Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Oh so now the alleged former death camp you saw was not even a death camp? You change your story a lot. Why should anyone believe you about the poles?

Why should responses be outraged? Is this a topic people are incapable of being rational about? Why?

You need to play this better.. you know that the slighest insinuation that Nazis/Hitler were the good guys and justified in their actions is going to provoke outrage. You can play stupid and thats fine. But you know that I speak the truth. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

You need to play this better.. you know that the slighest insinuation that Nazis/Hitler were the good guys and justified in their actions is going to provoke outrage. You can play stupid and thats fine. But you know that I speak the truth. 

What if I just think it is true, though?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

What if I just think it is true, though?

You would not be posting on a forum if you were not anticipating a response. You can't deny that. You also know that the responses will be full of outrage.. So by that two-fold logic, you are trolling.

 

I could be a pedophile who honestly believes that it is helpful to society (which I do not) and my guess is that you would vehemently oppose that. I know that folks will not discuss it rationally and I know that by posting such unpopular opinions.. all i am going to get in response is outrage. 

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Why should responses be outraged? Is this a topic people are incapable of being rational about? Why?

Because many people lost loved ones in those death camps. Are you really that stupid and heartless?

Edited by robosmith
Posted
11 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

You would not be posting on a forum if you were not anticipating a response. You can't deny that. You also know that the responses will be full of outrage.. So by that two-fold logic, you are trolling.

 

I could be a pedophile who honestly believes that it is helpful to society (which I do not) and my guess is that you would vehemently oppose that. I know that folks will not discuss it rationally and I know that by posting such unpopular opinions.. all i am going to get in response is outrage. 

Of course many people will respond with outrage because western people are brainwashed. But it is possible someone isn't insane and might recognize that the pavlovian reaction to Hitler is just weird.

 

There are objective reasons to hate pedophilia. But not Hitler. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Five of swords said:

Of course many people will respond with outrage because western people are brainwashed. But it is possible someone isn't insane and might recognize that the pavlovian reaction to Hitler is just weird.

 

There are objective reasons to hate pedophilia. But not Hitler. 

point proven. and yet you have not garnered the quality of responses that you had hoped for and yet you persist. Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.. there is a word for that. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

point proven. and yet you have not garnered the quality of responses that you had hoped for and yet you persist. Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.. there is a word for that. 

Well I am fascinated by the shape of people's brainwashing

Posted
7 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Well I am fascinated by the shape of people's brainwashing

And you think that you will penetrate said brainwashing. I guess we can say that you are dedicated. Dedicated to achieve nothing but dedicated altogether. May as well try to break down a brick wall with a single wet tooth pick . 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

What country has never killed anyone?

What other country murdered 6 MILLION CIVILIANS for their RELIGION?

MAYBE Armenians.

Doesn't really matter if there WAS a precedent, that DOES NOT EXCUSE EVIL.

33 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Well I am fascinated by the shape of people's brainwashing

IF anyone is brainwashed here, IT'S YOU.

Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What other country murdered 6 MILLION CIVILIANS for their RELIGION?

MAYBE Armenians.

Doesn't really matter if there WAS a precedent, that DOES NOT EXCUSE EVIL.

IF anyone is brainwashed here, IT'S YOU.

I mean...lots of countries murdered 6 million civilians over religion...but not Germany...if you believe the holocaust

Posted
7 hours ago, Black Dog said:

I've heard of the "no true Scotsman" fallacy but this is the first time I've heard of the "no true Nazi" version.

I feel like Churchill during WWII when I read this thread... There were two evil, murderous dictators that he had to deal with, Stalin and Hitler, and he didn't want to be aligned with either.

Luckily for me, I don't have to side with either of you skids.

While you're both vile enough to deserve each other, and I'm definitely not going to back his "intelligent Nazi" drivel (tbh, the more intelligent they were, the more evil it makes them), I'll just promise you this much: you have no f'ing clue how the "no true scotsman" logical fallacy is applicable in any scenario, as evidenced by your ridiculous stance on terrorism.

Leftards should just say away from big words at all costs, and especially terms. "Logical fallacy" is about 9 letters clear of your max capacity.

Don't take that personally, dumbfack.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Just because FASCISTS name themselves "National  Socialists" does not mean it's true.

When Bernie and AOC call themselves Democratic Socialists, you should believe them.😉

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
2 hours ago, Five of swords said:

I mean...lots of countries murdered 6 million civilians over religion...but not Germany...if you believe the holocaust

Well, if you say so.... that means NOTHING.

2 hours ago, ironstone said:

When Bernie and AOC call themselves Democratic Socialists, you should believe them.😉

I believe them NOT because of what they say, but because of what they DO. Duh

Posted
9 hours ago, robosmith said:

Well, if you say so.... that means NOTHING.

I believe them NOT because of what they say, but because of what they DO. Duh

The issue Hitler had with jews was racial. He did not care one bit if they practiced judaism or not. He believed that as a race jews were prone to behavior that was destructive to civilization as a whole.

Posted
14 hours ago, Five of swords said:

Of course many people will respond with outrage because western people are brainwashed. But it is possible someone isn't insane and might recognize that the pavlovian reaction to Hitler is just weird.

 

There are objective reasons to hate pedophilia. But not Hitler. 

70 million dead is not  reason to hate Hitler and you call other brainwashed. You really are a sad little puppy.

Posted
12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I feel like Churchill during WWII when I read this thread... There were two evil, murderous dictators that he had to deal with, Stalin and Hitler, and he didn't want to be aligned with either.

Luckily for me, I don't have to side with either of you skids.

While you're both vile enough to deserve each other, and I'm definitely not going to back his "intelligent Nazi" drivel (tbh, the more intelligent they were, the more evil it makes them), I'll just promise you this much: you have no f'ing clue how the "no true scotsman" logical fallacy is applicable in any scenario, as evidenced by your ridiculous stance on terrorism.

Leftards should just say away from big words at all costs, and especially terms. "Logical fallacy" is about 9 letters clear of your max capacity.

Don't take that personally, dumbfack.

But Churchill loved Stalin prior to the war.

 

And if someone just happens to be your adversary, that does not make them evil.if you always assume that you are the 'good guy' rather than just a person with particular interests and demand for resources then every war will have to end in genocide...

7 minutes ago, Aristides said:

70 million dead is not  reason to hate Hitler and you call other brainwashed. You really are a sad little puppy.

You can thank the allies for how many people died

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

But Churchill loved Stalin prior to the war.

 

No he didn't but he did make the mistake of thinking he could trust him.

Quote

And if someone just happens to be your adversary, that does not make them evil.if you always assume that you are the 'good guy' rather than just a person with particular interests and demand for resources then every war will have to end in genocide...

You can thank the allies for how many people died

Hitler didn't just happen to be our adversary. He took over Austria and Czechoslovakia. He invaded   Poland, Russia, Denmark, Norway, Holland, Belgium, Yugoslavia and Greece. None of those countries declared war on him nor were French or British troops based there when he did invade them. He even declared war on the US even though they hadn't declared war on him. 

Edited by Aristides
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

No he didn't but he did make the mistake of thinking he could trust him.

Hitler didn't just happen to be our adversary. He took over Austria and Czechoslovakia. He invaded   Poland, Russia, Denmark, Norway, Holland, Belgium, Yugoslavia and Greece. None of those countries declared war on him nor were French or British troops based there when he did invade them. He even declared war on the US even though they hadn't declared war on him. 

Austria and sudenteland voted to be part of Germany because...of course...they were german. Slovakia begged to become a vassal state because Hungary and Romania wanted to absord them. Danzig was also german and poland illegally annexed danzig.

 

Germany was forced to invade countries to prevent uk troops from landing in their rear and bypass maginot line. They had to control the beach. Same thing happened in ww1. Italy had its own reasons to invade Greece and Germany just needed Italy as an ally. The usa was of course sending all the military aid it could to countries that wanted to destroy enemy and it was preventing oil from getting to Japan. All of these decisions were necessary.

Edited by Five of swords
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Five of swords said:

The issue Hitler had with jews was racial. He did not care one bit if they practiced judaism or not. He believed that as a race jews were prone to behavior that was destructive to civilization as a whole.

IF Hitler believed what you CLAIM, then you are both very ill informed. The fact is, Jews, and Arabs which were on Hitler's side, are BOTH ethnic Semites.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Austria and sudenteland voted to be part of Germany because...of course...they were german. Slovakia begged to become a vassal state because Hungary and Romania wanted to absord them. Danzig was also german and poland illegally annexed danzig.

 

Germany was forced to invade countries to prevent uk troops from landing in their rear and bypass maginot line. They had to control the beach. Same thing happened in ww1. Italy had its own reasons to invade Greece and Germany just needed Italy as an ally. The usa was of course sending all the military aid it could to countries that wanted to destroy enemy and it was preventing oil from getting to Japan. All of these decisions were necessary.

Your vain attempt to rewrite history has you twisting like a pretzel. 🤮

Hitler did NOT have to invade Poland just because they annexed Danzig. He invaded because he wanted Poland, just like France.

Posted
1 hour ago, Five of swords said:

Austria and sudenteland voted to be part of Germany because...of course...they were german. Slovakia begged to become a vassal state because Hungary and Romania wanted to absord them. Danzig was also german and poland illegally annexed danzig.

 

Germany was forced to invade countries to prevent uk troops from landing in their rear and bypass maginot line. They had to control the beach. Same thing happened in ww1. Italy had its own reasons to invade Greece and Germany just needed Italy as an ally. The usa was of course sending all the military aid it could to countries that wanted to destroy enemy and it was preventing oil from getting to Japan. All of these decisions were necessary.

Norway, Belgium, Holland and Denmark were all declared neutrals, just like Sweden and Switzerland. Hitler attacked neutrals that had no Allied troops present. He invaded Denmark because he could, Norway for its iron ore and other minerals, Holland and Belgium to bypass the Maginot line to get at France.

Posted (edited)

Hitler invaded Greece because Italy had made such a mess of it. To invade Greece he had to go through Yugoslavia. The upside is that it delayed his invasion of Russia long enough that he couldn’t take Moscow before winter. 

Hitler laid out his intention to expand east (liebensraum) in Mein Kampf in 1925.

Edited by Aristides
  • Thanks 2
Posted
19 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I feel like Churchill during WWII when I read this thread... There were two evil, murderous dictators that he had to deal with, Stalin and Hitler, and he didn't want to be aligned with either.

Luckily for me, I don't have to side with either of you skids.

While you're both vile enough to deserve each other, and I'm definitely not going to back his "intelligent Nazi" drivel (tbh, the more intelligent they were, the more evil it makes them), I'll just promise you this much: you have no f'ing clue how the "no true scotsman" logical fallacy is applicable in any scenario, as evidenced by your ridiculous stance on terrorism.

Leftards should just say away from big words at all costs, and especially terms. "Logical fallacy" is about 9 letters clear of your max capacity.

Don't take that personally, dumbfack.

No one cares, shitstain.

Posted
On 1/23/2025 at 12:56 PM, Five of swords said:

He didn't start the war. The uk did.

lol, no. Hitler invaded Poland knowing that would bring the UK and France into the war, read a book thats not mein kampf you halfwit.

On 1/23/2025 at 2:02 PM, Five of swords said:

I don't believe death camps existed. But even if they did, he happened to believe that jews were a serious threat to all civilization and indeed humanity itself. So...what he did to jews was perfectly justified.

"If you believe something hard enough then anything you do is justified" you're a grade A dumbshit.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...