robosmith Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago Trump caught LYING AGAIN. Just like when he said DNI Gabbard was "wrong" about the US Intel community assessment. 🤮 7:03 YouTube · BBC News BREAKING: Leaked US intelligence says Iran's nuclear plans “likely only set back months” YouTube · BBC News 5 hours ago 8:46 YouTube · CNN Exclusive: US strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites ... YouTube · CNN 7 hours ago 7:48 YouTube · Face the Nation Iranian nuclear sites damaged, but not destroyed by U.S. ... YouTube · Face the Nation 2 hours ago Quote
robosmith Posted 18 hours ago Author Report Posted 18 hours ago 6 minutes ago, West said: So now you admit they are building nukes? Enriching U is ONLY the first step. I know they wanted to maintain ambiguity to dissuade being attacked. But now that's been proven to not work, they will likely covertly build nukes. Pin it on Israel proving they need some. Quote
West Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 14 minutes ago, robosmith said: Enriching U is ONLY the first step. I know they wanted to maintain ambiguity to dissuade being attacked. But now that's been proven to not work, they will likely covertly build nukes. Pin it on Israel proving they need some. Then they'll get attacked again. Quote
Nationalist Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 8 hours ago, West said: Then they'll get attacked again. It's like robo is hoping for a nuclear war, just so he can pin that on Trump. Dweebles has sunk to the lowest form of human. An enemy of the entire race. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 10 hours ago, robosmith said: Trump caught LYING AGAIN. Just like when he said DNI Gabbard was "wrong" about the US Intel community assessment. 🤮 7:03 YouTube · BBC News BREAKING: Leaked US intelligence says Iran's nuclear plans “likely only set back months” YouTube · BBC News 5 hours ago 8:46 YouTube · CNN Exclusive: US strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites ... YouTube · CNN 7 hours ago 7:48 YouTube · Face the Nation Iranian nuclear sites damaged, but not destroyed by U.S. ... YouTube · Face the Nation 2 hours ago Don't get too excited there, comrade. It looks like we're going to have to hit them harder. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 33 minutes ago, Deluge said: Don't get too excited there, comrade. It looks like we're going to have to hit them harder. Whatever it takes to stabilize that desert. 1 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Legato Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 10 hours ago, robosmith said: Trump caught LYING AGAIN. Just like when he said DNI Gabbard was "wrong" about the US Intel community assessment. 🤮 7:03 YouTube · BBC News BREAKING: Leaked US intelligence says Iran's nuclear plans “likely only set back months” YouTube · BBC News 5 hours ago 8:46 YouTube · CNN Exclusive: US strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites ... YouTube · CNN 7 hours ago 7:48 YouTube · Face the Nation Iranian nuclear sites damaged, but not destroyed by U.S. ... YouTube · Face the Nation 2 hours ago Yet. Quote
Boges Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Whatever it takes to stabilize that desert. Yes, because we all know bombing a country is the best way to win hearts and minds. Iran's best course of action would be to develop nuclear weapons. North Korea has them and every leaves them alone. Trump denying his own intelligence reports is hilarious. This strike literally was just for show. Iran can continue to develop nuclear weapons without any oversight now. The word of Trump means nothing. 1 Quote
West Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Boges said: Yes, because we all know bombing a country is the best way to win hearts and minds. Iran's best course of action would be to develop nuclear weapons. North Korea has them and every leaves them alone. Trump denying his own intelligence reports is hilarious. This strike literally was just for show. Iran can continue to develop nuclear weapons without any oversight now. The word of Trump means nothing. And your plan is to issue a firmly worded letter to Iran while they build a nuclear bomb with the money Obama gave to them? Quote
Legato Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Boges said: Yes, because we all know bombing a country is the best way to win hearts and minds. Iran's best course of action would be to develop nuclear weapons. North Korea has them and every leaves them alone. Trump denying his own intelligence reports is hilarious. This strike literally was just for show. Iran can continue to develop nuclear weapons without any oversight now. The word of Trump means nothing. So you think it's okay for an Islamic Theocracy which has/is funding terrorism to have nuclear weapon capability? Quote
Boges Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Legato said: So you think it's okay for an Islamic Theocracy which has/is funding terrorism to have nuclear weapon capability? MAD is a thing. North Korea isn't nuking anyone. The one thing that's clear is that not having a nuke seems to make it more likely for the likes of the West to continue to bomb and/or invade them to prevent them from making a nuke. All these last two weeks have done is ensure Iran will be less transparent about their nuclear power. Quote
User Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 12 hours ago, robosmith said: Trump caught LYING AGAIN. Just like when he said DNI Gabbard was "wrong" about the US Intel community assessment. 🤮 How are you this dishonest? Trump is not lying when he is relying on the intelligence he has. There have been many different assessements of the damage and quite frankly, unless someone is standing in the crater of one of those holes with a camera, none of them are perfectly accurate. Also, Gabbard was talking about an actual weapon, not the enriched uranium to make one. This is a stupid gotcha game that most people are too ignorant to understand or are dishonest about. Actually building a nuclear weapon is the easy part, building an ballasitc missile is more complicated (but Iran has those already, clearly, they launch them at Israel), it is the enrichment of uranium that takes time and massive amounts of centrifuges to complete. Iran has clearly been doing the latter, and clearly has the missiles, so once they have weapons grade uranium, making the bomb is the easy part. 26 minutes ago, Boges said: MAD is a thing. North Korea isn't nuking anyone. The one thing that's clear is that not having a nuke seems to make it more likely for the likes of the West to continue to bomb and/or invade them to prevent them from making a nuke. All these last two weeks have done is ensure Iran will be less transparent about their nuclear power. Iran is not interested in MAD in the traditional sense, they clearly hate Israel and chant death to Israel. Iran was already not being transparent... hence the mountain bunker to hide and protect their program. 1 Quote
Boges Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, User said: Iran is not interested in MAD in the traditional sense, they clearly hate Israel and chant death to Israel. The entire Middleeast hates the idea of Israel. And that's likely only escalated seeing what they've done to civilians in Gaza. It doesn't mean that Iran would nuke Israel. But it sure would mean that Israel would think twice about attacking Iran. 1 Quote
Deluge Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Boges said: Yes, because we all know bombing a country is the best way to win hearts and minds. Iran's best course of action would be to develop nuclear weapons. North Korea has them and every leaves them alone. Trump denying his own intelligence reports is hilarious. This strike literally was just for show. Iran can continue to develop nuclear weapons without any oversight now. The word of Trump means nothing. Let's see how the ceasefire goes. If Iran wants to dish out more stupid, then I'm sure we'll be happy to smack the shit out of them. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) The leak is likely inaccurate. I am sure you'll try to say Pete isn't reliable, so here is the IAEA saying the same thing: Quote https://apnews.com/video/iaea-reports-very-significant-damage-at-fordo-nuclear-site-332d33b715394a30910862c6709abd33 [VIDEO] IAEA reports “very significant damage” at Fordo nuclear site The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency said “very significant damage” is expected at a nuclear enrichment site in Iran. Published 5:27 AM CDT, June 23, 2025 So who leaked this information? Jeffery Kraus, who was nominated by Joe Biden, runs the DIA. That sure makes you wonder. The Council of Presidents was not big on promoting people for their abilities. They concentrated on liberal ideology. If he was nominated by Joe, that puts an air of doubt behind his motives. Now, here is Pete fully explaining how it is virtually impossible that Fordo is intact enough to use: The FBI is looking into who leaked this false information and there will be prosecutions. That is how law enforcement works. You find a crime then determine who did it rather than find the.man and determine his crime i.e. the Biden era. Edited 5 hours ago by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago 12 hours ago, West said: Then they'll get attacked again. Not by Israel if they have nukes that can be delivered. Israel could be hit by a truck bomb. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Not by Israel if they have nukes that can be delivered. Israel could be hit by a truck bomb. All the more reason to keep bombing them. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: It's like robo is hoping for a nuclear war, just so he can pin that on Trump. Dweebles has sunk to the lowest form of human. An enemy of the entire race. Your ^OPINIONS mean NOTHING. Trump IS RESPONSIBLE for tearing up the agreement which STOPPED Iranian enrichment and you're too stupid to see that. Quote
robosmith Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, West said: And your plan is to issue a firmly worded letter to Iran while they build a nuclear bomb with the money Obama gave to them? Lot better than Trump's plan to remove the inspectors and all limits on nuclear enrichment. Duh Obama didn't give them ANYTHING. Their assets were unfrozen in RETURN FOR LIMITS AND INSPECTORS. How many times do you have to be informed before you understand? LMAO 1 hour ago, Legato said: So you think it's okay for an Islamic Theocracy which has/is funding terrorism to have nuclear weapon capability? As long as a Jewish Theocracy is threatening them with THEIR NUKES. Duh Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: Your ^OPINIONS mean NOTHING. Trump IS RESPONSIBLE for tearing up the agreement which STOPPED Iranian enrichment and you're too stupid to see that. Obama’s Disastrous Iran Deal It funded Iran and they didn't allow inspectors in. The deal helped Iran build nukes, not stop them. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 43 minutes ago, Boges said: The entire Middleeast hates the idea of Israel. And that's likely only escalated seeing what they've done to civilians in Gaza. It doesn't mean that Iran would nuke Israel. But it sure would mean that Israel would think twice about attacking Iran. Well, Israel doesn't have to wager their future on some random guy on the internet thinking it is all going to be OK for them just after admitting that everyone hates them. Those folks in Gaza being killed --- did you forget what started that? Quote
robosmith Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Obama’s Disastrous Iran Deal It funded Iran and they didn't allow inspectors in. The deal helped Iran build nukes, not stop them. ^AN OPINION from a right wing "think tank" and Epstein. Records show that enrichment STOPPED. How do the Iran nuclear deal inspections work? Quote What exactly is the Iran Nuclear Deal? In 2015, China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the U.S. (known as P5+1) along with the European Union and Iran created the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Most people call it the “Iran nuclear deal.” It guaranteed that if Tehran’s nuclear program were “exclusively peaceful,” the U.S. and the EU would lift economic sanctions against Iran. In January 2016, IAEA verified that Iran had complied with the terms of the nuclear deal, and the sanctions were lifted. How do the nuclear inspections work? There are 18 nuclear facilities and nine other facilities in Iran monitored by IAEA. The IAEA inspects these sites to see if their activities match descriptions submitted by Iran. Kelsey Davenport, Director for Nonproliferation Policy with the Arms Control Association said: “Iran is a unique case in that some key locations are subject to 24-hour surveillance and inspection teams are continually in Iran to verify its compliance with the agreement.” The IAEA’s main focus in Iran is monitoring uranium enrichment. This process can produce fuel to run nuclear reactors or make a nuclear weapon. Quote
User Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 22 minutes ago, robosmith said: Trump IS RESPONSIBLE for tearing up the agreement which STOPPED Iranian enrichment and you're too stupid to see that. That is not what the agreement did at all. Liarl Quote
Nationalist Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Boges said: Yes, because we all know bombing a country is the best way to win hearts and minds. Iran's best course of action would be to develop nuclear weapons. North Korea has them and every leaves them alone. Trump denying his own intelligence reports is hilarious. This strike literally was just for show. Iran can continue to develop nuclear weapons without any oversight now. The word of Trump means nothing. Yes and Brandon did so much to discourage Iran... Look Tweenkie-Poo...if you don't have the balls to do anything but whine and complain...then expect to be treated as such. 27 minutes ago, robosmith said: Your ^OPINIONS mean NOTHING. Trump IS RESPONSIBLE for tearing up the agreement which STOPPED Iranian enrichment and you're too stupid to see that. Ya we now see how effective that agreement was. Dumb-ass. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.