West Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-doj-white-house-coordinated-controversial-school-boards-memo-documents-reveal?intcmp=tw_fnc&taid=687a850cdb4cbf000154984b&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter Sick individual Quote
robosmith Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 (edited) 2 hours ago, West said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-doj-white-house-coordinated-controversial-school-boards-memo-documents-reveal?intcmp=tw_fnc&taid=687a850cdb4cbf000154984b&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter Sick individual The sick individual is the one who posts ONLY naked links from FOS LIES. How about you QUOTE anything from the cite which substantiates YOUR CLAIM about LIES? Edited July 19, 2025 by robosmith Quote
gatomontes99 Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: The sick individual is the one who posts ONLY naked links from FOS LIES. How about you QUOTE anything from the cite which substantiates YOUR CLAIM about LIES? So you don't care the the Council of Presidents (acting on behalf of Joe Biden) were targetting parents for simply speaking out at a local school board? All you care about is that the link is too obvious and it comes from FoxNews? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Venandi Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 (edited) 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: So you don't care the the Council of Presidents (acting on behalf of Joe Biden) were targetting parents for simply speaking out at a local school board? All you care about is that the link is too obvious and it comes from FoxNews? Various organizations (UN, RCMP, DOD, HLS, FBI etc) have their own definition of terrorism but all of them are variations of a common theme. Angry parents at a PTA meeting DON'T fit any of those definitions.... it was a talking point and politically motivated stunt from the beginning, every bit as silly as how the word Nazi is hurled about here on the forum... except it was the government doing it as opposed to a rabid buffoon on an anonymous forum. If you're a democrat though the idea is a good one, labeling parents as domestic terrorists qualifies as one of the few ways the federal government could intervene in local school board meetings and use the FBI to silence parents. That was the federal "hook" they were talking about and that's how they obtained it. Edited July 19, 2025 by Venandi 2 Quote
Nationalist Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 (edited) This is typical of Libbies. But when are they going to pay the price for all this abuse? Until they see their leaders locked up, they will continue to do these things. Lay charges in a very republican state. Choose a hard line judge and begin caging these ba5tards. Edited July 19, 2025 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: So you don't care the the Council of Presidents (acting on behalf of Joe Biden) were targetting parents for simply speaking out at a local school board? All you care about is that the link is too obvious and it comes from FoxNews? NO ONE was "targeted" for merely "speaking out." They are targeted for making THREATS OF VIOLENCE. And you STILL have not QUOTED ANYTHING which substantiates LIES. 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: This is typical of Libbies. But when are they going to pay the price for all this abuse? Until they see their leaders locked up, they will continue to do these things. Lay charges in a very republican state. Choose a hard line judge and begin caging these ba5tards. IF there were legitimate charges to be made, I'm sure they would be. Duh But there are NOT. 1 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: NO ONE was "targeted" for merely "speaking out." They are targeted for making THREATS OF VIOLENCE. Do you have a cute? Seems like the original article would have quoted extenuating circumstances if there were any. Assuming Fox News conducts responsible journalism of course. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
robosmith Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said: Do you have a cute? Seems like the original article would have quoted extenuating circumstances if there were any. Assuming Fox News conducts responsible journalism of course. There are a lot of other sources which have reported threats of violence at school board meetings. FOS LIES only tells (at best) half the story. School boards get death threats over race, gender, mask ... Reuters https://www.reuters.com › usa-education-threats Feb 15, 2022 — Local school officials across the United States are being inundated with threats of violence and other hostile messages from anonymous ... 'No legitimate basis' for 2021 DOJ memo on school board ... WCTI https://wcti12.com › news › nation-world › no-legitimat... Mar 24, 2023 — “Near my district in southeastern Pennsylvania, school board members received threats of evoking gas chambers And acts of physical violence,” ... 'Threats of violence': School boards curb public comments ... Politico https://www.politico.com › news › 2021/10/27 › school... Oct 27, 2021 — 'Threats of violence': School boards curb public comments to calm raucous meetings. School officials are finding ways to lower the ... DOJ school board memo: Garland says FBI sent 6 cases to ... USA Today https://www.usatoday.com › news › politics › 2023/03/29 Mar 29, 2023 — Garland said the memo was aimed at violence and threats of violence ... GOP questions FBI 'threat tag' for school board cases 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 29 minutes ago, robosmith said: NO ONE was "targeted" for merely "speaking out." They are targeted for making THREATS OF VIOLENCE. And you STILL have not QUOTED ANYTHING which substantiates LIES. IF there were legitimate charges to be made, I'm sure they would be. Duh But there are NOT. Yet. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Michael Hardner Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 It seems to me that there's anecdotal evidence of a declining atmosphere in the public sphere. For us to assess the subculture of school board engagement, I think we'd need a third party investigation using data. I'm not saying that either side is better than the other in the context of this local controversy. Seems like a lobby group is central to the dispute though. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
User Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 12 hours ago, robosmith said: The sick individual is the one who posts ONLY naked links from FOS LIES. How about you QUOTE anything from the cite which substantiates YOUR CLAIM about LIES? Because this is a dishonest game you play. As soon as someone does post a link to another source, you just run away like the coward you are. You ignore the facts presented because it was Fox news link. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 59 minutes ago, robosmith said: There are a lot of other sources which have reported threats of violence at school board meetings. FOS LIES only tells (at best) half the story. School boards get death threats over race, gender, mask ... Reuters https://www.reuters.com › usa-education-threats Feb 15, 2022 — Local school officials across the United States are being inundated with threats of violence and other hostile messages from anonymous ... 'No legitimate basis' for 2021 DOJ memo on school board ... WCTI https://wcti12.com › news › nation-world › no-legitimat... Mar 24, 2023 — “Near my district in southeastern Pennsylvania, school board members received threats of evoking gas chambers And acts of physical violence,” ... 'Threats of violence': School boards curb public comments ... Politico https://www.politico.com › news › 2021/10/27 › school... Oct 27, 2021 — 'Threats of violence': School boards curb public comments to calm raucous meetings. School officials are finding ways to lower the ... DOJ school board memo: Garland says FBI sent 6 cases to ... USA Today https://www.usatoday.com › news › politics › 2023/03/29 Mar 29, 2023 — Garland said the memo was aimed at violence and threats of violence ... GOP questions FBI 'threat tag' for school board cases https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/whistleblowers-the-fbi-has-labeled-dozens-of-investigations-into-parents-with In one such instance, for example, the FBI investigated whether a mom was a threat to her local school board because she belonged to a “right wing mom’s group” known as “Moms for Liberty” and because she “is a gun owner.” ----‐----------------‐---------- So being a member of Moms for Liberty and a gun owner is a domestic terrorist now? You've been lied to. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Michael Hardner Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: You've been lied to. We are all lied to. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Venandi Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 (edited) 3 hours ago, robosmith said: There are a lot of other sources which have reported threats of violence at school board meetings. There was real violence, real property destruction and real deaths at the ANTIFA riots... they didn't make the terrorism threshold (even though I think they hit the parameters of the definition). In this case though the domestic terrorism designation was the hook requested and it allowed FBI resources into the venue. It was a deliberate (and cynical) response to a direct request (for a hook) and both parties knew upfront that the intent was to silence parents, and do it in a way that would intimidate others. There's pretty much no other way of looking at this. I think you'd have to make the case that the ANTIFA riots were mild by comparison in order to convince anyone that the whole sordid thing wasn't cravenly political. In response though, I think people will provide reams of examples of death threats that didn't tar an entire group of innocuous individuals (like concerned parents) as domestic terrorists. I understand why they did it though, if I wanted to do horrid things in the school system crushing parental dissent would be job one, I'd do exactly the same thing. OK, actually I would never do that... I'm only speaking hypothetically as if I were a democrat. Edited July 19, 2025 by Venandi Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 33 minutes ago, Venandi said: ... both parties knew upfront that the intent was to silence parents, and do it in a way that would intimidate others. I don't think anyone knows that. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Venandi Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I don't think anyone knows that. Can you imagine a galaxy where they didn't? I see no other reason for such a weak sister terrorism designation. I can just visualize the staff officers rolling their eyes as they actioned the request for a hook. Edited July 19, 2025 by Venandi Quote
User Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 31 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I don't think anyone knows that. Yeah, lets just gaslight the whole thing years later... This played out with the NSBA writing a letter to the President complaining literally about Parents, listing out specific incidents and examples, where parents were not engaged in criminal threatening behavior but were in fact just angry and upset about their school board policies and the NSBA wanting the administration to use whatever and any law possible to go after them, including labeling them as domestic terrorists. A few days later, Garland released his memo, while not using the domestic terrorism language, the counter terrorism law enforcement braches certainly did start spinning up resources in response to that memo. But yeah, sure, no one knows that they wanted to silence or intimidate parents. Just a total mystery. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 1 hour ago, Venandi said: Can you imagine a galaxy where they didn't? I see no other reason for such a weak sister terrorism designation. I can just visualize the staff officers rolling their eyes as they actioned the request for a hook. I live in one. I think it's understandable for people to fear what intimidation of public officials will lead to. The only question is for us to establish a baseline for when to act. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
User Posted July 19, 2025 Report Posted July 19, 2025 23 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I think it's understandable for people to fear what intimidation of public officials will lead to. You think it is "intimidation" of public officials to show up to a public school board meeting and express your anger at their policies? Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 20, 2025 Report Posted July 20, 2025 54 minutes ago, User said: You think it is "intimidation" of public officials to show up to a public school board meeting and express your anger at their policies? No. 1 Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
robosmith Posted July 20, 2025 Report Posted July 20, 2025 4 hours ago, Venandi said: There was real violence, real property destruction and real deaths at the ANTIFA riots... Show us ^these "antifa riots," where there wasn't any OTHER groups involved. Quote
User Posted July 20, 2025 Report Posted July 20, 2025 3 hours ago, robosmith said: Show us ^these "antifa riots," where there wasn't any OTHER groups involved. LOL, so there was no MAGA violence on J6 that you can point to because OTHER groups were involved... 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.