Poilievre OBLITERATED the LPOC's Super-Sycophant at CBC, Rosemary Barton

[WestCanMan]

This made his famous apple-eating interview look boring.

Poor little Rosemary Barton had her pom-poms going and her cheerleading skirt riding high 🤢 for Carney, and she thought that she was gonna put Poilievre in his place, but she got steamrolled.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1aKGQUa6qc/?mibextid=wwXIfr

PP [paraphrasing]: "Everywhere Carney goes on his grand trips we are getting tariffs added on" 

Barton [paraphrasing]: "Carney met with Xi and now officials from the gov'ts are gonna meet to try to solve the trade irritants. He is trying to make some progress."

PP: "More meetings"

Barton: "No, you don't see those things as a bit of progress?"

PP: "What progress? Can you name one tariff line that he has reduced abroad?"

Barton, BOTTOM LIP FALLING TO THE FLOOR, WHIMPERING: "Not at this stage, no." 

• She said that like it was a confession.
• Why is she confessing for Carney's failures? She works for the CBC, she's not the f'ing Minister of Foreign Affairs. 

PP: "He's had 7 months. He's been on 20 trips."

Barton: What would you like to see him do then?"

PP: "Keep his promise."  (🤣 In your face, b10tch)

Barton: "Yeah but how? It's easy to say that, it's the how that's difficult." (I guess she forgot that Carney was the one who made the f'ing promise)

PP... (goes on at length about how he would unlock our energy sector and make progress at getting our oil and LNG to overseas shipping terminals)

Barton, voice literally quivering: "But the gov't is doing some of that. There is an LNG plant that is happening..."

PP: "🤣🤣😂That was approved by Stephen Harper😂😭🤣."

Barton laughs along nervously: "Yeah but Carney got an expansion"

*****

Me: So if you're keeping score at home, the LPOC got hundreds of billions of dollars in energy projects cancelled, permanently, but there is this ONE project that they have expanded and it forms the entirety of the LPOC/Carney achievement list - for the last TEN F'ING YEARS!!!!!!!!. Honestly, Harper stopped being the PM TEN YEARS AGO. But this one plant got expanded 🤣. Ooooh, I can feel the Canadian economy stronger as I speak....🤣

 

There's honestly no f'ing way to watch that interview and not understand that it's a case of Pierre Poilievre versus Rosemary "the defender the LPOC" Barton. She's not playing devil's advocate here, because she doesn't grill Carney or Trudeau like that. She's sitting there grilling the leader of the opposition over Canada's death spiral, and then when she got hoisted on her own petard, the CBC started saying "EVERYONE DISLIKES POILIEVRE!!!! WAAAAAAH!!!!!"

The CBC can go to f'ing hell, along with their little dog and pony show anchor, Rosemary Barton. 

Conservatives like Poilievre more than ever, but it is a bit alarming to see how many traitors we have in the party now. I really wonder how much money is getting thrown at these guys. 

Edited November 7, 2025 by WestCanMan

[Queenmandy85]

The title is ironic. It is Mr. Poilievre who is going to be obliterated. He is following in the tracks of John Diefenbaker and Justin Trudeau. Although I was a Diefenbaker loyalist up to the end, both leaders refused to recognize when it is time to go.

We cannot win an election with Mr. Poilievre. While we will always need the support of the reform / social credit rump in the Party, it is time for Conservatives to take bake the control of the Conservative Party, the Party of MacDonald.

 

Edited November 7, 2025 by Queenmandy85

[Goddess]

14 minutes ago, Queenmandy85 said:

We cannot win an election with Mr. Poilievre.

We cannot win an election with or without him.

I don't think the Conservatives will win another election in Canada - ever.

Liberals are importing 2 million Liberal voters a year and Canadians love it.

Liberal supporters do not want ANY KIND of opposition party.  They will only allow another party to exist if it shuts up, never holds the Liberal party accountable for anything and green lights everything the Liberal party does.  They only want another party to blame for anything that goes wrong.

Canada is finished as a democracy.

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Queenmandy85 said:

The title is ironic. It is Mr. Poilievre who is going to be obliterated. He is following in the tracks of John Diefenbaker and Justin Trudeau. Although I was a Diefenbaker loyalist up to the end, both leaders refused to recognize when it is time to go.

We cannot win an election with Mr. Poilievre. While we will always need the support of the reform / social credit rump in the Party, it is time for Conservatives to take bake the control of the Conservative Party, the Party of MacDonald.

 

Why are you frightened of Poilievre?

[Queenmandy85]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Why are you frightened of Poilievre?

I'm not freighted of Mr. Poilievre. I am freightened for him. His all consuming passion has been to become Prime Minister. He had it almost within his grasp and now he sees it slipping away. 

I admit I don't think he would have made a very good PM. He seems to be unable to listen to advice. Jean Charest would have been far better.

 

Edited November 8, 2025 by Queenmandy85

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Queenmandy85 said:

I'm not freighted of Mr. Poilievre. I am freightened for him. His all consuming passion has been to become Prime Minister. He had it almost within his grasp and now he sees it slipping away. 

I admit I don't think he would have made a very good PM. He seems to be unable to listen to advice. Jean Charest would have been far better.

 

Jean Charest is still a LIberal.

You need to stop listening to our bought and paid for  anti-Poilievre media. What advice would you give him?

 

[Queenmandy85]

41 minutes ago, Legato said:

Jean Charest is still a LIberal.

And Pierre Poilievre is a Socred like Manning. Carney is more of a conservative than Pierre. He has a closer relationship with the boss.

I have yet to hear Poilievre speak of the primary Conservative values except for a speech in the fall of 2022, if memory serves.

Edited November 8, 2025 by Queenmandy85

[blackbird]

15 minutes ago, Queenmandy85 said:

I have yet to hear Poilievre speak of the primary Conservative values except for a speech in the fall of 2022, if memory serves.

You don't seem to understand Poilievre cannot cover any significant amount of Conservative values simply because the Policy Declaration has 189 items to it.  He would be talking for days if he had to describe all the policies of the party.  It would make more sense for you to read their document online if you want to know what they believe.  Of course it has grown over the years and it would much different and much broader than former conservative party policies.  When Poilievre is speaking, he is only speaking about a tiny fraction of the party policies, usually things that concern the public such as the massive debt, the failing of the Liberal party to deal with the major problems such as housing, crime, etc.   I'm not sure what your problem is.  You seem to think conservatives should go back 60 years.  

03e5bd1329256f1.pdf

 

 

[CdnFox]

On 11/6/2025 at 4:07 PM, WestCanMan said:

This made his famous apple-eating interview look boring.

Poor little Rosemary Barton had her pom-poms going and her cheerleading skirt riding high 🤢 for Carney, and she thought that she was gonna put Poilievre in his place, but she got steamrolled.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1aKGQUa6qc/?mibextid=wwXIfr

PP [paraphrasing]: "Everywhere Carney goes on his grand trips we are getting tariffs added on" 

Barton [paraphrasing]: "Carney met with Xi and now officials from the gov'ts are gonna meet to try to solve the trade irritants. He is trying to make some progress."

PP: "More meetings"

Barton: "No, you don't see those things as a bit of progress?"

PP: "What progress? Can you name one tariff line that he has reduced abroad?"

Barton, BOTTOM LIP FALLING TO THE FLOOR, WHIMPERING: "Not at this stage, no." 

• She said that like it was a confession.
• Why is she confessing for Carney's failures? She works for the CBC, she's not the f'ing Minister of Foreign Affairs. 

PP: "He's had 7 months. He's been on 20 trips."

Barton: What would you like to see him do then?"

PP: "Keep his promise."  (🤣 In your face, b10tch)

Barton: "Yeah but how? It's easy to say that, it's the how that's difficult." (I guess she forgot that Carney was the one who made the f'ing promise)

PP... (goes on at length about how he would unlock our energy sector and make progress at getting our oil and LNG to overseas shipping terminals)

Barton, voice literally quivering: "But the gov't is doing some of that. There is an LNG plant that is happening..."

PP: "🤣🤣😂That was approved by Stephen Harper😂😭🤣."

Barton laughs along nervously: "Yeah but Carney got an expansion"

*****

Me: So if you're keeping score at home, the LPOC got hundreds of billions of dollars in energy projects cancelled, permanently, but there is this ONE project that they have expanded and it forms the entirety of the LPOC/Carney achievement list - for the last TEN F'ING YEARS!!!!!!!!. Honestly, Harper stopped being the PM TEN YEARS AGO. But this one plant got expanded 🤣. Ooooh, I can feel the Canadian economy stronger as I speak....🤣

 

There's honestly no f'ing way to watch that interview and not understand that it's a case of Pierre Poilievre versus Rosemary "the defender the LPOC" Barton. She's not playing devil's advocate here, because she doesn't grill Carney or Trudeau like that. She's sitting there grilling the leader of the opposition over Canada's death spiral, and then when she got hoisted on her own petard, the CBC started saying "EVERYONE DISLIKES POILIEVRE!!!! WAAAAAAH!!!!!"

The CBC can go to f'ing hell, along with their little dog and pony show anchor, Rosemary Barton. 

Conservatives like Poilievre more than ever, but it is a bit alarming to see how many traitors we have in the party now. I really wonder how much money is getting thrown at these guys. 

It was a good interview. And he really needed that.

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

And Pierre Poilievre is a Socred like Manning. Carney is more of a conservative than Pierre. He has a closer relationship with the boss.

I have yet to hear Poilievre speak of the primary Conservative values except for a speech in the fall of 2022, if memory serves.

That's just dumb.

Poilievre is a solid  conservative, With conservative ideas and a conservative background. Carney is a leftist freak who will say whatever he needs to to make money. They are not the same thing and carney is no conservative

Pierre talks about conservative values at every single one of his talking events. Every single one. So if you haven't heard him talk about them then you haven't heard any of his speeches so maybe don't comment on them.

His whole thing is that families should be able to work hard, study hard, and then have a good life for themselves for the decent home and a safe neighborhood and raise their kids.

He's talked about the need to be strong on crime instead of catch and release which is definitely a conservative value and not a liberal one.

Smaller gov't, less taxes, spending focused on core duties and less red tape. ALl conservative values. 

etc etc.  

It's pretty hard to sell the idea he doesn't talk about conservative values all the time

 

[Barquentine]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Carney is a leftist freak who will say whatever he needs to to make money.

As usual, your extreme partisanship makes you stoopid.

[Barquentine]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

His whole thing is that families should be able to work hard, study hard, and then have a good life for themselves for the decent home and a safe neighborhood and raise their kids.

So? That's what every party and every citizen believes. He might as well say "Everyone should be able to breath air!". He's still just spouting slogans and homilies and people stiil don't like him and he'll never be PM.

[CdnFox]

24 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

As usual, your extreme partisanship makes you stoopid.

As usual when you know i'm right and you can't rebut it but you're really angry about it you break out the grade 4 level insults and run away   LOL

I appreciate you conceding like that  

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

So?

So what. You said he didn't comment on conservative values.  That's a conservative value. 

Quote

That's what every party and every citizen believes.

Not the liberals, and only sometimes the ndp. They've go this weird jeckle and hyde thing going on where sometimes they're all about working families and sometimes they're all about tampons in boys bathrooms, depending on the leader.

But nope, 10 years of history shows the libs have no interest at all in that idea. 

Quote

He might as well say "Everyone should be able to breath air!". He's still just spouting slogans and homilies and people stiil don't like him and he'll never be PM.

History proves you wrong. The state of young people now is that they can't have that simple dream I mentioned as being a conservative value. And that is 100% completely due to the policies actions and priorities of the liberal government over the last 10 years. It is not liberal policy to worry about that kind of thing.

[Queenmandy85]

14 hours ago, blackbird said:

You don't seem to understand Poilievre cannot cover any significant amount of Conservative values simply because the Policy Declaration has 189 items to it.  He would be talking for days if he had to describe all the policies of the party.  It would make more sense for you to read their document online if you want to know what they believe.  Of course it has grown over the years and it would much different and much broader than former conservative party policies.  When Poilievre is speaking, he is only speaking about a tiny fraction of the party policies, usually things that concern the public such as the massive debt, the failing of the Liberal party to deal with the major problems such as housing, crime, etc.   I'm not sure what your problem is.  You seem to think conservatives should go back 60 years.  

03e5bd1329256f1.pdf

 

 

I started reading the document and it could be something published by the Liberals. 

"12. Senate Reform

The Conservative Party supports the election of senators."

This is creeping republicanism. It was pushed by Preston Manning, who was quoted in Jeffrey Simpson's book Fault Lines as saying his hero was the American republican, Lincoln. Manning was Social Credit. He changed the name of the Socreds to "reform" and then it morphed into the CPC. It is not the Party of Sir John A. MacDonald.

Republicanism is the antithesis of the Conservative movement.

To paraphrase the late, great Senator Hugh Segal, I remain a poor conservative warrior in the Great Tory Crusade.

Edited November 8, 2025 by Queenmandy85

[WestCanMan]

22 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

The title is ironic. It is Mr. Poilievre who is going to be obliterated. He is following in the tracks of John Diefenbaker and Justin Trudeau. Although I was a Diefenbaker loyalist up to the end, both leaders refused to recognize when it is time to go.

1. The title is 100% correct, thank you very much, and your post is merely an opinion. 
2. Stop saying "It's time for him to go" just because the CBC said "It's time for him to go"
3. The time for Trudeau to go was 2019, but CBC said the exact opposite, and he didn't go, and Canada continued to get screwed

Quote

We cannot win an election with Mr. Poilievre. 

Canada lost the 2015 election, but we could have won it if the CBC didn't tell Canadians to vote for la turd.  

Canada lost the 2019 election, but we could have won it if the CBC didn't tell Canadians to vote for la turd. 

Canada lost the 2021 election, but we could have won it if the CBC didn't tell Canadians to vote for la turd. 

Canada lost the 2025 election, but we could have won it if the CBC didn't tell Canadians to vote for Carney. 

Canada keeps listening to the CBC, just like you do, and Canada keeps on losing.

[WestCanMan]

20 hours ago, Legato said:

Why are you frightened of Poilievre?

Because he keeps steamrolling CBC reporters when they're trying to land gotcha questions. 

The CBC wants the conservatives to have a leader like Carney, who drops like a fainting goat whenever Trump looks at him. 

[blackbird]

2 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

I started reading the document and it could be something published by the Liberals. 

"12. Senate Reform

The Conservative Party supports the election of senators."

This is creeping republicanism. It was pushed by Preston Manning, who was quoted in Jeffrey Simpson's book Fault Lines as saying his hero was the American republican, Lincoln. Manning was Social Credit. He changed the name of the Socreds to "reform" and then it morphed into the CPC. It is not the Party of Sir John A. MacDonald.

Republicanism is the antithesis of the Conservative movement.

To paraphrase the late, great Senator Hugh Segal, I remain a poor conservative warrior in the Great Tory Crusade.

I don't believe today's CPC is supporting becoming Republican in any way.  An elected senate, yes.  most conservatives would agree with that.

It is not "creeping republicanism".  Nobody believes that.

 

Edited November 8, 2025 by blackbird

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

As usual, your extreme partisanship makes you stoopid.

Did Mark Carney play a role in moving Brookfield to NY? 

There ya go. So Carney actually does exactly what Cdn accused him of, and you're the one with the partisanship issue. 

[Legato]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. The title is 100% correct, thank you very much, and your post is merely an opinion. 
2. Stop saying "It's time for him to go" just because the CBC said "It's time for him to go"
3. The time for Trudeau to go was 2019, but CBC said the exact opposite, and he didn't go, and Canada continued to get screwed

Canada lost the 2015 election, but we could have won it if the CBC didn't tell Canadians to vote for la turd.  

Canada lost the 2019 election, but we could have won it if the CBC didn't tell Canadians to vote for la turd. 

Canada lost the 2021 election, but we could have won it if the CBC didn't tell Canadians to vote for la turd. 

Canada lost the 2025 election, but we could have won it if the CBC didn't tell Canadians to vote for Carney. 

Canada keeps listening to the CBC, just like you do, and Canada keeps on losing.

 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

So? That's what every party and every citizen believes. He might as well say "Everyone should be able to breath air!". He's still just spouting slogans and homilies and people stiil don't like him and he'll never be PM.

Are you high, lying, or a stupid little cultist who actually believes what you just said?

FYI leftists all over NA acted like the BLM riots were peaceful while people and police officers were being assaulted and killed, and billions of dollars worth of buildings were being destroyed. Then all those leftists proposed that the solution was that we DEFUND POLICE. 

Trudeau even said that "BLM is an excellent example of a protest that I support."

You guys also cry every time ICE deports a murderer, or every time Trump kills a boat full of drug dealers and narcotics.

So, yes, the concern for public safety is the exclusive domain of conservative leaders right now, and that's re-confirmed on a daily basis. 

[Legato]

15 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

And Pierre Poilievre is a Socred like Manning. Carney is more of a conservative than Pierre. He has a closer relationship with the boss.

I have yet to hear Poilievre speak of the primary Conservative values except for a speech in the fall of 2022, if memory serves.

A Socred he is not.

You're memory is then suspect or you have never listened to any of his speeches. Either way that statement has zero credibility.

[WestCanMan]

Honest to God, it's alarming just how quickly Canadians take up the "It's time for Poilievre to go" chant just because the CBC said it. 

If the CBC said "Stick your finger up your butthole and then taste it", 49% of Canadians would end up with Barton-breath (that's what you get when you kiss someone's ass 24/7 for ten years straight).

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Honest to God, it's alarming just how quickly Canadians take up the "It's time for Poilievre to go" chant just because the CBC said it. 

If the CBC said "Stick your finger up your butthole and then taste it", 49% of Canadians would end up with Barton-breath (that's what you get when you kiss someone's ass 24/7 for ten years straight).

The liberals have become masters of controlling the message especially when it comes to older people

You'll notice that pulls before the election after the election and even the election results itself show that younger people, who are more likely to be exposed to conservative information on the internet, turn their back on the liberals.

The people that still vote liberal are the older people because they listen to CBC every night

[Queenmandy85]

In 1952, I asked my Dad what a communist is. He said it is someone who talks too much. It is time I heeded his advice. 

Go Riders.