robosmith Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 (edited) Trumps latest Executive Order NSPM-7 makes "Anti-American Views" a Crime; Joe McCarthy redux. 🤮 The next major step to FASCISM. https://www.instagram.com/reels/DQC-pn7kqF0/ Edited October 21, 2025 by robosmith Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 6 hours ago, robosmith said: Trumps latest Executive Order NSPM-7 makes "Anti-American Views" a Crime; Joe McCarthy redux. 🤮 The next major step to FASCISM. https://www.instagram.com/reels/DQC-pn7kqF0/ The actual order, absent lwnj histerics: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/countering-domestic-terrorism-and-organized-political-violence/ NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM/NSPM-7 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY SUBJECT: Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct the following: Section 1. Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence. Heinous assassinations and other acts of political violence in the United States have dramatically increased in recent years. Even in the aftermath of the horrifying assassination of Charlie Kirk, some individuals who adhered to the alleged shooter’s ideology embraced and cheered this evil murder while actively encouraging more political violence. This was preceded by the 2024 assassination of a senior healthcare executive and the 2022 assassination attempt against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Two separate assassination attempts against my own life in less than 3 months took place during the 2024 Presidential election cycle. Riots in Los Angeles and Portland reflect a more than 1,000 percent increase in attacks on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers since January 21, 2025, compared to the same period last year. Just yesterday, a shooting targeting an ICE facility in Dallas resulted in multiple casualties. Separate anti-police and “criminal justice” riots have left many people dead and injured and inflicted over $2 billion in property damage nationwide. This political violence is not a series of isolated incidents and does not emerge organically. Instead, it is a culmination of sophisticated, organized campaigns of targeted intimidation, radicalization, threats, and violence designed to silence opposing speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy outcomes, and prevent the functioning of a democratic society. A new law enforcement strategy that investigates all participants in these criminal and terroristic conspiracies — including the organized structures, networks, entities, organizations, funding sources, and predicate actions behind them — is required. These campaigns often begin by isolating and dehumanizing specific targets to justify murder or other violent action against them. They do so through a variety of fora, including anonymous chat forums, in-person meetings, social media, and even educational institutions. These campaigns then escalate to organized doxing, where the private or identifying information of their targets (such as home addresses, phone numbers, or other personal information) is exposed to the public with the explicit intent of encouraging others to harass, intimidate, or violently assault them. As in the case of several ICE agents in Los Angeles being doxed, the goal of these campaigns can be to obstruct the operations of the Federal Government as well as aid and abet criminal activity the Federal Government is lawfully pursuing. These campaigns are coordinated and perpetrated by actors who have developed a comprehensive strategy to achieve specific policy goals through radicalization and violent intimidation. There are common recurrent motivations and indicia uniting this pattern of violent and terroristic activities under the umbrella of self-described “anti-fascism.” These movements portray foundational American principles (e.g., support for law enforcement and border control) as “fascist” to justify and encourage acts of violent revolution. This “anti-fascist” lie has become the organizing rallying cry used by domestic terrorists to wage a violent assault against democratic institutions, constitutional rights, and fundamental American liberties. Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality. As described in the Order of September 22, 2025 (Designating Antifa as a Domestic Terrorist Organization), the groups and entities that perpetuate this extremism have created a movement that embraces and elevates violence to achieve policy outcomes, including justifying additional assassinations. For example, Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin engraved the bullets used in the murder with so-called “anti-fascist” rhetoric. The United States requires a national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts. Through this comprehensive strategy, law enforcement will disband and uproot networks, entities, and organizations that promote organized violence, violent intimidation, conspiracies against rights, and other efforts to disrupt the functioning of a democratic society. Sec. 2. Investigating Domestic Terrorist Organizations. (a) The National Joint Terrorism Task Force and its local offices (collectively, “JTTFs”) shall coordinate and supervise a comprehensive national strategy to investigate, prosecute, and disrupt entities and individuals engaged in acts of political violence and intimidation designed to suppress lawful political activity or obstruct the rule of law. This strategy shall include the investigatory and prosecutorial measures set forth in this section. (b) The JTTFs shall investigate potential Federal crimes relating to acts of recruiting or radicalizing persons for the purpose of: (i) political violence, terrorism, or conspiracy against rights; or (ii) the violent deprivation of any citizen’s rights. (c) The JTTFs shall also investigate: (i) institutional and individual funders, and officers and employees of organizations, that are responsible for, sponsor, or otherwise aid and abet the principal actors engaging in the criminal conduct described in subsections (a) and (b) of this section; and (ii) non-governmental organizations and American citizens residing abroad or with close ties to foreign governments, agents, citizens, foundations, or influence networks engaged in violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (22 U.S.C. 611 et seq.) or money laundering by funding, creating, or supporting entities that engage in activities that support or encourage domestic terrorism. (d) The JTTFs shall consult and coordinate with executive departments and agencies (agencies) as needed to determine whether such agencies can apply existing authorities or exercise their own authorities, as appropriate, to support the JTTFs’ investigations and relevant prosecutions of political violence. (e) The JTTFs may, to the extent permitted by law, request operational assistance from and coordinate with law enforcement partners when investigating domestic terrorism. (f) The National Joint Terrorism Task Force shall provide regular progress updates to the President through the Assistant to the President and Homeland Security Advisor. (g) The Attorney General shall direct the Department of Justice to prosecute all Federal crimes, to the maximum extent permissible by law, related to the investigations described in subsections (a) through (c) of this section. (h) The Attorney General shall issue specific guidance that ensures domestic terrorism priorities include politically motivated terrorist acts such as organized doxing campaigns, swatting, rioting, looting, trespass, assault, destruction of property, threats of violence, and civil disorder. This guidance shall also include an identification of any behaviors, fact patterns, recurrent motivations, or other indicia common to organizations and entities that coordinate these acts in order to direct efforts to identify and prevent potential violent activity. (i) The Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary), in coordination with the Attorney General, shall make available all resources, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to identify and disrupt financial networks that fund domestic terrorism and political violence. The Secretary, acting through the Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Office of the Department of the Treasury, shall deploy investigative tools, examine financial flows, and coordinate with partner agencies to trace illicit funding streams. The Secretary shall provide guidance for financial institutions to file Suspicious Activity Reports and investigate indicia of illicit funding streams to ensure such activity is rooted out at the source and referred for law enforcement action, as appropriate. (j) The Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (Commissioner) shall take action to ensure that no tax-exempt entities are directly or indirectly financing political violence or domestic terrorism. In addition, where applicable, the Commissioner shall ensure that the Internal Revenue Service refers such organizations, and the employees and officers of such organizations, to the Department of Justice for investigation and possible prosecution. (k) All Federal law enforcement agencies with investigative authority shall question and interrogate, within all lawful authorities, individuals engaged in political violence or lawlessness regarding the entity or individual organizing such actions and any related financial sponsorship of those actions prior to adjudication or initiation of a plea agreement. Investigations should prioritize crimes such as the following: assaulting Federal officers or employees or otherwise engaging in conduct proscribed by 18 U.S.C. 111; conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. 241; conspiracy to commit offense under 18 U.S.C. 371; solicitation to commit a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 373; money laundering under 18 U.S.C. 1956; funding of terrorist acts or otherwise facilitating terrorism under 18 U.S.C. 2339, 2339A, 2339B, 2339C, and 2339D; arson offenses under 18 U.S.C. 844; violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.); and major fraud against the United States under 18 U.S.C. 1031. (l) All Federal law enforcement agencies with investigative authority shall adopt strategies similar to those used to address violent crime and organized crime to disrupt and dismantle entire networks of criminal activity. Sec. 3. Department of Justice Designation. In the course of and as a result of the investigations directed by section 2 of this memorandum, the Attorney General may recommend that any group or entity whose members are engaged in activities meeting the definition of “domestic terrorism” in 18 U.S.C. 2331(5) merits designation as a “domestic terrorist organization.” The Attorney General shall submit a list of any such groups or entities to the President through the Assistant to the President and Homeland Security Advisor. Sec. 4. Domestic Terrorism as a National Priority Area. The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall designate domestic terrorism a national priority area and develop appropriate grant programs to allocate funding for law enforcement partners to detect, prevent, and protect against threats arising from this area. Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. (d) The Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. DONALD J. TRUMP Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Nationalist Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 Interesting. So now the funders of violent protests can be rounded up and charged. Those who make violent threats can be charged. Those being violent at protests can be charged. DOXing and looting is now a terrorist act. Well...looks like the Demoncrats just lost their game plan. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Chrissy1979 Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 29 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Interesting. So now the funders of violent protests can be rounded up and charged. Those who make violent threats can be charged. Those being violent at protests can be charged. DOXing and looting is now a terrorist act. Well...looks like the Demoncrats just lost their game plan. They couldn't be charged before? Oh, they could but then they would just be pardoned, right? This is all just an excuse to cancel elections they know they will lose. Quote
Legato Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 8 hours ago, robosmith said: Trumps latest Executive Order NSPM-7 makes "Anti-American Views" a Crime; Joe McCarthy redux. 🤮 The next major step to FASCISM. https://www.instagram.com/reels/DQC-pn7kqF0/ Oh dear, please tread carefully my good man. Quote
Nationalist Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 3 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: They couldn't be charged before? Oh, they could but then they would just be pardoned, right? This is all just an excuse to cancel elections they know they will lose. What planet do you live on? Put down the glass pipe. You're embarrassing yourself. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
WestCanMan Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 31 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Interesting. So now the funders of violent protests can be rounded up and charged. Those who make violent threats can be charged. Those being violent at protests can be charged. DOXing and looting is now a terrorist act. Well...looks like the Demoncrats just lost their game plan. The left: Peaceful protesters should be trampled by horses or have their bank accounts frozen Peaceful protesters who have surrendered to the police, on their knees, should be beaten in the street The leaders of peaceful protests should be jailed without trial for years Protests outside of conservative-appointed judges' homes should be allowed Encouraging violence and assassination attempts against conservative politicians is humour 1 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Deluge Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 8 hours ago, robosmith said: Trumps latest Executive Order NSPM-7 makes "Anti-American Views" a Crime; Joe McCarthy redux. 🤮 The next major step to FASCISM. https://www.instagram.com/reels/DQC-pn7kqF0/ Well, it's pretty clear to me: If you're anti-American then you'd best make like Ellen & Rosie and gtfo. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 45 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: The left: Peaceful protesters should be trampled by horses or have their bank accounts frozen Peaceful protesters who have surrendered to the police, on their knees, should be beaten in the street The leaders of peaceful protests should be jailed without trial for years Protests outside of conservative-appointed judges' homes should be allowed Encouraging violence and assassination attempts against conservative politicians is humour They are the ultimate hypocrites. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
WestCanMan Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 1 hour ago, Deluge said: Well, it's pretty clear to me: If you're anti-American then you'd best make like Ellen & Rosie and gtfo. The left: "I HATE AMERICA! I THINK THAT MAKING JOKES ABOUT KILLING THE PRESIDENT IS FUNNY! ITHINK THAT FIERY PROTESTS WITH LOOTING AND ASSAULTS ARE PEACEFUL! I WILL NEVER LEAVE HERE!" 1 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Hodad Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 A. The POTUS does not have legal authority to designate "domestic terrorist" groups. For obvious reasons. This is a massive overreach. B. This part is an open declaration of war on free speech, and a promise to use the force of government to stifle critical voices. There are common recurrent motivations and indicia uniting this pattern of violent and terroristic activities under the umbrella of self-described “anti-fascism.” These movements portray foundational American principles (e.g., support for law enforcement and border control) as “fascist” to justify and encourage acts of violent revolution. This “anti-fascist” lie has become the organizing rallying cry used by domestic terrorists to wage a violent assault against democratic institutions, constitutional rights, and fundamental American liberties. Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality. As described in the Order of September 22, 2025 (Designating Antifa as a Domestic Terrorist Organization), the groups and entities that perpetuate this extremism have created a movement that embraces and elevates violence to achieve policy outcomes, including justifying additional assassinations. For example, Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin engraved the bullets used in the murder with so-called “anti-fascist” rhetoric. The United States requires a national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts. Through this comprehensive strategy, law enforcement will disband and uproot networks, entities, and organizations that promote organized violence, violent intimidation, conspiracies against rights, and other efforts to disrupt the functioning of a democratic society. Never sure whether MAGA is too dumb to recognize how this is an egregious attack on the first amendment and political and cultural dissent, or whether they simply don't see any value in the first amendment--authoritarianism is great if it helps them consolidate political power. Likely a mix of the two. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: The left: "I HATE AMERICA! I THINK THAT MAKING JOKES ABOUT KILLING THE PRESIDENT IS FUNNY! ITHINK THAT FIERY PROTESTS WITH LOOTING AND ASSAULTS ARE PEACEFUL! I WILL NEVER LEAVE HERE!" And now...they can be charged as terrorists. 41 minutes ago, Hodad said: A. The POTUS does not have legal authority to designate "domestic terrorist" groups. For obvious reasons. This is a massive overreach. B. This part is an open declaration of war on free speech, and a promise to use the force of government to stifle critical voices. There are common recurrent motivations and indicia uniting this pattern of violent and terroristic activities under the umbrella of self-described “anti-fascism.” These movements portray foundational American principles (e.g., support for law enforcement and border control) as “fascist” to justify and encourage acts of violent revolution. This “anti-fascist” lie has become the organizing rallying cry used by domestic terrorists to wage a violent assault against democratic institutions, constitutional rights, and fundamental American liberties. Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality. As described in the Order of September 22, 2025 (Designating Antifa as a Domestic Terrorist Organization), the groups and entities that perpetuate this extremism have created a movement that embraces and elevates violence to achieve policy outcomes, including justifying additional assassinations. For example, Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin engraved the bullets used in the murder with so-called “anti-fascist” rhetoric. The United States requires a national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts. Through this comprehensive strategy, law enforcement will disband and uproot networks, entities, and organizations that promote organized violence, violent intimidation, conspiracies against rights, and other efforts to disrupt the functioning of a democratic society. Never sure whether MAGA is too dumb to recognize how this is an egregious attack on the first amendment and political and cultural dissent, or whether they simply don't see any value in the first amendment--authoritarianism is great if it helps them consolidate political power. Likely a mix of the two. He already did. But go ahead and defend the indefensible. You've been doing it for years now. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted October 21, 2025 Author Report Posted October 21, 2025 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: Interesting. So now the funders of violent protests can be rounded up and charged. Those who make violent threats can be charged. Those being violent at protests can be charged. DOXing and looting is now a terrorist act. Well...looks like the Demoncrats just lost their game plan. A single successful challenge will INVALIDATE that ludicrous EO wrt "anti-American views." Only a Canuck would not understand that. Quote
robosmith Posted October 21, 2025 Author Report Posted October 21, 2025 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: They are the ultimate hypocrites. You Canuck right wingers are the ultimate IGNORAMUS & LIARS. Quote
robosmith Posted October 21, 2025 Author Report Posted October 21, 2025 17 minutes ago, Nationalist said: And now...they can be charged as terrorists. He already did. But go ahead and defend the indefensible. You've been doing it for years now. Declaring violations of the 1st Amendment to be a crime will be knocked down in the FIRST CHALLENGE. Duh Quote
WestCanMan Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 (edited) 1 hour ago, Hodad said: A. The POTUS does not have legal authority to designate "domestic terrorist" groups. For obvious reasons. This is a massive overreach. B. This part is an open declaration of war on free speech, and a promise to use the force of government to stifle critical voices. A. Not surprising to see you take the side of terrorists, again. Why do you want to make it harder to designate terrorist groups? How does that benefit you, as a citizen? This isn't something that Trump is doing underhandedly, like when Biden and Obama secretly weaponized the FBI and IRS against innocent Americans with no evidence. He's openly naming groups that operate as terrorist orgs as terrorist orgs, and your only defence is "He can't do that", not "They aren't terrorist orgs" lol. B. The type of law that Trump is creating is in the exact same form as the sedition law. The sedition law makes it illegal to plot to attack the gov't, the terrorist version of the sedition law makes it illegal to plot to kill American citizens. B.2 FYI you're not talking about "critical voices", you're talking about people who are plotting and inciting violence. Edited October 21, 2025 by WestCanMan 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Hodad Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: And now...they can be charged as terrorists. He already did. But go ahead and defend the indefensible. You've been doing it for years now. Because you are particularly dense, let's look at a hypothetical. You like to vociferously criticize Muslims and Islam, no? Imagine that your government announced that it would investigate people who used critical language under the pretense that such language would foment political violence. Or that you could be arrested for giving a water bottle to a protestor who was later deemed to be affiliated with a so-called "domestic terrorist" organization. Spooky idea no? Yet that's exactly the assault on free speech that has been mounted in the US. You're just not alarmed because you're pro-fascism. 1 Quote
Hodad Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 (edited) 9 hours ago, WestCanMan said: A. Not surprising to see you take the side of terrorists, again. Why do you want to make it harder to designate terrorist groups? How does that benefit you, as a citizen? This isn't something that Trump is doing underhandedly, like when Biden and Obama secretly weaponized the FBI and IRS against innocent Americans with no evidence. He's openly naming groups that operate as terrorist orgs as terrorist orgs, and your only defence is "He can't do that", not "They aren't terrorist orgs" lol. B. The type of law that Trump is creating is in the exact same form as the sedition law. The sedition law makes it illegal to plot to attack the gov't, the terrorist version of the sedition law makes it illegal to plot to kill American citizens. B.2 FYI you're not talking about "critical voices", you're talking about people who are plotting and inciting violence. I'm not "making it harder" to designate terrorists. There simply is no legal mechanism to make that designation. Nor should there be. We have proof positive in the current occupant of the White House that a corrupt autocrat can be elected to the office and can then (try) to use such designations to persecute political opposition. The president shouldn't have such power. There's a reason why we have checks, balances and 3 branches of government rather than a dictator. Edited October 22, 2025 by Hodad 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 16 minutes ago, Hodad said: Because you are particularly dense, let's look at a hypothetical. You like to vociferously criticize Muslims and Islam, no? Imagine that your government announced that it would investigate people who used critical language under the pretense that such language would foment political violence. Or that you could be arrested for giving a water bottle to a protestor who was later deemed to be affiliated with a so-called "domestic terrorist" organization. Spooky idea no? Yet that's exactly the assault on free speech that has been mounted in the US. You're just not alarmed because you're pro-fascism. OMG but you are stretching reality to snapping point. If anyone here is "pro-fascist" it you Libbies. You howl about free speach after 4 years of Brandon's autopen stomping all over free speech. You're nothing but a liar and a hypocrite. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted October 21, 2025 Author Report Posted October 21, 2025 2 minutes ago, Nationalist said: OMG but you are stretching reality to snapping point. If anyone here is "pro-fascist" it you Libbies. You howl about free speach after 4 years of Brandon's autopen stomping all over free speech. You're nothing but a liar and a hypocrite. YOU don't understand the difference between free speech an threatening LIVES with LIES. Quote
Nationalist Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 1 minute ago, robosmith said: YOU don't understand the difference between free speech an threatening LIVES with LIES. Lol...you dont understand life or common sense. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 5 hours ago, Nationalist said: OMG but you are stretching reality to snapping point. If anyone here is "pro-fascist" it you Libbies. You howl about free speach after 4 years of Brandon's autopen stomping all over free speech. You're nothing but a liar and a hypocrite. You demonstrated the other day that you have no idea what the word means, but yes you are pro fascism. Here you go. You are supporting an executive order that illegally established a framework to investigate, harass and even imprison people for exercising a huge range of political speech and non-criminal actions. It's HUAC on steroids, aimed at chilling and criminalizing dissent. Under this illegal EO, I'm eligible for investigation simply for making this post. And you're applauding it. Yes, to are pro-fascist. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 21, 2025 Report Posted October 21, 2025 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Hodad said: You demonstrated the other day that you have no idea what the word means, but yes you are pro fascism. Here you go. You are supporting an executive order that illegally established a framework to investigate, harass and even imprison people for exercising a huge range of political speech and non-criminal actions. It's HUAC on steroids, aimed at chilling and criminalizing dissent. Under this illegal EO, I'm eligible for investigation simply for making this post. And you're applauding it. Yes, to are pro-fascist. EOs do not create laws. They create policies. The new policy is to not gloss over violent rhetoric. We have in the past and now the left has NORMALIZED hatred and violence in their party. That will not end until they pay real, material consequences. If it does not end, more people will die. In the worst case scenario, the vitriol and violence of the left will drive some on the right to react in kind, sparking a tit for tat civil war. It is best to prosecute speech that crosses the line to specifically calling for violence. Like when Don Lemon told illegal aliens to get a gun and defend themselves from ICE. Edited October 21, 2025 by gatomontes99 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Nationalist Posted October 22, 2025 Report Posted October 22, 2025 1 hour ago, Hodad said: You demonstrated the other day that you have no idea what the word means, but yes you are pro fascism. Here you go. You are supporting an executive order that illegally established a framework to investigate, harass and even imprison people for exercising a huge range of political speech and non-criminal actions. It's HUAC on steroids, aimed at chilling and criminalizing dissent. Under this illegal EO, I'm eligible for investigation simply for making this post. And you're applauding it. Yes, to are pro-fascist. Oh horseshit you are. Nothing you've posted here qualifies as domestic terrorism as outlined in that EO. Stop being such an alarmist. You're embarrassing yourself. Be a normal person, dont threaten political violence or engage in it...and you'll be left alone to post your silly ideas. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted October 22, 2025 Report Posted October 22, 2025 (edited) 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: EOs do not create laws. They create policies. The new policy is to not gloss over violent rhetoric. We have in the past and now the left has NORMALIZED hatred and violence in their party. That will not end until they pay real, material consequences. If it does not end, more people will die. In the worst case scenario, the vitriol and violence of the left will drive some on the right to react in kind, sparking a tit for tat civil war. It is best to prosecute speech that crosses the line to specifically calling for violence. Like when Don Lemon told illegal aliens to get a gun and defend themselves from ICE. On the one hand, you say that EOs don't create law, but on the other, you've just endorsed an EO which claims for the executive authority which has neither constitutional nor statutory basis. You might wanna figure that out. And someone whose lies and rhetoric incited the worst political violence since the civil war--and then pardoned the perpetrators--clearly is *not* concerned about divisive language as a whole. That's why the damn thing is written *specifically* to target his political opposition rather than to address all political speech. The opposition: that's who he's directing the government to investigate. It's naked fascism. There in black and white plain as day. Trump continues his quest to end the American experiment while you cheer him on. Edited October 22, 2025 by Hodad 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.