Trump Assassination Attempt #2 Letter

[gatomontes99]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you FAILED to provide evidence YOU HAD to make YOURSELF look like an lDIOT. Congrats.

I proved the letter was legit. What are you smoking?

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I proved the letter was legit. What are you smoking?

Go easy on him. He jumps to conclusions so fast he often pulls a muscle in his brain

[gatomontes99]

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Go easy on him. He jumps to conclusions so fast he often pulls a muscle in his brain

I even used a lwnj website. And not just any lwnj website...THEEEE lwnj website. And somehow that makes me an idyot? He's such a waste of time.

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I even used a lwnj website. And not just any lwnj website...THEEEE lwnj website. And somehow that makes me an idyot? He's such a waste of time.

You need to start thinking of him in terms of comedic value.  

[gatomontes99]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You need to start thinking of him in terms of comedic value.  

Yes....but he votes and that makes me sad.

 

Lol

[User]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Really? He KNEW he failed BEFORE the attempt. LMAO

You MAGA lDIOTS are SO NAIVE you'll believe ANY  pile of CRAP you see on the Interwebz that helps Trump's campaign, and shit it out here. 🤮 

 

You have so little regard for being honest on this forum, its just your usual schtick to just deny anything posted... even when it is quite clearly obviously true. 

What is wrong with you?

[Chrissy1979]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's intended as humor. Most people would have found it funny. As a liberal female we know that you are more prone to mental health issues so it probably wouldn't seem that way to you. But to most people it would. I'll see if I can get a sarcasm sign for you   

Ah, yes. The old, "he was only joking." Didn't you use that when he tried to burn down the Capitol?

Most people found it insane and unfit behavior for a potential president.

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Ah, yes. The old, "he was only joking." Didn't you use that when he tried to burn down the Capitol?

Most people found it insane and unfit behavior for a potential president.

Burn down the Capital?

Such bullshit is only possible from complete id1ots.

[Chrissy1979]

You obviously refused to watch the videos 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Ah, yes. The old, "he was only joking." Didn't you use that when he tried to burn down the Capitol?

 

Ahhh yes, the "Claim that the actual explanation is invalid because it's some species of "old" tactic without offering an actual reasoned argument"    

I don't recall trump burning down the capital? Are you perhaps referring to when the dems supported riots that burned several cites and cost over 4 billion in damages? 

[Chrissy1979]

52 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Ahhh yes, the "Claim that the actual explanation is invalid because it's some species of "old" tactic without offering an actual reasoned argument"    

I don't recall trump burning down the capital? Are you perhaps referring to when the dems supported riots that burned several cites and cost over 4 billion in damages? 

Why isn't Pence his running mate this time?

[User]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You obviously refused to watch the videos 

You must be watching some Science Fiction movie. Which one? Those are my favorites. 

 

[Chrissy1979]

12 minutes ago, User said:

You must be watching some Science Fiction movie. Which one? Those are my favorites. 

 

The Jan. 6 insurrection attempt videos where you guys were beating police, leaving pipe bombs, and breaking into and vandalizing the Capitol. You probably just remember it for the stupid woman who tried to lead a mob into the Chamber by breaking through a window and getting shot. That was certainly the best part.

[User]

1 minute ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The Jan. 6 insurrection attempt videos where you guys were beating police, leaving pipe bombs, and breaking into and vandalizing the Capitol. You probably just remember it for the stupid woman who tried to lead a mob into the Chamber by breaking through a window and getting shot. That was certainly the best part.

The subject was not beating police, pipe bombs... it was the absurd notion that the Capitol was anywhere close to being burned down. 

Care to get back on subject?

 

[Chrissy1979]

41 minutes ago, User said:

The subject was not beating police, pipe bombs... it was the absurd notion that the Capitol was anywhere close to being burned down. 

Care to get back on subject?

 

You wouldn't consider it absurd if you watched the videos.

[User]

18 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You wouldn't consider it absurd if you watched the videos.

I watched the videos. The last time I checked, no one was trying to burn the place down let alone would anyone have come close to doing so to a modern building with fire suppression systems. 

All you have is ignorant fear-mongering, and lies. 

[Chrissy1979]

Did you watch the part of the video where you guys ripped the fire suppression systems off the wall and beat police with them?

[User]

25 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Did you watch the part of the video where you guys ripped the fire suppression systems off the wall and beat police with them?

Fire Extinguishers are a fire suppression device, not systems. 

Yet again, you continue to be uninterested in honest, factual discussions. 

 

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Why isn't Pence his running mate this time?

Why would he be? 

[Chrissy1979]

14 minutes ago, User said:

Fire Extinguishers are a fire suppression device, not systems. 

Yet again, you continue to be uninterested in honest, factual discussions. 

 

 

Oooh.  Let's get bogged down in autistic semantics because you lack a credible rebuttal. A device can't be part of or representative of a system? Where did you learn English? Lol

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Why would he be? 

Good question. Few would go back after his running mate tried to have him killed, I suppose. 

[User]

2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Oooh.  Let's get bogged down in autistic semantics because you lack a credible rebuttal. A device can't be part of or representative of a system? Where did you learn English? Lol

Semantics?

You are on here lying and fear-mongering about how The Capitol was almost burned down. 

You never had a case to rebuttal, you clown. 

 

3 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Good question. Few would go back after his running mate tried to have him killed, I suppose. 

Another lie. You wouldn't have to keep lying if you had good arguments or an honest position to advance. 

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Oooh.  Let's get bogged down in autistic semantics because you lack a credible rebuttal. A device can't be part of or representative of a system? Where did you learn English? Lol

But not if you refer to the device. If i have a nut (or am talking to one in this case) but no bolt, then it's a nut it's not a 'fastener system''.  He didn't pull a system off the wall, he pulled a specific item which is not a 'system' in and of itself even if it part of a system. Also a fire extinguisher isn't part of the system. It's independent. It may be a part of the fire control PLAN but it's not attached to or controlled by anything so it's independent of the system.

Someone who speaks english would  know this   And how stupid do you have to be to act like a grammar nazi and then get mad when people act like a grammar nazi  

That's something a non Russian would have realized immediately    

Quote

Good question. Few would go back after his running mate tried to have him killed, I suppose. 

Sure. Of course that didn't happen in this case, but regardless he wasn't very good and his debate helped trump lose the last election (well the fly did anyway).  So of course trump would swap out. 

A better question is why isn't Kamala the dem vp candidate? 

[herbie]

Listen to the flailing and bleating of those so morally compromised they're forced to defend the DonOld, a person so despicable and depraved you wouldn't elect him head of your local sanitation department.

With only childish denial, whataboutism and I know you are but what am I? arguments.
Pathetic.

[User]

Just now, herbie said:

Listen to the flailing and bleating of those so morally compromised they're forced to defend the DonOld, a person so despicable and depraved you wouldn't elect him head of your local sanitation department.

With only childish denial, whataboutism and I know you are but what am I? arguments.
Pathetic.

He screamed into the void... 

[CdnFox]

33 minutes ago, herbie said:

Listen to the flailing and bleating of those so morally compromised they're forced to defend the DonOld, a person so despicable and depraved you wouldn't elect him head of your local sanitation department.

 

Listen to the flaiing and bleating of those so morally butthurt by the facts that they are reduced  to referring to donald trump as "donOld" because they've got nothing else  

Quote

With only childish denial, whataboutism and I know you are but what am I? 

 

If all you've got is childish denial whatboutism and i know you are but what am i, then what you are is a democrat