Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It probably won't, but elections this close are won on the margins.

who would have thought that the Democrats would be desperately grasping at these straws ?

they are in a dead heat with a guy who claims that immigrants are eating family pets

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

The story about Haitians eating pets is yet another reason I have such a complete lack of respect for politicos. 

it really comes down to the 1A, the 2A, Immigration & the Economy

the Democrats are so bad on those four things, that they are propping Trump up therein

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

it really comes down to the 1A, the 2A, Immigration & the Economy

the Democrats are so bad on those four things, that they are propping Trump up therein

I have yet to see any actual evidence that the story is anything more than fabrications. links to articles does not work for me so hold off. To buy into a fabrication like this says that either one is braindead or gullible.

its like that "story" about the pizza place having a child trafficking ring in the basement. Complete fabrication and yet certain folks bought into it and still passionately believe that it happened even when it was debunked. That sort of blind stupidity is why I dislike politicos. 

Edited by impartialobserver
Posted
Just now, impartialobserver said:

I have yet to see any actual evidence that the story is anything more than fabrications. links to articles does not work for me so hold off. To buy into a fabrication like this says that either one is braindead or gullible.

well I have never endorsed Trump, because he is a loose cannon

but the Democrat policies and narratives are literally so repulsive to half the population

that Trump continues to get away with it

Posted
32 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

She was never conflicted, stupid. She endorsed Biden-Harris in 2020, there's no chance she would have flipped this year.

The reason they didn't speak out about the fake AI slop Trump's people put out before is because doing so would have spoiled this announcement that they already had planned and timed for greatest impact. Do you not understand any of this?

The average Swiftie is a 30-40 something housewife.

There are conservative white women who are Swifties.

It probably won't, but elections this close are won on the margins.

Easy f*ckface, you need to slow down. lol

Now, I know this is difficult for a woke psychopath to capture, but people do change over time, even if it's only four years. ;) 

The silly b*tch didn't pounce the second she learned about the fake endorsement, and that's because she was probably conflicted. Again, perverts like you never change; it's obvious that you are too stunted to see the bigger picture, so naturally you are going to lash out at what you don't understand. You're basically wild animals with spray paint and molotov cocktails. 

Now, what you need to do, is step away from your computer, take your meds and get some fresh air. You need it. 

Posted
Just now, Dougie93 said:

well I have never endorsed Trump, because he is a loose cannon

but the Democrat policies and narratives are literally so repulsive to half the population

that Trump continues to get away with it

You are off topic. My point is that politicos will believe anything.. they do not need any actual evidence. If I was to make up a story about hispanics in whateverville imprisoning white women in a cave and eating them.. a politico would not flinch. They would without hesitation believe me and even if I came out and said, "yeah, it was complete BS".. they would still believe it. That sort of blind faith is not something I respect. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Do you think she wasn't conflicted? If so, why didn't she immediately set everyone straight the second she learned about the fake endorsement? 

It's because she WAS conflicted. 

Now stop being a woke dumbass. You're embarrassing yourself. 

I doubt she was ever conflicted. She’s tried to stay out of politics from the beginning amd over the years has repeatedly refused to give in any indication. In fact back in 2016 it was a point of curiosity that many young alt-right / white nationalists were big Taylor Swift fans. 
 

She probably would have stayed silent if the Trumptards hadn’t tried to mislead the public with their fake AI endorsements as a desperate stunt to reverse their slide. Another self-inflicted wound 

Posted
7 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

You are off topic. My point is that politicos will believe anything.. they do not need any actual evidence. If I was to make up a story about hispanics in whateverville imprisoning white women in a cave and eating them.. a politico would not flinch. They would without hesitation believe me and even if I came out and said, "yeah, it was complete BS".. they would still believe it. That sort of blind faith is not something I respect. 

well the Culture War is an actual war

the Information War predicted by Marshall McLuhan n 1970

as in any war, the hatred of the enemy becomes all consuming

Posted
Just now, Dougie93 said:

well the Culture War is an actual war

the Information War predicted by Marshall McLuhan n 1970

as in any war, the hatred of the enemy becomes all consuming

Not sure how that is related to my point. Going to move on.. this discussion is becoming too incoherent to be of any values. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

I doubt she was ever conflicted. She’s tried to stay out of politics from the beginning amd over the years has repeatedly refused to give in any indication. In fact back in 2016 it was a point of curiosity that many young alt-right / white nationalists were big Taylor Swift fans. 
 

She probably would have stayed silent if the Trumptards hadn’t tried to mislead the public with their fake AI endorsements as a desperate stunt to reverse their slide. Another self-inflicted wound 

She was conflicted. If she wasn't, she would've stormed social media and screamed support for Harris. She's doing it now, because she caved in to the woketards, but she was conflicted before. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

who would have thought that the Democrats would be desperately grasping at these straws ?

they are in a dead heat with a guy who claims that immigrants are eating family pets

How is this "desperately grasping at straws". These kinds of endorsements are par for the course. The only reason you don't see the Republicans make as many of these announcements is because most Republican voting celebs are has-beens and D listers.

21 minutes ago, Deluge said:

She was conflicted. If she wasn't, she would've stormed social media and screamed support for Harris. She's doing it now, because she caved in to the woketards, but she was conflicted before. 

This retarded guy doesn't understand campaign strategy or brand management lol.

She didn't scream before because they already had her in the bag and had this all planned out, they weren't going to throw all that away just to address obviously fake AI slop.

Edited by Black Dog
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Not sure how that is related to my point.

the point is that truth and facts cease to matter in a war

is there some truth to the pet eating story ?

perhaps there are some incidents of this occurring

but it doesn't matter, because I would vote against the Democrats no natter what Trump said

it's not a vote for Trump, it's a vote against the Democrats

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
Just now, Dougie93 said:

the point is that truth and facts cease to matter in a war

is there some truth to the pet eating story ?

perhaps there are some incidents of this occurring

but it doesn't matter, because I would against the Democrats no natter what Trump said

it's not a vote Trump, it's a vote against the Democrats

Believing in fabricated stories is not something i can respect. Clear enough? I do not care whose side the fabrication is tied to. That sort of blind allegiance is not something I can condone. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

This retarded guy doesn't understand campaign strategy or brand management lol.

She didn't scream before because they already had her in the bag and had this all planned out, they weren't going to throw all that away just to address obviously fake AI slop.

I can see that, actually. It's exactly what demon worshipping sociopaths would do when they know their candidate isn't even worth monkey spunk. 

Good one, pervert. I think you might have something here. ;) 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I can see that, actually. It's exactly what demon worshipping sociopaths would do when they know their candidate isn't even worth monkey spunk. 

Good one, pervert. I think you might have something here. ;) 

Yeah I understand that billionaire pop stars and well-oiled political machines don't fly off the handle at the slightest provocation, which is something a party led by a thin-skinned dementia patient can't comprehend. And you can't even wipe your own ass without help.

LOL I somehow missed the part where Swift described herself as a "Childless Cat Lady" in her post endorsing Harris, Trump is gonna have JD Vance run over with the campaign bus lol.

Edited by Black Dog
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

How is this "desperately grasping at straws".

well the Democrats are in a statistical tie in every single battleground state

when polling has consistently underrated the Trump vote by 6-7 points

which means the Democrats should assume that they are probably behind

so we see the Democrat media vastly overrating the Swift endorsement

as if everybody didn't know already that she is a Democrat

Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah I understand that billionaire pop stars and well-oiled political machines don't fly off the handle at the slightest provocation,

Bingo.. that is the answer. Trump on the other hand, responds to every provocation. to be so thin-skinned show that one is insecure. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah I understand that billionaire pop stars and well-oiled political machines don't fly off the handle at the slightest provocation, which is something a party led by a thin-skinned dementia patient can't comprehend. And you can't even wipe your own ass without help.

Let's not get carried away. 

You dumbf*cks can't even manage a meeting of the comrades without one of you triggering a fellow wokejob. ;) 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Don't care. People are entitled to their political positions and I do not begrudge her having one or sharing it at all. It only becomes annoying when they use their products to push it... like, if I was at a concert (as if I could ever get a ticket) and she started going on some tirade about something political instead of singing, that would be not very pleasant... 

 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

Don't care. People are entitled to their political positions and I do not begrudge her having one or sharing it at all. It only becomes annoying when they use their products to push it... like, if I was at a concert (as if I could ever get a ticket) and she started going on some tirade about something political instead of singing, that would be not very pleasant... 

 

I mostly agree. However, some acts are inherently political such as Rage Against the Machine or Kid Rock. You know by attending the show that you are getting a nice helping of politics and preaching along with your music. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Believing in fabricated stories is not something i can respect. Clear enough? I do not care whose side the fabrication is tied to. That sort of blind allegiance is not something I can condone. 

well I don't reject it as a fabrication out of hand

I don't think Trump should have brought it up in a debate

but there could be some truth to it

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Let's not get carried away. 

You dumbf*cks can't even manage a meeting of the comrades without one of you triggering a fellow wokejob. ;)

 

Cope and seethe, MAGAtard, cope and seethe.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Bingo.. that is the answer. Trump on the other hand, responds to every provocation. to be so thin-skinned show that one is insecure. 

Hey, you bedwetters have it down to a science; what can I say. You project your bullshit onto your political opponents and too many clueless Americans buy into it. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...