gatomontes99 Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 Up to 7,000 unruly anti-Israeli protesters — including some proudly waving Hamas flags — stormed through the Big Apple on Labor Day, lighting flares and setting off smoke bombs as they marched toward the heart of the city. The chaotic demonstrators gathered at Union Square in Manhattan in the early afternoon and began their raucous march to Washington Square Park. Only in America can people protest for murderers. This is in reaction to Hamas killing people they abducted as Israel approached to rescue them. https://youtu.be/1KRE_hIMFVU And where were these hostages held? Rafah. Rafah is where Harris swore there was no need to go there. Yet, that's where the hostages were. HARRIS: "We have been clear in multiple conversations and in every way that any major military operation in Rafah would be a huge mistake. Let me tell you something: I have studied the maps. There’s nowhere for those folks to go. And we’re looking at about a million and a half people in Rafah who are there because they were told to go there, most of them. And so we’ve been very clear that it would be a mistake to move into Rafah with any type of military operation." She's just wrong on every aspect of politics. She's so wrong on thongs, I have to wonder if her husband doesn't have to stop her from leaving the house with her shoes on her hands and underwater on her head. She's so wrong so often, you have to wonder how? Even stupid people get somethings right some times. I have to conclude that she intentionally gets it wrong. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Rebound Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: Up to 7,000 unruly anti-Israeli protesters — including some proudly waving Hamas flags — stormed through the Big Apple on Labor Day, lighting flares and setting off smoke bombs as they marched toward the heart of the city. The chaotic demonstrators gathered at Union Square in Manhattan in the early afternoon and began their raucous march to Washington Square Park. Only in America can people protest for murderers. This is in reaction to Hamas killing people they abducted as Israel approached to rescue them. https://youtu.be/1KRE_hIMFVU And where were these hostages held? Rafah. Rafah is where Harris swore there was no need to go there. Yet, that's where the hostages were. HARRIS: "We have been clear in multiple conversations and in every way that any major military operation in Rafah would be a huge mistake. Let me tell you something: I have studied the maps. There’s nowhere for those folks to go. And we’re looking at about a million and a half people in Rafah who are there because they were told to go there, most of them. And so we’ve been very clear that it would be a mistake to move into Rafah with any type of military operation." She's just wrong on every aspect of politics. She's so wrong on thongs, I have to wonder if her husband doesn't have to stop her from leaving the house with her shoes on her hands and underwater on her head. She's so wrong so often, you have to wonder how? Even stupid people get somethings right some times. I have to conclude that she intentionally gets it wrong. So the right thing to do was to invade those tunnels, leading to the murder of the hostages? Sometimes, there just aren’t any right answers. 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
gatomontes99 Posted September 3, 2024 Author Report Posted September 3, 2024 9 minutes ago, Rebound said: So the right thing to do was to invade those tunnels, leading to the murder of the hostages? Sometimes, there just aren’t any right answers. Yes, the right thing to do was to get the hostages. The wrong thing to do was to take hostages, keep hostages and then kill hostages. What you should have said is that sometimes there is no winning when the other side is pure evil. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Deluge Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 (edited) 48 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes, the right thing to do was to get the hostages. The wrong thing to do was to take hostages, keep hostages and then kill hostages. What you should have said is that sometimes there is no winning when the other side is pure evil. Rebound is different. He's a leftoid that actively speaks out against Islamic terrorism, but he could NEVER say something like that. Talk about a personal paradox. lol Edited September 3, 2024 by Deluge Quote
Rebound Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 52 minutes ago, Deluge said: Rebound is different. He's a leftoid that actively speaks out against Islamic terrorism, but he could NEVER say something like that. Talk about a personal paradox. lol I don’t make my decisions by choosing a conservative or liberal answer. I do not trust Trump at all. But Biden just approved another $20 billion in weapons for Israel. Biden does not support Netanyahu, but he definitely supports Israel. Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
Moonlight Graham Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes, the right thing to do was to get the hostages. The wrong thing to do was to take hostages, keep hostages and then kill hostages. What you should have said is that sometimes there is no winning when the other side is pure evil. Yes because the hostages have a GPS on them LOL. Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
robosmith Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 12 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Up to 7,000 unruly anti-Israeli protesters — including some proudly waving Hamas flags — stormed through the Big Apple on Labor Day, lighting flares and setting off smoke bombs as they marched toward the heart of the city. The chaotic demonstrators gathered at Union Square in Manhattan in the early afternoon and began their raucous march to Washington Square Park. Only in America can people protest for murderers. This is in reaction to Hamas killing people they abducted as Israel approached to rescue them. https://youtu.be/1KRE_hIMFVU And where were these hostages held? Rafah. Rafah is where Harris swore there was no need to go there. Yet, that's where the hostages were. HARRIS: "We have been clear in multiple conversations and in every way that any major military operation in Rafah would be a huge mistake. Let me tell you something: I have studied the maps. There’s nowhere for those folks to go. And we’re looking at about a million and a half people in Rafah who are there because they were told to go there, most of them. And so we’ve been very clear that it would be a mistake to move into Rafah with any type of military operation." She's just wrong on every aspect of politics. She's so wrong on thongs, I have to wonder if her husband doesn't have to stop her from leaving the house with her shoes on her hands and underwater on her head. She's so wrong so often, you have to wonder how? Even stupid people get somethings right some times. I have to conclude that she intentionally gets it wrong. "Only in America"? LMAO Obviously you're completely IGNORANT of the news about what's going on IN ISRAEL where massive protests against Netanyahu's incompetence have been staged. One man there was interviewed and stated that Netanyahu was completely to BLAME for the deaths of the six hostages. IOW, you've got your head up your A$$ Quote
Guest Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 3 hours ago, robosmith said: One man there was interviewed and stated that Netanyahu was completely to BLAME for the deaths of the six hostages. Because he is the one using innocent civilians as political pawns, right? He's the one threatening to broadcast the humiliating final words of each victim, psychologically torturing people after having spent months physically doing so, right? They have already broadcast the final words of one of the victims, as the family gave their blessings. Because Israel must make insanely lopsided concessions to a terrorist group, all but guaranteeing imminent future attacks. Right, its Israel's fault. Hamas is deliberately refusing to accept any deal, because the longer this goes, the better position they will be in for negotiations. They don't care about their people. Most of the higher ups are outside of Gaza, sitting in luxury hotels watching their people getting slaughtered, feeling zero pressure to stop the carnage. The more Gazan kids killed and crying, the better. You're making it sound like you're having two reasonable parties at the negotiating table. The unfortunate part with Israel, is they must respect international laws. Otherwise they would have entered Rafah far sooner, and far more effectively, vs giving the aggressor several months to meticulously plan their next few moves. The only way out of this, is at the negotiatiating table, where Israel will have to accept humiliating terms, and get very little in return in terms of security, yet being forced to guarantee the security of a terrorist organization. I don't blame them for their reluctance. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 4, 2024 Author Report Posted September 4, 2024 6 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said: Yes because the hostages have a GPS on them LOL. I think they probably wouldn't have waited a year if that was the case. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted September 4, 2024 Author Report Posted September 4, 2024 5 hours ago, robosmith said: "Only in America"? LMAO Obviously you're completely IGNORANT of the news about what's going on IN ISRAEL where massive protests against Netanyahu's incompetence have been staged. One man there was interviewed and stated that Netanyahu was completely to BLAME for the deaths of the six hostages. IOW, you've got your head up your A$$ Fine. But try that in England. It will get you arrested. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 7 hours ago, Perspektiv said: Because he is the one using innocent civilians as political pawns, right? He's the one threatening to broadcast the humiliating final words of each victim, psychologically torturing people after having spent months physically doing so, right? They have already broadcast the final words of one of the victims, as the family gave their blessings. Because Israel must make insanely lopsided concessions to a terrorist group, all but guaranteeing imminent future attacks. Right, its Israel's fault. Hamas is deliberately refusing to accept any deal, because the longer this goes, the better position they will be in for negotiations. They don't care about their people. Most of the higher ups are outside of Gaza, sitting in luxury hotels watching their people getting slaughtered, feeling zero pressure to stop the carnage. The more Gazan kids killed and crying, the better. You're making it sound like you're having two reasonable parties at the negotiating table. The unfortunate part with Israel, is they must respect international laws. The unfortunate part with Israel is that you believe they ARE. 7 hours ago, Perspektiv said: Otherwise they would have entered Rafah far sooner, and far more effectively, vs giving the aggressor several months to meticulously plan their next few moves. The only way out of this, is at the negotiatiating table, where Israel will have to accept humiliating terms, and get very little in return in terms of security, yet being forced to guarantee the security of a terrorist organization. I don't blame them for their reluctance. Only Netanyahu will REFUSE to negotiate like he is now, and MORE hostages will die. 8 hostages were recovered by serendipity with military assaults. Over 100 were recovered by negotiations. The thing you don't understand, is there is EQUAL responsibility for this tragedy. I already stated why, the question is, DO YOU UNDERSTAND what happened? 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Fine. But try that in England. It will get you arrested. Prove it. Whatever it is you're CLAIMING. 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I think they probably wouldn't have waited a year if that was the case. It's obviously sarcasm. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 4, 2024 Author Report Posted September 4, 2024 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: Prove it. Whatever it is you're CLAIMING. It's obviously sarcasm. England is arresting people for saying things. Look it up. You do understand that I was being sarcastic, as well? No. You never do. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: England is arresting people for saying things. Look it up. ^Debate LOST. "Look it up" does NOT make your case. 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: You do understand that I was being sarcastic, as well? No. You never do. When you post stupid all the time, it's very difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 4, 2024 Author Report Posted September 4, 2024 36 minutes ago, robosmith said: ^Debate LOST. "Look it up" does NOT make your case. When you post stupid all the time, it's very difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. This has been the most viral story for almost three weeks. How have you missed it? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly8k1648kpo That is one example, but there are hundreds of examples of people in England being arrested for social media posts. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 10 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: This has been the most viral story for almost three weeks. How have you missed it? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly8k1648kpo That is one example, but there are hundreds of examples of people in England being arrested for social media posts. In your example the guy wasn't arrested for making a social media post; he was arrested on suspicion of sending communication threatening death or serious harm. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 44 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: This has been the most viral story for almost three weeks. How have you missed it? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly8k1648kpo That is one example, but there are hundreds of examples of people in England being arrested for social media posts. Viral on the BBC is easily missed HERE. 33 minutes ago, Black Dog said: In your example the guy wasn't arrested for making a social media post; he was arrested on suspicion of sending communication threatening death or serious harm. Thanks for chasing gato's wild goose for me. You've demonstrated WHY naked links are unpersuasive. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 4, 2024 Author Report Posted September 4, 2024 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: Viral on the BBC is easily missed HERE. Thanks for chasing gato's wild goose for me. You've demonstrated WHY naked links are unpersuasive. It keeps going. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.