Have Democrats Given Up on Men?

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I don’t talk to women about abortion. I’m not qualified or arrogant enough to tell them what’s best for them. I respect their right to control their own bodies.

You support the people that DO talk to women about abortion. Just because you don't say anything doesn't mean that you don't support it. Your vote helps abortion activists get their message out. 

And it's not just their bodies anymore - it's TWO bodies. 

Edited October 25, 2024 by Deluge

[Aristides]

34 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You support the people that DO talk to women about abortion. Just because you don't say anything doesn't mean that you don't support it. Your vote helps abortion activists get their message out. 

And it's not just their bodies anymore - it's TWO bodies. 

I support the right to choose. Nothing more.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

You are behind because you think women are stupid and that statement is a good example.

Behind what? That makes no sense.

I'll say this for certain, anyone who's still enamoured with Kamala at this point is actually stupid, and there's no denying that. So whatever percent of women are still following Kamala, that percentage of women are stupid, 100%.

Whatever percent of men are still following Kamala, that percentage of men are stupid, 100%.

Why? Because Kamala loses on the topic of running the economy, 100%. She's a total dunce there.

Also because Kamala loses on the topic of foreign affairs, 100%. The same people who used the teleprompter to control Joe's lips are moving Kamala's lips now, and all of these wars started because of the Dems. 

Also because Kamala loses on the topic of border security, 100%. Regardless of any bills proposed and voted down, the border was the Dems' to command and they blew it, 100%. They couldn't understand how walls work for Pete's sake. They had to find out the hard way. Their lack of foresight was a disaster for America.

Also because Kamala refused to speak to the media without a teleprompter for 75 days, and then looked like a complete dunce ever since. There are questions that she has been asked a dozen times now which she has yet to answer. She's just beyond useless, and that has nothing to do with being a black woman. She's just a really bad example. 

No one actually knows what Kamala stands for because so many of her own personal policy positions have switched by 180° in the last 4 years. And we're not talking about a 17-yr-old who saw the world from the POV of someone who was completely isolated from the economic realities, and then had to live on their own for 3 years, she was 55 then and 59 now. It's REALLY late in the game for an adult to experience that much personal growth. 

Honestly, 2020 Kamala would look at the policy positions of 2024 Kamala and say "You're a stupid racist." Am I right? She called Trump's wall stupid, her and Biden sold off border materials at pennies on the dollar, now she wants to build $640M worth of border wall. 

Is it too late to call up the people they sold all those border-wall materials to now, Aristedes? Maybe they sold them to their friends, and now they're buying them all back at the post-Bidenflation price. YIKES! What a profit that would be. 

I'll just say this again so that you don't think I was serious, or that I'd think better of it later: whatever percent of women are still following Kamala, that percentage of women are stupid, 100%. Not "a bit below average", stupid, stupid, stupid. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Not sure what that has to do with your admitted propensity for pissing people to the point they assault you.

🤣 You're just a clown.

Quote

No I wish they had connected in your case.

We both already knew that you're an ardent supporter of violence. 

Quote

blah blah blah

That's it? You can't even deny that you supported violence against innocent people? 

Quote

Again, you don't know a single thing about who I am IRL.

Buddy, your lack of character and intelligence are literally the only two things that we actually do know about you, and they're really all that matters. 

You could be a guy, girl, trans, a convict, a drug dealer, a leper, fat, skinny, ugly, blind, deaf, gay, straight or a thousand other things and we could never know for sure, but we know for certain that you're a dumb, pro-violence liar. 100%. Those 3 things all stem from the fact that you're dumb and lack character.

Quote

Again, she's never tried to hit me with anything so I must be doing something right. 

I don't think "she" exists, but if she does, I feel sorry for her, because you're a horrible person.  

Quote

Lol what am I lying about, dummy? You volunteered the info that multiple people have thrown shit at you and my theory is that it's because you're an a**hole, not because they were on the rag or whatever you think.

You know that she didn't try to main me, so you lied. 

You also know that you're exaggerating when you say "multiple" people, because that implies 4 or more (a person = 1, a couple people = 2, a few people = 3 or maybe 4 at most, multiple people = 4 or more), and I said 2. No one says "multiple" when they mean "2", ergo you're a liar, 100%. Stop weaselling away from it. Literally everyone knows that you're a liar anyways dude. It's weird that you'd try to deny it at this stage.

Quote

And frankly there's more evidence of you being an a**hole than just about anything out there.

If you find my honesty offensive, call the waahmbulance. I honestly don't care.

Quote

LOL I was calling Biden senile back in 2020, your shit doesn't work on me bud.

If you can find some posts where you admitted to his dementia then I'll acknowledge that I was incorrect to accuse you of defending mainstream leftist lies about Biden's mental acuity.

I've never seen a leftist here, or anywhere else, acknowledge Biden's poor mental state until it became a liability for the party specifically. When he was just a liability to the US, but he was mumbling the alt-left agenda that was written on his teleprompter, leftists guarded him like the golden child.

Quote

You're literally lying here about me pretending Biden was mentally fit.

Wrong, 100%. I'd only be lying if I knew that you told the truth about Biden's dementia, and nothing would surprise me more than finding out that you told the truth about something that important. I really doubt that you did. 

I would have remembered it if I saw you being honest, or if I saw a leftard here acknowledging Biden's dementia.

Quote

And we all know you're actually divorced. You have rancid divorced man vibes.

Not divorced at all. In fact, we are planning to get re-married on our 20th anniversary, as if that's any of your business.

What you're detecting isn't "rancid divorced man vibes" lol, it's my lack of patience for stupid people and liars, like yourself.

Quote

I'm not taking life advice from a sack of shit like you who has nothing better to do but marinate in a sour stew of resentment and made up conspiracies.

You should definitely be taking advice from me, and deep down you know that. 

 

Re: your alleged honesty (tbh I don't know if I've ever seen you try to pretend that you're honest. Have you?), can you name 5 inconvenient truths about Kamala Harris right now? It's honestly really easy. Go with the biggest ones of all. I'd just love to see you try to be honest about something for once. 

Edited October 25, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Behind what? That makes no sense.

I'll say this for certain, anyone who's still enamoured with Kamala at this point is actually stupid, and there's no denying that. So whatever percent of women are still following Kamala, that percentage of women are stupid, 100%.

Whatever percent of men are still following Kamala, that percentage of men are stupid, 100%.

Why? Because Kamala loses on the topic of running the economy, 100%. She's a total dunce there.

Also because Kamala loses on the topic of foreign affairs, 100%. The same people who used the teleprompter to control Joe's lips are moving Kamala's lips now, and all of these wars started because of the Dems. 

Also because Kamala loses on the topic of border security, 100%. Regardless of any bills proposed and voted down, the border was the Dems' to command and they blew it, 100%. They couldn't understand how walls work for Pete's sake. They had to find out the hard way. Their lack of foresight was a disaster for America.

Also because Kamala refused to speak to the media without a teleprompter for 75 days, and then looked like a complete dunce ever since. There are questions that she has been asked a dozen times now which she has yet to answer. She's just beyond useless, and that has nothing to do with being a black woman. She's just a really bad example. 

No one actually knows what Kamala stands for because so many of her own personal policy positions have switched by 180° in the last 4 years. And we're not talking about a 17-yr-old who saw the world from the POV of someone who was completely isolated from the economic realities, and then had to live on their own for 3 years, she was 55 then and 59 now. It's REALLY late in the game for an adult to experience that much personal growth. 

Honestly, 2020 Kamala would look at the policy positions of 2024 Kamala and say "You're a stupid racist." Am I right? She called Trump's wall stupid, her and Biden sold off border materials at pennies on the dollar, now she wants to build $640M worth of border wall. 

Is it too late to call up the people they sold all those border-wall materials to now, Aristedes? Maybe they sold them to their friends, and now they're buying them all back at the post-Bidenflation price. YIKES! What a profit that would be. 

I'll just say this again so that you don't think I was serious, or that I'd think better of it later: whatever percent of women are still following Kamala, that percentage of women are stupid, 100%. Not "a bit below average", stupid, stupid, stupid. 

That kind of tone deafness and arrogance is  why the Republicans  are 21 points behind with women. You guys never learn. But carry on, maybe you can alienate a few more.

Edited October 25, 2024 by Aristides

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Aristides said:

That kind of tone deafness and arrogance is  why the Republicans  are 21 points behind with women. You guys never learn.

What's tone deaf, genius? 

Can you tell me why abortion is even an issue in a federal election right now?

Is the right to abortion more important than averting WW3? More important than the economy? More important than the border?

Kamala and Biden got F's on all of those things, and that's not funny at all. Kamala is just reading from the same teleprompter that Biden was. She has the same handlers. Why would you expect a different outcome than Joe had?

When Kamala doesn't have a teleprompter in front of her she's a joke. She doesn't answer questions, she doesn't make sense, she's extremely rude to interviewers that dare to ask her real questions (even friendlies hate her), and to this date, no one really knows the answers to any of the questions she was asked.  

 

Honestly, watch this video and tell me exactly what you learned from her answer... Did she take any accountability for letting in 10M illegals? 

4 minutes into her invective she references that kid's question as if she answered it and NO part of what she said had anything to do with what he asked her. 

He asked her what would be done to help immigrants integrate, how much benefits and subsidies they'd get, for how long, how much would it cost...? Not one word that came out of her mouth had anything to do with what he asked. 

Then AC tried to ask her questions which again, she didn't answer. 

She babbled like her defeated border bill would have prevented the zerg rush at the border, but as AC correctly pointed out, it didn't get voted on until halfway through her 4th year in office, mid-2024.

She says "We cut illegal immigration in half in 2024", but that's only by comparison to her own failed numbers. It was still high.

Then AC says "Why didn't you sign that executive order years earlier" and her BS answer was "we sat around for 3.5 years waiting to see if we could get a bill through congress while 10M illegals came in." That was totally stupid, and there's no excuse for totally stupid. 

Then after she was so rude to AC for so long, he had enough, and he absolutely tore her apart. You and I both know that Anderson Cooper was not supposed to humiliate Kamala Harris on live TV, but she just treated him like crap for so long that he clapped back. 

WTF dude. Watch that video and tell me if the woman in it is a competent adult or a complete failure. 

[Deluge]

4 hours ago, Aristides said:

I support the right to choose. Nothing more.

You support the agenda to convince women to slaughter their unborn. Nothing more. 

Edited October 26, 2024 by Deluge

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Aristides said:

That kind of tone deafness and arrogance is  why the Republicans  are 21 points behind with women. You guys never learn. But carry on, maybe you can alienate a few more.

And yet will form government.  Funny old world innit?

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

You support the agenda to convince women to slaughter their unborn. Nothing more. 

I support their right to choose. Period. Their choices are their business, not mine.

Maybe you should listen instead of preaching.

Edited October 26, 2024 by Aristides

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

I support their right to choose. Period. Their choices are their business, not mine.

Maybe you should listen instead of preaching.

You feed the abortion agenda. Period.

Maybe you should listen to yourself. 

[Aristides]

7 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You feed the abortion agenda. Period.

Maybe you should listen to yourself. 

Too bad you can’t respect other peoples choices. You whine about your own rights while you have no problem denying others theirs and wonder why you lose them. Carry on.

[Deluge]

10 hours ago, Aristides said:

Too bad you can’t respect other peoples choices. You whine about your own rights while you have no problem denying others theirs and wonder why you lose them. Carry on.

Aristedes wants the right to murder. First it's the unborn, then comes the newborn, then comes anyone that disagrees with the wokejobs.

Give an inch to the wokejobs, and they'll take a mile. 

[Aristides]

10 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Aristedes wants the right to murder. First it's the unborn, then comes the newborn, then comes anyone that disagrees with the wokejobs.

Give an inch to the wokejobs, and they'll take a mile. 

As I said, carry on.

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

As I said, carry on.

As always.  

[Five of swords]

15 hours ago, Aristides said:

That kind of tone deafness and arrogance is  why the Republicans  are 21 points behind with women. You guys never learn. But carry on, maybe you can alienate a few more.

The reason women vote democrat is because women are more conformist than men and democrats are the status quo. The vast majority of women have no concept of rational discussion or any cost benefit analysis...they just 'think' with their feelings, and their 'feelings' are whatever they are told to feel. Natural followers. It is in their dna. 

[Nationalist]

14 hours ago, Aristides said:

I support their right to choose. Period. Their choices are their business, not mine.

Maybe you should listen instead of preaching.

Maybe you should listen...to yourself.

The federal law approving abortion, regardless of how anyone feels about it, is designated a "States' Issue". It is so in the USA because that was/is the constitutional deal made. The US culture is one based on "freedom". The right to "choose". The freedom of the States to govern they way they want. To "choose" their own state laws.

It is what it is.

Most states "choose" reasonable abortion laws IMO. Some "choose" unreasonable laws. But it's their choice. That's how US law works. A collection of semi-independant states, within a federal state.

They have the "right to choose". Since you are all for "the right to choose", I'm sure you understand it.

Edited October 26, 2024 by Nationalist

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

As always.  

Good, zealots always alienate people.

2 hours ago, Five of swords said:

The reason women vote democrat is because women are more conformist than men and democrats are the status quo. The vast majority of women have no concept of rational discussion or any cost benefit analysis...they just 'think' with their feelings, and their 'feelings' are whatever they are told to feel. Natural followers. It is in their dna. 

Ha, republicans are the ones trying to turn the clock back.

You tell women they need men to think for them and wonder why they give you the middle finger.

Talk about oblivious.

 

Edited October 26, 2024 by Aristides

[Five of swords]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Good, zealots always alienate people.

Ha, republicans are the ones trying to turn the clock back.

You tell women they need men to think for them and wonder why they give you the middle finger.

Talk about oblivious.

 

I am justingorming you what comes naturally to women. I am not a republican and I didn't make women be the way they are.

[Aristides]

Well, you have confirmed you know a lot less about women than most men, let alone what comes naturally to them. Instead of seriously asking why they are rejecting Trump, you blame them and call them stupid. Now that's a winning strategy🤣

[WestCanMan]

17 hours ago, Aristides said:

I support their right to choose. Period. Their choices are their business, not mine.

Maybe you should listen instead of preaching.

Did you watch that video, Aristedes?

Does that woman even seem the slightest bit presidential to you?

Reporter: "Kamala, how much money did you give to Hamas, and what kind of restrictions did you put on how they could spend it?"

Kamala: "Look. I grew up in a middle class neighbourhood, surrounded by nurses and carpenters, where people really cared about their lawns. There was a woman who I called a second mom who was a small-business owner. And so I care and I know that you care and I know how important is to care about how much other people care, so believe me, Gazans are happier now with some money to spend than they were when they had no money to spend, because spending is better than not having any money to spend HAhahahaha. If Trump wasn't such a racist, Gazans would all have their own small businesses now, and they'd have amusement parks and puppies and kittens. But we have to deal with the reality that reality is more important than things that aren't really a part of the actual reality that is... reality, really. Let's really really work together to make their reality a better reality. Thank you."

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Did you watch that video, Aristedes?

Does that woman even seem the slightest bit presidential to you?

Reporter: "Kamala, how much money did you give to Hamas, and what kind of restrictions did you put on how they could spend it?"

Kamala: "Look. I grew up in a middle class neighbourhood, surrounded by nurses and carpenters, where people really cared about their lawns. There was a woman who I called a second mom who was a small-business owner. And so I care and I know that you care and I know how important is to care about how much other people care, so believe me, Gazans are happier now with some money to spend than they were when they had no money to spend, because spending is better than not having any money to spend HAhahahaha. If Trump wasn't such a racist, Gazans would all have their own small businesses now, and they'd have amusement parks and puppies and kittens. But we have to deal with the reality that reality is more important than things that aren't really a part of the actual reality that is... reality, really. Let's really really work together to make their reality a better reality. Thank you."

 

What video are you talking about. She didn't say anything about Palestine or the Middle East in the one you posted. She actually addressed an issue raised by a Republican instead of rambling on about Haitians eating neighbourhood pets, putting FEMA personnel in danger by making baseless claims they are refusing aid to different areas because of the way they vote, Arnold Palmer's junk and swaying to music for 40 minutes. And you think this guy is presidential material? Wow, have you no standards at all? You just ignore all his lies like they never happen. He really could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and you would still make excuses for him and follow him like a puppy.

Edited October 26, 2024 by Aristides

[WestCanMan]

21 hours ago, Aristides said:

 

What video are you talking about. She didn't say anything about Palestine or the Middle East in the one you posted. She actually addressed an issue raised by a Republican instead of rambling on about Haitians eating neighbourhood pets, putting FEMA personnel in danger by making baseless claims they are refusing aid to different areas because of the way they vote, Arnold Palmer's junk and swaying to music for 40 minutes. And you think this guy is presidential material? Wow, have you no standards at all? You just ignore all his lies like they never happen. He really could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and you would still make excuses for him and follow him like a puppy.

Makes no difference, Aristedes, the point is that she never answers any questions asked by anyone. 

In that specific video the guy asked her a multi-pronged question and she went on at length without addressing even one single aspect of his question.

Then she referenced him again, and the fact that he had asked some questions, but still didn't reply to any of them. Then AC asked her some questions along a similar vein which again, she dodged and gave long-winded, off-topic answers to, while she was using body language to try and stop AC from interjecting. 

AC is her friend and her ally, but her refusal to answer his questions, her rude tone, her rude body language, and constantly interrupting him eventually pissed AC off to the point where he humiliated her on that stage. AC absolutely took her to task with direct, short questions at that point, to which her answers could only expose her failures and her own stupidity.  

Try to tell me that:

1. Anderson's Cooper's job was to expose how stupid Kamala was/is on national TV
2. Kamala wasn't proven to completely lack foresight in that exchange, or that she didn't look completely rude and stupid
3. Anderson Cooper didn't show up there trying as best he could to try to make her look good.

Put yourself in his shoes: you go there with the absolute best of intentions, trying to manage that whole scenario so that Kamala comes out looking like a star, but she's failing miserably at answering all of the questions, so you try to gently nudge her towards some answers, and she's just rude to you, over and over and over, trying to make you look like a dummy. You just say: "But Kamala, answer this one question...." and she fires back with "Look, blahblahblah" and she's giving you the palm-down hand gesture over and over meaning "STFU boy, the adults are talking". Right on your show. 

So he just put her in her place. 

Now imagine her having that type of interaction with Xi. And then Putin. And then KJU. And then Trudeau. And then Pierre Poilievre. Then the leaders of England, Germany, Spain, Mexico, France, NATO, Japan, India....

Can CNN spin all of those interactions into: "Kamala was brilliant and Xi was wrong. Etc, etc, etc...."?

Kamala isn't just stupid, buddy. She's extremely rude and stupid, and that's impossible to deal with. Just imagine being stuck in a room with robo for 90 minutes. Only 1 of you could possibly walk out. 

• If the powers that be have decided that the US is at the apex of their power compared to the rest of the world, and they need to start WW3 now, then Kamala is their ace in the hole.
• If the powers that be want to put another Biden-style puppet behind the Seal so that they can control the US through their teleprompter, and they think that they can make sure that she doesn't pop off and try to do her own thing, then Kamala is their gal. She did that for 75 days straight, and now she knows how bad she is at trying to think and talk - I'm sure she'd welcome the opportunity to do it like Biden did.
• If this is a question of electing an actual human who has capabilities of their own, can answer questions, has a track record of success running the economy and the border and fostering global peace, then Trump wins by a landslide. 

Edited October 27, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Makes no difference, Aristedes, the point is that she never answers any questions asked by anyone. 

In that specific video the guy asked her a multi-pronged question and she went on at length without addressing even one single aspect of his question.

It does make a difference when you quote a bunch of bullshit she never said. Obviously you didn't watch the video yourself , you just parroted something else without even looking at it. Now you are trying to backpedal by saying she never addressed a question she quite clearly did.

Edited October 27, 2024 by Aristides

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

It does make a difference when you quote a bunch of bullshit she never said. Obviously you didn't watch the video yourself , you just parroted something else without even looking at it. Now you are trying to backpedal by saying she never addressed a question she quite clearly did.

Find the part of her answer that addressed the costs associated with illegal immigration, Aristedes.

She absolutely did not.

She didn't say the word "dollars" once in her answer, dummy. She talked about prosecuting trans-national drug cartels [which is a farce] and some other off-topic crap, but she never addressed the topic of costs associated with processing, housing, etc for illegals

Then she pontificated and babbled and filibustered to the point where it was extremely rude, and AC made her look stupid. 

Again, find the part of her quote that addressed the costs associated with illegal immigration, Aristedes. How much does it cost to arrest, detain, feed, medicate, house and process illegals? Find the answer from that video, dummy. 

Edited October 27, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Aristides]

26 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Find the part of her answer that addressed the costs associated with illegal immigration, Aristedes.

She absolutely did not.

She didn't say the word "dollars" once in her answer, dummy. She talked about prosecuting trans-national drug cartels [which is a farce] and some other off-topic crap, but she never addressed the topic of costs associated with processing, housing, etc for illegals

Then she pontificated and babbled and filibustered to the point where it was extremely rude, and AC made her look stupid. 

Again, find the part of her quote that addressed the costs associated with illegal immigration, Aristedes. How much does it cost to arrest, detain, feed, medicate, house and process illegals? Find the answer from that video, dummy. 

So what are the costs associated of illegal immigration genius and don't give me some made up bullshit from Trump. Something credible please.