Legato Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 2 minutes ago, eyeball said: It's possible the list of payees you guys can't seem to produce will prove otherwise but I doubt that'll ever happen. Say's the guy who wants bodycams on the grifters. 1 Quote
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 Just now, CdnFox said: Sure you are. You just said that you wanted a minority just like the last one we had. As opposed to a majority. 2 minutes ago, CdnFox said: We don't need another Frankenstein government that's made up of the bodies of multiple parties. And I don't think we're going to get one. I think people have seen how badly minority governments work and how much of a failure the NDP in the left were and at the end of the day they'll choose a majority Well don't look now but with the gap narrowing between the Conservatives and Liberals voters are closing in on returning another minority government. Like last time. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 1 minute ago, Legato said: Say's the guy who wants bodycams on the grifters. Yeah well, that would sure make it a lot easier for Goddess and CdnFox to make their case wouldn't it? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 1 minute ago, eyeball said: As opposed to a majority. That's not what you said. And the last minority was a majority thanks to the NDP signing a deal with the liberals Quote Well don't look now but with the gap narrowing between the Conservatives and Liberals voters are closing in on returning another minority government. That's not what they're closing in on But we'll see Just now, eyeball said: Yeah well, that would sure make it a lot easier for Goddess and CdnFox to make their case wouldn't it? I never made a case. Not only are you losing your argument, you decided to Arbitrarily lose against more people that are actually in the argument Honestly are you sure you just don't like losing or something? It would certainly explain most of your time here Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: ...the last minority was a majority LMAO! Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 27 minutes ago, eyeball said: LMAO! LOL as i always say when you break out the LMAO It's your way of saying you can't refute what i've said and you'll just pretend you're not crying about it Hang in there little guy. Its just the internet 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 15 minutes ago, CdnFox said: LOL as i always say when you break out the LMAO. It's your way of saying you can't refute what i've said Yup that's your go-to hee haw alright. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Legato Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 55 minutes ago, eyeball said: Yeah well, that would sure make it a lot easier for Goddess and CdnFox to make their case wouldn't it? You saying there's no grift? ArriveCan just off the top of my head. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 4 hours ago, eyeball said: Because you are, so's Goddess. In other words you're losing the arguments that you're having with different people and you've decided that you're going to cry about it and lash out like any child Well fair enough Quote No, I said you are. But that's what I said. That's literally what you are saying I'm full of shit about. I think you just realized you were standing up for corruption and grift and now you're regretting it and trying to make it my fault somehow Sorry kiddo, as always your stupidity is not my fault. That's on you. Also corruption and grift are bad, i wish you'd learn that one of these days. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 4 hours ago, Legato said: You saying there's no grift? Nope. I'm just saying there's no proof of the $40 billion worth you clowns are talking about, apparently occuring as we speak. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 4 hours ago, eyeball said: Yup that's your go-to hee haw alright. Yeah, those words don't actually mean what you think they do I realize that you think if you say it you're somehow dismissing what i said... you're really not. You're demonstrating you can't think of a reply that makes sense. Which amusingly really IS your 'go to' 1 minute ago, eyeball said: Nope. I'm just saying there's no proof of the $40 billion worth you clowns are talking about, apparently occuring as we speak. I've never mentioned any 40 billion. Soooo .... was that maybe the voices in your head talking to you and you mistook it for me again? Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: I've never mentioned any 40 billion. Goddess did. You figure she's full of crap too? You have an odd way of showing it. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 Just now, eyeball said: Goddess did. I"m not goddess. Goddess is a woman. I am a man. You really can't tell the difference between a man and a woman? Actually you are a leftie so that makes sense, no wonder you can't get laid and are so bitter Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I"m not goddess. Goddess is a woman. I am a man. You really can't tell the difference between a man and a woman? Sure, it's you bullshiters who all look and sound the same. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 3 minutes ago, eyeball said: Sure, it's you bullshiters who all look and sound the same. Not to other men and women. Makes me wonder what you are Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 Truthful obviously Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 What steps has PP taken to improve his support among female voters? I see his wife is conspicuous in the campaign which is a start. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ana-poilievre-campaign-election-pierre-1.7501082 Quote
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 28 minutes ago, eyeball said: Truthful obviously salty definitely Honestly you're just a glutton for punishment Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 27 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: What steps has PP taken to improve his support among female voters? I see his wife is conspicuous in the campaign which is a start. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ana-poilievre-campaign-election-pierre-1.7501082 Well that's a more recent problem. But i'm not sure what he can do at this point, most of that is due to liberal misinformation about his 'secret agenda'. Fair bit of that going around right now. I'm not sure you counter that easily in the time remaining. I think all he can do is stay on message and point out that whether you're a man or a woman you're going to need a job, a home, food, and all of those things are problematic under the liberals. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 49 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Well that's a more recent problem. But i'm not sure what he can do at this point, most of that is due to liberal misinformation about his 'secret agenda'. Fair bit of that going around right now. I'm not sure you counter that easily in the time remaining. I think all he can do is stay on message and point out that whether you're a man or a woman you're going to need a job, a home, food, and all of those things are problematic under the liberals. Both parties have a gender imbalance but the Liberals can afford to be light on men at the minute if the polls are right. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 43 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: Both parties have a gender imbalance but the Liberals can afford to be light on men at the minute if the polls are right. That depends. Historically men vote in larger numbers than women. But I don't think it's going to be the deciding factor for either campaign. I think age is going to be far more important. The conservatives are not doing well in the older people. Incidentally women live longer than men as a general rule and maybe that's why they're beginning to lag Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
WestCanMan Posted April 10 Author Report Posted April 10 39 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: Both parties have a gender imbalance but the Liberals can afford to be light on men at the minute if the polls are right. I don't think that Christia "Let's get friends with nukes to help us against the US" Freeland is a positive among female voters. I also don't think that the LPOC and their "STFU, YOU STUPID LITTLE B1TCH!" session with JWR left them beholden to female voters either. Think about the optics of an upstart substitute drama teacher punching down an a female lawyer/Justice Minister regarding matters of law.... If that doesn't say "patriarchy prevails" I don't know what does. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: I don't think that Christia "Let's get friends with nukes to help us against the US" Freeland is a positive among female voters. I also don't think that the LPOC and their "STFU, YOU STUPID LITTLE B1TCH!" session with JWR left them beholden to female voters either. Think about the optics of an upstart substitute drama teacher punching down an a female lawyer/Justice Minister regarding matters of law.... If that doesn't say "patriarchy prevails" I don't know what does. So what do you say about the gender breakdown in the polls? Quote
WestCanMan Posted April 10 Author Report Posted April 10 1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said: So what do you say about the gender breakdown in the polls? I just say that polls are BS, and I really don't think much of anyone that votes LPOC. There's no excuse. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
betsy Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 (edited) 15 hours ago, CdnFox said: Well i loved the reporter's question "I wanted to ask you if you think size matters" LOL But yeah, when people see that a politican is successful and popular that does matter for sure. And it's also giving the conservative voters a much needed sense that maybe the polls are wrong and there's hope yet and they should get out and vote on voting day. The skewed polling (especially from ekos who promised to do exactly that) was designed to discourage Conservatives and keep them at home on voting day and discourage them from volunteering or bothering with lawn signs etc... the sheer number of large highly successful rallies calls the polling into question. And for soft voters who are thinking about carney they compare what they see about size and content of the CPC rallys to Carneys and ask themselves "why is he so much more popular than Carney? why can't carney draw crowds like that?" It won't win an election on it's own but it's powerful and an important part of winning. ................at the very least, people are interested what PP has to say. Listening to Carney, he's beginning to sound like Harris and Biden......with his word salads. Nothing concrete or specific about plans. Edited April 10 by betsy 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.