ABC whitleblower Avidavit

[Black Dog]

12 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Like I said: by YOUR standards, that thing qualifies as incontrovertible evidence. That's because leftards accept things like "an anonymous source close to the Trump administration said..." as absolute proof that something happened. 

It's weird that you can laugh at that, when it greatly exceeds your standards. 

lol you really have no idea how this works huh.

[WestCanMan]

6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol you really have no idea how this works huh.

I know exactly how this works. 

"An anonymous source" has 3 different meanings:

1. To a leftard, it means absolute proof if it's damning to a conservative
2. To a leftard, it means absolutely nothing if it's damning to a liberal
3. To a conservative, it means nothing.

Be honest: at what point did you figure out that Biden was no longer capable of being president? 

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

I know exactly how this works. 

"An anonymous source" has 3 different meanings:

1. To a leftard, it means absolute proof if it's damning to a conservative
2. To a leftard, it means absolutely nothing if it's damning to a liberal
3. To a conservative, it means nothing.

Clearly not if you think professional journalists with major news organizations operate the same way as anonymous nobodies with AI PFPs posting on twitter lol.

Quote

Be honest: at what point did you figure out that Biden was no longer capable of being president? 

2016, b!tch.

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Clearly not if you think professional journalists with major news organizations operate the same way as anonymous nobodies with AI PFPs posting on twitter lol.

🤣 You said "professional journalists" lol

Quote

2016, b!tch.

Your vaunted sources, the "professional journalists", were pretending that Biden was capable of being president up until Jun 27 2024.

[Black Dog]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 You said "professional journalists" lol

Yeah I know that as a Fox News watcher you're unfamiliar with the concept, but it's a thing. 

Quote

Your vaunted sources, the "professional journalists", were pretending that Biden was capable of being president up until Jun 27 2024.

If you think that's bad, some of them are still pretending Trump is capable of being president right now.

Anyway none of that has anything to do with the legitimacy of the alleged "affidavit".

Edited September 19, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

If you think that's bad, 

You should think it's bad. You've known the "professional journalists" were lying since 2020. 

Why do you still call them "professional journalists"?

[Black Dog]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You should think it's bad. You've known the "professional journalists" were lying since 2020. 

Why do you still call them "professional journalists"?

Why do you believe an anonymous twitter account posting absurdly fake-ass looking documents?

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Why do you believe an anonymous twitter account posting absurdly fake-ass looking documents?

You don't know the affidavit is fake, or that it contains lies, but you do know that "professional journalists" lied constantly from 2020 through to June 27 2024. 

[Black Dog]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You don't know the affidavit is fake, or that it contains lies, but you do know that "professional journalists" lied constantly from 2020 through to June 27 2024. 

It's funny that you're so skeptical of everything but a random dude can post a word doc on his twitter account and call it a sworn affidavit and you believe it because it aligns with your priors lol.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Did you suddenly forget the part where you claimed (without evidence as usual) that ABC said the "affidavit" was legit?

They're responding to it so they're saying they believe it's legit. But they wouldn't be the ones to declare it legitimate. So when I say they say it's legitimate I don't mean to ABC is certifying its legitimate.

Why do you need everything explained to you like your 5 years old?

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

It's funny that you're so skeptical of everything but a random dude can post a word doc on his twitter account and call it a sworn affidavit and you believe it because it aligns with your priors lol.

I said that YOU have to believe it. It far exceeds your standards.

[Black Dog]

16 hours ago, CdnFox said:

They're responding to it so they're saying they believe it's legit.

Where do you come up with this dumb shit? They're denying the claims so no, they don't think it's "legit." 

Quote

 

But they wouldn't be the ones to declare it legitimate. So when I say they say it's legitimate I don't mean to ABC is certifying its legitimate.

 

lmao. You're backpedaling here.

14 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I said that YOU have to believe it. It far exceeds your standards.

I bet that made sense in your fentanyl-wracked brain.

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Black Dog said:

Where do you come up with this dumb shit? 

It can't be that dumb or you'd be repeating it.

Quote

I bet that made sense in your fentanyl-wracked brain.

I bet it makes sense that people who believe that "an anonymous he said she said" constitutes absolute proof, should consider signed affidavits as proof as well.

Reporter (totally legit guy who was saying that Biden is mentally healthy right up until June 2024): "I uhh, know someone from MSNBC who claims to have talked to a dude that's close to the Trump administration who says that Trump said "Demonrat voters are dumber than shit" at a meeting last night."

Black Dog: "OMG IT'S 100% TRUE! I SAW IT ON CNN! DEMONRAT VOTERS ARE DUMBER THAN SHIT! Wait, how does that work again??? Oh yeah, Trump said that Demonrat voters are dumber than shit, but he doesn't mean me, right mommy?"

I actually know an anonymous source who said that he heard you admit that Demi voters are dumber than shit, so that means it's true... You actually admitted that Demi voters are dumber than shit. Congrats buddy. I didn't know that you had any honesty or decency in you until now. 

[Black Dog]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It can't be that dumb or you'd be repeating it.

I bet it makes sense that people who believe that "an anonymous he said she said" constitutes absolute proof, should consider signed affidavits as proof as well.

Reporter (totally legit guy who was saying that Biden is mentally healthy right up until June 2024): "I uhh, know someone from MSNBC who claims to have talked to a dude that's close to the Trump administration who says that Trump said "Demonrat voters are dumber than shit" at a meeting last night."

Black Dog: "OMG IT'S 100% TRUE! I SAW IT ON CNN! DEMONRAT VOTERS ARE DUMBER THAN SHIT! Wait, how does that work again??? Oh yeah, Trump said that Demonrat voters are dumber than shit, but he doesn't mean me, right mommy?"

I actually know an anonymous source who said that he heard you admit that Demi voters are dumber than shit, so that means it's true... You actually admitted that Demi voters are dumber than shit. Congrats buddy. I didn't know that you had any honesty or decency in you until now. 

You have the brain of a hamster.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

You have the brain of a hamster.

You admitted that Demi voters are dumber than shit. An anonymous source even said it. 

[Black Dog]

11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You admitted that Demi voters are dumber than shit. An anonymous source even said it. 

And you admitted you're a pedophile. I have a sworn affidavit right here.

[Nationalist]

6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

And you admitted you're a pedophile. I have a sworn affidavit right here.

Let's see it and the verification...or apologize for such a disgusting accusation.

[Black Dog]

Just now, Nationalist said:

Let's see it and the verification...or apologize for such a disgusting accusation.

I'll post in on Twitter. then you'd believe it.

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

I'll post in on Twitter. then you'd believe it.

Do it. Go ahead. Then post a link here to your X post.

[Black Dog]

7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Do it. Go ahead. Then post a link here to your X post.

Dude did you not read the conversation up to that point?

[Nationalist]

Just now, Black Dog said:

Dude did you not read the conversation up to that point?

Make the X post pup. Go ahead. Then give us the link to it.

[Black Dog]

4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Make the X post pup. Go ahead. Then give us the link to it.

lol

[Nationalist]

7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol

Ya...as I suspected...

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Where do you come up with this dumb shit? They're denying the claims so no, they don't think it's "legit." 

Nobody said anything about the claims.  They obviously believe the affidavit is real or they wouldn't respond to it. They believe the claims in the affidavit are false, but that's not what we were discussing. 

So i come up with this "shit" with logic reason and fact.  You should give those a try sometimes. There's probably a youtube video you can watch if you want to learn about them. 

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

lmao. You're backpedaling here.

No, he just don't understand how logical reason works.  They can agree the affidavit exists and that it's legit as a document WITHOUT agreeing that any of the allegations are true. 

 

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

I bet that made sense in your fentanyl-wracked brain.

That's racist   

[Black Dog]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nobody said anything about the claims.  They obviously believe the affidavit is real or they wouldn't respond to it. They believe the claims in the affidavit are false, but that's not what we were discussing. 

LOl that doesn't logically follow at all. Someone made a claim, the network was asked about the claims by the media, they denied the claims. The question of the actual document as a sworn affidavit is irrelevant.

Quote

So i come up with this "shit" with logic reason and fact.  You should give those a try sometimes. There's probably a youtube video you can watch if you want to learn about them. 

Good joke given your claim that ABC thinks the affidavit is legit because they responded to it is completely divorced from logic and reason.

Quote

No, he just don't understand how logical reason works.  They can agree the affidavit exists and that it's legit as a document WITHOUT agreeing that any of the allegations are true. 

Except they've made no statements to that effect. You're trying to read between the lines but you're illiterate.

 

Quote

That's racist   

Keep trying little buddy! You'll land a joke someday!

Edited September 20, 2024 by Black Dog