FURIOUS Canada STRIKES BACK at Trump OVER WAR CRIMES

[CdnFox]

Just now, Radiorum said:

You recall wrong

Well we'll see, it'll take you one second to clear that up and get an apology

 

Quote

I don't take orders from you

LOLOLOL!!!! You are SUCH A LIAR!!    Busted!!! TOTALLY pro abortion as i remembered! 

Here's a hint kiddo, don't say someone's wrong about your opinion unless you're prepared to admit that isn't your opinion    LOL what a complete twat!

Quote

You are so transparent

Yeah, truth and honesty tends to be that way  

You're right, nothing hidden with me.  I knew you were lying and you  were pro abortion and  you'd said so before, and all i had to do to prove it was to ask you to demonstrate i'm wrong by saying you weren't now.  Even offered to appologize 11

Now you look like a tard AND a liar   Well done !!!

[Radiorum]

Cdn Fox: a legend in his own mind

[CdnFox]

30 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Cdn Fox: a legend in his own mind

LOL kid do NOT be mad at me for your flubbery  

Look, I don't care if you do or you don't have a pro abortion stance Provided you have decent and honest reasons justifying your stance, but let's not try and make me out of some sort of indifferent monster just because I don't care all that much about every single murder that takes place on the planet, Especially when you're holding that view.

I wish to hell that the only people Who got murdered in the last couple of weeks or some greaseball drug dealer. So let's keep the hypocrisy to a minimum shall we?

Edited December 9, 2025 by CdnFox

[Radiorum]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

but let's not try and make me out of some sort of indifferent monster

I knew it! You think it's all about you!!

Look, I consider myself pro-life, but I do not want to have a discussion about abortion.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

I knew it! You think it's all about you!!

 

No, YOU think it's all about me.  That's why i said lets not pretend it's about me. 

Quote

Look, I consider myself pro-life, but I do not want to have a discussion about abortion.

Uh huh. 

Looks more like you don't want to have a conversation about your previous comments.  You're working pretty hard to avoid them  

Trump killing a couple of drug runners in venezuela just isn't that important to the vast majority of Canadians, it's pretty clear that canada is neither 'furious' nor 'striking back'. 

Now, if you want to make a case as to why we should be then go ahead, but "you're a monster if you don't" just makes you look very twattish.  

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

You recall wrong

I don't take orders from you

You are so transparent

CdnLIAR has always LIED transparently.

[User]

2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Look, I consider myself pro-life, but I do not want to have a discussion about abortion.

Yeah, I highly doubt you are using Pro-Life here to mean what it actually means... 

[CdnFox]

50 minutes ago, robosmith said:

CdnLIAR has always LIED transparently.

LOL aww muffin, still too scared to talk to me huh?   

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, ironstone said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/study-on-political-violence-omits-pro-abortion-attacks-blm-and-antifa/ar-AA1NdErY

Your cite says "Ryan Routh, who is being prosecuted for allegedly shooting at the president in Florida."

Routh never shot at Trump. He was discovered by SS because his gun was sticking out of the bushes BEFORE Trump was on the same hole. AKA out of sight/range.

Sorry but your cite borders on incomprehensible in addition to making blatant errors.

[Radiorum]

10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Trump killing a couple of drug runners in venezuela just isn't that important to the vast majority of Canadians,

But him conducting himself illegally is

 

10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

but "you're a monster if you don't" just makes you look very twattish.  

I never used the word "monster"  -  that is your misinterpretation

But I do think we need to care about the most powerful nation on the planet conducting themselves illegally

[ironstone]

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

Your cite says "Ryan Routh, who is being prosecuted for allegedly shooting at the president in Florida."

Routh never shot at Trump. He was discovered by SS because his gun was sticking out of the bushes BEFORE Trump was on the same hole. AKA out of sight/range.

Sorry but your cite borders on incomprehensible in addition to making blatant errors.

I would put a specific question to you, do you consider the BLM/Antifa riots as being left-wing violence?

[Deluge]

21 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Well, Trump is stupid, but what he is doing goes far beyond stupidity. It's corruption. He's always looking for the angle.

RINO mischief? really? Shifting the blame? Are you saying the auto-pen might have been used?

I'm saying some Republicans look and act more like democrats than they do Republicans, and they need to go. 

So what are you trying to say? Are you trying to get us to say that we should have voted for the democrat? lol

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, ironstone said:

I would put a specific question to you, do you consider the BLM/Antifa riots as being left-wing violence?

Perhaps more left than right, but I've not seen ANY polls of participants that make such identification definitive.

And I highly doubt you have either. Main stream right wingers always used to be STAUNCHLY anti-FASCIST.

I'm sure some STILL ARE, just like many believe Black LIves Matter.

WHO blew up in outrage when Chauvin was convicted?

[ironstone]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

WHO blew up in outrage when Chauvin was convicted?

On that question, I think some were clearly not happy with the verdict. I believe that although they may have been outraged by the verdict, they did not respond with riots. Just as many were outraged about the murder of Charlie Kirk, there were no riots. Quite a stark contrast to the usual response from the left.

[Nationalist]

11 hours ago, robosmith said:

Your cite says "Ryan Routh, who is being prosecuted for allegedly shooting at the president in Florida."

Routh never shot at Trump. He was discovered by SS because his gun was sticking out of the bushes BEFORE Trump was on the same hole. AKA out of sight/range.

Sorry but your cite borders on incomprehensible in addition to making blatant errors.

Well this is a typical robo-thought. Hilarious...

Are you people still musing about Canada being "jutht furiuth" with Trump? 

Ahem...I am Canadian and I am not "furiuth". In fact, I think Trump focusing on Venezuela is better than him focusing on Iran...or Ukraine. At least Venezuela is within, what people call their "sphere of influence". Besides, capitalizing all that oil would be good for Venezuela...and us.

[robosmith]

21 minutes ago, ironstone said:

On that question, I think some were clearly not happy with the verdict. I believe that although they may have been outraged by the verdict, they did not respond with riots. Just as many were outraged about the murder of Charlie Kirk, there were no riots. Quite a stark contrast to the usual response from the left.

They didn't have the NUMBERS because they weren't subjected to LONGSTANDING PERSECUTION like BLM.

You make no sense with a false equivalence because you're IGNORANT of US history.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Well this is a typical robo-thought. Hilarious...

Are you people still musing about Canada being "jutht furiuth" with Trump? 

Ahem...I am Canadian and I am not "furiuth". In fact, I think Trump focusing on Venezuela is better than him focusing on Iran...or Ukraine. At least Venezuela is within, what people call their "sphere of influence". Besides, capitalizing all that oil would be good for Venezuela...and us.

Thanks for proving you would back the ILLEGAL theft of Venezuelan oil for PERSONAL GAIN.

Which is all that EVER MATTERS TO YOU. 🤮

[Nationalist]

17 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for proving you would back the ILLEGAL theft of Venezuelan oil for PERSONAL GAIN.

Which is all that EVER MATTERS TO YOU. 🤮

Who said steal? Capitalism denotes purchasing. Financial exchange.

Where the Hell were you educated?

[User]

4 hours ago, Radiorum said:

But him conducting himself illegally is

This thread and many others is just you and other leftists asserting it’s illegal and never offering any substance to back it up. 

[Nationalist]

33 minutes ago, User said:

This thread and many others is just you and other leftists asserting it’s illegal and never offering any substance to back it up. 

This is true.

Unfortunately for the Libbies, the Trump admin made sure this was all legal before they started.

Thus the whole issue is reduced to, "I Hate Everything Trump Does!"

[robosmith]

53 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Who said steal? Capitalism denotes purchasing. Financial exchange.

Where the Hell were you educated?

A much better university than you, and I GOT MY MS DEGREE, dropout

Trump wants control over Venezuelan Oil

Quote

While Donald Trump hasn't explicitly said he wants to "steal" Venezuelan oil, his administration has aggressively pressured the Maduro regime through sanctions to control its oil resources, leading to accusations from Venezuela that the U.S. aims to seize its oil, and some analysts believe oil is a major factor in U.S. actions, especially after Maduro reportedly offered U.S. companies major concessions to ease sanctions. 

Key Points on the Situation:

• Sanctions & Pressure: The Trump administration has imposed significant sanctions on Venezuela's oil sector to pressure the Maduro government, cutting off revenue and limiting exports.
• Maduro's Concessions: In talks, Venezuelan officials reportedly offered U.S. companies major stakes in oil and mining, preferential contracts, and a pivot away from China, but the U.S. rejected these, according to The New York Times.
• Accusations of Seizure: Venezuelan officials, including President Maduro and his Foreign Minister, have claimed the U.S. goal is to seize their oil, a sentiment echoed by other regional leaders.
• Oil as Motivation: Analysts and officials suggest oil is a core motivation for U.S. pressure, with Colombia's President even stating it's "at the heart of the matter".
• Chevron's Role: The Trump administration previously allowed Chevron to resume limited oil operations in Venezuela, but later cut that permit, a move seen as a strong message. 

In essence, while the word "steal" is used by Venezuelan officials, the U.S. policy involves sanctions, pressure, and seeking control over oil revenues, with some analysts seeing oil access as a key driver of these actions, as detailed in recent news reports from outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and The Guardian.

 

[User]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

A much better university than you, and I GOT MY MS DEGREE, dropout

So… you admit you were wrong on steal. 

[Legato]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

A much better university than you, and I GOT MY MS DEGREE, dropout

Trump wants control over Venezuelan Oil

 

Reportedly? Accusations? Is this what a degree in possibilities gives you?

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, Radiorum said:

But him conducting himself illegally is

No it isn't. And it wasn't when Biden did it and it wasn't when Obama did it

Let's be clear, doing things illegally doesn't upset you in the slightest. What's your mad about is it's trump and you don't like trump.

 

But I do think we need to care about the most powerful nation on the planet conducting themselves illegally

Quote

I never used the word "monster"  -  that is your misinterpretation

Liar  It's your clear meaning.

Quote

But I do think we need to care about the most powerful nation on the planet conducting themselves illegally

No you don't.  You just care because it's trump. If it was obama or biden you were fine with it. 

[John Stone]

On 12/7/2025 at 11:47 PM, Fluffypants said:

Oh noes not Canada, well if they get froggie we may get our next state..

Infuriated Nations demand that bold and underlined memos be used to convey said infuriation. 

.......... ditto for quoting said memo.