Obama's Hateful, Revisionist-History Screed

[Chrissy1979]

37 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Who is Gus Walz when his balls aren't on your chin? 

Sounds delicious. But if I said that to you, you'd cry how I'm a hateful bully who's victimizing you. 

[WestCanMan]

32 minutes ago, Hodad said:

He got old. People lost confidence.

🤣 You stupid little liar. Did you think no one would notice that?

FYI no one "lost confidence in him". It just became impossible to hide the fact that he is well on his way to full-blown dementia.

Noticing that he has dementia and "losing confidence in him" aren't the same things at all. 

Quote

He decided listen to advisors. Done deal.

He couldn't resist the DNC coup because dozens of high-ranking elected officials from his own party and major donors were going on TV and the internet demanding that Joe step down. It had become 100% impossible for him to win the election.

Stick a fork in that stupid turkey.

Quote

And the relief the world felt when we booted Trump out of office was palpable. HUGE swing, again since countries from single digits to high double. 

I'll grant you that Iran, Afghanistan, several other terrorist states, and everyone who stands to benefit from war was ecstatic that Biden got elected, but none of America's true allies are happy to see the bi-dolt n the WH.

Like Obama said, when he slipped up and told the truth for once: "Americans are still struggling right now" because of all the recent "years of bluster & bumbling & chaos", but the price being paid by other countries is far higher than mere soaring interest rates and inflation.

Ukraine has lost part of their country, tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians. Europe and the ME are at war.

That might just be an annoying tag line to you, because the destruction and suffering of others in inconsequential to you and your true cultist brethren - as you proved during years of violent riots in your own country - but to decent people, all of this war and suffering is a needless tragedy. 

You can stop with your fake polling BS, dipshit. Everyone in the world knows that there are two consequential wars going on right now. Everyone in the world knows that,

1. islamic state was defeated, after their roaring surge under Obama
2. global terrorism was plummeting as terrorist leaders dropped like flies
3. ME peace was increasing
4. the Afghan war was winding down peacefully

Trump inherited a dumpster-fire, got the world back on solid ground, and now how many major wars are there, dumbass? How many? Open your id10t mouth and tell the truth for once, stupid. 

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Sounds delicious.

Kamala, is that you? Trudeau? C'mon, which one are you? 

Quote

But if I said that to you, you'd cry how I'm a hateful bully who's victimizing you. 

You couldn't bully a 2-yr-old with your tiny little intellect, and crying is a leftard thing. 

Did you see any conservatives yelling at clouds or trying to get emotional support goats onto airplanes, dummy? 

[Chrissy1979]

15 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 

Did you see any conservatives yelling at clouds or trying to get emotional support goats onto airplanes, dummy? 

You'll believe anything you read on the Internet? What do you think of the moon landing and chem trails?

[NAME REMOVED]

This thread topic is great comedy.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You'll believe anything you read on the Internet? What do you think of the moon landing and chem trails?

Congrats, ditzy. You've successfully followed the Hodad/leftard cultist template to a tee. 

Your post didn't make any attempt at facts and stats, and went right to snotty insults. 

Now run around the forum doing that exact same thing as fast as you can in every thread. Prove to the world that hos can be a stupid as robo and rebound. 

[Chrissy1979]

You didn't answer my question. Did it hit too close to home? 😆 

[Hodad]

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yes. When he's not pushing known-to-be-false narratives like "Trayvon and M Brown were purely innocent victims of systemic racism who were murdered by the hateful pigs that all black men need to fear" to incite rioting and immerse a new generation of blacks in fear and hate, he's lying about Trump, Biden, Kamala and everything else. 

If you had a higher IQ then you would have caught him in the act all those years ago, because video of M Brown's violent robbery was out on the same day, but Obama brainwashed you. That's why you're a cultist, dummy.

Sorry, but your Sun God is not really divine, at best he's asinine . 

Just for gits and shiggles, what's your favorite example of Trump giving a hate-filled speech?

I already gave you examples of Obama's hate-laced speech at the DNC, about Trayvon and about M Brown. It's your turn you stupid little cultist weasel. Put up or shut up, dummy. 

Another of your oft-repeated, oft-debunked lies. As you've been shown many, many times the Brown robbery video want released until the Aug. 15th. 

And Obama didn't actually say any of what you've made up here.

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 You stupid little liar. Did you think no one would notice that?

FYI no one "lost confidence in him". It just became impossible to hide the fact that he is well on his way to full-blown dementia.

Noticing that he has dementia and "losing confidence in him" aren't the same things at all. 

He couldn't resist the DNC coup because dozens of high-ranking elected officials from his own party and major donors were going on TV and the internet demanding that Joe step down. It had become 100% impossible for him to win the election.

Stick a fork in that stupid turkey.

I'll grant you that Iran, Afghanistan, several other terrorist states, and everyone who stands to benefit from war was ecstatic that Biden got elected, but none of America's true allies are happy to see the bi-dolt n the WH.

Like Obama said, when he slipped up and told the truth for once: "Americans are still struggling right now" because of all the recent "years of bluster & bumbling & chaos", but the price being paid by other countries is far higher than mere soaring interest rates and inflation.

Ukraine has lost part of their country, tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians. Europe and the ME are at war.

That might just be an annoying tag line to you, because the destruction and suffering of others in inconsequential to you and your true cultist brethren - as you proved during years of violent riots in your own country - but to decent people, all of this war and suffering is a needless tragedy. 

You can stop with your fake polling BS, dipshit. Everyone in the world knows that there are two consequential wars going on right now. Everyone in the world knows that,

1. islamic state was defeated, after their roaring surge under Obama
2. global terrorism was plummeting as terrorist leaders dropped like flies
3. ME peace was increasing
4. the Afghan war was winding down peacefully

Trump inherited a dumpster-fire, got the world back on solid ground, and now how many major wars are there, dumbass? How many? Open your id10t mouth and tell the truth for once, stupid. 

Halfwit, you're responding to a post that includes international opinion data. 

I know you're awfully slow, but that means anyone can click the link and see that you're lying again. 

Edited August 23, 2024 by Hodad

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

He created the conditions for extreme inflation, which Biden solved. Of course he's losing. 😂 

LOL literally nobody believes that  

And if they did biden wouldnt' have been losing  

But hell - lets hope she runs on that entirely!   "TRUMP CREATED INFLATION WHICH DIDN"T START TILL A YEAR AFTER WE GOT IN BUT WE COULDNT FIX IT AND IT"S STILL ABOVE TARGET BUT HONESTLY THIS TIME I"LL TRY REEEEAAAALLYY HARD!"

Sounds like 4 more years of trump to me  

[WestCanMan]

43 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You didn't answer my question. Did it hit too close to home? 😆 

I'm not here to answer your questions, id10t. What's the matter, is your magic 8 ball busted?

Do you believe that M Brown and G Floyd were gentle giants, or were we lied to?

Do you believe that kids needed a covid jab, or were we lied to?

Do you believe that people should have been banned from social media for posting about the Wuhan BSL4 lab?

Do you believe that Fauci was unaware of the Wuhan lab and the bat coronavirus there - which he admittedly funded research on to make it transmissible among humans - back when he was telling us that covid came from interactions between humans, an intermediary species such as a pangolin, and some bats in a wetmarket?  

Do you believe that the NYPost should have been banned from social media for posting about the Hunter laptop? Do you believe it was "Russian disinformation", or that the FBI ever really had reason to believe that it was?

Do you believe that the FBI committed crimes during the Russian collusion investigation?

 

Those are important questions which I know you can't answer, because at this point your only choices are "admit that the MSM lies to us constantly" and "admit that little Chrissy is an 1d10t."

[Chrissy1979]

Your victim emotions are getting the better of you. I bet you're crying like Gus Walz. 😂 

[WestCanMan]

30 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Another of your oft-repeated, oft-debunked lies. As you've been shown many, many times the Brown robbery video want released until the Aug. 15th. 

And Obama didn't actually say any of what you've made up here.

There was a M Brown video on Fox on the very first day that I saw coverage of that incident, and it's possible that in Canada I didn't hear about it until 6 days later, but it's certain that CNN was still pimping the "gentle giant" narrative for months after the video of Brown's violent crime came out. 

Here's Barack Obama a month and a half after the video of Brown's violent robbery came out, still acting as if M Brown just HAD TO BE a victim:

• I know that Michael’s family is here tonight.  (Applause.)  I know that nothing any of us can say can ease the grief of losing a child so soon.  But the anger and the emotion that followed his death awakened our nation once again to the reality that people in this room have long understood, which is, in too many communities around the country, a gulf of mistrust exists between local residents and law enforcement.

  Too many young men of color feel targeted by law enforcement, guilty of walking while black, or driving while black, judged by stereotypes that fuel fear and resentment and hopelessness.  We know that, statistically, in everything from enforcing drug policy to applying the death penalty to pulling people over, there are significant racial disparities.  That’s just the statistics.  One recent poll showed that the majority of Americans think the criminal justice system doesn’t treat people of all races equally.  Think about that.  That’s not just blacks, not just Latinos or Asians or Native Americans saying things may not be unfair.  That’s most Americans.

  And that has a corrosive effect -- not just on the black community; it has a corrosive effect on America.  It harms the communities that need law enforcement the most.  It makes folks who are victimized by crime and need strong policing reluctant to go to the police because they may not trust them.  And the worst part of it is it scars the hearts of our children.  It scars the hearts of the white kids who grow unnecessarily fearful of somebody who doesn’t look like them.  It stains the heart of black children who feel as if no matter what he does, he will always be under suspicion.

FYI that wasn't what was happening at that point. Not at all. The M Brown shooting at that point was known to be "An interaction between the police and an angry, aggressive and violent criminal". It wasn't a "walking black" incident at all. 

So why did Obama, while directly addressing the M Brown incident, refer to "driving black" and "walking black" incidents? And why did he make no mention of the fact that sometimes interactions between the police and angry, violent criminals sometimes force police to protect themselves using lethal force? 

It's like looking at the Pulse night club shooting and then talking about drag queens reading books to little kids. When you are talking about something deadly serious like that, why would you link it to something that is entirely unlikely to have anything to do with it? 

There was no reason at that point for Obama to be insinuating that police racism might have something to do with that incident. It was not only wrong, his ridiculous assumption/false narrative was causing violent riots. 

Obama's own speech fit this exact description:

• has a corrosive effect on America.  It harms the communities that need law enforcement the most.  It makes folks who are victimized by crime and need strong policing reluctant to go to the police because they may not trust them.  And the worst part of it is it scars the hearts of our children.  It scars the hearts of the white kids who grow unnecessarily fearful of somebody who doesn’t look like them.  It stains the heart of black children who feel as if no matter what he does, he will always be under suspicion.

Obama described in painstaking detail exactly what his own false narrative was doing. Only it stopped short of admitting that Obama was still inciting riots by pretending that the "gentle giant walking black" scenario was in any way likely. 

[WestCanMan]

57 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Halfwit, you're responding to a post that includes international opinion data. 

Halfwit, I just dunked on you.

1. I don't care about the international polling data. Polls are more skewed than stats. 

2. I outed you for lying. You should honestly respond to that, if you think you can.

[herbie]

Keep poking Chrissy, he might eventually run out of shit to spew.

[WestCanMan]

38 minutes ago, herbie said:

Baaaaah

 

[Hodad]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

There was a M Brown video on Fox on the very first day that I saw coverage of that incident, and it's possible that in Canada I didn't hear about it until 6 days later, but it's certain that CNN was still pimping the "gentle giant" narrative for months after the video of Brown's violent crime came out. 

Here's Barack Obama a month and a half after the video of Brown's violent robbery came out, still acting as if M Brown just HAD TO BE a victim:

• I know that Michael’s family is here tonight.  (Applause.)  I know that nothing any of us can say can ease the grief of losing a child so soon.  But the anger and the emotion that followed his death awakened our nation once again to the reality that people in this room have long understood, which is, in too many communities around the country, a gulf of mistrust exists between local residents and law enforcement.

  Too many young men of color feel targeted by law enforcement, guilty of walking while black, or driving while black, judged by stereotypes that fuel fear and resentment and hopelessness.  We know that, statistically, in everything from enforcing drug policy to applying the death penalty to pulling people over, there are significant racial disparities.  That’s just the statistics.  One recent poll showed that the majority of Americans think the criminal justice system doesn’t treat people of all races equally.  Think about that.  That’s not just blacks, not just Latinos or Asians or Native Americans saying things may not be unfair.  That’s most Americans.

  And that has a corrosive effect -- not just on the black community; it has a corrosive effect on America.  It harms the communities that need law enforcement the most.  It makes folks who are victimized by crime and need strong policing reluctant to go to the police because they may not trust them.  And the worst part of it is it scars the hearts of our children.  It scars the hearts of the white kids who grow unnecessarily fearful of somebody who doesn’t look like them.  It stains the heart of black children who feel as if no matter what he does, he will always be under suspicion.

FYI that wasn't what was happening at that point. Not at all. The M Brown shooting at that point was known to be "An interaction between the police and an angry, aggressive and violent criminal". It wasn't a "walking black" incident at all. 

So why did Obama, while directly addressing the M Brown incident, refer to "driving black" and "walking black" incidents? And why did he make no mention of the fact that sometimes interactions between the police and angry, violent criminals sometimes force police to protect themselves using lethal force? 

It's like looking at the Pulse night club shooting and then talking about drag queens reading books to little kids. When you are talking about something deadly serious like that, why would you link it to something that is entirely unlikely to have anything to do with it? 

There was no reason at that point for Obama to be insinuating that police racism might have something to do with that incident. It was not only wrong, his ridiculous assumption/false narrative was causing violent riots. 

Obama's own speech fit this exact description:

• has a corrosive effect on America.  It harms the communities that need law enforcement the most.  It makes folks who are victimized by crime and need strong policing reluctant to go to the police because they may not trust them.  And the worst part of it is it scars the hearts of our children.  It scars the hearts of the white kids who grow unnecessarily fearful of somebody who doesn’t look like them.  It stains the heart of black children who feel as if no matter what he does, he will always be under suspicion.

Obama described in painstaking detail exactly what his own false narrative was doing. Only it stopped short of admitting that Obama was still inciting riots by pretending that the "gentle giant walking black" scenario was in any way likely. 

It's not a false narrative, dummy. Obama is exactly on point. There is deep mistrust between the Black community and the police, particularly in areas like Ferguson. And yes, much of that is because for too many officers, being Black is sufficient probable cause. 

It's baked into our history and woven through our society. It's going to take more time and a lot more effort to reverse, and that takes more unifying leaders like Obama. With her dual history, Harris may be capable of carrying that baton.

I frankly didn't expect you will understand any of this, as you are a foreigner and nakedly racist yourself, but it's accurate.

[Hodad]

16 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Halfwit, I just dunked on you.

1. I don't care about the international polling data. Polls are more skewed than stats. 

2. I outed you for lying. You should honestly respond to that, if you think you can.

You're just bog stupid. Lol. "Polls are meaningless! Stats are meaningless! Fark data! The only things that matter are my hate-filled unsubstantiated opinions! That's what everyone should believe!"

You're certifiable. 😂

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

It's not a false narrative, dummy. Obama is exactly on point. There is deep mistrust between the Black community and the police, particularly in areas like Ferguson. And yes, much of that is because for too many officers, being Black is sufficient probable cause. 

It's baked into our history and woven through our society. It's going to take more time and a lot more effort to reverse, and that takes more unifying leaders like Obama. With her dual history, Harris may be capable of carrying that baton.

I frankly didn't expect you will understand any of this, as you are a foreigner and nakedly racist yourself, but it's accurate.

No, he's not on-point at all, because the truth is that CNN just conned millions of black people into believing they just saw the bogeyman, and Barack Obama just stood there and told everyone: "That was the bogeyman. He is real."

Keep in mind that the stakes were not low at that moment. There were still violent riots going on at that point and for years after. 

That wasn't the time for a POTUS to pretend that the riots were "a legitimate struggle for equality in America". Those riots were incited by the careful manipulation of information by CNN and by the false narratives that they spread with the Dems over an actual "non-event". By that I mean, it's not newsworthy when a violent criminal gets shot while attacking a cop for no reason, regardless of the colour of anyone's skin. 

Knowing what you know now, was it worth the destruction of an entire town just because dumb, violent Michael Brown was shot? 

What's a more accurate description of M Brown:

1. dumb and violent
2. gentle giant?

Why did Barack Obama just keep piling onto that original false narrative instead of de-escalating by talking about the actual facts of the matter? "Walking black"???? WTF???? Remember that at the moment he said that everyone on the planet already knew that Brown was not a gentle giant who was just walking black if they were paying attention. 

[Hodad]

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

No, he's not on-point at all, because the truth is that CNN just conned millions of black people into believing they just saw the bogeyman, and Barack Obama just stood there and told everyone: "That was the bogeyman. He is real."

Keep in mind that the stakes were not low at that moment. There were still violent riots going on at that point and for years after. 

That wasn't the time for a POTUS to pretend that the riots were "a legitimate struggle for equality in America". Those riots were incited by the careful manipulation of information by CNN and by the false narratives that they spread with the Dems over an actual "non-event". By that I mean, it's not newsworthy when a violent criminal gets shot while attacking a cop for no reason, regardless of the colour of anyone's skin. 

Knowing what you know now, was it worth the destruction of an entire town just because dumb, violent Michael Brown was shot? 

What's a more accurate description of M Brown:

1. dumb and violent
2. gentle giant?

Why did Barack Obama just keep piling onto that original false narrative instead of de-escalating by talking about the actual facts of the matter? "Walking black"???? WTF???? Remember that at the moment he said that everyone on the planet already knew that Brown was not a gentle giant who was just walking black if they were paying attention. 

What we "know now" is still not much. Friends, family and teachers all described him as a "gentle giant." He didn't have any weapons or a criminal record. Doesn't seem to have been particularly violent. He managed to finish high school and was set to start college. So not too dumb. 

We also know that that in the encounter with Darren Wilson, neither of them were tabula rasa man. Years of mistrust and fear laid the groundwork before they ever met each other, and that's baggage they carried into that meeting. We don't have a sensible version of what actually transpired because there were no car or body cams to show us. 

I completely reject your bizarre interpretation of Obama's remarks and the asinine idea that the priests and riots were engineered. And again, because you cannot manage to keep straight, the protests started the day after the shooting and Obama spoke the day before the alleged robbery footage was released. 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Hodad said:

What we "know now" is still not much.

We know he lied trying to get himself off a dui charge and failed. 

We know he made committments to his squad mates to go into battle with them and then fled. 

We know he lied about how his wife got pregnant. 

 We know he lied about the rank he retired at.

You mean you think there's even more?