Trying to defend Trump's 30,000+ lies did not go well for WCM

[robosmith]

Trying to defend Trump's 30,000+ lies did not go well for WCM

WCM thought he could neutralize the dishonesty of Trump's 30,000+ LIES documented by WAPO by proving one of the first 2 was actually a true statement.

But then HIS EVIDENCE proved that Trump's LIE was in FACT FALSE and it did rain at Trump's inauguration.

Now that it's clear he FAILED with that strategy, there are still 30,000+ Trump lies, none of which have been proven true statements.

Yet WCM keeps nitpicking away at Kamila Harris's minor miscues while ignoring the FACT of the orders of magnitude more of Trump's.

What is the bible says about criticizing the mote in another's eye when there is a LOG in their own?

"And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

 

 

[robosmith]

IOW, Harris could concoct a dozen "word salad" speeches and never come close to the DUPLICITY of Trump's 30,000+ LIES.

However, as we've seen, none to date have exhibited the incomprehensible words that are the definition of "word salad." 

[Legato]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

However, as we've seen, none to date have exhibited the incomprehensible words that are the definition of "word salad." 

Kamala is exhibit number one.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Kamala is exhibit number one.

I've understood everything you guys call "word salad." It's not even difficult.

Can you really not understand what she says?

[Deluge]

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trying to defend Trump's 30,000+ lies did not go well for WCM

WCM thought he could neutralize the dishonesty of Trump's 30,000+ LIES documented by WAPO by proving one of the first 2 was actually a true statement.

But then HIS EVIDENCE proved that Trump's LIE was in FACT FALSE and it did rain at Trump's inauguration.

Now that it's clear he FAILED with that strategy, there are still 30,000+ Trump lies, none of which have been proven true statements.

Yet WCM keeps nitpicking away at Kamila Harris's minor miscues while ignoring the FACT of the orders of magnitude more of Trump's.

What is the bible says about criticizing the mote in another's eye when there is a LOG in their own?

"And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

 

 

the democrat party IS the beam, so it's best to just stfu.  

[robosmith]

12 minutes ago, Deluge said:

the democrat party IS the beam, so it's best to just stfu.  

You clearly can't see past your BULLSHIT due to the beam in your eyes. LMAO

[Deluge]

17 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You clearly can't see past your BULLSHIT due to the beam in your eyes. LMAO

I don't even have a mote right now. 

YOU, on the other hand:

 

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

I've understood everything you guys call "word salad." It's not even difficult.

Can you really not understand what she says?

It's difficult to understand the nothingness even when many words are used butchered.

Yoy seem to be burdened by what has been.

[sharkman]

After eight years of Obama lies, suddenly the left cares about truth?  Too late, losers!  The truth will ruin the left, the right, and anyone else who got in the way of it.  Selah.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

It's difficult to understand the nothingness even when many words are used butchered.

Yoy seem to be burdened by what has been.

Didn't ask you, troll. Your posts always lack substance.

[robosmith]

8 minutes ago, sharkman said:

After eight years of Obama lies, suddenly the left cares about truth?  Too late, losers!  The truth will ruin the left, the right, and anyone else who got in the way of it.  Selah.

You are TRUE MAGA CULT if you believe ANYONE has come close to the staggering number of Trump LIES.

Let's see YOUR LIST that's greater than 30,000+. We KNOW you don't have one that's anywhere close.

[Legato]

24 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Didn't ask you, troll. Your posts always lack substance.

Yes you did, it was a question you asked. As for substance what you mean is lack of caps. 

[robosmith]

23 minutes ago, Legato said:

Yes you did, it was a question you asked.

You're right. If you believe it's "nothingness" then you don't understand what she said. Not her fault; YOURS.

23 minutes ago, Legato said:

As for substance what you mean is lack of caps. 

You don't even know why I use caps. It's because too many people MISS words when they read.

[Fluffypants]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You are TRUE MAGA CULT if you believe ANYONE has come close to the staggering number of Trump LIES.

Let's see YOUR LIST that's greater than 30,000+. We KNOW you don't have one that's anywhere close.

Its hard to do since WaPoo is a hack paper who only counted Trumps lies and a lot of those 30k were obvious embellishments and they decided they didn't need to count Bidens lies.

[WestCanMan]

15 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trying to defend Trump's 30,000+ lies did not go well for WCM

WCM thought he could neutralize the dishonesty of Trump's 30,000+ LIES documented by WAPO by proving one of the first 2 was actually a true statement.

But then HIS EVIDENCE proved that Trump's LIE was in FACT FALSE and it did rain at Trump's inauguration.

Now that it's clear he FAILED with that strategy, there are still 30,000+ Trump lies, none of which have been proven true statements.

Yet WCM keeps nitpicking away at Kamila Harris's minor miscues while ignoring the FACT of the orders of magnitude more of Trump's.

What is the bible says about criticizing the mote in another's eye when there is a LOG in their own?

"And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

 

 

You're still an id10t, robo.

The first 3 things on your list were actually MSM lies, not Trump lies, and I even predicted raindropgate would be one of their go-to lies, in case you don't recall.

Raindropgate was their first theoretical "lie", but light drizzle for 15 seconds out of 17 minutes isn't "rain". Period. GFYS, dummy.

Another one was "Trump lied about his crowd size". He didn't lie, he was just wrong, because they didn't have the official numbers from whoever manages that park, so they gave an estimate based on transit ridership. Being wrong about something as inconsequential as the size of the inauguration crowd or 15 seconds of drizzle is just ridiculous. You're really desperate to call someone a liar if those are your go-tos.

As far as their list of 30,000 "lies", 95% of them will just be times when Trump said "I didn't collude with Russia", which weren't lies at all. And guess what, every time they said that "Trump lied about Russian collusion", THOSE ARE ALL MSM LIES. I can guarantee you that the MSM lied about Russian collusion FAR MORE THAN 30,000 times, for real. 

And FYI the old canard about "there were 13 people indicted on Russian collusion charges who were convicted", or whatever their slimy wording was, is an enormous lie because it is so intentionally misleading. Sure, those people were all rung up on false charges, but there were 0 convictions for Russian collusion unless you count the FBI being convicted for fabrication of evidence.

[robosmith]

42 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're still an id10t, robo.

The first 3 things on your list were actually MSM lies, not Trump lies, and I even predicted raindropgate would be one of their go-to lies, in case you don't recall.

Raindropgate was their first theoretical "lie", but light drizzle for 15 seconds out of 17 minutes isn't "rain". Period. GFYS, dummy.

Another one was "Trump lied about his crowd size". He didn't lie, he was just wrong, because they didn't have the official numbers from whoever manages that park, so they gave an estimate based on transit ridership. Being wrong about something as inconsequential as the size of the inauguration crowd or 15 seconds of drizzle is just ridiculous. You're really desperate to call someone a liar if those are your go-tos.

As far as their list of 30,000 "lies", 95% of them will just be times when Trump said "I didn't collude with Russia", which weren't lies at all. And guess what, every time they said that "Trump lied about Russian collusion", THOSE ARE ALL MSM LIES. I can guarantee you that the MSM lied about Russian collusion FAR MORE THAN 30,000 times, for real. 

And FYI the old canard about "there were 13 people indicted on Russian collusion charges who were convicted", or whatever their slimy wording was, is an enormous lie because it is so intentionally misleading. Sure, those people were all rung up on false charges, but there were 0 convictions for Russian collusion unless you count the FBI being convicted for fabrication of evidence.

Your denial only proves your DELUSION. The camera doesn't LIE and anyone who looks can see the rain.

To be fair, WAPO claims 30,000+ LIES or misleading claims and you have NO CREDIBILITY with which to dispute them with your mere words.

Trump's false or misleading claims total 30573 over 4 years

The Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com › ... › Fact Checker

 

Jan 24, 2021 — When The Washington Post Fact Checker team first started cataloguing President Donald Trump's false or misleading claims, we recorded 492 ...

Fact Checker “As a result of Trump's constant lying through the presidential ...

A term of untruths Inspired by Trump's oft-repeated lie that he won the election, a ...

Washington Post logo The Fact Checker's database of the false or misleading claims ...

More results from washingtonpost.com »

 

Washington Post counts 30573 false or misleading claims ...

The Hill

https://thehill.com › homenews › media › 535081-wap...

 

Jan 20, 2021 — The number of falsehoods from Trump reportedly increased exponentially around October with the approach of the presidential election that he ...

 

 

 

 

Edited October 11, 2024 by robosmith

[CdnFox]

45 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're still an id10t, robo.

STILL  an !diot?  I feel that's very dismissive.  Clearly he's put a great deal of effort into taking his !diocy to new and exciting levels and put some real polish on it.  That was some olympic class !dioting and you're just blowing it off as his regular run of the mill !diocy. 

It's a masterpeice!  If it were literature it would be "of mice and m0rons", or "a midsummer night's doof". If it were a movie it would be Casabonehead.  That is now military grade dumb,  he's a weapon of mass stupidity. 

This transcends mere "1diocy" sir!!!  Respect the art! 

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's a masterpeice!  If it were literature it would be "of mice and m0rons", 

OMG, that's the perfect name for a book about the Demis' cultist sheeple. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG, that's the perfect name for a book about the Demis' cultist sheeple. 

Thanks for doubling down on you delusions. I know it must be very frustrating to know the "truth" and be unable to find ANY EVIDENCE. And the evidence you did find, blew up in your face. How disappointing for YOU.

[gatomontes99]

Does anyone know what this id1ot is rambling on about?

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Does anyone know what this id1ot is rambling on about?

Do you know you're an lDIOT who is unable to find several threads about this?

I guess the TWO articles cited was not enough of a clue for you. LMAO

All you have to do is search this forum for "30,000" 💡

[Legato]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

All you have to do is search this forum for "30,000" 💡

I did and the result was 30,000 of these...

LMAO  DUH SOAKHOASHAPIWEDHNCOPPOEPIRUOGIHBVHCOOGOSISOTGSONOSTSDJVCCMBNBXCNBQPI

I wonder where they came from. 

[gatomontes99]

19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Do you know you're an lDIOT who is unable to find several threads about this?

I guess the TWO articles cited was not enough of a clue for you. LMAO

All you have to do is search this forum for "30,000" 💡

Does anyone know what this id1ot is rambling on about? Anyone?

[robosmith]

12 minutes ago, Legato said:

I did and the result was 30,000 of these...

LMAO  DUH SOAKHOASHAPIWEDHNCOPPOEPIRUOGIHBVHCOOGOSISOTGSONOSTSDJVCCMBNBXCNBQPI

I wonder where they came from. 

You know they came from a TROLL.

5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Does anyone know what this id1ot is rambling on about? Anyone?

^Doubling down on lDIOCY.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Does anyone know what this id1ot is rambling on about?

Yes.  He's saying that we, and i mean we ALL, and by all i mean all of we, must consider the significance of the moment in which Westcan, and by westcan i mean westcanman, and by westcanman  i mean WCM, has communicated the essence of the statement that he felt the moment in time, and by time i mean the magazine, which is very significant, imparted so that we could grow in our understandingness. 

I thought that was very obviously implied.