How will they blame Trump?

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

In fairness as it turns out this really wasn't a manifesto as much as it was a suicide letter. It's pretty clear he didn't intend to kill anyone or cause serious injury. He was suffering terribly from his time in the military having received no help and wanted to end the pain in a spectacular fashion and send a message about his concerns at the same time.

Because of the truck incident that occurred at the same time we all thought of this as being a terrorist action or something along those lines. But this is more like the monk who sets himself on fire outside of the political offices.

So it might be a little different than the usual terrorist stuff.

Right, but nothing that you said proves that the FBI didn't just write that manifesto themselves.

The known evidence-fabricators at the FBI have exclusive control of all the manifestos of these mass murderers, school shooters, terrorists, etc, and it seems like the only manifestos that ever make it to the MSM are the ones involving white conservative men. Are white conservative men the only people who write manifestos? 

This convenient control of information is reminiscent of the video that Minn AG Keith Ellison decided to keep hidden from the public, which showed G Floyd resisting arrest, and saying "I can't breathe" when no one was touching him, and of CNN's insistence on calling M Brown a "gentle giant" while refusing to acknowledge what was plainly evident in the video from moments before he was shot. 

[WestCanMan]

6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Do I have to do everything for you dummies?

-LINK

Do I have to do everything for you dummies?

• Matthew Livelsberger Alleged Manifesto

• alleged
  /əˈlɛdʒ(ɪ)d/

  adjective

  • 1.said, without proof, to have taken place or to have a specified illegal or undesirable quality:"the alleged conspirators"

[CdnFox]

18 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I quoted you in the response where i provided the link, holy sh*t dude, this is just sad.

Still going, huh? OK, I'm happy to keep kicking you around.

Here's what I posted first:

Then you replied an hour later (I had logged off at that point because i have a life):

Then there was some back-and-forth with Chrissy1979, to whom you replied:

When I logged back on on Monday, I saw your first reply to me from Saturday and posted this:

I didn't even see the post where you claimed to have read the manifesto until after I posted it.

So that's your goes your whining about me not providing a cite or refusing to do so dealt with.

I said "The guy quite explicitly said it was a "wake up call" to start a purge of Democrats by the military."

Here's what his manifesto said:

So I'd say I summed up the contents quite accurately and you haven't proven otherwise.

That's a complete fiction, I'd ask for a quote to prove your claim here but we know you're a lying old b!tch. Fact is only one if us said they read the manifesto then turned around and said they didn't say they did. That was you, the lying old b!tch.

It's funny you seem to think being liked is a concern of mine when I wouldn't cross the street to p!ss on most of the people here if they were on fire.

This masturbatory nonsense is extra pathetic when everyone can see how you done f*cked up again here. I brought receipts, you should try it sometime, loser.

LOL  

Ok lets see...  denial of easily verified facts already presented.  Check!

Rabid insults to cover up the fact that you were the one being stupid   Check

Repeating previous lies hoping they'll some how be true.  Check. 

Sexual reference which indicates you're feeling dominated and it triggers your repressed homosexual nature... check  

Yep. It's a Black Dog post!

You lied entirely about what he said. He said that they should get rid of the dems lawfully but that they needed to be prepared to use the military if it was necessary to get them out. In other words  if they won't surrender power peacefully then you better be ready to force them to leave.

YOU claimed he was calling for an immediate 'purge'.  Which is an absolute lie and in no way reflects what he actually said. 

You lied about what i said, and when called on it you lied again and pretended you had quoted something entirely different.

Everyone can see this. You look more pathetic each time you open your yap. 

As to not caring about what people think that is very obviously not true. 

this is why nobody respects you. There's just not an honest bone in your body.

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Right, but nothing that you said proves that the FBI didn't just write that manifesto themselves.

Well that's true i suppose. 

[Black Dog]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Right, but nothing that you said proves that the FBI didn't just write that manifesto themselves.

uh huh sure dude.

Quote

The known evidence-fabricators at the FBI have exclusive control of all the manifestos of these mass murderers, school shooters, terrorists, etc, and it seems like the only manifestos that ever make it to the MSM are the ones involving white conservative men. Are white conservative men the only people who write manifestos? 

Well they are almost the only ones who carry out politically motivated acts of mass violence in America.

[Black Dog]

33 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL  

Ok lets see...  denial of easily verified facts already presented.  Check!

Rabid insults to cover up the fact that you were the one being stupid   Check

Repeating previous lies hoping they'll some how be true.  Check. 

Sexual reference which indicates you're feeling dominated and it triggers your repressed homosexual nature... check  

Yep. It's a Black Dog post!

Aw honey, it's ok, you can't win them all. Or ,in your case, any.

Quote

You lied entirely about what he said. He said that they should get rid of the dems lawfully but that they needed to be prepared to use the military if it was necessary to get them out. In other words  if they won't surrender power peacefully then you better be ready to force them to leave.

YOU claimed he was calling for an immediate 'purge'.  Which is an absolute lie and in no way reflects what he actually said. 

 

Quote

Military and vets move on DC starting now. Militias facilitate and augment this activity.

Occupy every major road along fed buildings and the campus of fed buildings by the hundreds of thousands.

Lock the highways around down with semis right after everybody gets in. Hold until the purge is complete.  

Military: check.

Immediate action: check.

Purge: check.

He also doesn't say anything about "lawfully" only "peacefully" which is not the same thing.

Quote

You lied about what i said, and when called on it you lied again and pretended you had quoted something entirely different.

Quotes or gtfo.

Quote

 

Everyone can see this. You look more pathetic each time you open your yap. 

As to not caring about what people think that is very obviously not true. 

this is why nobody respects you. There's just not an honest bone in your body.

 

 

 

 

Edited January 7 by Black Dog

[CdnFox]

21 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Aw honey, it's ok, you can't win them all. Or ,in your case, any.

He didn't say that. Like dude, I posted the entire thing, the only person you're fooling is yourself.

 

LOl come on:

 

Quotes or gtfo.

 

 

 

He did say that.  It's right there.  Get the dems to leave lawfully but be ready if they don't. 

Like I say it just wouldn't be one of your posts if you weren't denying the facts that were already presented.

And as usual you've been proven wrong and so you beg for other people to let you win just once.

At least you're backing off on the weird sexual stuff. I suppose that's progress.

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously. I mean basically you're just here for the comic relief. You never actually contribute anything to the conversation that is in any way  useful, You just spend 90% of your time backtracking from whatever stupid thing you started off saying before finally breaking down into sexual fantasies as a way of coping with your loss.

Honestly, can't you do better than that? Is it really too much to ask?

Edited January 7 by CdnFox

[Black Dog]

26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

He did say that.  It's right there.  Get the dems to leave lawfully but be ready if they don't. 

He doesn't use the word lawfully. Good lord, I quoted the entire thing and you're still denying reality, this is pathetic. Here it is again FTR:

Quote

Try peaceful means first, but be prepared to fight to get the Dems out of the fed government and military by any means necessary.

Do you genuinely think peaceful and lawful are the same thing in the context of the military storming and occupying government buildings? LMAO. 

Quote

Like I say it just wouldn't be one of your posts if you weren't denying the facts that were already presented.

And it wouldn't be a reply from you if you weren't peddling an extremely easily disproven lie.

Quote

And as usual you've been proven wrong and so you beg for other people to let you win just once.

Sad, delusional man. You're already dead and you don't even know it.

Quote

At least you're backing off on the weird sexual stuff. I suppose that's progress.

LOL your puritan whinging about anything with a slight sexual connotation will never stop being pathetic, but I was referring to your excessively self-absorbed and self-indulgent posting which only gets worse the deeper you dig yourself into a hole, as your last several posts show.

Quote

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously. I mean basically you're just here for the comic relief. You never actually contribute anything to the conversation that is in any way  useful, You just spend 90% of your time backtracking from whatever stupid thing you started off saying before finally breaking down into sexual fantasies as a way of coping with your loss.

Project more, IMAX. Too bad for you anyone with eyes can just look at the last few pages of you making an utter buffoon of yourself and draw their own conclusions. You said you read the manifesto yet were ignorant of its contents, then you said you didn't say you read the manifesto, and then you say the manifesto doesn't say what it actually says it clear and plain English. What are you gonna do for an encore, slam the fridge door on your head a few times?

Quote

Honestly, can't you do better than that? Is it really too much to ask?

I'm still torn on whether you're binging on copium here because you know you f*cked up and are trying to wriggle off the hook because you're a sad loser who can't admit he's wrong or if you genuinely believe this garbage you're saying. Because if it's the latter there's no hope for you until the sweet embrace of the grave.

[WestCanMan]

So the alleged manifesto may have been sent by email, and what is the FBI known to do for the Dems? They're known to alter emails and present them in court as "evidence". If the FBI are willing to fabricate evidence and present it to a judge for the Dems, which is obviously quite risky, would they provide them to the MSM, who have always been the Dems' willing accomplices? Of course, it's a major step down in criminality. 

This isn't conspiratorial in nature: nothing that the FBI says or does can be trusted. Anyone would say "Look what the FBI found" and regard that as factual in nature just isn't aware of anything the FBI has done in the past 8 years.

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

uh huh sure dude.

Well they are almost the only ones who carry out politically motivated acts of mass violence in America.

1. I'm not sure where you've been for the past while, but 99% of the political acts of violence in the USA in the past 10 years have been by BLM or Antifa. They're basically Dem militias, and they're not "majority white", dummy. What's the problem Black Dummy, you don't think of the BLM/Antifa/Dem riots as being acts of political violence? What do you see them as?  
2. White, Christian men account for anywhere from 50% to 80% of the men in America if you go back far enough, and muslims are about 1%. Those muslims have committed far more terrorist attacks than the whites and everyone else combined.
3. White men only account for a tiny fraction of the acts of political violence committed in the past ten years. Sorry to destroy another one of your stupid narratives. 

😘

[impartialobserver]

When I read about this case.. I get the feeling that we do not have even close to the whole story. I have no problem with law enforcement not disclosing their entire data set to the public. It takes time to put pieces together in a criminal case. I worked on a civil case and it took 6 months to really come to a solid hypothesis. I do not buy into conspiracy theories (no matter which side peddles them) so spare me the self righteous narratives. A lot of unanswered questions on my part.