Russian Colusion is 100% Debunked

[gatomontes99]

 

From the most trust worthy news source (That was for you @robosmith )...Waters breaks down what may be the biggest scandal in the history of politics....world history of politics. 

[CdnFox]

Yeah.  I mean we knew but still. 

But Obama won't face any consequences.

And this is what the dems don't get.  Obama is going to get away with this, so what's to stop the next dem from doing the same?

The only thing left is "mad", mutually assured destruction.  The republicans MUST do the same thing now as hard and as much as they can and destroy as many dems as possible. If they do then MAYBE the dems will wake up and when they get back in power will say "ok, we've got to stop this cycle.  Can we both agree not to and to let the past be the past"

If a bully punches you, the only sane thing to do is punch back as hard as you can. Even if you lose that bully has to know if he picks on you then you're going all out and he's getting a bloody nose out of it at least. Trump has to give the bullies a bloody nose. 

The democrats were warned with all of this that if they opened the door there was no way to easily close it but they chose to do it anyway

[Venandi]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The republicans MUST do the same thing now as hard and as much as they can and destroy as many dems as possible.

And hopefully they'll be less clumsy about it.

The Hunter laptop letter and media assistance that accompanied it still makes me laugh. When compared with the unintended (and completely accidental) brilliance of the NS wolf hoax, it stands as amateurish and easily recognizable for what it was. 

They needed (and lacked) a companion event... something tangible but at arms length from the creators, an "accidentally discovered" trace that tended to support the original premise but they stopped short of manufacturing it. I was waiting for that shoe to fall and it never did.

By way of example, in support of the wolf hoax I would have trucked in some refrigerated (road kill) wolf caucuses from Ontario, placed them on a couple of rural thoroughfares in the target area and then leaked a fake memo about unexpected mortality rates threatening the success of the project and the possible need for introducing an additional group. 

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The democrats were warned with all of this that if they opened the door there was no way to easily close it but they chose to do it anyway

That's the truly fascinating part for me... the warnings stressed the fact that they wouldn't like what comes next and those predictions seem to have come true.

No need to look further than this forum and extrapolate a bit.

Fun to watch though and in like manner to what's on display here, people still swear they saw wolf packs.

People LIKE Robo WILL never ADMIT that THEY got IT wrong AND they WILL always EXIST in SUFFICIENT numbers TO be CONSIDERED part OF the TOOL box.

Edited October 14, 2025 by Venandi

[Chrissy1979]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Yeah.  I mean we knew but still. 

But Obama won't face any consequences.

And this is what the dems don't get.  Obama is going to get away with this, so what's to stop the next dem from doing the same?

The only thing left is "mad", mutually assured destruction.  The republicans MUST do the same thing now as hard and as much as they can and destroy as many dems as possible. If they do then MAYBE the dems will wake up and when they get back in power will say "ok, we've got to stop this cycle.  Can we both agree not to and to let the past be the past"

If a bully punches you, the only sane thing to do is punch back as hard as you can. Even if you lose that bully has to know if he picks on you then you're going all out and he's getting a bloody nose out of it at least. Trump has to give the bullies a bloody nose. 

The democrats were warned with all of this that if they opened the door there was no way to easily close it but they chose to do it anyway

Obama won't face consequences because then you guys would have to face scrutiny. 

[gatomontes99]

8 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Obama won't face consequences because then you guys would have to face scrutiny. 

Obama can't face consequences because he acted within the duties of the POTUS. Unless it can be proven he committed treason. While this did involve Russia, they were more of a patsy than an active participant. 

What could, and probably should, come of this is a Constitutional amendment that does hold the POTUS responsible if they use their office, duties or powers to unfairly effect an election. What the exact wording would be is debatable. Something needs to be done, though. 

[Chrissy1979]

18 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Obama can't face consequences because he acted within the duties of the POTUS. Unless it can be proven he committed treason. While this did involve Russia, they were more of a patsy than an active participant. 

What could, and probably should, come of this is a Constitutional amendment that does hold the POTUS responsible if they use their office, duties or powers to unfairly effect an election. What the exact wording would be is debatable. Something needs to be done, though. 

You won't do anything because everybody knows you're lying and Trump is in Putin's pocket.

Although they may have had a falling out since he humiliated Trump at the Alaska summit. 

[Hodad]

21 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

From the most trust worthy news source (That was for you @robosmith )...Waters breaks down what may be the biggest scandal in the history of politics....world history of politics. 

I see you're still mainlining the fever swamp juice, but there's nothing new here. Just impotent howling in an effort to deny documented, established facts. 

Fact 1: Russian intelligence engaged in a an influence operation to interfere in the US election and help secure a Trump victory.

Fact 2: Trump's campaign chairman was working with known Russian intelligence officers, feeding them the campaign strategy and internal polling data they needed to effectively orchestrate their influence campaign. And going through extraordinary machinations to conceal those connections and cover all tracks. 

 

Those things happened. It's thoroughly laid out in the congressional record, documented in excruciating detail. Those facts are not "made up" intelligence. They have nothing to do with Obama and the CIA. The Republican-led intelligence committee report was released in 2020, FFS. You can pretend all you like that Trump is a good guy and nobody should care that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, but obviously people do care. If they didn't, they (and you) would stop lying about it in an attempt to rewrite history. 

 

Edited October 14, 2025 by Hodad

[Legato]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

I see you're still mainlining the fever swamp juice, but there's nothing new here. Just impotent howling in an effort to deny documented, established facts. 

Fact 1: Russian intelligence engaged in a an influence operation to interfere in the US election and help secure a Trump victory.

Fact 2: Trump's campaign chairman was working with known Russian intelligence officers, feeding them the campaign strategy and internal polling data they needed to effectively orchestrate their influence campaign. And going through extraordinary machinations to conceal those connections and cover all tracks. 

 

Those things happened. It's pay off the congressional record, documented in excruciating detail. They are not "made up" intelligence. They have nothing to do with Obama and the CIA. You can pretend all you like that Trump is a good guy and nobody should care that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, but obviously people do care. If they didn't, they (and you) would stop lying about it in an attempt to rewrite history. 

 

 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Obama won't face consequences because then you guys would have to face scrutiny. 

I think the republicans would have been very happy to face scruitiny if obama had faced consequences   

And that's the thing.  If democrats hadn't been allowed to get away with all the crap they pulled then trump wouldn't be in a position to respond in kind and do what he wants to do. 

This is the world you chose to live in. .Now trump IS the consequence for the dems. 

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Obama can't face consequences because he acted within the duties of the POTUS. Unless it can be proven he committed treason. While this did involve Russia, they were more of a patsy than an active participant. 

What could, and probably should, come of this is a Constitutional amendment that does hold the POTUS responsible if they use their office, duties or powers to unfairly effect an election. What the exact wording would be is debatable. Something needs to be done, though. 

There is a mechanism for dealing with this and that's the impeachment process.  But it's become entirely political and everyone just votes along party lines. 

It's one spot where the founding fathers kind of dropped the ball

[robosmith]

18 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

From the most trust worthy news source (That was for you @robosmith )...Waters breaks down what may be the biggest scandal in the history of politics....world history of politics. 

Reposting the same debunked story you posted before will NOT make it true. Duh

Since you've not figured it out yet: GABBARD is a LIAR, and has FOOLED YOU AGAIN.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

I see you're still mainlining the fever swamp juice, but there's nothing new here. Just impotent howling in an effort to deny documented, established facts. 

Fact 1: Russian intelligence engaged in a an influence operation to interfere in the US election and help secure a Trump victory.

Fact 2: Trump's campaign chairman was working with known Russian intelligence officers, feeding them the campaign strategy and internal polling data they needed to effectively orchestrate their influence campaign. And going through extraordinary machinations to conceal those connections and cover all tracks. 

 

Those things happened. It's pay off the congressional record, documented in excruciating detail. They are not "made up" intelligence. They have nothing to do with Obama and the CIA. You can pretend all you like that Trump is a good guy and nobody should care that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, but obviously people do care. If they didn't, they (and you) would stop lying about it in an attempt to rewrite history. 

Trump liked the Senate Intel Committee report which verified Russian collusion so much, he made the Chairman Rubio his SoS. LMAO

2 hours ago, Legato said:

 

Thanks for PROVING your ^COMPLETE IGNORANCE. LMAO

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump liked the Senate Intel Committee report which verified Russian collusion so much, he made the Chairman Rubio his SoS. LMAO

Thanks for PROVING your ^COMPLETE IGNORANCE. LMAO

It's probably very hard for you to realize that you were lied to all those years. But there really can be no doubt anymore, the whole thing was a hoax. I'm sorry, I realize that you've probably spent a lot of nights crying since the news came out and are very emotional. Hang in there little guy, you'll get through it

[Chrissy1979]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's probably very hard for you to realize that you were lied to all those years. But there really can be no doubt anymore, the whole thing was a hoax. I'm sorry, I realize that you've probably spent a lot of nights crying since the news came out and are very emotional. Hang in there little guy, you'll get through it

I don't think even someone out of touch as you really thinks there was no Russian collusion. It seems far more likely you're a weak-kneed dickless mamby-pamby who is frightened to admit you're wrong ..like when you defended the paedophiles 

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I think the republicans would have been very happy to face scruitiny if obama had faced consequences   

And that's the thing.  If democrats hadn't been allowed to get away with all the crap they pulled then trump wouldn't be in a position to respond in kind and do what he wants to do. 

This is the world you chose to live in. .Now trump IS the consequence for the dems. 

There is a mechanism for dealing with this and that's the impeachment process.  But it's become entirely political and everyone just votes along party lines. 

It's one spot where the founding fathers kind of dropped the ball

I don't think the founding father's dropped the ball. I think people have become increasingly petty and less interested in facts while more interested in public perception.

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Reposting the same debunked story you posted before will NOT make it true. Duh

Since you've not figured it out yet: GABBARD is a LIAR, and has FOOLED YOU AGAIN.

What about the 20 CIA agents? Are they liars? What about the emails and communications that have been revealed, are they liars? What about the lack of evidence to support the false claims? 

You can cling to the fantasy if you'd like. Reality is Obama and Clinton made up the Russian collusion hoax. Your choice is to ignore the facts and be a willing dupe or face the facts and reject the democrats that put our republic at risk. 

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I don't think the founding father's dropped the ball. I think people have become increasingly petty and less interested in facts while more interested in public perception.

I think two things can be true. I agree with the second half and my point would be that the founding father should have anticipated that possibility and crafted a system that didn't so obviously reward party favoritism.

Still, not to take away from what they did. I mean it was their very first country from scratch so there were bound to be a few minor glitches  

[gatomontes99]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I think two things can be true. I agree with the second half and my point would be that the founding father should have anticipated that possibility and crafted a system that didn't so obviously reward party favoritism.

Still, not to take away from what they did. I mean it was their very first country from scratch so there were bound to be a few minor glitches  

Yeah, but they put in a way to fix it. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I don't think even someone out of touch as you really thinks there was no Russian collusion.

Anyone with a tenth of a brain realizes there was no Russian collusion. In no way she performed at the Russians conspire and plan with the trump campaign to win an election. In fact we now know that's not just my opinion, that was the original assessment of the intelligence community.

The intelligence community literally said there's no collusion and there's no threat hereobama told them to lie and say that there was. That is what happened.

So we know there was no Russian collusion. It's a done deal. The debate is over. You spent 8 years repeating a lie that a child should have seen through

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

It seems far more likely you're a weak-kneed dickless mamby-pamby who is frightened to admit you're wrong ..like when you defended the paedophiles 

ROFLMAO!!!!   Holy snit!  Triggered hissy chrissy is triggered!!  LOL!You always get so angry when you realize you're wrong and look stupid    It warms my heart to see your little leftist meltdowns   

Edited October 15, 2025 by CdnFox

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

What about the 20 CIA agents? Are they liars? What about the emails and communications that have been revealed, are they liars? What about the lack of evidence to support the false claims? 

You can cling to the fantasy if you'd like. Reality is Obama and Clinton made up the Russian collusion hoax. Your choice is to ignore the facts and be a willing dupe or face the facts and reject the democrats that put our republic at risk. 

Sure. They made up a "hoax" and it just turned out to be true. One-in-a-million shot. They sure are lucky! 🙄

 

[gatomontes99]

55 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sure. They made up a "hoax" and it just turned out to be true. One-in-a-million shot. They sure are lucky! 🙄

 

You chose willing dupe.

 

[Hodad]

Eh, that's rich coming from a guy who get's 100% of his information and opinions from the Twitter algorithms--including this thread. You still haven't realized that you are the product, dummy, and you're just farking thrilled to be manipulated. 

Try again when you have actual information to share. 

[robosmith]

I have solid intelligence that Putin wanted Trump to win.

He SAID THAT on National TV. LMAO

 

[CdnFox]

23 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Eh, that's rich coming from a guy who get's 100% of his information and opinions from the Twitter algorithms--including this thread. You still haven't realized that you are the product, dummy, and you're just farking thrilled to be manipulated. 

Try again when you have actual information to share. 

Says the guy who runs and hides from facts he doesn't like and people with views he doesn't like  

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I have solid intelligence that Putin wanted Trump to win.

He SAID THAT on National TV. LMAO

 

He also said publicly he wanted kamala to win.    and said biden was his favorite  

Watch: Putin discusses his 'favourite' US president

You're so stupid   

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, Hodad said:

Eh, that's rich coming from a guy who get's 100% of his information and opinions from the Twitter algorithms--including this thread. You still haven't realized that you are the product, dummy, and you're just farking thrilled to be manipulated. 

Try again when you have actual information to share. 

Couldn't come up with anything substantive so you decided to attack me? Sounds like good Ole rule #2. 

I use X on here so much because it is easier than the quote function on mobile browsers. 

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Couldn't come up with anything substantive so you decided to attack me? Sounds like good Ole rule #2. 

I use X on here so much because it is easier than the quote function on mobile browsers. 

Look at your post to which I replied and then shove "rule #2" right back up your Trump hole. 

You use Twitter because it's easier than thinking for yourself. Like a kid who thinks copying and pasting Wikipedia is "doing the homework."  

A (well established) toolbag from Fox said something, another toolbag reposed it on Twitter, you reposted it here as if it is substantive information. Congratulations, you're the bad end of the human centipede. 

Edited October 15, 2025 by Hodad