needs NATO more than NATO needs America.  While it would be disadvantageous to have less allies, this assumes there is even a common enemy that requires NATO. That’s just no longer the case. The Soviets were defeated, China is in demographic collapse and one of the most exposed country to international sanctions to even maintain a semblance of unity. America has no rival, only liability. That’s all of you NATO deadbeat, a liability. 

YOU are DELUSIONAL in your MERE BELIEFS.

  • Haha 1
Posted
23 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

 

Here’s Bessent parroting his master’s lines, fascism pure and simple. Another shameless thug. 

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that European leaders would come to “understand” that American ownership of Greenland would be “best for Greenland, best for Europe and best for the United States.”

Bessent suggested that Europe’s security ties with the U.S. would eventually work in Trump’s favor. “The European leaders will come around,” Bessent said. “They need to be under the U.S. security umbrella.”

Bessent is just kissing Trump's ass as usual, while pumping US debt to the MAX. 🤮

Probably he's even backing Trump's plan to raise defense spending 50%, and further sacrificing US healthcare.

Posted
23 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

What person here wants China to have Greenland? Hands up, please. I’m not seeing any hands, folks. 

Greenland is saying no Chinese ships there in a decade.

Posted
On 1/6/2026 at 11:30 AM, Deluge said:

robomarx thinks Greenland should have secure borders, but the US should not have secure borders. 

It's why robomarx should be deported with the illegal aliens. 

Thanks for once again demonstrating your OPPOSITION to the US Constitution, FASCIST.

Posted
On 1/6/2026 at 9:03 PM, Moonlight Graham said:

Do you agree with Trump that the US should annex Greenland against their wishes, even using military means?

Do you agree with Trump that the US should annex Greenland against their wishes, even using military means?

Do you agree with Trump that the US should annex Greenland against their wishes, even using military means?

Careful there, you're exposing the FACT that L@User has nothing but WHINING to post here. LMAO

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Careful there, you're exposing the FACT that L@User has nothing but WHINING to post here. LMAO

How would you know? You are a coward hiding from me that runs away when I respond to your lies and garbage spam you post. 

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for once again demonstrating your OPPOSITION to the US Constitution, FASCIST.

Easy, pervert. 

Point out in the constitution where it allows aliens to cross the borders illegally and then allow you traitors to keep those invaders here for as long as they want. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, ironstone said:

I wonder why there are only 60,000 residents on Greenland?

https://www.arctictoday.com/denmarks-history-of-forced-birth-control-in-greenland/

 

1966–1970 — Campaign launched.
Danish health authorities begin the coil campaign. About half of fertile women and girls — some as young as 13 — receive IUDs, often without consent. Roughly 4,500 insertions are recorded in these first five years. Births in Greenland drop about 50% in the early 1970s.
1973 — Parental involvement eased.
Rules change so doctors in Greenland no longer must involve parents when advising girls 15–18 on birth control, a shift critics say enabled forced insertions.

Search Assist
 

Yes, Denmark conducted a program of forced sterilization and contraception on Greenlandic women and girls, particularly between the 1960s and 1991, often without their consent. This campaign aimed to control population growth and has been described as systematic discrimination and a violation of human rights.

What is your point? A lot of nations have pasts with shameful policies.

US and Canada NOT excepted.

You don't even says WHY Denmark did that.

The program was aimed at Inuit women and girls.

Quote
Denmark implemented forced contraception in Greenland during the 1960s and 1970s, primarily through the "coil campaign" (spiralkampagnen) to place IUDs on Inuit women and girls without consent, aiming to lower the birth rate, control population, and reduce costs associated with a growing Greenlandic population within the Danish state, reflecting a paternalistic desire to "modernize" and integrate Greenland while undermining Inuit culture. 
Key Reasons for the Policy:
  • Population Control: Danish authorities sought to curb the high birth rates in Greenland to manage the growing population within the Danish welfare system, viewing it as a burden.
  • Modernization & Assimilation: The policy was part of a broader effort to modernize Greenland and assimilate the Inuit population into Danish society, often disregarding traditional Inuit family structures and reproductive autonomy.
  • Cost Reduction: By reducing births, Denmark aimed to lower the economic costs of supporting a larger Greenlandic population.
  • Paternalism: A belief among Danish officials that they knew what was best for Greenlanders, leading to decisions made without genuine consultation or consent from the affected population. 

 

Edited by robosmith
Posted

The whole concept is so illegal, immoral and absurd it can only be a concerted distraction from something godawful that will collapse the current administration.
How stupid do you have to be to think China is a threat to Greenland? Or Russia even. Oe to ignore the fact they've let the US military do pretty much whatever they want in Greenland?

Or beyond all sensibility; looking at the treatment of Indigenous people in the USA that they'll be better off. 

Time to study the Constitution to find out how to legally remover both the President and the VP and fire all the current staff because the US will be threatened b enemies if the people take to the streets like Iran.

  • Haha 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Deluge said:

robomarx is not a reasonable person; neither is anyone else who opposes ICE. 

Either you're either completely IGNORANT of the ICE ABUSES and/or EVERYTHING.

Jon Ross is not the ONLY one who MURDERED Good. So did  the ones who kept the doctor away from her and made the EMS WALK a block to the crash site.

Posted
1 hour ago, ironstone said:

Canadians are among the most sanctimonious people on the planet, especially leftist Canadians.

Rightists keep demonstrating here ^they are far MORE sanctimonious by pretending they know more about US Federal politics than US citizens who are paying attention. AKA NOT MAGA.

Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

1. Either you're either completely IGNORANT of the ICE ABUSES and/or EVERYTHING.

2. Jon Ross is not the ONLY one who MURDERED Good. So did  the ones who kept the doctor away from her and made the EMS WALK a block to the crash site.

1. ICE is enforcing US law. You shitheads are opposing US law. That is what's going  on here. 

2. Jon Ross shot a seditionist. ICE needs to do that more often, because you traitors still haven't gotten the message. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

a seditionist

Look at you throwing this word around as if it could be applied to Renee Good.

Why are you allowing the stupidest man in the world to do the thinking for you?

Posted
1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

No it does not. Japan can contain China on its own and has decided to become bedfellows with the Americans. China has no shortage of enemies, particularly its neighbors. So not only does geography work against China but the second and third most powerful naval power are already close allies with America. Give up the ghost. Europe is a liability for America like it or not.

This century was the first century that China could export its way to wealth (and many of the third world) . Built on American back security umbrella and global free trade of the seas (yeah you all seem to forget this fact)! The world needs America , not the other way around. You all would rather raid and pirate each other shipping if left to your own devices like the 19th century.

And to drive the American point, you NATO deadbeats have the least to contribute and everything to whine about America.

Look at ^this! The MAGA cheerleader squad has only 2-3 members.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Radiorum said:

Look at you throwing this word around as if it could be applied to Renee Good.

Why are you allowing the stupidest man in the world to do the thinking for you?

You're a dumbass if you think I'm letting Trump think for me. 

Pull you head out of your ass. 

Let's look at the definition together, and you explain how Good was NOT there to incite or resist, or cause or take part in an insurrection. 

sedition

: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority
 
 
Posted
5 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Then why is trump still free?

Because you freaks are wrong. You're wrong about pretty much everything. 

I'm sorry you had to hear that from me - I know how much you hate this country and its constitution...

Posted
9 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Because you freaks are wrong. You're wrong about pretty much everything. 

I'm sorry you had to hear that from me - I know how much you hate this country and its constitution...

 

You are as out of touch with reality as Trump is

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, paxamericana said:

No it does not. Japan can contain China on its own and has decided to become bedfellows with the Americans. China has no shortage of enemies, particularly its neighbors. So not only does geography work against China but the second and third most powerful naval power are already close allies with America. Give up the ghost. Europe is a liability for America like it or not.

This century was the first century that China could export its way to wealth (and many of the third world) . Built on American back security umbrella and global free trade of the seas (yeah you all seem to forget this fact)! The world needs America , not the other way around. You all would rather raid and pirate each other shipping if left to your own devices like the 19th century.

And to drive the American point, you NATO deadbeats have the least to contribute and everything to whine about America.

Thirty years ago, in my previous area of interest, one would see the occasional Chinese name, usually outside China. Now the research journals are filled with Mainland Chinese authors. There is a profound change afoot. Anybody can see that. One can recognize reality and try to deal with it or be washed away. 

‘How small we make our worlds. Gather them in, tighten them up into little castles of fear.’

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...