Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.

[Moonbox]

29 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

In other words your buthurt that I'm correct yet again and instead of making some species of coherent counter argument you offered this, which is actually of even lower value than what you're replying to.

The hope of course is that someday you'll begin to listen to the number of people who look at you with disdain and do a bit of a self evaluation and hopefully improve.

I realize it's unlikely, you are very clearly and emotionally damaged little guy and if you were half as smart as you think you are you'd still be twice as smart as you actually are.

But there's always a chance that someday you may start actually contributing to the forum in a meaningful fashion. I have in the past seen you start a conversation with something that was semi-intelligent only to completely fall apart the moment somebody points out a flaw in your argument. So it is at least theoretically possible that you may stop doing that and actually offer intelligent discussions.

Or god help us all maybe actually start a topic once in awhile   Or contribute meaningfully to the board in some fashion other than being a douche.

I realize you won't understand any of what I just said, it's too long. But who knows, if you work on it for a few days maybe you'll figure it out

In other words, you're so fragile that a casual one-liner sends you spiraling into yet another useless, longwinded rant.  🥱 

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

In other words, you're so fragile that a casual one-liner sends you spiraling into yet another useless, longwinded rant.  🥱 

LOL in other words seeing an honest answer causes you to shrivel up and lash out with the wit of a 5 year old  

And it only seems useless to you because you can't read that much without taking a nap and it only seems long because you type with 2 fingers and one brain cell   

Oh dear..... was that too long for you?   Honestly i can't imagine what it must be like for you to get by with a brain so small that for a thought to enter it one must leave to make room   

[Army Guy]

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Because you say so?  😆

When you gauge the "value" of what people are saying based on how much it agrees with what you've chosen to believe, your opinion on this is worth less than nothing. 

Somehow it's lost on you how ridiculous you make yourself look whining about insults while happily throwing around your own, and upvoting the endless stream of insults from our forum's biggest troll.  

Have you ever heard of....double-standards? 

...and miss out on your deeply informed gems of wisdom?  No thank you sir!  

And here we are again, if you need a hug just say so, there free....

Everything you have said in the last 10 posts have been lost on me, what is it they say, in one ear out the other....becasue there is no value in any of it...I've up voted stuff you have said mind you not often, but i do up vote on comments that i agree with...Sorry muffin man, want more up votes your going to have to step up....or maybe it is not a him problem but a you problem...anyways maybe step back and reflect on you...instead of others....i guess that's what happens when you vote liberal, you lose your objectivity....

Maybe you should be looking at writing a book, now that you've gleaned all this wisdom from the forum...

 

 

 

[taxme]

On 5/24/2025 at 11:40 AM, Politics1990 said:

well after todays news i may not be voting for either one unless the ndp get a leader i like heather mcpherson maybe.. i got letter to apply for canada free dental plan.. but apparently because i  turned down my companys health pharmacare/dental plan which takes 70$ off each cheque i don't qualify for this bogus free canada  dental plan they been advertising lol..🤣  that combined with tax break for middle class which i miss by 4-5k  and screwing me on my income taxes this year  is the last straw  very well may be voting con next time even if i dislike PP. 

Things could not get any worse, but maybe even got better under a conservative government, but thanks to those stoopid imbeciles out there that voted for the liebreals back in power, they have just helped once again in making Canada even a worse place than what it is today. We ain't seen nuttin' yet, pardner, of what the WEF globalist lieberals will be doing in the next four years to you and me and thee. 

My gal friend has told me that her daughter and husband have just lost all contracts for demolitions to be done here in BC. Is that just a coincidence or is it because of Corney and the lieberals that got back in power? Hey, we never know, eh? 

[Moonbox]

23 hours ago, Army Guy said:

Everything you have said in the last 10 posts have been lost on me, what is it they say, in one ear out the other.

You're just describing your default mindset.  If someone/something is saying you LIKE, you believe it without question, and if it's something you DON'T LIKE, you discard it.  That's filtered reality, but I'm sure it's nice and  comfy.  🤡

[SkyHigh]

On 5/14/2025 at 7:11 PM, CdnFox said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberals-won-t-table-budget-1.7534962

Like WHAT the actual EFF?!?!

This guy's whole stick was that we were in massive crisis mode and we need a plan desperately and he's the guy with the plan

And now he's not even going to table a budget until next year? What the hell is that? What happened to the most serious crisis of our time?

This guy is a total fraud and the stupidest half of Canada fell for it. I cannot believe he's not even going to table a freaking budget. He's got no plan and he's just going to carry on that way.

 

Just to be clear, you're upset because someone that didn't enter parliament until after the 2025 fiscal year had started, isn't going to table a budget for the 2025 fiscal year?

As always your ignorance is comical, but what more can be expected from someone who's only experience with budgeting is probably notations in his check book , gotta make sure there's enough left for milk at the end of the month. 

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

Just to be clear, you're upset because someone that didn't enter parliament until after the 2025 fiscal year had started, isn't going to table a budget for the 2025 fiscal year?

 

Just to be clear, you're claiming someone who has been the fiscal advisor to the liberals for 5 years and who has access to all the budgetary officers of the CURRENT gov't who know every detail required is somehow 'brand new' to parliament?

Every single gov't in Canadian history produced a budget even if they were elected just before budget time. Harper was elected in january, turned one out a few months later.  Others did too. 

So can you explain why a man who's supposed to be an economic and fiscal genus who is intimately familiar with the finances and budgets to date who has access to the current gov't ministers and experts who know the financial situation back and forward and who produced a platform budget to run on...  why THAT guy CANNOT do what every other prime minister before him has done?

As always your lies in defense of the indefensible are comical but what can one expect from someone who would happily sell out their country if it meant keeping their beloved liberals in power. 

[SkyHigh]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Just to be clear, you're claiming someone who has been the fiscal advisor to the liberals for 5 years and who has access to all the budgetary officers of the CURRENT gov't who know every detail required is somehow 'brand new' to parliament?

Every single gov't in Canadian history produced a budget even if they were elected just before budget time. Harper was elected in january, turned one out a few months later.  Others did too. 

So can you explain why a man who's supposed to be an economic and fiscal genus who is intimately familiar with the finances and budgets to date who has access to the current gov't ministers and experts who know the financial situation back and forward and who produced a platform budget to run on...  why THAT guy CANNOT do what every other prime minister before him has done?

As always your lies in defense of the indefensible are comical but what can one expect from someone who would happily sell out their country if it meant keeping their beloved liberals in power. 

First, not a liberal. In fact last time I voted Liberal was for David Pratt and that was only because I knew him personally.

Now back to your lack of understanding of economics. Canada's fiscal year is from April 1st to March 31st, much like many businesses. I could explain the reasons for this but I'm sure it would fall on most likely deaf ears and most definitely ignorant ones

So either you want him to table a budget for fiscal year that was over half way through the first quarter when a new government took over. OR you were expecting him to release a budget as an unelected party leader weeks before a close election? Or did you have another idea , untethered from the realities associated with finance at that scale, or in your case any scale 

And, as you often do, you've argued against your own point. We'll to be fair this specific point. Your overall pointis just Libs bad, because you're a partisan hack.

You said Harper elected in JANUARY (hint January is before April) months before the fiscal year started, (Again Months Before) and still tabled a budget. Your right and many economists didn't think he could and were impressed when he did. I too thought this was quite an accomplishment, because I'm not a partisan hack 

But Please continue to show you're nothing but a crotchety old man that has nothing in his life other than spouting  the ignorant talking points of the grifters that confirm your pre-existing bias , behind your keyboard (probably still running windows 98. You're the internet equivalent of the old man yelling at kids to get off his yard, both sad and amusing at the same time. At least very entertaining when I come on the rare times I'm not living in the real world. You should try it.

 

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

First, not a liberal. In fact last time I voted Liberal was for David Pratt and that was only because I knew him personally.

 

Dude you're already obviously a dishonest person so why the hell would we believe you? You're here defending the liberals with the most absolutely asinine and incredibly stupid arguments possible. Your actions say you're probably more likely a liberal

Quote

 

Now back to your lack of understanding of economics. Canada's fiscal year is from April 1st to March 31st, much like many businesses. I could explain the reasons for this but I'm sure it would fall on most likely deaf ears and most definitely ignorant ones

So either you want him to table a budget for fiscal year that was over half way through the first quarter when a new government took over. OR you were expecting him to release a budget as an unelected party leader weeks before a close election? Or did you have another idea , untethered from the realities associated with finance at that scale, or in your case any scale 

And, as you often do, you've argued against your own point. We'll to be fair this specific point. Your overall pointis just Libs bad, because you're a partisan hack.

You said Harper elected in JANUARY (hint January is before April) months before the fiscal year started, (Again Months Before) and still tabled a budget. Your right and many economists didn't think he could and were impressed when he did. I too thought this was quite an accomplishment, because I'm not a partisan hack 

But Please continue to show you're nothing but a crotchety old man that has nothing in his life other than spouting  the ignorant talking points of the grifters that confirm your pre-existing bias , behind your keyboard (probably still running windows 98. You're the internet equivalent of the old man yelling at kids to get off his yard, both sad and amusing at the same time. At least very entertaining when I come on the rare times I'm not living in the real world. You should try it.

 

The only thing you're proving with this is your own ignorance and dishonesty

And neither of the things you said are true. Budgets are not released at the fiscal year end precisely. They are often either very early or sometimes very late.

And he did in fact release a budget as part of his platform. Oopsie, you forgot about that didn't you. But we're talking about is presenting one to the house of commons

So your argument entirely is that if you don't present a budget by April 1st you can't present a budget at all for that year. That's your argument.

That is the stupidest thing I have heard on this forum and we've got Robo Smith.

There is no law that requires the budget to be presented on the 1st or by the 1st. And in fact many times in history it's been presented much later than that.

He won the election In April. There should be absolutely no problem whatsoever for him to present a 2025 to 2026 budget by June. That is 100% doable and possible and they had all of the numbers before the election, during the election and after the election

Your premise that somehow harper found it easier because the year hadn't started yet is absolutely childish. 

As to the rest, I take it you just found out your wife is cheating? You've got that kind of tone and personality about you. Can't say as i blame her. 

 

Edited May 27 by CdnFox

[Army Guy]

15 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

Now back to your lack of understanding of economics. Canada's fiscal year is from April 1st to March 31st, much like many businesses. I could explain the reasons for this but I'm sure it would fall on most likely deaf ears and most definitely ignorant ones

So either you want him to table a budget for fiscal year that was over half way through the first quarter when a new government took over. OR you were expecting him to release a budget as an unelected party leader weeks before a close election? Or did you have another idea , untethered from the realities associated with finance at that scale, or in your case any scale 

And, as you often do, you've argued against your own point. We'll to be fair this specific point. Your overall pointis just Libs bad, because you're a partisan hack.

You said Harper elected in JANUARY (hint January is before April) months before the fiscal year started, (Again Months Before) and still tabled a budget. Your right and many economists didn't think he could and were impressed when he did. I too thought this was quite an accomplishment, because I'm not a partisan hack 

But Please continue to show you're nothing but a crotchety old man that has nothing in his life other than spouting  the ignorant talking points of the grifters that confirm your pre-existing bias , behind your keyboard (probably still running windows 98. You're the internet equivalent of the old man yelling at kids to get off his yard, both sad and amusing at the same time. At least very entertaining when I come on the rare times I'm not living in the real world. You should try it.

 

100 % right the federal fiscal budget is from Apr 1st to march 31 st, and i might be wrong here but the budget we all were expecting was more of the liberals game plan such as what was announced in the throne speech, the budget which will be tabled later this year was how they were going to pay for all these campaign promises and their way forward....and where is all this new money coming from....

So yes we want him to table a new budget, to tell us how is going to pay for all his new promises or policies, as i'm sure Justins budget did not take in any of the new liberal direction...that make sense... 

What your suggesting is , is there is no way to find out who or what is going to be spent until a new fiscal year....which is not very transparent is it ? As we have a new government with a brand new direction, that no funding has been attached to....would it not be like a blank check let's spend what we want until we are forced to table a fiscal budget in Apr of next year...just 10 months from now...so a full year of no budget?

 

[Army Guy]

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

You're just describing your default mindset.  If someone/something is saying you LIKE, you believe it without question, and if it's something you DON'T LIKE, you discard it.  That's filtered reality, but I'm sure it's nice and  comfy.  🤡

sure....