FBI probes congressional Democrats who warned military about illegal orders

[Deluge]

They damn well better probe. Those sluts will say and do anything to derail this country.

Remember, these are the same a$$holes who fight to dissolve our borders. 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fbi-scheduling-interviews-with-democratic-lawmakers-who-warned-military-about-2025-11-25/

[John Stone]

59 minutes ago, Deluge said:

They damn well better probe. Those sluts will say and do anything to derail this country.

Remember, these are the same a$$holes who fight to dissolve our borders. 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fbi-scheduling-interviews-with-democratic-lawmakers-who-warned-military-about-2025-11-25/

RE: They damn well better probe. Those sluts will say and do anything to derail this country.

What goes around-comes around?

Does Pandora's box mean anything - it's not sexual.

[Legato]

1 minute ago, John Stone said:

RE: They damn well better probe. Those sluts will say and do anything to derail this country.

What goes around-comes around?

Does Pandora's box mean anything - it's not sexual.

opened approx' November 15, 2022

[Deluge]

31 minutes ago, John Stone said:

RE: They damn well better probe. Those sluts will say and do anything to derail this country.

What goes around-comes around?

Does Pandora's box mean anything - it's not sexual.

So, keep the borders open? 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, John Stone said:

RE: They damn well better probe. Those sluts will say and do anything to derail this country.

What goes around-comes around?

Does Pandora's box mean anything - it's not sexual.

As @Legato suggests...the box is open already. The question now is, how much are we going to fck it...up...

Its a tough question. 

Should we forgive and forget? Hope the show of "better angels" convince the Libbies to come back to reality?

Or should we teach the Libbies a harsh lesson? Spare the rod, spoil the child?

I dont know, except I just dont trust these Libbies to actually grow up.

"I HATE NASHVILLE!" Now vote for me to represent Nashville!"

Nope...not inspiring much trust.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

As @Legato suggests...the box is open already. The question now is, how much are we going to fck it...up...

Its a tough question. 

Should we forgive and forget? Hope the show of "better angels" convince the Libbies to come back to reality?

Or should we teach the Libbies a harsh lesson? Spare the rod, spoil the child?

I dont know, except I just dont trust these Libbies to actually grow up.

"I HATE NASHVILLE!" Now vote for me to represent Nashville!"

Nope...not inspiring much trust.

Democrats were never NEAR your "reality." The FACT is, the six Democrats in the video were ONLY STATING THE LAW despite what Trump wants you to believe. But you're a FOOL so you believe HIM. 🤮

[Nationalist]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Democrats were never NEAR your "reality." The FACT is, the six Democrats in the video were ONLY STATING THE LAW despite what Trump wants you to believe. But you're a FOOL so you believe HIM. 🤮

Ya...Just reminding everyone of what we all know. With no intent but to remind everyone of the law. Perfectly innocent. 

LaLaLand...

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Democrats were never NEAR your "reality." The FACT is, the six Democrats in the video were ONLY STATING THE LAW despite what Trump wants you to believe. But you're a FOOL so you believe HIM. 🤮

You know damn good and well that they were trying to incite rebellion in the form of disobeyed orders. When pressed, not one single member of this coalition can come up withan unlawful orders that should have been disobeyed. Quite the contrary. They refused to name a single order that should be disobeyed. They know what they did was wrong. 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Democrats were never NEAR your "reality." The FACT is, the six Democrats in the video were ONLY STATING THE LAW despite what Trump wants you to believe. But you're a FOOL so you believe HIM. 🤮

What "LAW", comrade? The anti-Trump "laws" that democrats pull out of their asses? 

If they think Trump is breaking laws then they need to impeach him, not advise soldiers to subvert their commander in chief. 

[User]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Democrats were never NEAR your "reality." The FACT is, the six Democrats in the video were ONLY STATING THE LAW despite what Trump wants you to believe. But you're a FOOL so you believe HIM. 🤮

No, they were not only stating the law. They were implying there were unlawful orders either happening now or about to happen without ever explaining what they were, encouraging mutiny and chaos in the military ranks. 

[Down East]

Regardless of your politics, and whether you hate Trump or love him............. what these Kelly and his cohorts did was sickening.

They were hoping to create turmoil within the ranks of the military by suggesting that Trump's orders were unconstitutional.

[Down East]

6 hours ago, User said:

No, they were not only stating the law. They were implying there were unlawful orders either happening now or about to happen without ever explaining what they were, encouraging mutiny and chaos in the military ranks. 

Exactly.

 

11 hours ago, robosmith said:

Democrats were never NEAR your "reality." The FACT is, the six Democrats in the video were ONLY STATING THE LAW despite what Trump wants you to believe. But you're a FOOL so you believe HIM. 🤮

I understand that you're a loyal team player to your party,  but there comes a point where your blind fanaticism becomes obnoxious.

[TreeBeard]

17 hours ago, User said:

They were implying

Is implying Trump’s orders were unlawful somehow illegal?  

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, Down East said:

Regardless of your politics, and whether you hate Trump or love him............. what these Kelly and his cohorts did was sickening.

They were hoping to create turmoil within the ranks of the military by suggesting that Trump's orders were unconstitutional.

What they said is from the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Unfortunate that you're so ignorant of that you find it "sickening."

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, Down East said:

Exactly.

 

I understand that you're a loyal team player to your party,  but there comes a point where your blind fanaticism becomes obnoxious.

It is also unfortunate that you believe the Military Codes of Justice are "obnoxious," when you should believe that about Trump believing HE IS ABOVE THOSE.

[User]

1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

Is implying Trump’s orders were unlawful somehow illegal?  

Its disgusting and wrong.

22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What they said is from the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Unfortunate that you're so ignorant of that you find it "sickening."

Context. They were not merely quoting the UCMJ. 

19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It is also unfortunate that you believe the Military Codes of Justice are "obnoxious," when you should believe that about Trump believing HE IS ABOVE THOSE.

What unlawful orders were they talking about?

[TreeBeard]

13 minutes ago, User said:

It’s disgusting and wrong.

 Not illegal.  
 

But you’re in favour of having the FBI probe into something that would clearly be protected by the 1st Amendment.  And you don’t seem to think it’s ”disgusting and wrong” of the president to call for executions of people saying things protected by the 1st Amendment.  

Is that a bit hypocritical?  “It’s disgusting and wrong” to imply the president’s orders are unlawful.  It’s perfectly fine for the president to say these people should be hanged for free speech.  

[User]

3 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

 Not illegal.  
 

But you’re in favour of having the FBI probe into something that would clearly be protected by the 1st Amendment.  And you don’t seem to think it’s ”disgusting and wrong” of the president to call for executions of people saying things protected by the 1st Amendment.  

Is that a bit hypocritical?  “It’s disgusting and wrong” to imply the president’s orders are unlawful.  It’s perfectly fine for the president to say these people should be hanged for free speech.  

Inciting military rebellion/mutiny doesn't seem legal to me... that is what investigations are for. 

[Moonlight Graham]

Democrats say "follow the law", and that's seditious?  LOL.  Meanwhile the Trump admin is taking hot dumps on the constitution.

There's certainly legit danger of a military-supported coup in the US in coming elections, considering Trumpster doesn't concede elections and how most service members lean politically.  Good job to all the knuckle-dragging Republicans and supporters who voted for this fool again.

[User]

27 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Democrats say "follow the law", and that's seditious?  LOL.  Meanwhile the Trump admin is taking hot dumps on the constitution.

There's certainly legit danger of a military-supported coup in the US in coming elections, considering Trumpster doesn't concede elections and how most service members lean politically.  Good job to all the knuckle-dragging Republicans and supporters who voted for this fool again.

In context, they did not merely say follow the law. The implication was clearly that Trump was giving them unlawful orders or soon would be, and they offered no examples. 

There is no danger of a military coup. None. Zero. This is stupid, dumb fear-mongering. 

Trump conceded the last election. Notice how we had 4 years of Biden?

I would vote for Trump any day rather than have Harris running things. 

 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Democrats say "follow the law", and that's seditious?  LOL.  Meanwhile the Trump admin is taking hot dumps on the constitution.

There's certainly legit danger of a military-supported coup in the US in coming elections, considering Trumpster doesn't concede elections and how most service members lean politically.  Good job to all the knuckle-dragging Republicans and supporters who voted for this fool again.

Trump has to define down sedition to minimize HIS GUILT. 

If everyone is "seditious," no one is.

[TreeBeard]

3 hours ago, User said:

Inciting military rebellion/mutiny doesn't seem legal to me... that is what investigations are for. 

Are they not allowed to say they think Trump might give unlawful orders?  Or that he gave unlawful orders?   That’s forbidden in America to say that?

[robosmith]

12 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Are they not allowed to say they think Trump might give unlawful orders?  Or that he gave unlawful orders?   That’s forbidden in America to say that?

It is 1st Amendment protected speech, which is only illegal incitement if FALSE AND actually incites disobeying lawful orders.

[Down East]

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

It is also unfortunate that you believe the Military Codes of Justice are "obnoxious," when you should believe that about Trump believing HE IS ABOVE THOSE.

I'm retired military.  Almost my entire neighborhood is active duty military, retired military and ex military and we are a close knit community. I associate with my active duty military friends every single day on my street, on base, at the club, at the golf course, the exchange......etc. etc. etc.

Most all of them are laughing at Kelly and his cohorts, and they think the video was disgusting. There hasn't been a single order that has came down through their chain of command that is anything close to illegal.

And, every single member of the military is trained on, and has a full understanding of what a illegal order is long before they leave boot camp.

Meanwhile, you think you really know something.

 

Edited November 27, 2025 by Down East

[Down East]

4 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Democrats say "follow the law", and that's seditious?  LOL.  Meanwhile the Trump admin is taking hot dumps on the constitution.

There's certainly legit danger of a military-supported coup in the US in coming elections, considering Trumpster doesn't concede elections and how most service members lean politically.  Good job to all the knuckle-dragging Republicans and supporters who voted for this fool again.

OMG.   There is certainly a legit danger of a military coup?  This statement is about as comical as Kelly's video.

Trump is dumping on the Constitution?   Really?   

Can you be specific, or are you just throwing this nonsense out there for some confirmation bias from your leftist echo chamber?