gatomontes99 Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 So, Mike Benz pointed out that Liz Cheney worked at USAID. Does anyone wonder why she was so adamant about getting Trump? Any how, she wanted to "end" the story by being out in front and admitting she was there and talking about all the noble things she did for USAID. Ok, that's fine. Here's what she had to say: Just one ittty bitty little problem. She didn't start working at USAID until 1993 and her resume claim of "win[ning] the Cold War, defeat[ing] Soviet communism..." can't be true. Quote 1993: Liz Cheney Begins Work at USAID Liz Cheney commenced her work with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in 1993. https://populartimelines.com/timeline/Liz-Cheney/full Quote In late 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed and 15 newly independent nations were born from its corpse, including a Russia with a democratically elected, anticommunist leader. The Cold War had come to an end. https://www.britannica.com/event/Cold-War If there was no USSR, there was no Soviet Communism to beat and no Cold War to win. She lied. 2 1 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Radiorum Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: She lied. Um, she said America won the Cold War, defeated communism, and defended democracy, not her. 1 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 8 Author Report Posted February 8 22 minutes ago, Radiorum said: Um, she said America won the Cold War, defeated communism, and defended democracy, not her. Oh please. She's trying to take credit for it. If her time there was so valuable and meaningful, why didn't she just say what she did? Why not tought her achievements instead of the acts of others? She's hiding something. She's lying. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
NAME REMOVED Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 Another day....another redundant @gatomontes99 thread.... Quote
ironstone Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 $1.5 million to “advance diversity equity and inclusion in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities” $70,000 for production of a “DEI musical” in Ireland $2.5 million for electric vehicles for Vietnam $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia $32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Peru $2 million for sex changes and “LGBT activism” in Guatemala $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt Hundreds of thousands of dollars for a non-profit linked to designated terrorist organizations — even AFTER an inspector general launched an investigation Millions to EcoHealth Alliance — which was involved in research at the Wuhan lab “Hundreds of thousands of meals that went to al Qaeda-affiliated fighters in Syria” Funding to print “personalized” contraceptives birth control devices in developing countries Hundreds of millions of dollars to fund “irrigation canals, farming equipment, and even fertilizer used to support the unprecedented poppy cultivation and heroin production in Afghanistan,” benefiting the Taliban These are some of the things USAID was paying for with taxpayer dollars. This is not to suggest that USAID did not do some good things, but how can anyone defend the kinds of things listed above? 2 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
gatomontes99 Posted February 8 Author Report Posted February 8 14 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: Another day....another redundant @gatomontes99 thread.... Rule 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 24 minutes ago, ironstone said: $1.5 million to “advance diversity equity and inclusion in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities” $70,000 for production of a “DEI musical” in Ireland $2.5 million for electric vehicles for Vietnam $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia $32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Peru $2 million for sex changes and “LGBT activism” in Guatemala $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt Hundreds of thousands of dollars for a non-profit linked to designated terrorist organizations — even AFTER an inspector general launched an investigation Millions to EcoHealth Alliance — which was involved in research at the Wuhan lab “Hundreds of thousands of meals that went to al Qaeda-affiliated fighters in Syria” Funding to print “personalized” contraceptives birth control devices in developing countries Hundreds of millions of dollars to fund “irrigation canals, farming equipment, and even fertilizer used to support the unprecedented poppy cultivation and heroin production in Afghanistan,” benefiting the Taliban These are some of the things USAID was paying for with taxpayer dollars. This is not to suggest that USAID did not do some good things, but how can anyone defend the kinds of things listed above? Sorry but YOU don't get to determine the relevance of US aid, cause you clearly DON'T UNDERSTAND their methods. 1 Quote
Radiorum Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Liz Cheney worked at USAID. Does anyone wonder why she was so adamant about getting Trump? Lol. I read Cheney's book Oath and Honor: A Memoir and a Warning It had nothing to do with USAID. Quote
ironstone Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: Sorry but YOU don't get to determine the relevance of US aid, cause you clearly DON'T UNDERSTAND their methods. Let's just pick one. Explain how the US benefits from a "transgender opera" in Columbia? What would be the reasoning behind that? 1 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
gatomontes99 Posted February 8 Author Report Posted February 8 31 minutes ago, robosmith said: Sorry but YOU don't get to determine the relevance of US aid, cause you clearly DON'T UNDERSTAND their methods. It's not aid. Quote http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:22 section:9808 edition:prelim) There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund, which shall be known as the "Prevention and Stabilization Fund" (in this subsection referred to as "The Fund"), to be administered by the Department of State and USAID, as appropriate, to support stabilization of conflict-affected areas and to mitigate fragility, including through the Global Fragility Strategy established pursuant to section 9803 of this title, which shall replace the Relief and Recovery Fund. The public purpose was for stabilizing poor regimes. Of course, those regimes would be favorable to us. But it's true purpose was for the CIA to destabilize regimes they didn't like. Even going as far as starting civil wars and insurrections. Real ones woth guns and killing not costums and piffy chants. To keep the funds flowing, the CIA allowed the swampy Rs and Ds to syphon money off to friends and their campaigns. 31 minutes ago, Radiorum said: Lol. I read Cheney's book Oath and Honor: A Memoir and a Warning It had nothing to do with USAID. Right. Because she would write a book and just confess to all the shit she was into. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: So, Mike Benz pointed out that Liz Cheney worked at USAID. Does anyone wonder why she was so adamant about getting Trump? Any how, she wanted to "end" the story by being out in front and admitting she was there and talking about all the noble things she did for USAID. Ok, that's fine. Here's what she had to say: Just one ittty bitty little problem. She didn't start working at USAID until 1993 and her resume claim of "win[ning] the Cold War, defeat[ing] Soviet communism..." can't be true. If there was no USSR, there was no Soviet Communism to beat and no Cold War to win. She lied. Just one ittty bitty little problem. She didn't actually say she was there during the Cold War. You have arguably the worst reading comprehension on a website full of extremely dumb conservatives lmao. 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Oh please. She's trying to take credit for it. If her time there was so valuable and meaningful, why didn't she just say what she did? Why not tought her achievements instead of the acts of others? She's hiding something. She's lying. Lol another example of you projecting motivations onto people you disagree with even as you give people on your side a pass for things they actually say, hope you polished your floppy red shoes. 1 1 Quote
Radiorum Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 16 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: all the shit she was into. This is what concerns you? Really? A made-up story? While Musk is accessing the Treasury’s payment system? 2 Quote
User Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Sorry but YOU don't get to determine the relevance of US aid, cause you clearly DON'T UNDERSTAND their methods. LOL, yes, in fact we do. Trump won. 17 minutes ago, Radiorum said: This is what concerns you? Really? A made-up story? While Musk is accessing the Treasury’s payment system? What about his access? I am cheering this on. Quote
Radiorum Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, User said: I am cheering this on Oh, I see, so you would like an unelected demagogue to have access to Medicare and Social Security payments and all other programs of the American government. Hell with Congress. It seems the fears about the death of democracy were not overstated. 2 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 8 Author Report Posted February 8 25 minutes ago, Radiorum said: This is what concerns you? Really? A made-up story? While Musk is accessing the Treasury’s payment system? Fùck yeah he is. Good. No more secrets. I notice you aren't mad about the waste, just who is finding it. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Radiorum Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 20 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: I notice you aren't mad about the waste, just who is finding it. That's just silly. Of course no-one likes waste. But if you think that is his purpose, you are mistaken. And, no, not because of who he is. No unelected demagogue should get his grubby paws on the US Treasury. It's illegal and unethical, and it's going to cause a lot of pain. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 8 Author Report Posted February 8 6 minutes ago, Radiorum said: That's just silly. Of course no-one likes waste. But if you think that is his purpose, you are mistaken. And, no, not because of who he is. No unelected demagogue should get his grubby paws on the US Treasury. It's illegal and unethical, and it's going to cause a lot of pain. The problem is the elected gawds. Unelected is fine by me. I just want the job done. It is getting done. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Radiorum Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: I just want the job done. It is getting done. Exactly what job do you believe is getting done? 3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Unelected is fine by me. Maybe we should do away with laws and ethics totally? /s Quote
robosmith Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 2 hours ago, ironstone said: Let's just pick one. Explain how the US benefits from a "transgender opera" in Columbia? What would be the reasoning behind that? In most countries tolerance and equality are favored values, cause they don't have a ridiculous MAGA CULT like you. Quote
herbie Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 Another Trumpalo fan of the Insane Clown in the White House. Like who the hell benefits supplying food for International Aid? American farmers, stupid! Quote
User Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 1 hour ago, Radiorum said: Oh, I see, so you would like an unelected demagogue to have access to Medicare and Social Security payments and all other programs of the American government. Hell with Congress. It seems the fears about the death of democracy were not overstated. Trump was elected. He campaigned with Musk on the promise of working with him to create and enact DOGE. They are operating within the powers of the Executive branch. 26 minutes ago, herbie said: Another Trumpalo fan of the Insane Clown in the White House. Like who the hell benefits supplying food for International Aid? American farmers, stupid! What about Canada? Are you even America. Why are you not demanding your country foot the bill for all this international aid that will benefit your farmers? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 8 Author Report Posted February 8 1 hour ago, Radiorum said: Exactly what job do you believe is getting done? Maybe we should do away with laws and ethics totally? /s Oh for fùcks sake. Why are you people such drama queens. Government spending and waste is getting cut. USAID was supposed to be about stabilizing good governments and destabilizing bad governments. Now it's about gay sesame stree in Iraq and other stupid shit. Lets eliminate that stupid ass crap and fund our military, schools and roads and see what we can do after that. Ok? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
herbie Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 42 minutes ago, User said: What about Canada? Are you even America. Why are you not demanding your country foot the bill for all this international aid that will benefit your farmers? Because Canada DOES provide foreign aid. And only the stupid and the greedy gripe about it. I don't have to demand they do so. If you live in a wealthy country and don't want to provide aid you're just and arsehole and sure as hell can't claim to be a Christian at all. Like the simpletons that can't figure out farmers get paid to provide it and our workers get paid to distribute it. Getting quite sick of the Trumpalos championing ever single petty, selfish, greedy, half baked and reprehensible policy spewing from the Orange Imbecile and his lackeys 1 Quote
Black Dog Posted February 9 Report Posted February 9 (edited) 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Fùck yeah he is. Good. No more secrets. I notice you aren't mad about the waste, just who is finding it. It's not waste they're finding you rube. 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: The problem is the elected gawds. Unelected is fine by me. I just want the job done. It is getting done. God I hope the chickens come home to roost for you, personally. 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Oh for fùcks sake. Why are you people such drama queens. Government spending and waste is getting cut. USAID was supposed to be about stabilizing good governments and destabilizing bad governments. Now it's about gay sesame stree in Iraq and other stupid shit. Lets eliminate that stupid ass crap and fund our military, schools and roads and see what we can do after that. Ok? One cannot reason with people like this, you can only purge them from polite society. Edited February 9 by Black Dog Quote
West Posted February 9 Report Posted February 9 Liz is a lefty who's unfortunately grifted many old grannies out of retirement savings to support her financial campaign. All the while scamming tax payers. It's all very sick and will be a special place in hell for sickos like this 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.