Jump to content

Trump blatantly violating court orders: it means nothing less than a de facto end of the constitutional order in the U.S.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Federal judges have temporarily blocked nearly two dozen actions of President Donald Trump’s administration. So far the administration shows no signs of respecting them.

In a constitutional republic, no one can be above the law. Consequently, an end to the rule of law means the end of the constitutional order.

I hope not many in America are carefree, lighthearted or dumb for the lack of a better word, to not see this direct and immediate connection. Over the centuries of history many peoples have found out the hard way the cost and consequences of unchecked authoritarian and tyrannical rule. Dumbness and ignorance will not protect anybody, America included from experiencing and feeling the consequences of the failure of the rule of law immediately and to the full extent.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted

Two centuries back American republic came on the face of this planet in a protest against an overreach by a colonial power. And now, two centuries on, Americans think nothing about their leader grasping for unchecked and unlimited power, tantamount and equivalent to that of a dictator? Fascinating. Unprecedented. Did America just invent a time machine working in only one, backward direction though?

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted

You mean the Canadian born judge that says we have to spend money in Canada? Judges don't get to tell the President where to spend money. Congress and the Executive branch are the authority on that.

  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 hours ago, myata said:

So far the administration shows no signs of respecting them.

This is an outright lie. 

Just the other day, they respected one of these absurd orders and put Hampton Dellinger back in his position and he immediately used his position to say what the Trump admin was doing was illegal. LOL

Seriously, every day it is a new lie on here with you. You have no care at all for posting anything honest and run away from a challenge. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted

The rule of law either exists or there's no law. Dictatorship and lawlessness. Little lying tongues will twist and vibrate but anyone with a single working cell in their brain gets that. Don't tell you didn't know.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
6 hours ago, myata said:

Federal judges have temporarily blocked nearly two dozen actions of President Donald Trump’s administration. So far the administration shows no signs of respecting them.

In a constitutional republic, no one can be above the law. Consequently, an end to the rule of law means the end of the constitutional order.

I hope not many in America are carefree, lighthearted or dumb for the lack of a better word, to not see this direct and immediate connection. Over the centuries of history many peoples have found out the hard way the cost and consequences of unchecked authoritarian and tyrannical rule. Dumbness and ignorance will not protect anybody, America included from experiencing and feeling the consequences of the failure of the rule of law immediately and to the full extent.

Nobody respects activist judges, and right now this country is full of them. 

Give it some time; I'm sure the President will find a way to have those freaks removed for treason. 

  • Like 1
Posted

As said, and see above, the rule of law either exists or the lawlessness rules. Be careful choosing because you can only have one. And nowhere to show buyers remorse.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
2 minutes ago, myata said:

As said, and see above, the rule of law either exists or the lawlessness rules. Be careful choosing because you can only have one. And nowhere to show buyers remorse.

Rule of law does not exist under democrat control. 

Trump will purge, and America will be judicious again. 

Posted

"He will stop the rule of law only temporarily till the new order is constructed". Only a brainless wouldn't know what happened next. And in this case there is no known cure.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
7 minutes ago, myata said:

"He will stop the rule of law only temporarily till the new order is constructed". Only a brainless wouldn't know what happened next. And in this case there is no known cure.

Wokeism is what needs to be cured, and your TDS only exacerbates it. 

You and the rest of your cult need to be medically treated. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, myata said:

"He will stop the rule of law only temporarily till the new order is constructed". Only a brainless wouldn't know what happened next. And in this case there is no known cure.

I have to admit that I am fully enjoying the endless sobbing of you Libbies.

Trump has not crossed any judicial orders. He abides by them and waits for them to be discarded as foolish whims.

Unlike Brandon who completely ignored SCOTUS orders. You know that but manage to completely ignore the fact.

Ahhh...you Libbies. I do wish you'd end this childish display and cultural warfare but, since you won't,

I hope y'all choke on reality.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
57 minutes ago, myata said:

The rule of law either exists or there's no law. Dictatorship and lawlessness. Little lying tongues will twist and vibrate but anyone with a single working cell in their brain gets that. Don't tell you didn't know.

Give us one example. Name the specific TRO or order Trump is not following. Put up some actual facts for us to discuss. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted

If the rule of law is broken, it entails the end of the constitutional order and an advent of an age of lawlessness. It takes exactly one working cell in the brain to get it. One or the other. Yes, you have to choose.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
14 minutes ago, myata said:

If the rule of law is broken, it entails the end of the constitutional order and an advent of an age of lawlessness. It takes exactly one working cell in the brain to get it. One or the other. Yes, you have to choose.

Specific examples. Give us one fact to discuss. 

 

 

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, myata said:

If the rule of law is broken, it entails the end of the constitutional order and an advent of an age of lawlessness. It takes exactly one working cell in the brain to get it. One or the other. Yes, you have to choose.

The democrat party is what's broken, and you degenerates will continue to lose until it gets fixed. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The institutions are overrun with liberal activists hellbent on sabotaging the elected administration.

The exact same shit these Libs are fearmongering over.

There's nothing more fascist than their social engineered genocide of White populations across Western societies.

Edited by CDN1
Posted
2 hours ago, User said:

Specific examples. Give us one fact to discuss. 

 

Google translate doesn't work that way. Lol

  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
29 minutes ago, myata said:

Jerk, thug and !diot open season. Spill it all out, what's there to be ashamed of?

You tell us. You refuse to engage in pointed factual discussion. Are you ashamed?

 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, myata said:

Federal judges have temporarily blocked nearly two dozen actions of President Donald Trump’s administration. So far the administration shows no signs of respecting them.

In a constitutional republic, no one can be above the law. Consequently, an end to the rule of law means the end of the constitutional order.

I hope not many in America are carefree, lighthearted or dumb for the lack of a better word, to not see this direct and immediate connection. Over the centuries of history many peoples have found out the hard way the cost and consequences of unchecked authoritarian and tyrannical rule. Dumbness and ignorance will not protect anybody, America included from experiencing and feeling the consequences of the failure of the rule of law immediately and to the full extent.

Trump has appealed the USAID ruling to the SCOTUS and they will hear arguments on Friday.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I have to admit that I am fully enjoying the endless sobbing of you Libbies.

Trump has not crossed any judicial orders. He abides by them and waits for them to be discarded as foolish whims.

Unlike Brandon who completely ignored SCOTUS orders. You know that but manage to completely ignore the fact.

Ahhh...you Libbies. I do wish you'd end this childish display and cultural warfare but, since you won't,

I hope y'all choke on reality.

No one BUT YOU will choke on ^THIS "REALITY." Of course you have NO EVIDENCE that Joe Biden ignored any SCOTUS ruling.

He did use another LEGAL method to get around it.

Edited by robosmith
Posted

Some more good news for Americans under Trump.

On the same day this week that New Brunswick’s Irving Paper said it’s closing half of its operations in the province, Apple announced a US$500 billion investment in the United States.
Apple’s announcement came on the heels of Saudi Arabia committing to a US$600 billion investment in the United States in January, and an Emirati businessman pledging US$20 billion to build data centres in the country earlier the same month.
Meanwhile, the Tissue subsidiary of Irving, whose Paper division cited rising energy costs for cutting operations in Canada, announced a US$600 million expansion to its operations in Macon, Georgia, in late November.

While the threat of Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canadian exports is garnering most of the attention, whether in the news cycle or amid the Liberal leadership race, an issue that may be getting overlooked is how the U.S. president’s focus on cutting taxes and regulations and using other tactics to attract business is impacting Canada’s competitiveness in getting investments.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
41 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Some more good news for Americans under Trump.

On the same day this week that New Brunswick’s Irving Paper said it’s closing half of its operations in the province, Apple announced a US$500 billion investment in the United States.
Apple’s announcement came on the heels of Saudi Arabia committing to a US$600 billion investment in the United States in January, and an Emirati businessman pledging US$20 billion to build data centres in the country earlier the same month.
Meanwhile, the Tissue subsidiary of Irving, whose Paper division cited rising energy costs for cutting operations in Canada, announced a US$600 million expansion to its operations in Macon, Georgia, in late November.

While the threat of Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canadian exports is garnering most of the attention, whether in the news cycle or amid the Liberal leadership race, an issue that may be getting overlooked is how the U.S. president’s focus on cutting taxes and regulations and using other tactics to attract business is impacting Canada’s competitiveness in getting investments.

Do you know how many announcements of investments during Trump's first term were merely illusions which never came to pass?

Apr 20, 2021  Under a deal with the state of Wisconsin announced on Tuesday, Foxconn will reduce its planned investment to $672 million from $10 billion and cut the number of new jobs to 1,454 from 13,000. The Foxconn-Wisconsin deal was first announced to great fanfare at the White House in July 2017, with Trump ...
Aug 22, 2023  President Donald Trump announced a multibillion-dollar deal with Foxconn in 2017 and the town spent millions to clear land for a tech and manufacturing campus.

image.png

Posted
3 hours ago, robosmith said:

No one BUT YOU will choke on ^THIS "REALITY." Of course you have NO EVIDENCE that Joe Biden ignored any SCOTUS ruling.

He did use another LEGAL method to get around it.

Its not legal when you keep getting told its not legal. 

 

 

 

Posted

Maga lies. It lied about the election, it lied for a multi-felon an aspiring dictator (Gaza statue) and now it lies for Vlad the Butcher. Lying is all it does and it has no other purpose but to lie, lie and pump grotesque absurd lies endlessly.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...