Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.

[Moonbox]

29 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

In other words your buthurt that I'm correct yet again and instead of making some species of coherent counter argument you offered this, which is actually of even lower value than what you're replying to.

The hope of course is that someday you'll begin to listen to the number of people who look at you with disdain and do a bit of a self evaluation and hopefully improve.

I realize it's unlikely, you are very clearly and emotionally damaged little guy and if you were half as smart as you think you are you'd still be twice as smart as you actually are.

But there's always a chance that someday you may start actually contributing to the forum in a meaningful fashion. I have in the past seen you start a conversation with something that was semi-intelligent only to completely fall apart the moment somebody points out a flaw in your argument. So it is at least theoretically possible that you may stop doing that and actually offer intelligent discussions.

Or god help us all maybe actually start a topic once in awhile   Or contribute meaningfully to the board in some fashion other than being a douche.

I realize you won't understand any of what I just said, it's too long. But who knows, if you work on it for a few days maybe you'll figure it out

In other words, you're so fragile that a casual one-liner sends you spiraling into yet another useless, longwinded rant.  🥱 

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

In other words, you're so fragile that a casual one-liner sends you spiraling into yet another useless, longwinded rant.  🥱 

LOL in other words seeing an honest answer causes you to shrivel up and lash out with the wit of a 5 year old  

And it only seems useless to you because you can't read that much without taking a nap and it only seems long because you type with 2 fingers and one brain cell   

Oh dear..... was that too long for you?   Honestly i can't imagine what it must be like for you to get by with a brain so small that for a thought to enter it one must leave to make room   

[Army Guy]

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Because you say so?  😆

When you gauge the "value" of what people are saying based on how much it agrees with what you've chosen to believe, your opinion on this is worth less than nothing. 

Somehow it's lost on you how ridiculous you make yourself look whining about insults while happily throwing around your own, and upvoting the endless stream of insults from our forum's biggest troll.  

Have you ever heard of....double-standards? 

...and miss out on your deeply informed gems of wisdom?  No thank you sir!  

And here we are again, if you need a hug just say so, there free....

Everything you have said in the last 10 posts have been lost on me, what is it they say, in one ear out the other....becasue there is no value in any of it...I've up voted stuff you have said mind you not often, but i do up vote on comments that i agree with...Sorry muffin man, want more up votes your going to have to step up....or maybe it is not a him problem but a you problem...anyways maybe step back and reflect on you...instead of others....i guess that's what happens when you vote liberal, you lose your objectivity....

Maybe you should be looking at writing a book, now that you've gleaned all this wisdom from the forum...

 

 

 

[taxme]

On 5/24/2025 at 11:40 AM, Politics1990 said:

well after todays news i may not be voting for either one unless the ndp get a leader i like heather mcpherson maybe.. i got letter to apply for canada free dental plan.. but apparently because i  turned down my companys health pharmacare/dental plan which takes 70$ off each cheque i don't qualify for this bogus free canada  dental plan they been advertising lol..🤣  that combined with tax break for middle class which i miss by 4-5k  and screwing me on my income taxes this year  is the last straw  very well may be voting con next time even if i dislike PP. 

Things could not get any worse, but maybe even got better under a conservative government, but thanks to those stoopid imbeciles out there that voted for the liebreals back in power, they have just helped once again in making Canada even a worse place than what it is today. We ain't seen nuttin' yet, pardner, of what the WEF globalist lieberals will be doing in the next four years to you and me and thee. 

My gal friend has told me that her daughter and husband have just lost all contracts for demolitions to be done here in BC. Is that just a coincidence or is it because of Corney and the lieberals that got back in power? Hey, we never know, eh? 

[Moonbox]

23 hours ago, Army Guy said:

Everything you have said in the last 10 posts have been lost on me, what is it they say, in one ear out the other.

You're just describing your default mindset.  If someone/something is saying you LIKE, you believe it without question, and if it's something you DON'T LIKE, you discard it.  That's filtered reality, but I'm sure it's nice and  comfy.  🤡

[SkyHigh]

On 5/14/2025 at 7:11 PM, CdnFox said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberals-won-t-table-budget-1.7534962

Like WHAT the actual EFF?!?!

This guy's whole stick was that we were in massive crisis mode and we need a plan desperately and he's the guy with the plan

And now he's not even going to table a budget until next year? What the hell is that? What happened to the most serious crisis of our time?

This guy is a total fraud and the stupidest half of Canada fell for it. I cannot believe he's not even going to table a freaking budget. He's got no plan and he's just going to carry on that way.

 

Just to be clear, you're upset because someone that didn't enter parliament until after the 2025 fiscal year had started, isn't going to table a budget for the 2025 fiscal year?

As always your ignorance is comical, but what more can be expected from someone who's only experience with budgeting is probably notations in his check book , gotta make sure there's enough left for milk at the end of the month. 

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

Just to be clear, you're upset because someone that didn't enter parliament until after the 2025 fiscal year had started, isn't going to table a budget for the 2025 fiscal year?

 

Just to be clear, you're claiming someone who has been the fiscal advisor to the liberals for 5 years and who has access to all the budgetary officers of the CURRENT gov't who know every detail required is somehow 'brand new' to parliament?

Every single gov't in Canadian history produced a budget even if they were elected just before budget time. Harper was elected in january, turned one out a few months later.  Others did too. 

So can you explain why a man who's supposed to be an economic and fiscal genus who is intimately familiar with the finances and budgets to date who has access to the current gov't ministers and experts who know the financial situation back and forward and who produced a platform budget to run on...  why THAT guy CANNOT do what every other prime minister before him has done?

As always your lies in defense of the indefensible are comical but what can one expect from someone who would happily sell out their country if it meant keeping their beloved liberals in power. 

[SkyHigh]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Just to be clear, you're claiming someone who has been the fiscal advisor to the liberals for 5 years and who has access to all the budgetary officers of the CURRENT gov't who know every detail required is somehow 'brand new' to parliament?

Every single gov't in Canadian history produced a budget even if they were elected just before budget time. Harper was elected in january, turned one out a few months later.  Others did too. 

So can you explain why a man who's supposed to be an economic and fiscal genus who is intimately familiar with the finances and budgets to date who has access to the current gov't ministers and experts who know the financial situation back and forward and who produced a platform budget to run on...  why THAT guy CANNOT do what every other prime minister before him has done?

As always your lies in defense of the indefensible are comical but what can one expect from someone who would happily sell out their country if it meant keeping their beloved liberals in power. 

First, not a liberal. In fact last time I voted Liberal was for David Pratt and that was only because I knew him personally.

Now back to your lack of understanding of economics. Canada's fiscal year is from April 1st to March 31st, much like many businesses. I could explain the reasons for this but I'm sure it would fall on most likely deaf ears and most definitely ignorant ones

So either you want him to table a budget for fiscal year that was over half way through the first quarter when a new government took over. OR you were expecting him to release a budget as an unelected party leader weeks before a close election? Or did you have another idea , untethered from the realities associated with finance at that scale, or in your case any scale 

And, as you often do, you've argued against your own point. We'll to be fair this specific point. Your overall pointis just Libs bad, because you're a partisan hack.

You said Harper elected in JANUARY (hint January is before April) months before the fiscal year started, (Again Months Before) and still tabled a budget. Your right and many economists didn't think he could and were impressed when he did. I too thought this was quite an accomplishment, because I'm not a partisan hack 

But Please continue to show you're nothing but a crotchety old man that has nothing in his life other than spouting  the ignorant talking points of the grifters that confirm your pre-existing bias , behind your keyboard (probably still running windows 98. You're the internet equivalent of the old man yelling at kids to get off his yard, both sad and amusing at the same time. At least very entertaining when I come on the rare times I'm not living in the real world. You should try it.

 

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

First, not a liberal. In fact last time I voted Liberal was for David Pratt and that was only because I knew him personally.

 

Dude you're already obviously a dishonest person so why the hell would we believe you? You're here defending the liberals with the most absolutely asinine and incredibly stupid arguments possible. Your actions say you're probably more likely a liberal

Quote

 

Now back to your lack of understanding of economics. Canada's fiscal year is from April 1st to March 31st, much like many businesses. I could explain the reasons for this but I'm sure it would fall on most likely deaf ears and most definitely ignorant ones

So either you want him to table a budget for fiscal year that was over half way through the first quarter when a new government took over. OR you were expecting him to release a budget as an unelected party leader weeks before a close election? Or did you have another idea , untethered from the realities associated with finance at that scale, or in your case any scale 

And, as you often do, you've argued against your own point. We'll to be fair this specific point. Your overall pointis just Libs bad, because you're a partisan hack.

You said Harper elected in JANUARY (hint January is before April) months before the fiscal year started, (Again Months Before) and still tabled a budget. Your right and many economists didn't think he could and were impressed when he did. I too thought this was quite an accomplishment, because I'm not a partisan hack 

But Please continue to show you're nothing but a crotchety old man that has nothing in his life other than spouting  the ignorant talking points of the grifters that confirm your pre-existing bias , behind your keyboard (probably still running windows 98. You're the internet equivalent of the old man yelling at kids to get off his yard, both sad and amusing at the same time. At least very entertaining when I come on the rare times I'm not living in the real world. You should try it.

 

The only thing you're proving with this is your own ignorance and dishonesty

And neither of the things you said are true. Budgets are not released at the fiscal year end precisely. They are often either very early or sometimes very late.

And he did in fact release a budget as part of his platform. Oopsie, you forgot about that didn't you. But we're talking about is presenting one to the house of commons

So your argument entirely is that if you don't present a budget by April 1st you can't present a budget at all for that year. That's your argument.

That is the stupidest thing I have heard on this forum and we've got Robo Smith.

There is no law that requires the budget to be presented on the 1st or by the 1st. And in fact many times in history it's been presented much later than that.

He won the election In April. There should be absolutely no problem whatsoever for him to present a 2025 to 2026 budget by June. That is 100% doable and possible and they had all of the numbers before the election, during the election and after the election

Your premise that somehow harper found it easier because the year hadn't started yet is absolutely childish. 

As to the rest, I take it you just found out your wife is cheating? You've got that kind of tone and personality about you. Can't say as i blame her. 

 

Edited May 27, 2025 by CdnFox

[Army Guy]

15 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

Now back to your lack of understanding of economics. Canada's fiscal year is from April 1st to March 31st, much like many businesses. I could explain the reasons for this but I'm sure it would fall on most likely deaf ears and most definitely ignorant ones

So either you want him to table a budget for fiscal year that was over half way through the first quarter when a new government took over. OR you were expecting him to release a budget as an unelected party leader weeks before a close election? Or did you have another idea , untethered from the realities associated with finance at that scale, or in your case any scale 

And, as you often do, you've argued against your own point. We'll to be fair this specific point. Your overall pointis just Libs bad, because you're a partisan hack.

You said Harper elected in JANUARY (hint January is before April) months before the fiscal year started, (Again Months Before) and still tabled a budget. Your right and many economists didn't think he could and were impressed when he did. I too thought this was quite an accomplishment, because I'm not a partisan hack 

But Please continue to show you're nothing but a crotchety old man that has nothing in his life other than spouting  the ignorant talking points of the grifters that confirm your pre-existing bias , behind your keyboard (probably still running windows 98. You're the internet equivalent of the old man yelling at kids to get off his yard, both sad and amusing at the same time. At least very entertaining when I come on the rare times I'm not living in the real world. You should try it.

 

100 % right the federal fiscal budget is from Apr 1st to march 31 st, and i might be wrong here but the budget we all were expecting was more of the liberals game plan such as what was announced in the throne speech, the budget which will be tabled later this year was how they were going to pay for all these campaign promises and their way forward....and where is all this new money coming from....

So yes we want him to table a new budget, to tell us how is going to pay for all his new promises or policies, as i'm sure Justins budget did not take in any of the new liberal direction...that make sense... 

What your suggesting is , is there is no way to find out who or what is going to be spent until a new fiscal year....which is not very transparent is it ? As we have a new government with a brand new direction, that no funding has been attached to....would it not be like a blank check let's spend what we want until we are forced to table a fiscal budget in Apr of next year...just 10 months from now...so a full year of no budget?

 

[Army Guy]

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

You're just describing your default mindset.  If someone/something is saying you LIKE, you believe it without question, and if it's something you DON'T LIKE, you discard it.  That's filtered reality, but I'm sure it's nice and  comfy.  🤡

sure....

[SkyHigh]

On 5/27/2025 at 2:34 PM, Army Guy said:

100 % right the federal fiscal budget is from Apr 1st to march 31 st, and i might be wrong here but the budget we all were expecting was more of the liberals game plan such as what was announced in the throne speech, the budget which will be tabled later this year was how they were going to pay for all these campaign promises and their way forward....and where is all this new money coming from....

So yes we want him to table a new budget, to tell us how is going to pay for all his new promises or policies, as i'm sure Justins budget did not take in any of the new liberal direction...that make sense... 

What your suggesting is , is there is no way to find out who or what is going to be spent until a new fiscal year....which is not very transparent is it ? As we have a new government with a brand new direction, that no funding has been attached to....would it not be like a blank check let's spend what we want until we are forced to table a fiscal budget in Apr of next year...just 10 months from now...so a full year of no budget?

 

I agree with everything you're saying, other than your characterization of me giving him a "blank check". 

Spending bills are subject to confidence votes in parlement and this being a minority government alone, puts in checks and balances.

I was commenting specifically on issue of  this years budget and more broadly on the ridiculousness of the title of this thread and the overall ignorance of political discours 

Yes Carney has zero charisma and lacks a certain gravitas as a leader in public, but is arguably the most qualified person to ever hold the office, and if people get sidetracked by silly partisan crap like             "Master economist REFUSES to table a budget" (again for a year already started Before taking power) then it just comes across as butt hurt, can be easily ignored and filled under goofy right winger and therefore not even be considered by the majority of the electorate that aren't partisan hacks.

You realize many on the left have conserns about Carney too right? 

Maybe both sides can find where their crazy meets and form a collision 

[Army Guy]

23 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

I agree with everything you're saying, other than your characterization of me giving him a "blank check". 

Spending bills are subject to confidence votes in parlement and this being a minority government alone, puts in checks and balances.

I was commenting specifically on issue of  this years budget and more broadly on the ridiculousness of the title of this thread and the overall ignorance of political discours 

Yes Carney has zero charisma and lacks a certain gravitas as a leader in public, but is arguably the most qualified person to ever hold the office, and if people get sidetracked by silly partisan crap like             "Master economist REFUSES to table a budget" (again for a year already started Before taking power) then it just comes across as butt hurt, can be easily ignored and filled under goofy right winger and therefore not even be considered by the majority of the electorate that aren't partisan hacks.

You realize many on the left have conserns about Carney too right? 

Maybe both sides can find where their crazy meets and form a collision 

Perhaps i did not explain it well enough,a budget is the costed plan that lets everyone know what it is the government is going to do and how they are going to pay for it, it requires approval of majority of parliament to pass...which could lead to another election...The short cut would be not to table a budget, and forego getting parliament approval, not risking another election, and not being transparent with canadians on what your going to spend money on...or like a blank check, becasue nobody knows the plan or what it costs...

Carney had like any party a long list of promises ,how was he going to pay for them as he wanted to get going ASAP...it is not being butt hurt but rather being transparent with the entire country, not just conservatives...

i do agree with you this country has a large pool of crazy, and it has collided where both sides can rarely talk to each other...

[SkyHigh]

It's been obvious for a while that your low mental capacity and lack of any real professional/life experience makes it impossible for you to understand even basic economic principles but I've just now realized the issue may be  larger, possibly an error in your medication or even the early signs of dementia. Let's explore 

On 5/27/2025 at 2:03 PM, CdnFox said:

Dude you're already obviously a dishonest person so why the hell would we believe you? You're here defending the liberals with the most absolutely asinine and incredibly stupid arguments possible. Your actions say you're probably more likely a liberal

Dude on this very forum I've spoken about being a recovering addict, a high school dropout, homeless, formally on welfare and having a criminal record, but you think I'd lie about voting Liberal? I like most Canadians am a liberal (notice the lower case "l" ) and if I thought that a Liberal (notice the upper case "L" I'll let you Google the difference) had been the best person to represent me then I would have proudly voted Liberal (again upper case L) 

But ya, I'm lying on some silly forum about who I vote for, definitely sounds like something that comes from a sound mind.

On 5/27/2025 at 2:03 PM, CdnFox said:

As to the rest, I take it you just found out your wife is cheating? You've got that kind of tone and personality about you. Can't say as i blame her. 

Here again is how we differ. In some lame attempt at a "come back" you just pull shīt out your àss. My crochety old man comment was based on observable facts, the fact is you spend an inordinate time on this forum and that alone allows me to extrapolate certain logical conclusions. 

People with successful professional careers either continue in their fields in an advisory or diminished role. They don't post dozens of times a day whilst providing little to no insight or even understanding of the topics discussed 

People with rewarding personal, or social lives live their lives out in the world not behind their computers screens calling people kiddo.

You have nothing but the sad validation you get by name calling on a useless forum , where you spend all day ( point of interest, you average more posts a day then I do a month) and before you use your throw away line " I just type faster" don't bother that's below even your intelligence and that's saying something.

But seriously think about making an appointment with a neurologist, now if you did have anyone that cared I'm sure they would have noticed already, but since you don't take it from me, someone that doesn't even like you, in fact I think you're most likely a horrible person but your decline is noticable. Go see a doctor 

 

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

It's been obvious for a while that your low mental capacity and lack of any real professional/life experience makes it impossible for you to understand even basic economic principles but I've just now realized the issue may be  larger, possibly an error in your medication or even the early signs of dementia. Let's explore 

Dude on this very forum I've spoken about being a recovering addict, a high school dropout, homeless, formally on welfare and having a criminal record, but you think I'd lie about voting Liberal? I like most Canadians am a liberal (notice the lower case "l" ) and if I thought that a Liberal (notice the upper case "L" I'll let you Google the difference) had been the best person to represent me then I would have proudly voted Liberal (again upper case L) 

But ya, I'm lying on some silly forum about who I vote for, definitely sounds like something that comes from a sound mind.

Here again is how we differ. In some lame attempt at a "come back" you just pull shīt out your àss. My crochety old man comment was based on observable facts, the fact is you spend an inordinate time on this forum and that alone allows me to extrapolate certain logical conclusions. 

People with successful professional careers either continue in their fields in an advisory or diminished role. They don't post dozens of times a day whilst providing little to no insight or even understanding of the topics discussed 

People with rewarding personal, or social lives live their lives out in the world not behind their computers screens calling people kiddo.

You have nothing but the sad validation you get by name calling on a useless forum , where you spend all day ( point of interest, you average more posts a day then I do a month) and before you use your throw away line " I just type faster" don't bother that's below even your intelligence and that's saying something.

But seriously think about making an appointment with a neurologist, now if you did have anyone that cared I'm sure they would have noticed already, but since you don't take it from me, someone that doesn't even like you, in fact I think you're most likely a horrible person but your decline is noticable. Go see a doctor 

 

Oh look, a child is going to tell his betters how smart he is

Kiddo it's already been long established that you are intellectual capacity is only slightly better than that of a hamster. Unless it was a particularly smart hamster

And frankly I think that a drug abusing lowlife Dropout who's made nothing of his life is capable of lying about anything.

And basically your whole post is just obsessing about me and how badly I've hurt your feelings. I honestly don't remember what the hell I said to you but whatever it was obviously I hit a nerve. 

You couldn't have told the world you were a loser any more clearly than the post you just made.

[SkyHigh]

 

 

39 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

Perhaps i did not explain it well enough,a budget is the costed plan that lets everyone know what it is the government is going to do and how they are going to pay for it, it requires approval of majority of parliament to pass...which could lead to another election...The short cut would be not to table a budget, and forego getting parliament approval, not risking another election, and not being transparent with canadians on what your going to spend money on...or like a blank check, becasue nobody knows the plan or what it costs...

Carney had like any party a long list of promises ,how was he going to pay for them as he wanted to get going ASAP...it is not being butt hurt but rather being transparent with the entire country, not just conservatives...

i do agree with you this country has a large pool of crazy, and it has collided where both sides can rarely talk to each other...

Let's forget the word budget, I think it might be interfering with where we agree 

You're right promises were made and must be kept, but we need to focus on real things.

One of the campaign promises that was most important to me was free interprovincial trade by July 1st and though some barriers were lifted through legislation many barriers still remain. This is a pressing issue that involves all Canadians directly, where decisive actions must be taken immediately.

Back to budgets. We both know that a budget for this year was and is in place, that ensures our bills will be paid and that putting together some quick patchwork budget for a fiscal year already in progress won't actually help, again any additional spending must pass a vote. 

Therefore even bringing it up distracts from real issues Further more anyone with an even rudimentary understanding of the financial system  will simply shrug such criticism off and be less inclined to consider anything else from that source whether or not those criticisms have merit.

For example, I think Trumps reputation in business ( let's be honest his daddy bought him some buildings in New York during a time and in an area where the real estate market was weak, and he played a business man on a scripted T V show) greatly outweigh his experience and acumen ( he bankrupted a casino, amongst other things, a casino) and most of his supporters are better described as marks. He is a brilliant self promoter (shameless but brilliant) and most have bought in to the hype,but when people call him Hitler or a Russian plant, they just sound like partisan hacks and shouldn't be taken seriously. 

The nimrod that wrote this thread falls into that same lunatic fringe, don't let him drag you down 

 

[SkyHigh]

15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Oh look, a child is going to tell his betters how smart he is

Kiddo it's already been long established that you are intellectual capacity is only slightly better than that of a hamster. Unless it was a particularly smart hamster

And frankly I think that a drug abusing lowlife Dropout who's made nothing of his life is capable of lying about anything.

And basically your whole post is just obsessing about me and how badly I've hurt your feelings. I honestly don't remember what the hell I said to you but whatever it was obviously I hit a nerve. 

You couldn't have told the world you were a loser any more clearly than the post you just made.

What I read is you can't defend your sad little life and all you have is 

"I know you are but what am I"

You're both sad and funny 

Now call me kiddo again your retorts are always so scathing and hurtful, no wait I mean bloated and impotent, just like you 

[Army Guy]

3 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

 

 

Let's forget the word budget, I think it might be interfering with where we agree 

You're right promises were made and must be kept, but we need to focus on real things.

One of the campaign promises that was most important to me was free interprovincial trade by July 1st and though some barriers were lifted through legislation many barriers still remain. This is a pressing issue that involves all Canadians directly, where decisive actions must be taken immediately.

Back to budgets. We both know that a budget for this year was and is in place, that ensures our bills will be paid and that putting together some quick patchwork budget for a fiscal year already in progress won't actually help, again any additional spending must pass a vote. 

Therefore even bringing it up distracts from real issues Further more anyone with an even rudimentary understanding of the financial system  will simply shrug such criticism off and be less inclined to consider anything else from that source whether or not those criticisms have merit.

For example, I think Trumps reputation in business ( let's be honest his daddy bought him some buildings in New York during a time and in an area where the real estate market was weak, and he played a business man on a scripted T V show) greatly outweigh his experience and acumen ( he bankrupted a casino, amongst other things, a casino) and most of his supporters are better described as marks. He is a brilliant self promoter (shameless but brilliant) and most have bought in to the hype,but when people call him Hitler or a Russian plant, they just sound like partisan hacks and shouldn't be taken seriously. 

The nimrod that wrote this thread falls into that same lunatic fringe, don't let him drag you down 

 

There are plenty of things Carney and his staff could work on that does not have a need for new funding, like you mentioned...

Yes Justin did submit a budget ....but within that budget there is NO funding for any of Carneys additions.....meaning yes we can pay some bills that are recurring, but thats it.......but it does not address any new Carney spending or campaign promises...which even Carney staff suggest a 90 bil deficit, no plan or parliamentary approval for any of that spending...  example where is that 9 bil dollars that carney gave the military coming from....i doubt it was in Justins original budget for the year...lets also remember that there was 10 months left and carney has a whole new plan...what everyone wants to know is for him to be transparent...his finance guys are keeping track of every cent spent and going forward, it is not like they have to find a cure for cancer to give an update....not sure what the problem is...

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

What I read is you can't defend your sad little life 

 

LOL Dude I didn't even read most of your crap. I don't need to defend myself against A drug addict with obvious mental health issues. You are so far beneath me that the stuff I wipe off the bottom of my shoes wipes you off the bottom of it's shoes. Losers like you or why we need instructions on shampoo.

Sorry, you just don't have the impact on my life that you really want to have and while I understand that you're kind of fixated on me, and who could blame you, I just don't have the same level of interest in anything to do with you.

[SkyHigh]

26 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

There are plenty of things Carney and his staff could work on that does not have a need for new funding, like you mentioned...

Yes Justin did submit a budget ....but within that budget there is NO funding for any of Carneys additions.....meaning yes we can pay some bills that are recurring, but thats it.......but it does not address any new Carney spending or campaign promises...which even Carney staff suggest a 90 bil deficit, no plan or parliamentary approval for any of that spending...  example where is that 9 bil dollars that carney gave the military coming from....i doubt it was in Justins original budget for the year...lets also remember that there was 10 months left and carney has a whole new plan...what everyone wants to know is for him to be transparent...his finance guys are keeping track of every cent spent and going forward, it is not like they have to find a cure for cancer to give an update....not sure what the problem is...

Again I don't disagree, but you seem to be overlooking the Fact I keep mentioning that any additional spending must be put to a vote of confidence in the house , this is a minority government so he doesn't have a blank cheque, and if you look at how effective Jack Layton was at getting things done in a minority government, any of the three parties can, as they represent the majority of Canadian voters 

I don't know what your professional experience is, so I'll only speak to my reality. I had a small event production company, most contracts were only a few weeks some as long as a few months. We would secure a contract usually a year in advance, sometimes shorter for smaller weekend events, but for the most part would spend three to four times the time on planning and budgeting than the actual on site work and we're talking contracts rarely more then six figures and often only tens of thousands. The idea of writing a budget mid event gives me stress. Particularly if the person that had wrote the previous budget was a nepo hire on his way out.

What I did was simple compared to a budget involving billions with 35 million share holders across thousands of kilometers. I'd rather he gets piece work approval when he wants new spending, than frantically putting something together to appease the economic illiterate 

[SkyHigh]

26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL Dude I didn't even read most of your crap. I don't need to defend myself against A drug addict with obvious mental health issues. You are so far beneath me that the stuff I wipe off the bottom of my shoes wipes you off the bottom of it's shoes. Losers like you or why we need instructions on shampoo.

Sorry, you just don't have the impact on my life that you really want to have and while I understand that you're kind of fixated on me, and who could blame you, I just don't have the same level of interest in anything to do with you.

He says sitting in a corner crying because he has nothing and no one.

You're just repeating what I said back, just with more anger and a weaker vocabulary.

Like I said, sad and funny 

Oh and impotent, can't forget impotent. My guess that's a major contributing factor 

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

He says sitting in a corner crying because he has nothing and no one.

 

Now you're having weird little fantasies about me? You actually are sitting there imagining little stories about what my life is like?

Slightly flattering but extremely creepy. Maybe you should see if you can find a boyfriend in the real world

[SkyHigh]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Now you're having weird little fantasies about me? You actually are sitting there imagining little stories about what my life is like?

Slightly flattering but extremely creepy. Maybe you should see if you can find a boyfriend in the real world

So using your words, you're flattered when a creepy dude fantasies about your life?

Jeez, do you have no other human contact other than this forum?

I won't even go into phycological aspects of suggesting that, that same creep , change sexuality a find a new boyfriend, because I'm pretty sure that was just homophobia being masked in one of your juvenile unoriginal attempts at humor 

And no need to imagine, I know you have no life. I actually made a logical argument supporting this, but since we both know you have no counter argument, you ignored it and went back to your kiddo/child script 

Impotent(I remembered),sad and funny 

Edited July 9, 2025 by SkyHigh

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, SkyHigh said:

So using your words, you're flattered when a creepy dude fantasies about your life?

Slightly.  But like i said, extremely creepy

 

Quote

Jeez, do you have no other human contact other than this forum?

I'm not sure they're talking to you counts as human interaction.

And yes, I have lots of people I talk to, The actual amount of time it takes to post here is almost zero, I use voice dictation and frequently I'm busy writing something else while I'm talking to you, or I'm doing it on my cell phone or the like

I do enjoy this place, I get to meet Some of the weirdest lefty nut bars and some nice people too so I either get to laugh my ass off or have interesting discussions.

Watch TV. I don't.

Are you about done fishing for information about my life? I'm a little concerned about how you'll use the knowledge considering you're already having weird fantasies  

In any case it certainly better than being a drug addled  loser

 

[SkyHigh]

On 7/8/2025 at 8:19 PM, CdnFox said:

, I use voice dictation and frequently I'm busy writing something else while I'm talking to you, or I'm doing it on my cell phone or the like

Even sader, now your claim is you do have a "real" social life. Hmmmm? Right, normal people interrupt rewarding social lives and/or actual business to read and respond to randos on the Internet.

Can you not see how ridiculous that sounds? But ya, im sure you are (and were) a contributing member of society.

That's sarcasm, we both know you have nothing and no one and you're just a sad impotent little man that has nothing but this forum to try and provide some validation of your insignificant waste of existence .

Now call me kiddo, had a bit of a rough week and could use the laugh.