What is Fascism?

[Deluge]

You hear democrats spewing shit about it constantly, but their definition of it doesn't hold up. 

According to Conservapedia: 

Fascism is a big government, totalitarian, economic, political, and statist ideology that arose in early twentieth century Europe and came to dominate the social and political systems of Italy under Mussolini. Under typical Marxist socialism, the workers rise up and seize the means of production. Under a fascist system, a socialist regime allows the means of production to remain in private capitalists and oligarchs' hands - provided that they lend support to the socialist regime. Additionally, the socialist regime can extend monopoly protection to the businesses by guaranteeing government contracts, and regulatory practices designed to drive competitors out of business.

"Fascism is an unholy alliance between monopoly capitalist enterprises and government. It is basically a set of economic policy prescriptions, although the word gained somewhat of a twisted meaning during World War II related to racism and prejudice because of its acceptance in Nazi Germany by Adolf Hitler. It stands in contrast to communism, which is outright expropriation of "the means of production", i.e. expropriation of private property, and then the government itself selecting managers and unqualified party bureaucrats to run the businesses. In a fascist regime, large corporations retain their private ownership, their profits, the ability to select their own managers and staff, and even are protected from competition provided that the corporation bends to the government's wishes.

Fascism is statist in nature, relying on a public-private partnerships, such as between Big Tech and the NSA for information control and surveillance; while private businesses provide personal data and political profiling on citizens to government without a search warrant, the government grants crony capitalist protection to the businesses in the form of government contracts, and harassment of competitors through arbitrary regulations and licensing."

Under the two comparisons, I would say the regular meatheads like robomarx, herpes, and beaverabuser would fall under Marxist socialism. But billionaires like Soros, Sanders, Gates and Oprah belong to the fascist system. the reason for the two categories is that the fascist system doesn't have room for the misguided marxists, so they relegate the marxists to a lesser class making them think they are part of the upperclass of socialism. 

Yes, I know this is stupidly complex, but that's how it has to be for left-wing radicals to seize control. 

https://www.conservapedia.com/Fascism

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You hear democrats spewing shit about it constantly, but their definition of it doesn't hold up. 

According to Conservapedia: 

Fascism is a big government, totalitarian, economic, political, and statist ideology that arose in early twentieth century Europe and came to dominate the social and political systems of Italy under Mussolini. Under typical Marxist socialism, the workers rise up and seize the means of production. Under a fascist system, a socialist regime allows the means of production to remain in private capitalists and oligarchs' hands - provided that they lend support to the socialist regime. Additionally, the socialist regime can extend monopoly protection to the businesses by guaranteeing government contracts, and regulatory practices designed to drive competitors out of business.

"Fascism is an unholy alliance between monopoly capitalist enterprises and government. It is basically a set of economic policy prescriptions, although the word gained somewhat of a twisted meaning during World War II related to racism and prejudice because of its acceptance in Nazi Germany by Adolf Hitler. It stands in contrast to communism, which is outright expropriation of "the means of production", i.e. expropriation of private property, and then the government itself selecting managers and unqualified party bureaucrats to run the businesses. In a fascist regime, large corporations retain their private ownership, their profits, the ability to select their own managers and staff, and even are protected from competition provided that the corporation bends to the government's wishes.

Fascism is statist in nature, relying on a public-private partnerships, such as between Big Tech and the NSA for information control and surveillance; while private businesses provide personal data and political profiling on citizens to government without a search warrant, the government grants crony capitalist protection to the businesses in the form of government contracts, and harassment of competitors through arbitrary regulations and licensing."

Under the two comparisons, I would say the regular meatheads like robomarx, herpes, and beaverabuser would fall under Marxist socialism. But billionaires like Soros, Sanders, Gates and Oprah belong to the fascist system. the reason for the two categories is that the fascist system doesn't have room for the misguided marxists, so they relegate the marxists to a lesser class making them think they are part of the upperclass of socialism. 

Yes, I know this is stupidly complex, but that's how it has to be for left-wing radicals to seize control. 

https://www.conservapedia.com/Fascism

Conservapedia is VAPEDE BULLSHIT which destroys YOUR CREDIBILITY.

Fascism

Quote

fascism, political ideology and mass movement that dominated many parts of central, southern, and eastern Europe between 1919 and 1945 and that also had adherents in western Europe, the United States, South Africa, Japan, Latin America, and the Middle East. Europe’s first fascist leader, Benito Mussolini, took the name of his party from the Latin word fasces, which referred to a bundle of elm or birch rods (usually containing an ax) used as a symbol of penal authority in ancient Rome. Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from one another, they had many characteristics in common, including extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a Volksgemeinschaft (German: “people’s community”), in which individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the nation. At the end of World War II, the major European fascist parties were broken up, and in some countries (such as Italy and West Germany) they were officially banned. Beginning in the late 1940s, however, many fascist-oriented parties and movements were founded in Europe as well as in Latin America and South Africa. Although some European “neofascist” groups attracted large followings, especially in Italy and France, none were as influential as the major fascist parties of the interwar period.

 

 

[Deluge]

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Conservapedia is VAPEDE BULLSHIT which destroys YOUR CREDIBILITY.

Fascism

 

 

I'm sorry robomarx, but you're a tool. Day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, you peddle nonsensical bullshit to weaken the masses for the fascist slavers, and what do you get in return? Well, you for sure get that bullshit thrown back in your face by me, but what else do you get? 

[herbie]

That one has to ask such a question on a web forum reveals their political ignorance more than anything else possibly could.
No access to school, a library or even the History Channel in Momma's basement, eh?

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, Deluge said:

Fascism is a big government, totalitarian, economic, political, and statist ideology

If the LPOC actually gave a sh1t about Canada, that description would fit 100%. Just cross off the word statist and it's bang-on. 

Quote

"Fascism is an unholy alliance between monopoly capitalist enterprises and government. 

LPOC 100%. That's the WE scandal, and the SNC scandal, etc.

Quote

Fascism is statist in nature,

Weird that even fascists are better than the LPOC, in that they actually seem to care about their country. 

Quote

relying on a public-private partnerships, such as between Big Tech and the NSA for information control and surveillance;

Such as the CBC, and the CBC's unholy alliance with Google, Youtube, Twitter (until Musk bought it), FB...

 

Trudeau must hate that definition. 

[robosmith]

On 6/9/2025 at 9:44 AM, Deluge said:

I'm sorry robomarx, but you're a tool. Day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, you peddle nonsensical bullshit to weaken the masses for the fascist slavers, and what do you get in return? Well, you for sure get that bullshit thrown back in your face by me, but what else do you get? 

You're the one peddling vaped bullshit ALL THE TIME HERE.

You need to learn how to cite REAL CREDIBLE SOURCES. Duh

Edited Tuesday at 05:10 PM by robosmith

[Nationalist]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're the one peddling veped bullshit ALL THE TIME HERE.

You need to learn how to cite REAL CREDIBLE SOURCES. Duh

Actually... @Deluge posted a much more detailed and accurate definition of fascism and his source is quite credible. However, it doesn't fit your Libbie ideology, so you do as all cornered Libbies do and attack the messenger instead of the message. 

[Michael Hardner]

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement.[1][2][3] It is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.[2][3] Opposed to communism, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and socialism,[4][5] fascism is at the far right of the traditional left–right spectrum.[6][5][7]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

 

Wikipedia is a more centrist and more widely accepted source for general knowledge.

 

 

[Deluge]

28 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement.[1][2][3] It is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.[2][3] Opposed to communism, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and socialism,[4][5] fascism is at the far right of the traditional left–right spectrum.[6][5][7]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

 

Wikipedia is a more centrist and more widely accepted source for general knowledge.

Wikipedia is a hub for left-wing revisionists. Only a fool would take that site seriously. 

Conservapedia goes after the truth. 

[Deluge]

16 hours ago, herbie said:

That one has to ask such a question on a web forum reveals their political ignorance more than anything else possibly could.
No access to school, a library or even the History Channel in Momma's basement, eh?

herpes believes that there is great ignorance in opposing illegal immigration. What the stupid pervert doesn't understand is that REAL Americans want their borders secure. 

[Nationalist]

57 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement.[1][2][3] It is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.[2][3] Opposed to communism, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and socialism,[4][5] fascism is at the far right of the traditional left–right spectrum.[6][5][7]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

 

Wikipedia is a more centrist and more widely accepted source for general knowledge.

 

 

Mike...all of your definition sounds rather similar to communism. In fact it describes the Soviet world to perfection.

[Deluge]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're the one peddling veped bullshit ALL THE TIME HERE.

You need to learn how to cite REAL CREDIBLE SOURCES. Duh

I'm sorry comrade, but Conservapedia's as real as it gets. 

You're a tool of global fascists and there's nothing you can do to hide from that fact.  

12 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Mike...all of your definition sounds rather similar to communism. In fact it describes the Soviet world to perfection.

Mike loves communism so it makes sense that he would sound like a communist. 

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Actually... @Deluge posted a much more detailed and accurate definition of fascism and his source is quite credible. However, it doesn't fit your Libbie ideology, so you do as all cornered Libbies do and attack the messenger instead of the message. 

^BULLSHIT. Cvaped is just a CON'S fantasy and absolutely NOT a credible source like Britannica I posted.

Thanks for proving you believe in fantasies. LMAO

Edited Tuesday at 05:10 PM by robosmith

[Deluge]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^BULLSHIT. Cvaped is just a CON'S fantasy and absolutely NOT a credible source like Britannica I posted.

Thanks for proving you believe in fantasies. LMAO

Sorry wokejob, but Britannica's been compromised. All your sources have been compromised. Your party has also been compromised and so has your head. You're all spewing woke nonsense and the true Americans have gotten sick of it. 

Trump is doing the right thing, and you people are doing the wrong thing, as usual. 

The hope is once ICE expels the criminal aliens from this country, the federal government will circle back around and start throwing you traitors into the slammer.

Personally, I'd like to see your citizenships revoked. You belong somewhere in the third world. I think people like you have a talent for cowering before dictators.  

Edited Tuesday at 05:18 PM by Deluge

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Sorry wokejob, but Britannica's been compromised. All your sources have been compromised. Your party has also been compromised and so has your head. You're all spewing woke nonsense and the true Americans have gotten sick of it. 

Trump is doing the right thing, and you people are doing the wrong thing, as usual. 

The hope is once ICE expels the criminal aliens from this country, the federal government will circle back around and start throwing you traitors into the slammer.

Personally, I'd like to see your citizenships revoked. You belong somewhere in the third world. I think people like you have a talent for cowering before dictators.  

You claiming "compromised" (esp with a highly credible source like Britannica) only proves it is YOUR BRAIN which is compromised. And you keep proving that over and over, again.

[Nationalist]

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You claiming "compromised" (esp with a highly credible source like Britannica) only proves it is YOUR BRAIN which is compromised. And you keep proving that over and over, again.

Uhm...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2015/01/20/wikipedia-or-encyclopaedia-britannica-which-has-more-bias/

Not altogether credible...

[Deluge]

12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You claiming "compromised" (esp with a highly credible source like Britannica) only proves it is YOUR BRAIN which is compromised. And you keep proving that over and over, again.

The Britannica cultists are no different than you, robomarx: they want the same, woke bullshit that you want: America destroyed and Donald Trump eliminated. 

On the outside you violently object - but on the inside, you're saying "yes, please god, YES!". 

[robosmith]

24 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Uhm...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2015/01/20/wikipedia-or-encyclopaedia-britannica-which-has-more-bias/

Not altogether credible...

Your cite compares Britannica to wikipedia, but conservapedia is CLEARLY an AGENDA DRIVEN site. Duh

[Nationalist]

Just now, robosmith said:

Your cite compares Britannica to wikipedia, but conservapedia is CLEARLY an AGENDA DRIVEN site. Duh

You were claiming credibility. 

I corrected you.

You're welcome. 

[robosmith]

Just now, Nationalist said:

You were claiming credibility. 

I corrected you.

You're welcome. 

AGENDA DRIVEN sites OBVIOUSLY lack credibility. Duh

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

AGENDA DRIVEN sites OBVIOUSLY lack credibility. Duh

Which is why every f*cking thing you present is considered propaganda. 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

AGENDA DRIVEN sites OBVIOUSLY lack credibility. Duh

Libbie...darling...you have spent your credibility and then some.

You shouldn't be beakin' off about it.

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Libbie...darling...you have spent your credibility and then some.

You shouldn't be beakin' off about it.

Did you even read your cite? LMAO

Clue for you: it says Britannica has LESS BIAS than Wikipedia. Duh 

From YOUR CITE:

Quote

They found that in general, Wikipedia articles were more biased—with 73 percent of them containing code words, compared to just 34 percent in Britannica.

IOW, it is YOUR CREDIBILITY which is SHOT AGAIN. LMAO

[Legato]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Did you even read your cite? LMAO

Clue for you: it says Britannica has LESS BIAS than Wikipedia. Duh 

From YOUR CITE:

IOW, it is YOUR CREDIBILITY which is SHOT AGAIN. LMAO

How about Britannica having 0%, 34% shows a distinct bias.

[robosmith]

9 minutes ago, Legato said:

How about Britannica having 0%, 34% shows a distinct bias.

How about you read it again (and again) until you understand it?