Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

You can call your chair whatever you want, but that doesn't make it RELEVANT.

I never said that, TROLLEGATO.

That's the whole point. 

Also depends on the caliber of the chair, I have one with high velocity wheels and a shoulder thing that goes up.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Legato said:

That's the whole point. 

Also depends on the caliber of the chair, I have one with high velocity wheels and a shoulder thing that goes up.

Your "whole point" is NOT RELEVANT to the deadliness of assault STYLE weapons.  

Do you even understand why AR STYLE weapons are the choice of so many mass shooters and why the Uvalde police were too afraid of one to intervene in timely manner?

Posted
11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your "whole point" is NOT RELEVANT to the deadliness of assault STYLE weapons.  

Do you even understand why AR STYLE weapons are the choice of so many mass shooters and why the Uvalde police were too afraid of one to intervene in timely manner?

All guns are deadly. 

They are the weapon of choice because you and others sensationalize them. Most mass shootings don't use them and they only get more popular every year over the last decade BECAUSE you and others keep focusing on them. 

The lack of response by Uvdale police had more to do with the bureaucratic stupidity of those in charge, not the fear of those there not wanting to respond. 

There is almost nothing on this forum you are ever honest or intelligent enough to discuss. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

A short and compact automatic or semi automatic rifle....

Sooooo - this?

Citadel AD500 Semi-Auto Hunting Rifle - .308 Win., 20"

Citadel AD500 Semi-Auto Hunting Rifle - .308 Win., 20" [CITAD500SBLK] - Firearms Outlet Canada

If you know anything about guns as you claim, that's a pretty short barrel

Here's my favourite quote from that advertisement :) "Picatinny rails on the receiver make it easy to mount your favourite optics and accessories—unless, of course, some radical, "elbows up" lunatic deems it “too tactical.” "

How about target rifles? LIke this?

Ruger Precision Rifle Gen 3 - .308 Win, 20"

Ruger Precision Rifle Gen 3 - .308 Win., 20" [18047]

 

I mean that looks pretty scary, so how about that one?

 

 

 

Here's the fact. You obviously know nothing about firearms, and your knowledge of what represents a military firearm sounds about as good as when McCarthy said that the barrel shroud was "the shoulder thing that goes up". 

 

 

Edited by CdnFox

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Your "whole point" is NOT RELEVANT to the deadliness of assault STYLE weapons.  

Do you even understand why AR STYLE weapons are the choice of so many mass shooters and why the Uvalde police were too afraid of one to intervene in timely manner?

What have you been feeding the bulls, you're going to need a big shovel.

Posted
6 hours ago, Deluge said:

There's only one cult in this country, and it's the democrat party. 

Abortion and tree worship are key components to the left, and you're trying to tell me that you don't support either of those. How is that possible? You're either lying, or you support things you don't understand. Which is it? 

I'd have to think the democrats say the same thing about the Maga cult...

Not everyone is hardcore right or left as you view the world.  Never knew that if you support some liberal ideologies you need to worship trees and abortion.... alas, I worship neither

Posted
45 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sooooo - this?

Citadel AD500 Semi-Auto Hunting Rifle - .308 Win., 20"

Citadel AD500 Semi-Auto Hunting Rifle - .308 Win., 20" [CITAD500SBLK] - Firearms Outlet Canada

If you know anything about guns as you claim, that's a pretty short barrel

Here's my favourite quote from that advertisement :) "Picatinny rails on the receiver make it easy to mount your favourite optics and accessories—unless, of course, some radical, "elbows up" lunatic deems it “too tactical.” "

How about target rifles? LIke this?

Ruger Precision Rifle Gen 3 - .308 Win, 20"

Ruger Precision Rifle Gen 3 - .308 Win., 20" [18047]

 

I mean that looks pretty scary, so how about that one?

 

 

 

Here's the fact. You obviously know nothing about firearms, and your knowledge of what represents a military firearm sounds about as good as when McCarthy said that the barrel shroud was "the shoulder thing that goes up". 

 

 

Play show and tell all day long if you'd like.  I told you the extent of my knowledge of guns, which is probably average but probably more than most given most people don't own a gun or have shot one for that matter.  Wasn't aware you have to be a firearms expert to support gun laws... or is that just a "left" thing?

If you're good with the commonplace mass killings in the US from assault weapons that's on you.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Wasn't aware you have to be a firearms expert to support gun laws... or is that just a "left" thing?

You don't have to be an expert, but you are on here ignorantly and dishonestly pushing gun control to stop mass shootings that won't stop mass shootings, while pretending that because you are a gun owner, that somehow gives you some kind of credibility to speak when clearly it doesn't. 

 

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Legato said:

What have you been feeding the bulls, you're going to need a big shovel.

Sorry but ^this DRIVEL gets an F in debate class. Riddles just don't cut it, IF you're trying convince anyone of your "point."

But since you're just TROLLEGATO, it's obvious you're NOT.

Posted
34 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I'd have to think the democrats say the same thing about the Maga cult...

Thing is, MAGA is CULT to a T(rump).

But since MAGA doesn't know the characteristics of CULTS, they believe they can just slap the name on ANYTHING, and completely miss how that makes them LOOK THE FOOL. Which is one of the characteristics of CULT members.

IF Democrats were in a cult, they never would have abandoned their leader for his VP. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, User said:

Yes, yes you did. You said you wanted to ban all semi-automatic firearms. That is in fact the most commonly owned firearm type. 

So, you are either so incredibly stupid that you don't grasp this or are just continuing to be this dishonest as to deny something you already said. 

Clearly not. 

No, just pointing out that you calling yourself a gun owner is meaningless in this discussion as you are clearly quite ignorant on how they function and even more ignorant on mass shootings.

Well, when you can't defend your own stupid lies, just make up something else to argue against. 

You are clearly oblivious....  Yes, very aware a semi auto is a common rifle....I have a Remington 308 semi auto.  This is a 'hunting' rifle....could it be used for mass killings sure but if you can't differentiate between common hunting or sport shooting guns versus an assault weapon.... you're stupider than you come across, which is saying something.

The one thing you hit on accurately is this is a meaningless discussion.  Your twisted logic and ignorance are epic... 

Posted
12 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You are clearly oblivious....

About what? Be specific. I have made so many pointed comments in response to yours now and you have completely ignored almost all of them. 

12 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yes, very aware a semi auto is a common rifle...

That was not the point. It was that you said you wanted to ban all semi-automatic firearms, then tried to claim you didn't want to ban the most commonly owned firearms... ignorant that semi-automatic firearms that you said you wanted to ban were in fact the most commonly owned firearms. 

16 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

This is a 'hunting' rifle....could it be used for mass killings sure but if you can't differentiate between common hunting or sport shooting guns versus an assault weapon.... you're stupider than you come across, which is saying something.

What have I said here to show I can't differentiate between common hunting or sport shooting guns verses an assault weapon?

Also, news flash, assault weapons ARE common sport shooting guns. Sport shooting includes things like 3 gun competitions, long range precision shooting, hog hunting, etc... all types of sport shooting that assault weapons are used in. 

I don't have to sit here and brag about my credentials with firearms because it is evident I actually know what I am talking about. 

You don't. 

 

 

 

Posted
41 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thing is, MAGA is CULT to a T(rump).

But since MAGA doesn't know the characteristics of CULTS, they believe they can just slap the name on ANYTHING, and completely miss how that makes them LOOK THE FOOL. Which is one of the characteristics of CULT members.

IF Democrats were in a cult, they never would have abandoned their leader for his VP. 

The cult is mind numbing, truly f*cking mind numbing....   Their cult leader is 79 years old, out of shape, poor eating habits, and leads a sedentary lifestyle.  Only a matter of time before he expires...  Hopefully the cult following expires with him.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Play show and tell all day long if you'd like.  I told you the extent of my knowledge of guns, which is probably average but probably more than most given most people don't own a gun or have shot one for that matter.  

 

So what you're saying is you don't know anything about guns, but because you own one gun or did at some point in the past you feel knowledgeable enough to speak on the subject intelligently. This by having admittedly low understanding of the subject.

Quote

Wasn't aware you have to be a firearms expert to support gun laws... or is that just a "left" thing?

So you weren't aware that you had to have knowledge of a subject before you could have an intelligent opinion regarding laws with regards to that subject.

Muh Feels is good enough eh? :) 

As it turns out you don't actually need any knowledge at all with regards to firearms in order to support laws against them. You just need to be stupid. However in my experience that tends to be those on the left more than on the right.

The police have come out against the latest gun laws and gun bans and gun collections, absolutely no criminal expert has ever suggested that they would make any difference whatsoever, and the fiscal experts have pointed out is going to be a lot more expensive then the liberals have suggested and question whether that's intelligent at a time that we are already significantly over budget given the fact that nobody thinks it's going to help.

But yeah, you can ignore the science and the experts and go with muh feels if that's the kind of person you are, sure. 

  • Like 2

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
27 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

 This is a 'hunting' rifle....could it be used for mass killings sure but if you can't differentiate between common hunting or sport shooting guns versus an assault weapon.... you're stupider than you come across, which is saying something.

 

Really!

Well go ahead and do it then. Explain to me what makes your semi-automatic 308 different than a military semi-automatic 308?

You claim you can differentiate between the two, so make it happen. Clearly state what the difference is between the two.

People on the left have been claiming there's an obvious difference and then failing completely to be able to articulate that difference effectively since forever. But go ahead, tell me all about the shoulder thing that goes up.

The one thing you see worldwide with gun bands is the very first thing they do is say we're only banning military guns, immediately followed by all guns or military guns

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
12 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

The cult is mind numbing, truly f*cking mind numbing....   Their cult leader is 79 years old, out of shape, poor eating habits, and leads a sedentary lifestyle.  Only a matter of time before he expires...  Hopefully the cult following expires with him.

Says the guy who was rooting for somebody with Parkinson's and actual dementia while actually being president :) 

Gives you some idea of how badly the democrats are doing when they make trump look like the better choice to the country.

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Really!

Well go ahead and do it then. Explain to me what makes your semi-automatic 308 different than a military semi-automatic 308?

You claim you can differentiate between the two, so make it happen. Clearly state what the difference is between the two.

People on the left have been claiming there's an obvious difference and then failing completely to be able to articulate that difference effectively since forever. But go ahead, tell me all about the shoulder thing that goes up.

The one thing you see worldwide with gun bands is the very first thing they do is say we're only banning military guns, immediately followed by all guns or military guns

4 bullets in the magazine and 1 in the chamber to start....   Not as well versed with the gun industry these days but will assume a military rifle is capable of accommodating more ammo than that.

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Says the guy who was rooting for somebody with Parkinson's and actual dementia while actually being president :) 

Gives you some idea of how badly the democrats are doing when they make trump look like the better choice to the country.

You validate the comments. You're a Canadian version and Maga wannabe but same end make-up.....  truly f*cking mind numbing.

Posted
2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

4 bullets in the magazine and 1 in the chamber to start....  

That's got nothing to do with the gun. Anybody can manufacture a large capacity magazine for a semi-automatic and in fact depending on the model it probably already exists. Likewise any military magazine can be pinned to four rounds

So what you're saying is that any military gun with its magazine pin to four rounds should be legal and is the same as a hunting rifle. Good news! That's already the law in Canada so there's no point in banning any guns anymore is there?

Quote

Not as well versed with the gun industry these days but will assume a military rifle is capable of accommodating more ammo than that.

No. A military gun With a detachable magazine and a civilian gun With a detachable magazine can hold exactly the same number of rounds.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the gun, and if you were gun owner you really ought to know that. And even guns that come with Boxster fix mags are easily converted, my Dad had a Remington 700 and he really wanted to detachable magazine for it so we took it in and the gunsmith had no problem making that modification. Didn't even cost much.

So you have now joined the ranks of millions of left-wing supporters for gun laws who are unable to actually tell the difference between a military gun and a civilian hunting rifle. Do you begin to see how pointless these laws are? The magazine does not define the gun. The magazine is a separate thing and we already have restrictions on magazines so that they have to be pinned to five rounds

 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That's got nothing to do with the gun. Anybody can manufacture a large capacity magazine for a semi-automatic and in fact depending on the model it probably already exists. Likewise any military magazine can be pinned to four rounds

So what you're saying is that any military gun with its magazine pin to four rounds should be legal and is the same as a hunting rifle. Good news! That's already the law in Canada so there's no point in banning any guns anymore is there?

No. A military gun With a detachable magazine and a civilian gun With a detachable magazine can hold exactly the same number of rounds.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the gun, and if you were gun owner you really ought to know that. And even guns that come with Boxster fix mags are easily converted, my Dad had a Remington 700 and he really wanted to detachable magazine for it so we took it in and the gunsmith had no problem making that modification. Didn't even cost much.

So you have now joined the ranks of millions of left-wing supporters for gun laws who are unable to actually tell the difference between a military gun and a civilian hunting rifle. Do you begin to see how pointless these laws are? The magazine does not define the gun. The magazine is a separate thing and we already have restrictions on magazines so that they have to be pinned to five rounds

 

Truly f*cking mind numbing.....   You asked me to explain the difference between my 308 and a military weapon which I did, assuming I was correct on ammo capacity.  What the f*ck don't you understand about what I typed?  Save the answer....it will be another bunch of your twisted bullsh*t anyway.  

Posted
1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

4 bullets in the magazine and 1 in the chamber to start....   Not as well versed with the gun industry these days but will assume a military rifle is capable of accommodating more ammo than that.

"military rifle"

OMG. I just can't with this level of ignorance. "Military rifles" can include everything from the M1 Garand to a bolt action precision long range rifle for snipers. 

Calling something "military" has nothing to do with anything. 

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You validate the comments. You're a Canadian version and Maga wannabe but same end make-up.....  truly f*cking mind numbing.

Awwww.... did you look bad on the internet again so now your wittel fewwings are hurt? :)   LOL,  every single time you wind up looking stupid you're like this.  It's a weird theme we have around here, every leftie has their weird or childish behavior that's their way of saying "Crap i lost and my butt is so hurt imma gonna do THIS stupid thing".  

Sorry you feel stupid kid.  I'd have though you might be getting used to it by now :) 

So once again, the magazine has nothing to do with the gun.   It would be like claiming the gun is 'Military" based on what type of bullet you loaded into it. 

And no. You were entirely wrong on ammo capacity, as i've mentioned.  I don't know the model of your gun but i bet there's extended capacity mags available for it.  

Soooo... wrong. :)  and thus butthurt. Magazine capacity has nothing to do with it.  

Did you want to have another guess, Alleged fellow gun owner?  LOLOL 

 

 

1 hour ago, User said:

"military rifle"

OMG. I just can't with this level of ignorance. "Military rifles" can include everything from the M1 Garand to a bolt action precision long range rifle for snipers. 

Calling something "military" has nothing to do with anything. 

 

calling it military based on the size of the magazine currently inserted certainly doesn't.

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,023
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Fred Kurtz
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...