PM Carney's chant of stop the war in Gaza is saying let Hamas carry on its attacks on Israel

[CdnFox]

35 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

False.

 

True i'm afraid and fairly well documented 

Quote

How old are you, 5?

Why is that the level of intellect you require to be spoken at?

I said two things that were true.  I wasn't rude, i didn't call you names, you're free to provide evidence if you wish to refute them.  Instead  you act like a complete príck and have a little hissy fit.  Which really WOULD suit an intellect that can't go above 5. 

The food issue is not a war crime. You may not like it but denying food to enemy forces is legit. They are the ones holding the people hostage 

So, i asked if that was the only example of a war crime you had and you freaked out. It would seem we've exhausted that argument. 

Pathetic showing btw.  I think even your 5 year old friends would be disappointed in you. 

[eyeball]

36 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

I defend Israel as much as anyone

 

13 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

That's simply not true.

You're saying you can have it both ways?

Let me know how that works out.

[Moonlight Graham]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Why is that the level of intellect you require to be spoken at?

18+ would be nice.

[Moonlight Graham]

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

You're saying you can have it both ways?

Let me know how that works out.

I don't understand your point.

Yes you can defend Israel when it acts justly and criticize them when they don't.  There's a lot of gray area and subjectivity for sure that's up for debate.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

That's simply not true.

In fact is is true. 

And on the very day that the UN was saying they didn't have evidence, this happened

UN says more food needed in Gaza as looting hampers deliveries | Reuters

Now hamas says it isn't their guys, yet their guys always have food and none gets to the refugees and it always happens in areas where hamas is operating. 

Whether hamas is stealing the food directly or getting someone to do it and taking it or buying it from them, that's what's happening 

So you can lie like the uneducated twat you are, or you can start looking around.  Isreal has ONLY halted food when there were concerns about it being taken and given to hamas. 

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

18+ would be nice.

Well i agree, maybe you can work your way up to that level of understanding over the years. Right now you're no where close. 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

I don't understand your point.

Yes you can defend Israel when it acts justly and criticize them when they don't.  There's a lot of gray area and subjectivity for sure that's up for debate.

Not for very long in this forum. Even Jewish critics of Israeli policies towards Palestine are called anti-Semites who support terrorists.

It looks to me like you understand my point just fine.

Anyway good luck with it.

[User]

8 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

That's simply not true.

Yes, it is true:

 

[SpankyMcFarland]

In most conflicts one can see reprehensible acts committed by both sides. Gaza is no different. Pointing  them out does not mean one supports either side. 

[eyeball]

44 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

In most conflicts one can see reprehensible acts committed by both sides. Gaza is no different. Pointing  them out does not mean one supports either side. 

It means exactly that to one side. If you're not with them it can only mean one thing.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

It means exactly that to one side. If you're not with them it can only mean one thing.

You literally advocate for hamas. You literallly say they were justified and acting with in "the rights of every human being" to 'resistance' when they did what they did.

So you directly and clearly support hamas atrocities and then say "Gosh , i just don't understand why those guys thing i'm taking one side!!!!" LOLOLOL

[CdnFox]

53 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

In most conflicts one can see reprehensible acts committed by both sides. Gaza is no different. Pointing  them out does not mean one supports either side. 

But you have to point them out in context. 

War is in and of itself a pretty reprehensible thing. Lots of innocent people die, lots of suffering, lots of destroyed homes, etc 

So if you're going to point things out you have to point them out within the context of war.  If you pretend that something is 'reprensible' just because it's part of a conflict then you're not being honest, 

For example it was reported in one media source that "israelis shot a dozen or so people near one of the food distribution areas".   But it does NOT mention they were attacking to steal food, how many of the dead were combatants and not civilians, or any other details. Sounds like the israelis just decided to up and kill people at random. 

If Hamas is stealing the food and using it to keep it's people fighting instead of feeding the public then israel has every military right to be concerned about that and to stop that.  Claiming that's a "war crime" isn't really accurate in light of the context. 

And you can see what happened.  When i asked about war crimes and the other poster mentioned food and i brought up the concerns raised he simply became angry and went to name calling and being a shíthead.  That is NOT someone holding one side accountable for a 'war crime', that is someone who's decided to take a partisan stance.