Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, myata said:

The brainless don't like being reminded of the true, objective reality. 

You certainly don't.  If a steaming turd could type it would be a more useful contributor here than you are. 

  • Thanks 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

We have to keep telling the objective, factual truth of the reality if only because without it, the lies of the liars magnified and spread by the brainless crowd will take over and dominate the public space. This is exactly how it happened the last time. There's nothing cozy or lighthearted about these things. And no guarantees either.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
6 hours ago, myata said:

We have to keep telling the objective, factual truth of the reality if only because without it, the lies of the liars magnified and spread by the brainless crowd will take over and dominate the public space. This is exactly how it happened the last time. There's nothing cozy or lighthearted about these things. And no guarantees either.

T

H

E

 

D

I

S

C

U

S

S

I

O

N

 

I

S

 

O

V

E

R

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

 

 

Posted
22 hours ago, myata said:

Nice try, or shall we say dumb? Dumbness, pretend or genuine is no argument to the reality. By this age, only the stupid wouldn't know.

myata is referring to the stone age which is where most environuts would like to be. Pacific Palisades is already there, so maybe that's what the cultist is referring to. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, Deluge said:

myata is referring to the stone age which is where most environuts would like to be. 

He thinks the stone age is where everyone has free dope.  Slight misunderstanding there i think. 

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

There is one, single exception so far and it proves that yes, independent thinking is possible whatever ideological and other differences and preferences. The brainless wont' know though: all connection to the reality is lost.

 

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
20 minutes ago, myata said:

There is one, single exception so far and it proves that yes, independent thinking is possible whatever ideological and other differences and preferences. The brainless wont' know though: all connection to the reality is lost.

 

ThE

dIsCuSsIoN

iS

oVeR

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, myata said:

There is one, single exception so far and it proves that yes, independent thinking is possible

 

Not for you it isn't

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

The score still stands at one, but it proves that thinking is possible. Do you want to think and take responsibility for your choices? Or go full brainless, like the bunch? The choice is yours. Remember, to the Time there will be no excuses or explanations.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
10 minutes ago, myata said:

The score still stands at one, 

The score stands at one because you're not arguing with anyone you're just blathering like a tard. 

The score is 1 becuase you're only playing with yourself.  

The score is 1 becuase you're only beating yourself.  

The score is 1 becuase you're the only one playing!   

(whew!)

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

The brainless herd wants you to believe that thinking is done for but the reality proves that it's possible. So, the reality, your eyes and your brain? Or lying twisty tongues spinning lying fairy tales? You choose. Remember, before the Time, there will be no explanations, nor excuses.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
33 minutes ago, myata said:

The brainless herd wants you to believe that thinking is done for but the reality proves that it's possible. So, the reality, your eyes and your brain? Or lying twisty tongues spinning lying fairy tales? You choose. Remember, before the Time, there will be no explanations, nor excuses.

For the discussion being over... you sure are carrying on a lot here. 

  • Haha 1

 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, myata said:

The brainless herd wants you to believe that thinking is done 

You were the one that said the discussion is done weren't you? Wouldn't that make you the brainless herd?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

Tha laughable part about this is he expects us to bow to his peer pressure and recite some mantra of the left to be accepted by him. It is as if thinks he's the keeper of the book of righteous souls or some nonsense.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, myata said:

 Do you want to think and take responsibility for your choices?

A good question.

Listening to impassioned New Yorkers is both entertaining and enlightening... it's actually a moving combination for people with relatable experience.

Two pages in and I'm not even sure what your original point or premise is. This guy is pretty clear on a single aspect of the madness though:

https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6366991539112

Edited by Venandi
Posted
41 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I don't understand why anyone bothers to respond to @myata anymore.

He's certifiably insane.

I don't know, because it's entertainment?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
11 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I don't know, because it's entertainment?

It's a word salad by someone who is filled with rage and directionless destruction.

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

It's a word salad by someone who is filled with rage and directionless destruction.

Yep. And its kind of funny.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

It's a word salad by someone who is filled with rage and directionless destruction.

I keep thinking it's some sort of weird code. You know, like how the allies used to do in the war when they would send strange radio messages that were meant to be picked up by the resistance. 

"The fat lady sings at 7:34!" "there is no ham in spam". "Fragrant walruses cavort on tulips!"  "when the clock strikes midnight, cinderella wants her pumpkin back!". That kind of thing. 

I thought perhaps he was sending secret coded messages to some odious cohorts of his. 

So i ran it through a chatgpt program designed to detect cryptology and ciphers and asked it to figure out what it meant.  It came back with "what the hell is wrong with you? ".   I've given up.

Edited by CdnFox
  • Haha 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
On 1/10/2025 at 9:06 AM, Deluge said:

What facts, snowflake? You don't even post any links. 

Thanks for admitting you know the standard while ALWAYS FAILING to to meet it.

13 hours ago, Venandi said:

I read the thread twice... only Herb and Robo understand what he's taking about.

Thanks for proving how dumb you are again with your failure to understand.

13 hours ago, Nationalist said:

It's a word salad by someone who is filled with rage and directionless destruction.

You're the EXPERT on ^that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,900
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...