Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/1/2024 at 5:48 PM, Queenmandy85 said:

That would be just as wrong as the Prime Minister asking for a deferred prosecution for SNC Lav. You would be interferring in the Justice system.

 

That's easy. Justin Trudeau is a card carrying member of the Liberal Party of Canada.  Anna Di Carlo is the leader of the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist). Elizabeth Rowley is leader of the Communist Party of Canada. If memory serves, the both Communist Parties combined  received les than 10,000 votes in the last Federal election. Now, since it is a secret ballot, there is no way to know for certain that Prime Minister Trudeau did not vote for Garnet Colly running under the banner of the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist, (the other Communist Party did not run a candidate in Papineau) you are only speculating that the Prime Minister voted against himself. You are really stretching credulity to believe Prime Minister Trudeau is a marxist. However, when you say, "The Covid big pharma scamdemic was one of the biggest hoaxes ever played on mankind," when over a million Americans and 50,000 Canadians died from Covid, you are not inspiring confidence in your version of events.

But, on the other hand, your posts are always interesting. Thank you.

The freezing of bank and credit card accounts, and the many anti free speech and censorship Bills that have been put forward by the Marxist in Ottawa says to me that this traitor to Canada is a Marxist. In a free and democratic country, those mentioned above would never have come to be. 

Whether you or anyone else want to believe it or not, the covid hoax and lie was a conspiracy by the big pharma globalists to push vaccines on innocent people. Many people were injured or even died after they took the covid shot. 

Thanks. I do like to make things interesting and controversial around here. 😇

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, taxme said:

The Marxist dictator in Ottawa

Unable to respond intelligently repeating a moronic statement to prove the original one is a common fallback for the illiterati.

Posted
5 hours ago, taxme said:

Whether you or anyone else want to believe it or not, the covid hoax and lie was a conspiracy

I'll choose "not." 

Have a good weekend. 🤠

  • Like 1

A Conservative stands for God, King and Country

Posted
On 10/29/2024 at 1:42 PM, Queenmandy85 said:

I tend to be skeptical about anything produced by CSIS or any other intelligence agency. I am not saying the allegations are without merit, just that CSIS, Mi6, CIA, GRU etc have a lousy track  record going back to before the execution of Margarite Gertrude Zelle.

This is incorrect.

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, taxme said:

The freezing of bank and credit card accounts, and the many anti free speech and censorship Bills that have been put forward ......

OMG...get over it.

There was a touch over 200 accounts frozen of the people identified as leaders of a protest, out of the over 5000 banking braches and tens of millions of accounts.

Tell me one area of free speech that has been impeded or prevented or censored and the exact censorship bill and where it prevents free speech or censors speech (other than hate speech). You will not and cannot...you are full of rhetorical BS.

Your (and others)  baseless accusations have been questions many times and to date, no exact and precise answers have been provided....only repetitive BS.

 

Edited by ExFlyer
  • Thanks 2

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

OMG...get over it.

 

Why?

It was a gross abuse of power that was totalitarian and dictatorial. It stopped on the freedoms of every Canadian including the ones who don't want to talk about it.

Why on earth should we ever get over it? If we get over it, then they think they get away with it and they do worse the next time.

The liberal party needs to be punished to the point of Extinction and we should never ever ever get over it.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Why?

....

If you actually can substantiate the accusations and can answer the questions with definitive evidence, then do so, otherwise, get over it and quit wallowing in the past with unsubstantiated BS LOL

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
28 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

If you actually can substantiate the accusations and can answer the questions with definitive evidence, then do so, otherwise, get over it and quit wallowing in the past with unsubstantiated BS LOL

So in other words you don't have a reason why.

And you need me to provide proof that they overstepped the rights of Canadians?

Ok.

Federal Court finds Emergencies Act orders exceed government’s powers | Insights | Torys LLP

Federal Court Rules that the Government’s Invocation of the Emergencies Act on February 14, 2022, was Unreasonable and not Justified. — Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre

Ottawa's use of Emergencies Act against convoy protests was unreasonable, violated Charter, court rules | CBC News

Emergencies Act: federal court rules use was 'not justified' | CTV News

 Canada's use of emergency powers 'unjustified' - judge

 

I thought I'd save us the time of you pretending that the sources an issue rather than the court ruling.

You knew about this. You were perfectly aware that what they did has been ruled to be a gross violation of people's charter rights.

You just chose to see lion because you give a shit more about your party than Canadians, people's rights, or anything else.

Anything else you want to add little boy? It is impossible for me to believe that someone who claims to have served the military to protect the rights of Canadians would lie and be in support of a government that stole those rights from the people. More proof that you're actually a 16 year old living in your mommy's basement

. Next I expect we'll see the Meltdown, and 14 pages of you posting memes that make you look even more like a child. That always ends well for you doesn't it.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So in other words you don't have a reason why.

....

None of which ypu provided  impeded or denies you of your right to freedom of speech.

Queston was "Tell me one area of free speech that has been impeded or prevented or censored and the exact censorship bill" and you have not provided anything.

There is no law or legislation affecting your right to freedmen of speech unless it is hate speech.  A judges opinion is not a bill and not a federal law.

Once again....you are swimming in your own bucket of BS   LOL

 

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

None of which ypu provided  impeded or denies you of your right to freedom of speech.

 

Nobody mentioned freedom of speech.

Back to your usual tricks I see, you know I'm right, I've proved you wrong, and rather than just admitted and move on you're going to try and change what I said so that it becomes something you might be able to argue with

. This is why the liberals must be removed from office and never allowed in again. Honestly.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Nobody mentioned freedom of speech.

....

That was the subject of my post...   "Tell me one area of free speech that has been impeded or prevented or censored and the exact censorship bill and where it prevents free speech or censors speech (other than hate speech). You will not and cannot...you are full of rhetorical BS. "

Whatever you are trying to emphasis is history.. over and done with and zero can and will be done about it.

Your reading compression issues erupt again...free speech is the reason I responded

Get over it, your other issues are over, done, dead...LOL

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
7 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

That was the subject of my post...  

But not the subject I mentioned or was discussing.

So you're taking something that you were discussing before and attempting to apply it to our current conversation which had nothing to do with freedom of speech

Uh Huh. 

In any case, seeing as you've brought it up now you're still wrong.  The judge ruled it DID violate their freedom of protest, speech and expression. 

Noting that “protests are inherently disruptive and are constitutionally protected political expression that goes to the core of the freedom,” and that “political speech is granted the highest level of protection because of its essential role in democratic life,” Justice Mosley also found that the emergency powers unjustifiably violated the Charter-protected freedom of expression of protestors.

so. They did violate people's right to free speech and expression. 

7 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Whatever you are trying to emphasis is history.. over and done with and zero can and will be done about it.

Sorry but that's just a plain old lie. It is not over and done with. There is much we can do about it.

We can absolutely destroy the liberal party so that it collapses and never holds power again as a warning to politicians who violate people's rights.  We can demand the laws be changed to prevent that kind of thing. We can demand compensation for all of those who had their rights trampled (maybe take it out of the money we give to the universities and special interest groups?)   We can remind Canadians every year so that they never forget how far the left will go to suppress their opponents.   And so on and so forth 

I get that as a liberal supporter you're DESPERATE for people  to turn the page and forget this horrific moment in history. 

But the thing is, it's ALWAYS the libs who steal rights.  King locked up the japanese and stole their land and sold it for nothing to wealthy friends. trudeau the first was the first to declare the war measures act. Willie made the residential schools manditory and then buried the report that there were horrific abuses.  Justin has stolen the rights of thousands of Candaians with his emergency act. 

People need to be reminded of that all the time. And reparations should be made to the protesters and those who had their banks siezed.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

But not the subject I mentioned or was discussing.

.......

Yup, the only thing you got right LOL

So, "Tell me one area of free speech that has been impeded or prevented or censored and the exact censorship bill and where it prevents free speech or censors speech (other than hate speech). "

No bill, no legislation so, you still have all your freedom of speech....that is the subject I brought up, not your off subject blather LOL

 

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
On 11/9/2024 at 12:25 PM, CdnFox said:

It was a gross abuse of power that was totalitarian and dictatorial.

It sent a very strong message to Canadian citizens.

"This is what I can do to you, if too many of you rise up in protest."

  • Thanks 1

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
1 hour ago, Goddess said:

It sent a very strong message to Canadian citizens.

"This is what I can do to you, if too many of you rise up in protest."

And the message needs to go back loud and clear, "this is what we'll do to you if you try"

This is why it was so disappointing that somebody Canadians kind of blew it off at the time is no big deal. But at least now he faces ruin along with his party. But we should be just as much in the face of the NDP for their support and for propping them up afterwards

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Goddess said:

It sent a very strong message to Canadian citizens.

"This is what I can do to you, if too many of you rise up in protest."

 

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And the message needs to go back loud and clear, "this is what we'll do to you if you try"

This is why it was so disappointing that somebody Canadians kind of blew it off at the time is no big deal. But at least now he faces ruin along with his party. But we should be just as much in the face of the NDP for their support and for propping them up afterwards

Get over it...and yourselves.

Living in the past only gains you grey hair LOL

Agonizing or complaining about past actions time after time and year after year that will not change and you have no control over is just a waste of effort. If your life revolves arounf old times...you have no future.

Still, show me what Bill or legislation or law that suppressed your freedom of speech...LOL

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
5 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

 

Get over it...and yourselves.

Nope!  :) 

You can keep begging all you want, This will keep being brought up. And even more fun, at some point it will wind up being used against people you like and you'll have nothing to say because you strongly supported it and desperately wanted to avoid fixing the problems

See you next election kiddo :) 

Posted
On 11/8/2024 at 1:33 PM, herbie said:

Unable to respond intelligently repeating a moronic statement to prove the original one is a common fallback for the illiterati.

Stunned buffoon. 🤡

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Nope!  :) 

You can keep begging all you want, This will keep being brought up. And even more fun, at some point it will wind up being used against people you like and you'll have nothing to say because you strongly supported it and desperately wanted to avoid fixing the problems

See you next election kiddo :) 

Live in the past but bottom libe is there is diddly shit you can do abut it. LOL Suck it up buttercup Ha Ha Ha

You still have not provided the law, Bill or legislation that has impeded ypru freedom of speech.  Why?? Oh, because there is none LOL

Everyone knows trudeau is toast.. Do you actually think anyone in Canada (or the world)  is not aware of this LOL. Trump and PP... a couple of right wing extremist ...cannot wait to read your whining about them LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
On 11/9/2024 at 6:27 AM, ExFlyer said:

OMG...get over it.

There was a touch over 200 accounts frozen of the people identified as leaders of a protest, out of the over 5000 banking braches and tens of millions of accounts.

Tell me one area of free speech that has been impeded or prevented or censored and the exact censorship bill and where it prevents free speech or censors speech (other than hate speech). You will not and cannot...you are full of rhetorical BS.

Your (and others)  baseless accusations have been questions many times and to date, no exact and precise answers have been provided....only repetitive BS.

 

Freezing just one bank or credit card account is a sign of a communist like government in Canada. No one should have their bank or credit card accounts frozen just because of their political beliefs. Especially when the dictator in Ottawa says that all Canadians have a right to their opinions and beliefs. But apparently, you seem to have no problem with the dictator doing so, right comrade? 

The new Online Harms Bill C-36 that has been brought forward by the Marxist in Ottawa to stifle free speech and enforce censorship on their political opponents. It is just another hate speech law that will go after anyone that the dictator in Ottawa does not like or what they say and will be used against them. You seem to have a big problem with anyone questioning or challenging anything the government says or does, comrade. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, taxme said:

Freezing just one bank or credit card account i...

The new Online Harms Bill C-36 ....

Freezing accounts of protest ring leaders is quite acceptable....just as freezing assets of potential crimonals of any form. If found not guilty, they assets are released...as they were several days later. Get wiht it dude LOL

The Harms Bill C-36 is not a freedom of speech restriction unless it is designated hate speech...again, get with it dude LOL

Time for even you to wake up and smell the real world Ha Ha Ha

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
44 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Live in the past but bottom libe is there is diddly shit you can do abut it.

It's still the present kiddo. And as I mentioned there's a great deal we can do about it.

You'll see the start of it on next election day :)   Honk honk kiddo!

Posted
37 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's still ....

You'll see the start of it on next election day

Ha Ha Ha. So yesterday Yuck Yuck Yuck

Like I said... the whole world knows trudeau is toast and PP is in. Yo uare not a prognosticator LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
Just now, ExFlyer said:

Ha Ha Ha. So yesterday Yuck Yuck Yuck

 

Well, that's America, this is Canada. I realize for some who didn't quite get all the way through the education system it can be confusing :)

But I think it's safe to say that those who support all of the anti-democratic and woke nonsense that we've seen in the states for the last 4 years just got to wake up call there too  :) 

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

Like I said... the whole world knows trudeau is toast and PP is in.

. And this is one of the reasons why. But that's just the start :) 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Freezing accounts of protest ring leaders is quite acceptable....just as freezing assets of potential crimonals of any form. If found not guilty, they assets are released...as they were several days later. Get wiht it dude LOL

The Harms Bill C-36 is not a freedom of speech restriction unless it is designated hate speech...again, get with it dude LOL

Time for even you to wake up and smell the real world Ha Ha Ha

Now i know why as to why i call you comrade, comrade. I hope and pray that one day you will have your bank or credit card accounts frozen because you said something politically incorrect or woke, comrade. 

Bill C-36 is a bill that will be used by the leftist Human Wrongs Commission to suppress free speech and create censorship, especially against conservatives. You need to read between the lines, comrade. Phk awf. LOL. 

 

Edited by taxme

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...