Biden said he wasn't going to pardon his son right?

[Fluffypants]

2 hours ago, Aristides said:

A bit disappointing but with Trump threatening to go after everyone and nominating Patel as FBI head. Understandable. Didn't Trump pardon his father in law?

Did Trump tell reporters multiple times he cared about the "rule of law" and that he wouldn't pardon his father in law, also he pardoned him after he served his 24 month sentence.

How much of Hunter's did he serve? Oh nothing also he didn't give Kushner a blanket pardon that pardons him for anything he did for a decade. Hell Hunter could of committed murder, drug dealing, raping babies etc and can't be prosecuted for it.

Edited December 3, 2024 by Fluffypants

[West]

7 hours ago, Hodad said:

Literally all of them. Pick any of those numbers.

It's a categorically dishonest rhetorical approach, by dummies, for dummies. 

"Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested just for flexing his finger!" 

 

Every single one of those examples would not have been prosecuted if they were protesting something woke like mutilating the genitalia of children.

[West]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

OK...this one.

Is this not true? Yes it is. Does anyone think Trump...or anyone else...would hide documents in either his wife's or kid's undies? If you do...you're a sick minded sad-sack.

They are just upset as I use the imagery to make the valid underlying point which was it was a clear violation of the privacy of Trump and his family to abuse the power of the FBI by raiding his home, his lawyer's office, etc. 

[Hodad]

5 hours ago, West said:

Every single one of those examples would not have been prosecuted if they were protesting something woke like mutilating the genitalia of children.

You're really very stupid. And deeply dishonest. Not much else to say in this situation. 

[Hodad]

5 hours ago, West said:

They are just upset as I use the imagery to make the valid underlying point which was it was a clear violation of the privacy of Trump and his family to abuse the power of the FBI by raiding his home, his lawyer's office, etc. 

Sorry, dummy, but when you steal sensitive classified documents, take them to your house and then refuse to return them you forfeit your right to privacy. When you commit a felony and force the government to execute a search warrant to retrieve it's classified documents you forfeit your right to privacy. 

If Melania's unmentionables we touched (without adequate payment) then the person responsible for that forfeiture of privacy is Donald Trump. 

[West]

57 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sorry, dummy, but when you steal sensitive classified documents, take them to your house and then refuse to return them you forfeit your right to privacy. When you commit a felony and force the government to execute a search warrant to retrieve it's classified documents you forfeit your right to privacy. 

If Melania's unmentionables we touched (without adequate payment) then the person responsible for that forfeiture of privacy is Donald Trump. 

He was the president. He didn't steal shit. The Supreme Court has already ruled against the illegitimately appointed Jack Smith bud

[Aristides]

6 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Did Trump tell reporters multiple times he cared about the "rule of law" and that he wouldn't pardon his father in law, also he pardoned him after he served his 24 month sentence.

How much of Hunter's did he serve? Oh nothing also he didn't give Kushner a blanket pardon that pardons him for anything he did for a decade. Hell Hunter could of committed murder, drug dealing, raping babies etc and can't be prosecuted for it.

Trump's father in law was convicted and served his sentence during the Bush 2 term. Hard for Trump to pardon him then.

[NAME REMOVED]

 

Inside sources have mentioned that Biden may issue preemptive pardons for others, like Liz Cheney, Jack Smith, Chris Christie, Adam Schiff and others that the Trump Administration will have in their cross-hairs. 

Edited December 6, 2024 by DUI_Offender

[Fluffypants]

Man Bidens legacy is dog crap right now. Remember when Pelosi insisted he was a Mount Rushmore level of President?

Now Biden's legacy will be as follows, massive levels of inflation, weaponization of the DOJ against his political opponent, promising for months that no one is above the law until the end of his Presidency where it seems everyone close to him actually is.

You all realize we don't have a 2nd term of Trump if:

Democrats didn't indict him

Make a law specifically tailored to a make it so E Jean Carroll could sue him. Then have a jury say specifically they don't believe Trump raped her and then have a judge give her a massive judgement for defamation because Trump said he didn't rape her buuuuuut it kind of was rape in his the judges mind. At no point did they have ANY evidence other than her word that this happened 30 years ago.

Try to bankrupt him and destroy his business over subjective valuations that had disclaimers all over them and the banks he so-called defrauded did their own due-diligence and adjusted the valuations and gave him the loans that he paid back in full and would be happy to do business with him again. The appeals court looks ready to dismiss the case and maybe even sanction the attorneys for such a giant load of BS.

Trump wasn't winning the the primaries until that first indictment dropped which pissed people off enough to back Trump fully. If there were no indictments or frivolous lawsuits you would probably have Ron DeSantis as the next President of the US.

Face it, Democrats had a huge mountain to climb to win this one and any Republican would of beaten Biden/Harris.

Edited December 6, 2024 by Fluffypants

[gatomontes99]

The thing we haven't discussed is that Hunter can't take the fifth for any federal crime for which he is deposed. He can't take the fifth because he can't be incriminated.  If the DOJ calls him in to ask him about his activities in Joe's influence peddling scheme, he has to answer honestly or face perjury charges. Joe has given the DOJ a gift.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

The thing we haven't discussed is that Hunter can't take the fifth for any federal crime for which he is deposed. He can't take the fifth because he can't be incriminated.  If the DOJ calls him in to ask him about his activities in Joe's influence peddling scheme, he has to answer honestly or face perjury charges. Joe has given the DOJ a gift.

He can just say he doesn't remember or the like. Or he can lie and say that whatever crime they're investigating was him entirely and just him all by himself and they can't prosecute him. And in a few years Biden will pass and then that link is gone as well and they will have completely gotten away with it.

These people are a lot of things but stupid isn't one of them. On the other hand it's a safe bet that a criminal will continue to be a criminal. So they just have to keep an eye out, wait for the perfect moment to launch a bunch of tax audits when they know that these guys have been fudging and wait for any of the others to screw up as well.

Sadly this is the way it always is. Trudeau has stolen what appears to be hundreds of millions of dollars from the taxpayer of which he will get a sizable portion dumped into his pocket when he leaves office. And that's on top of the half a million dollar airline food he ordered and the like. You think he's ever going to face justice for that?

[gatomontes99]

25 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

He can just say he doesn't remember or the like. Or he can lie and say that whatever crime they're investigating was him entirely and just him all by himself and they can't prosecute him. And in a few years Biden will pass and then that link is gone as well and they will have completely gotten away with it.

These people are a lot of things but stupid isn't one of them. On the other hand it's a safe bet that a criminal will continue to be a criminal. So they just have to keep an eye out, wait for the perfect moment to launch a bunch of tax audits when they know that these guys have been fudging and wait for any of the others to screw up as well.

Sadly this is the way it always is. Trudeau has stolen what appears to be hundreds of millions of dollars from the taxpayer of which he will get a sizable portion dumped into his pocket when he leaves office. And that's on top of the half a million dollar airline food he ordered and the like. You think he's ever going to face justice for that?

If you can catch him in one of those lies, he isn't immune to perjury.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

If you can catch him in one of those lies, he isn't immune to perjury.

If you can catch him but those are very easy lies to get away with. And he would have the best of the best lawyers to help him through it. I would say there would be less than a 1% chance of catching him on that crap.

I think it's more likely that he'll screw up in the future and they can catch him for that.

The FBI are the only people who are truly expert at getting people to accidentally lie and then charging them. They actually train for that And as you'll recall most of trump's associates who were arrested were arrested for "Lying" To the FBI, not because anything they did was actually criminal or wrong.

But I doubt the FBI is going to go after hunter and he would be fairly well shielded unless he does something new by his voice who would say that he can't be prosecuted so he doesn't have to testify

[Fluffypants]

9 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

The thing we haven't discussed is that Hunter can't take the fifth for any federal crime for which he is deposed. He can't take the fifth because he can't be incriminated.  If the DOJ calls him in to ask him about his activities in Joe's influence peddling scheme, he has to answer honestly or face perjury charges. Joe has given the DOJ a gift.

Its not so much of a gift to Joe because if Hunter gets pissed off at his father or the family he could turn on them and rat them out since he knows he can't be prosecuted for the crimes.

Edited December 6, 2024 by Fluffypants