A Reminder of What Proves Fossil Fuel Burning CO2 is NOT Natural Warming

[robosmith]

Stolen from FB. Look at the exponential growth near year 0 (current)

[paxamericana]

Okay and? It’s a good thing. Greenhouse gases are also delaying the onset of global cooling. We’re overdue for one actually 

Edited August 9, 2025 by paxamericana

[User]

No worries, we will just have China burn it and you won't care. 

 

[Legato]

The highest CO2 concentrations in Earth's past occurred millions of years ago, with levels reaching as high as 3,000 to 9,000 ppm during the Ordovician period, 500 million years ago.

Ice ages are punctuated by “interglacial” periods where temperatures rise to around current levels. The most recent ice age occurred between 120,000 and 11,500 years ago, while the current interglacial period – the Holocene – is expected to last for additional tens of thousands of years (and human activity may inadvertently delay the start of the next ice age even further).

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, paxamericana said:

Okay and? It’s a good thing. Greenhouse gases are also delaying the onset of global cooling. We’re overdue for one actually 

Says who? The fact that we're not cooling is further proof that the current warming is NOT NATURAL.

Apparently YOU don't mind if our coastal cities become uninhabitable due to PERMANENT FLOODING like we've gotten a taste of when the subways flood in NYC. IOW you are a FOOL.

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Legato said:

The highest CO2 concentrations in Earth's past occurred millions of years ago, with levels reaching as high as 3,000 to 9,000 ppm during the Ordovician period, 500 million years ago.

Ice ages are punctuated by “interglacial” periods where temperatures rise to around current levels. The most recent ice age occurred between 120,000 and 11,500 years ago, while the current interglacial period – the Holocene – is expected to last for additional tens of thousands of years (and human activity may inadvertently delay the start of the next ice age even further).

Rising water levels during warming is FAR MORE DAMAGING to our INFRASTUTURE than falling sea levels, doofus.

But ANY CHANGE has HIGH COSTS, like the current rash of Canadian forest fires.

[gatomontes99]

When did weather stations and airports become synonamous? 

https://time.com/5655074/concrete-urban-heat/

 

[Legato]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Rising water levels during warming is FAR MORE DAMAGING to our INFRASTUTURE than falling sea levels, doofus.

But ANY CHANGE has HIGH COSTS, like the current rash of Canadian forest fires.

One could assume that that the rise in sea level matches your dick. 

They're called tides, something to do with moonglow.

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

When did weather stations and airports become synonamous? 

https://time.com/5655074/concrete-urban-heat/

 

The Urban heat theory was discredited years ago. These things keep popping up, and strangely there aren't any new ones as the temperatures skyrocket.

[Nationalist]

"AAAHHH! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!"

The climate religious are such fools.

[Deluge]

16 hours ago, robosmith said:

Stolen from FB. Look at the exponential growth near year 0 (current)

Good Lord! 

It's a good thing the Earth is cooling itself, eh comrade?

https://weather.com/storms/winter/news/2022-12-22-arctic-outbreak-smashes-record-temperature-drops-in-denver-cheyenne

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

One could assume that that the rise in sea level matches your dick. 

They're called tides, something to do with moonglow.

I see you need to return to clown school for remedial training.

[robosmith]

55 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"AAAHHH! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!"

The climate religious are such fools.

^The Dunning-Krueger climatologists never learn that they don't know JACK cause they dropped out and failed to learn science.

[Legato]

18 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^The Dunning-Krueger climatologists never learn that they don't know JACK cause they dropped out and failed to learn science.

Did you mean Dillon-Wagoner climatotherapists?

[robosmith]

17 minutes ago, Legato said:

Did you mean Dillon-Wagoner climatotherapists?

Why do you keep littering threads here with your ignorance? Does your stupidity make you proud?

[User]

27 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Why do you keep littering threads here with your ignorance? Does your stupidity make you proud?

I swear, if there were a picture of someone who embodies the notion of "projection," it would be of you. 

[gatomontes99]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

The Urban heat theory was discredited years ago. These things keep popping up, and strangely there aren't any new ones as the temperatures skyrocket.

No  it wasn't  https://wxguys.ssec.wisc.edu/2023/07/31/cities-hotter/

[robosmith]

26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

No  it wasn't  https://wxguys.ssec.wisc.edu/2023/07/31/cities-hotter/

Climate scientists account for urban heat island effects, corroborate data | Fact check

Quote

The implied claim is false. The Earth is warming due to an increased concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases as a result of human activity. Temperature data from sensors impacted by urban heat is corrected and corroborated by sensors that are unaffected by urban heat.

Temperature readings from urban areas are reliable

Urban infrastructure, such as concrete roads, buildings and parking lots, absorb more of the sun's energy than trees and grass, which causes urban landscapes to be hotter than less developed areas. This results in "urban heat islands" − areas where the average temperature is hotter than surrounding areas.

 

 

The Facebook user who posted the image, Climate Change is Crap, told USA TODAY that increased heat due to urban development "changes the readings on thermometers and gives us a false reading."

However, it is a myth that urban heat islands explain the steady rise in the Earth's global temperatures, Marshall Shepherd, director of the University of Georgia's atmospheric sciences program, wrote in Forbes. He referred to the idea as a "zombie theory" − a narrative reiterated even after substantive scientific evidence has shown it to be false. He noted some of the fastest warming is happening away from urban areas, like in the Arctic.

Climate scientists are WAY AHEAD of you AMATEURS.

[gatomontes99]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Climate scientists account for urban heat island effects, corroborate data | Fact check

Climate scientists are WAY AHEAD of you AMATEURS.

The satellite data has consistently said they are lying...until they decided to make excuses for the data. 

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The satellite data has consistently said they are lying...until they decided to make excuses for the data. 

You have no idea what you're talking about. Data has always been adjusted to correct inaccuracies of the raw measurements.

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Why do you keep littering threads here with your ignorance? Does your stupidity make you proud?

Why is always me that has to pick up your litter.

I'll have the one with the pink nose.

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

Why is always me that has to pick up your litter.

My posts are FACT BASED, and you're just a clown here.

 

[Legato]

Just now, robosmith said:

My posts are FACT BASED, and you're just a clown here.

 

Cmon robo, your facts are garnered from a glitch in the matrix.

 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

Cmon robo, your facts are garnered from a glitch in the matrix.

 

Only clowns post ^FICTION and believe it means something.

[Legato]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Only clowns post ^FICTION and believe it means something.

Well that's a good start for you autobiography. Well done.