Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, Hodad said:

As we discussed in the other thread, you're a bit of a chickenshit afraid to publicly answer basic questions about matters of public record.

You don't get to call anyone a chickenshit when you are on here hiding from people yourself. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, Hodad said:

As we discussed in the other thread, you're a bit of a chickenshit afraid to publicly answer basic questions about matters of public record.

User ended my fun in that thread. But you proved my point. Thank you.

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
40 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

User ended my fun in that thread. But you proved my point. Thank you.

I have no idea what User says. He's on ignore for being fundamentally dishonest and generally useless.

Does this mean you can't answer for yourself? 

Easy questions. Well, be easy for any honest person.

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, User said:

Not really. Your BFF Black Puppy brought it up as evidence that a man can be a woman. 

He has been running from that remark like a coward for a while now. 

A man can identify as a woman.

Men dont physically become Women you halfwit.

By God you're a stup!d person.

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

As we discussed in the other thread, you're a bit of a chickenshit afraid to publicly answer basic questions about matters of public record.

says the guy who literally puts anyone who he thinks he can't win an argument against on 'ignore' :)  

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

says the guy who literally puts anyone who he thinks he can't win an argument against on 'ignore' :)  

Well, now I'm hurt. I should be on ignore.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
On 9/21/2024 at 4:37 PM, Fluffypants said:

The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala, they never follow up on an question when she went into her complete non answers and let her lie incessantly while fact checking Trump. On one of their news programs 100% positive coverage of Kamala and 93% negative for Trump.

Why should he risk going back to CNN when JD Vance was grilled by Dana Bash while Kamala and Tim and her will giggle sisters, complete softballs and again no follow up to questions she wouldn't answer.

For F’s sakes, man… Trump didn’t get statistic wrong, he was corrected for outrageous lies.  Why’s that so f-ing hard?   There are still no actual reports of pets being eaten by Haitians, who are in the U.S. legally.  
 

If Donald Trump has the right ideas for America, then why does he need to lie at all? Wouldn’t the truth be perfectly fine?  Can’t you report on immigration problems without making up lies and repeating internet rumors? 

  • Like 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

For F’s sakes, man… Trump didn’t get statistic wrong, he was corrected for outrageous lies.  Why’s that so f-ing hard?   There are still no actual reports of pets being eaten by Haitians, who are in the U.S. legally.  
 

If Donald Trump has the right ideas for America, then why does he need to lie at all? Wouldn’t the truth be perfectly fine?  Can’t you report on immigration problems without making up lies and repeating internet rumors? 

Immigration problems. 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/immigration/2894316/laken-riley-five-other-illegal-immigrants-charged-murder/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illegals-charged-murder-rape-kidnapping-week-shocking-crimes-across-us

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/father-of-13-year-old-girl-allegedly-raped-by-migrant-in-nyc-park-blasts-biden-s-open-border-for-monstrous-attack-this-is-what-happens/ar-BB1oH7J5

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/us/haitian-migrant-massachusetts.html

https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-arrests-171-noncitizens-pending-charges-or-convictions-murder-homicide-or-assault

Oh...and of course...

 

 

Shall I continue? 

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
6 hours ago, Rebound said:

For F’s sakes, man… Trump didn’t get statistic wrong, he was corrected for outrageous lies.  Why’s that so f-ing hard?   There are still no actual reports of pets being eaten by Haitians, who are in the U.S. legally.  
 

If Donald Trump has the right ideas for America, then why does he need to lie at all? Wouldn’t the truth be perfectly fine?  Can’t you report on immigration problems without making up lies and repeating internet rumors? 

He doesn't lie as much as he exaggerates to an extreme extent. If he eats a piece of cake and likes it then it was the best most beautiful incredible cake ever made in the history of man. If he doesn't like it then it was the most horrible evil despicable foul food ever created and the chef should go to jail.

He's like that with everything. He says that his economy was the best economy ever in the history of the united states. His economy was good, better than many, but it wasn't the best by far. He says biden's inflation was the worst in history. It was bad, it was very negative but was it the worst in history? Of course not. 

Did pets get eaten? Sure, that turned out to be a thing that happened at least twice.  Are hordes of immigrants catching people's pets and eating them? Nope. 


It's a little late to be mad that donald trump behaves like donald trump.  It's just a quirk and people are aware of it. 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
On 9/27/2024 at 10:36 PM, CrakHoBarbie said:

A man can identify as a woman.

Men dont physically become Women you halfwit.

By God you're a stup!d person.

Not me. Your BFF puppy dog and others like Hodad insist that they actually are women. Hell, Robo was even trying to argue their brains were female. Most of your party refuses to even define what a woman is because they want to pretend men who identify as women actually are women. 

I am glad you realize they are not actually women though. 

So... you also agree we should not force real women to have to compete against men pretending to be women?

 

On 9/27/2024 at 10:18 PM, Hodad said:

I have no idea what User says. He's on ignore for being fundamentally dishonest and generally useless.

Does this mean you can't answer for yourself? 

Easy questions. Well, be easy for any honest person.

No, you are just a coward. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, User said:

you also agree we should not force real women to have to compete against men pretending to be women?

 

I do think that some injustices do occur with certain trans women in certain sports.

I also think that certain transgender individuals on gender affirming hormone therapy should not be equated to their pre-transition cisgender counterparts. 

That said, I don't think that we are at a stage in our capacity to discern what is or is not fair in transgender/cisgender sports interaction. 

4 hours ago, User said:

 

No, you are just a coward. 

Projection. 

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
Posted
7 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

I do think that some injustices do occur with certain trans women in certain sports.

Note, you did not say you want to stop the injustices... I have no doubt many folks like you know it is an injustice, you just don't care because you have another agenda. 

8 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

I also think that certain transgender individuals on gender affirming hormone therapy should not be equated to their pre-transition cisgender counterparts. 

"Gender affirming" 

So which is it, you just got done saying you understood that men pretending to be women were not in fact women, but now you are saying it is "affirming" of their gender. 

"pre-transition"

What are they transitioning into here exactly? Seems an awful lot like you are back to saying men can be women. 

"cis-gender"

So... if you understand men can't be women, why are you using this language? 

11 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

That said, I don't think that we are at a stage in our capacity to discern what is or is not fair in transgender/cisgender sports interaction. 

Oh... so you do want to force women and girls to have to compete against men.

12 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Projection. 

I am not the one hiding from Hodad. Hodad is hiding from me. Like a coward. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

I do think that some injustices do occur with certain trans women in certain sports.

I also think that certain transgender individuals on gender affirming hormone therapy should not be equated to their pre-transition cisgender counterparts. 

That said, I don't think that we are at a stage in our capacity to discern what is or is not fair in transgender/cisgender sports interaction. 

Projection. 

So you hate "natural" women?

Actually explains a lot.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you hate "natural" women?

You hate intelligent debate.

On 9/28/2024 at 4:21 PM, CdnFox said:

It's just a quirk and people are aware of it. 

Its narssississm. Much more than a "quirk". 🤡

Posted
2 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

You hate intelligent debate.

 

With Crackho?  There can't BE intelligent debate with her ;)  Sorry kiddo. 

I actually quite like intelligent debate but there's not a lot of that from the left here.  You get all kinds of stupid statements like "provinces grant human rights with laws".  I mean - honestly how do you argue with that level of dumb?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 hours ago, User said:

 

Oh... so you do want to force women and girls to have to compete against men.

 

I do not think we've gotten to the point where trans vs cis is always fair.

That said, I think we will get there. But no, we're not there yet.

4 hours ago, User said:

 

I am not the one hiding from Hodad. Hodad is hiding from me. Like a coward. 

Why would anyone hide from a whining b!tch like you?

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

Why would anyone hide from a whining b!tch like you?

 

There's a number of lefties here who hide from anyone that they perceive as being able to put up arguments that are difficult to refute. Some posters here don't try all that hard, and that allows that kind of poster to slide by even when they're wrong without looking too stupid. Others rub their nose in it if they're wrong.

Ho Dad Blocks anybody who uses facts and figures and logic to rub his nose in it when he's wrong.

You tend to do the same thing. Which is why you're pretending that you are not going to talk to me because I said that of the two candidates bein harris and trump If I live somewhere that I could vote in the USA I would probably vote for trump. And you claim this is enough to stop responding to me. Yet virtually everyone else here on the right that you respond to daily also would vote for trump or is actually planning on voting for trump

Cowards like you and hodad always have a reason for their cowardice and yet pretend that it's everyone else's fault that they're a coward

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
34 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Why would anyone hide from a whining b!tch like you?

You tell me, you ignored almost everything I said and still won't give me a straight answer. 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...