Aristides Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: LMAO...oh I just read it again. Conclusion: We are both wrong. Musk isn't claiming those people are collecting Social Security. He's claiming those are the numbers of people alive with a social security number. I have a US social security number and paid into it but haven't worked in the US in over 30 years and have never collected because I wasn't there long enough to make it worth while. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 7 minutes ago, Aristides said: I have a US social security number and paid into it but haven't worked in the US in over 30 years and have never collected because I wasn't there long enough to make it worth while. Ok? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Radiorum Posted February 19 Author Report Posted February 19 26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: LMAO...oh I just read it again. Conclusion: We are both wrong. Musk isn't claiming those people are collecting Social Security. He's claiming those are the numbers of people alive with a social security number. I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. What does he mean when he says “maybe Twilight is real and there are a lot of vampires collecting Social Security.” Quote
Aristides Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 (edited) 13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Ok? So just because someone has a SSN doesn't mean they are collecting or living in the US. Seeing as I have never collected SS, maybe I should get back the money I paid into it. Edited February 19 by Aristides Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 6 minutes ago, Radiorum said: I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. What does he mean when he says “maybe Twilight is real and there are a lot of vampires collecting Social Security.” Because of the ages of some of them. There are about 8 million people over 130 years old per that spreadsheet. 3 minutes ago, Aristides said: So just because someone has a SSN doesn't mean they are collecting or living in the US. True. But the point of the post you replied to is that the numbers were people with social security numbers and not the numbers of people collecting Social Security. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Aristides Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: Because of the ages of some of them. There are about 8 million people over 130 years old per that spreadsheet. Well then they aren't alive are they. Tough to collect if you are dead. Seeing as I never collected SS, maybe I should get back the money I paid into it, plus 30 years compounded interest. It's only fair. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 2 minutes ago, Aristides said: Well then they aren't alive are they. Tough to collect if you are dead. Seeing as I never collected SS, maybe I should get back the money I paid into it, plus 30 years compounded interest. It's only fair. There is a government website for that. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Aristides Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 Just now, gatomontes99 said: There is a government website for that. With Musk firing thousands of IRS employees, I won't hold my breath. It will make it easier for rich folks to avoid taxes. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 8 minutes ago, Aristides said: With Musk firing thousands of IRS employees, I won't hold my breath. It will make it easier for rich folks to avoid taxes. Lmao...uh huh. Sure. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
eyeball Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: His point was that they should have made a deal (in 2014) with the separatists and then there may not have been a war. What part of you never should have started it don't you stupid cocksuckers get? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Aristides Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Lmao...uh huh. Sure. Of course it will but hey, get rid of the IRS altogether. People are honest, right? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 (edited) 29 minutes ago, eyeball said: What part of you never should have started it don't you stupid cocksuckers get? Not making a deal started the war. What more do you need to know? Edited February 19 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
ironstone Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 1 hour ago, Aristides said: Yet Trump and Musk are firing thousands of IRS employees. Why didn't they catch this one before then? These were the same people that didn't want to even catch Hunter Biden lol. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
gatomontes99 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 28 minutes ago, Aristides said: Of course it will but hey, get rid of the IRS altogether. People are honest, right? If the IRS is gone, it's because the tax revenue is external, not internal. But, as I have said on here, it will never happen. Do you really want to keep up with thes childish attempts at gotchas? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 2 hours ago, Matthew said: Yeah he proved your point. User stays quiet about the trump policies and actions he doesn't like. Hes a caged cheerleader. For example I know with foreign policy User is not a fan of the US siding with fascist dictators and weakening the our NATO alliance. But he keeps his head down and recites the slogans required by the Party. Give examples. If you are going to sit here making accusations, you better back them up. Oh look here, I was not staying quiet... criticizing Trump: "I think Trump misspoke in a comment he was making explaining that Zelenski had 3 years to talk about peace, but still not a fan of the way he said that either. " If the search function worked, I would go back to show you all the times I have criticized Trump before now, keeping in mind I have only been on this forum for less than a year too. Quote
eyeball Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Not making a deal started the war. What more do you need to know? When it was that Ukraine launched its unprovoked invasion on Russia. I seem to have missed that part. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 20 hours ago, Nationalist said: Lol...the scent of desperation and panic. You misspelled "stench". It's pretty thick Mind you so is the poster so..... 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 1 hour ago, Radiorum said: I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. What does he mean when he says “maybe Twilight is real and there are a lot of vampires collecting Social Security.” It's pretty obvious that you didn't read it. Go look at the age range again. There are many many millions of people who are over the age of 150 on that list. Some as high as 300. Do you know a lot of 300-year-old people walking around? If you do, they're probably a vampire. You have just demonstrated yet again your inability to read and understand things before commenting. We've seen that here a number of times. You need to slow down and think about things. Musk is clearly correct that there is obviously some serious errors if they have people in the millions that are $120, 150, 200 years old. Human simply don't live that long. Feel stupid yet? Cuz ya should Quote
Radiorum Posted February 19 Author Report Posted February 19 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It's pretty obvious that you didn't read it. What is obvious is that they are made up numbers. Provided with no citing of his source. Quote
CdnFox Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 1 hour ago, Aristides said: Well then they aren't alive are they. Tough to collect if you are dead. Seeing as I never collected SS, maybe I should get back the money I paid into it, plus 30 years compounded interest. It's only fair. He never said they were collecting. He simply showing that the information is grossly in error and obvious ones at that. So the fact is someone COULD be collecting on dead people and this authority would never know it would they. I have little doubt that a percentage of dead people are still getting cheques that someone is cashing if there are those kinds of obvious errors being overlooked. And there would probably be fewer if they were keeping the lists properly. That would seem to be his point and it's a valid one. Quote
CdnFox Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Radiorum said: What is obvious is that they are made up numbers. Oh? Have you contacted the agency involved and verified that these are not the numbers in their system? LOL You started the whole tirade about how you can't talk to republicans cuz they aren't interested in facts!! Now here you are trying to deny the facts in order to keep up your fake argument LOLOLOL Very obviously you misread this. Very obviously based on your first post you misunderstood what he was saying and went on a big tirade about how republicans aren't fact based and now you look like a complete tard because you are denying the facts Unless you have another source which proves the numbers false, I have no reason to believe that these are not actual numbers that he got. And right away I can see the problem, whereas you could not. Sometimes when you make a mistake that big the best thing to do is either just walk away or own it, give a quick mea culpa, and do better next time. But yeah, your credibility took a bit of a hit with this one Just try to do a little better next time Edited February 19 by CdnFox Quote
User Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 4 minutes ago, Radiorum said: What is obvious is that they are made up numbers. Provided with no citing of his source. Nothing you have posted indicates they are made-up numbers. What is his source supposed to be here if he is sharing something from the database? LOL, that is literally THE source. 2 Quote
Aristides Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 (edited) 35 minutes ago, ironstone said: Why didn't they catch this one before then? These were the same people that didn't want to even catch Hunter Biden lol. So get rid of them all, MAGA’s don’t like paying taxes anyway. Who stands to benefit most from gutting the IRS, people with lots of money or people with little money? Edited February 19 by Aristides Quote
CdnFox Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 Just now, Aristides said: So get rid of them all, MAGA’s don’t like paying taxes anyway. It doesn't seem like their revenues would notice much of a difference. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 20 minutes ago, eyeball said: When it was that Ukraine launched its unprovoked invasion on Russia. I seem to have missed that part. Why would Ukraine have to invade Russia? Canadian fans picked this fight: But team USA threw the first punch. Who started it? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.