Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is a bit concerning that men are dropping out of higher education.  I go with Gary Becker, Nobel winner, and his theory with the "zero sum" game where academia is the best way to success. Higher paid jobs do require critical thinking meaning post-secondary education, meaning also labor shortage in some fields.  Since males are going to limit their earning power, they are going to become dissatisfied with life and face those mental and well-being challenges. In a few years see social dynamics changes including about getting married. Well, earning and success have an impact of decisions about marriage and family.

My suggestion is early intervention for males.  This can include, support programs (mentoring), success programs (success centres for males), mental health support (awareness-they are also not visiting their doctors), ease some financial burden by encouraging grants, scholarship, financial aid to males to help them stay in school, job placement so they see the long-term benefits of higher education.

My input.
RB

 

Posted
15 hours ago, RB said:

This is a bit concerning that men are dropping out of higher education.  I go with Gary Becker, Nobel winner, and his theory with the "zero sum" game where academia is the best way to success. Higher paid jobs do require critical thinking meaning post-secondary education, meaning also labor shortage in some fields.  Since males are going to limit their earning power, they are going to become dissatisfied with life and face those mental and well-being challenges. In a few years see social dynamics changes including about getting married. Well, earning and success have an impact of decisions about marriage and family.

My suggestion is early intervention for males.  This can include, support programs (mentoring), success programs (success centres for males), mental health support (awareness-they are also not visiting their doctors), ease some financial burden by encouraging grants, scholarship, financial aid to males to help them stay in school, job placement so they see the long-term benefits of higher education.

My input.
RB

 

Maybe referring to masculinity as "toxic" was a bad idea. It's amazing how society has beat down masculinity but tells young women they can do whatever a man can do and people are wondering what's wrong????? We're turning men into women and women into men but no one will get confused. The level of stupidity in all this garbage is mind numbing 

Posted

"toxic masculinity" evokes strong reactions.  This "toxic" as a precise meaning can be seen as "bad idea"?

Masculinity in itself is not inherently harmful but toxic masculinity does have an association of suppression of women, emotions and being overly aggressive.  Maybe it is not the best way to get reactions since it perpetuates the gender inequality.

So now I want to say that toxic masculinity is a phase that address harmful behavior, and since we know these behavior/attitudes we can encourage inclusive healthier expressions of masculinity.  Masculinity is divisive and misunderstood and now aligned with toxic and bad idea.

Quote Kakuda: "It's amazing how society has beat down masculinity but tells young women they can do whatever a man can do and people are wondering what's wrong????? "

This statement seems too simple to address a complex issue. The idea that society has "beat down" masculinity is a broad idea. Discussions around masculinity aim to address are the harmful behaviors and stereotypes that can be associated with traditional notions of masculinity, not masculinity itself. These discussions often encourage men to express their emotions, which can lead to healthier outcomes for everyone.

On the other hand, encouraging women to pursue opportunities traditionally dominated by men is about promoting equality and ensuring that everyone has the chance to reach their full potential, regardless of gender.  This doesn't mean that men are being pushed aside; rather, it's about creating a more inclusive society where both men and women can thrive.  You can think about creating a bigger pie.

We're turning men into women and women into men but no one will get confused

Again this statement is too simple and misrepresents the complexities of gender identity and societal roles. The idea that society is "turning men into women and women into men" is a misunderstanding of efforts to promote gender equality and inclusivity. These efforts aim to allow individuals to express themselves authentically, without being confined by traditional gender roles.

Encouraging men to be more emotionally expressive or women to pursue careers in STEM, for example, doesn't mean they are being turned into the opposite gender. Instead, it means they are being given the freedom to explore and express all aspects of their identity. This can lead to a more balanced and inclusive society where people are not limited by outdated stereotypes. We can have a balance society.

The level of stupidity in all this garbage is mind numbing
Yes, some of these topics can be frustrating and sometimes complex.  But it is important to approach them with an open mind and a willingness to understand different perspectives. Conversations about gender roles and equality are ongoing and evolving, and they can be challenging to navigate.

RB

Posted
On 11/11/2024 at 12:56 PM, Yakuda said:

Maybe referring to masculinity as "toxic" was a bad idea. It's amazing how society has beat down masculinity but tells young women they can do whatever a man can do and people are wondering what's wrong????? We're turning men into women and women into men but no one will get confused. The level of stupidity in all this garbage is mind numbing 

The level of stupidity to not understand that toxic masculinity is a descriptor of a certain form of masculinity (hence the modifier "toxic") and not masculinity as a whole is really impressive.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted (edited)
On 11/14/2024 at 12:25 PM, Black Dog said:

The level of stupidity to not understand that toxic masculinity is a descriptor of a certain form of masculinity (hence the modifier "toxic") and not masculinity as a whole is really impressive.

Name the various "types" of masculinity Einstein. There's stupid then there's stupid ^

Edited by Yakuda
Posted
3 hours ago, Yakuda said:

Name the various "types" of masculinity Einstein. There's stupid then there's stupid ^

Toxic, positive, diet, caffeine-free. Now. f*ck off loser.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
43 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Toxic, positive, diet, caffeine-free. Now. f*ck off loser.

Uh oh someone has an emotional boo boo. 

I love how agitated you low intelligence creatures get. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

Uh oh someone has an emotional boo boo. 

I love how agitated you low intelligence creatures get. 

You have some nerves calling other low intelligence when you believe in god, you peasant.

  • Haha 1

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
21 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You have some nerves calling other low intelligence when you believe in god, you peasant.

So let me get this straight, you think I'm of los intelligence because I believe in God and therefore that means you can't be of low intelligence????? I'd explain to you why thats nonsensical but you just made my original point. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

So let me get this straight, you think I'm of los intelligence because I believe in God and therefore that means you can't be of low intelligence????? I'd explain to you why thats nonsensical but you just made my original point. 

No I just think someone as demonstrably stupid as you shouldn't go around questioning the intelligence of those demonstrably smarter than you. I mean look at the original post you made where you didn't understand that the term toxic masculinity refers to a specific type of masculinity not masculinity as a whole. 

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
5 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

No I just think someone as demonstrably stupid as you shouldn't go around questioning the intelligence of those demonstrably smarter than you. I mean look at the original post you made where you didn't understand that the term toxic masculinity refers to a specific type of masculinity not masculinity as a whole. 

As you least you recognize your low intelligence. 

This isn't he same stupid a$$ shlt you nitwits pull with justice. You shine about "social" justice. There's only justice. "Social" justice is an imagined fantasy in your lesion infected leftists minds just like "toxic" masculinity. I'll keep repeating it until it gets through those blocks of granite you m0r0ns have in your heads that pass for brains, not everyone is as stupid as you. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

As you least you recognize your low intelligence. 

I'm smarter than you by several orders of magnitude.

Quote

This isn't he same stupid a$$ shlt you nitwits pull with justice. You shine about "social" justice. There's only justice. "Social" justice is an imagined fantasy in your lesion infected leftists minds just like "toxic" masculinity. I'll keep repeating it until it gets through those blocks of granite you m0r0ns have in your heads that pass for brains, not everyone is as stupid as you. 

 

LOL funny how you losers weren't content to cry about pronouns so now you're going after adjectives.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
8 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'm smarter than you by several orders of magnitude.

 

LOL funny how you losers weren't content to cry about pronouns so now you're going after adjectives.

My father always said an honest man should.never have to tell you he's honest. It's the same with intelligence I've come to learn over the years. If you feel compelled to say it then even you know it's not true.  LMAO you mOr0n 

Posted
Just now, Yakuda said:

My father always said an honest man should.never have to tell you he's honest. It's the same with intelligence I've come to learn over the years. If you feel compelled to say it then even you know it's not true.  LMAO you mOr0n 

I've already demonstrated that I'm smarter than you, sorry that hurts your feelings, maybe cry to your made up sky fairy about it, peasant.

 

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
11 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I've already demonstrated that I'm smarter than you, sorry that hurts your feelings, maybe cry to your made up sky fairy about it, peasant.

 

In your mind. Not very compelling. Keep telling me how smart you. Its less convincing every time you do. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Yakuda said:

In your mind. Not very compelling. Keep telling me how smart you. Its less convincing every time you do. 

Again i don't need to tell you, you prove it with every stupid post you make.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Again i don't need to tell you, you prove it with every stupid post you make.

Whatever you say Einstein. Keep trying to convince me how smart you are. Maybe one day you'll believe finally and won't have to keep telling yourself how smart you are. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Yakuda said:

Whatever you say Einstein. Keep trying to convince me how smart you are. Maybe one day you'll believe finally and won't have to keep telling yourself how smart you are. 

Aww you're still mad about adjectives. Wait until you hear about nouns and verbs.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Aww you're still mad about adjectives. Wait until you hear about nouns and verbs.

Ah yes of course of course Einstein. Tell.us again of your stellar brilliance that apparently blinds no one but you.  

Edited by Yakuda
Posted
28 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

Ah yes of course of course Einstein. Tell.us again of your stellar brilliance that apparently blinds no one but you.  

blah blah blah

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

I laughed because peasant should not be considered an insult 🖖

It's a mindset.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,844
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    beatbot
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...