Tim Walz taught students that communism "means that everyone is the same and everyone shares"

[Five of swords]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Sure, and I get that the Chinese gov't will protect its people. 

But they'll also f up anyone like you if they decide that they want to have their own opinion about something.

If Nancy, Fatima or Li down the street says "But I don't think that little children should be transitioned between sexes in gr 6" and that's contrary to the government's most recent statement, should she lose all of her rights and privileges?

If Nancy, Fatima or Li down the street says "I think that little children should be allowed to transition between sexes in gr 6" and that's contrary to the government's most recent statement, should she lose all of her rights and privileges?

The Taliban and the Chinese gov't don't allow Nancy or Fatima or Li to sound off on those things. Do you understand that? Do you want to live in a country where everyone has to say the same things or face gov't punishments? 

I would advocate executing Nancy and Fatima for their perverse ideas. No, it is not good for the Chinese people to mutilate their children based on insane cult religion...and anyone endorsing that cult should be considered enemies of the Chinese people

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

I don’t need to lie.

Just a hobby then?

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAHHAA:   Sorry  sorry,  it was out there, i had to take the shot....  

[WestCanMan]

44 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

I would advocate executing Nancy and Fatima for their perverse ideas. No, it is not good for the Chinese people to mutilate their children based on insane cult religion...and anyone endorsing that cult should be considered enemies of the Chinese people

You do you, FoS. 

[Five of swords]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You do you, FoS. 

And in China, it would be fine for me to say that. China is not in favor of transgenderism...thay is a usa thing. So it is dishonest for you to pretend that Chinese people want to protest transgenderism but the state won't let them...when that is actually what the usa does.

[WestCanMan]

13 hours ago, Five of swords said:

And in China, it would be fine for me to say that. China is not in favor of transgenderism...thay is a usa thing. So it is dishonest for you to pretend that Chinese people want to protest transgenderism but the state won't let them...when that is actually what the usa does.

Wrong again. I said that either way the gov't chooses, no one is allowed to speak in favour of the other way. 

[Five of swords]

7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Wrong again. I said that either way the gov't chooses, no one is allowed to speak in favour of the other way. 

It's no different in the usa, either. The state and economic powers decide what acceptable opinions are. We are only allowed to argue about taxes orabortion or irrelevant crap like that. If a person says that white Americans have a right to control their own destiny...which ought to be a perfectly normal political position...then they certainly will be excommunicated from the economy and are likely to be thrown in prison

[impartialobserver]

now if only Walz and those on here had actually read Das Kapital. But we know that they can't and won't

 

[Rebound]

On 8/20/2024 at 6:12 PM, Five of swords said:

I would advocate executing Nancy and Fatima for their perverse ideas. No, it is not good for the Chinese people to mutilate their children based on insane cult religion...and anyone endorsing that cult should be considered enemies of the Chinese people

They should execute you for having the idea that we should execute people for their ideas.  We have a First Amendment in the United States.  

[Rebound]

On 8/20/2024 at 5:23 PM, Nationalist said:

Still possible as well.

But the SCOTUS, if it comes to that, will likely toss it all out with a scolding for that judge in NY.

That’s because you believe the SCOTUS is a political organization.  Trump clearly violated very longstanding fraud laws.  
 

He runs a business. He wrote checks from that business which were categorized as “legal expenses,” knowing perfectly well that they were hush money payments to a porn star, intended to help him get elected.  

[Nationalist]

8 minutes ago, Rebound said:

That’s because you believe the SCOTUS is a political organization.  Trump clearly violated very longstanding fraud laws.  
 

He runs a business. He wrote checks from that business which were categorized as “legal expenses,” knowing perfectly well that they were hush money payments to a porn star, intended to help him get elected.  

Lol...ya that's why nobody wanted to touch the case until the DOJ got involved.

Yet another great plan of you lyin' garbagecans...thwarted.

Such..."patriots" you Libbies are.

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...ya that's why nobody wanted to touch the case until the DOJ got involved.

Yet another great plan of you lyin' garbagecans...thwarted.

Such..."patriots" you Libbies are.

WOW. You are a serious legal genius. Yup, you’re right… no prosecutor would prosecute the case until prosecutors prosecuted the case. You figured it out! You cracked the code.  All by yourself.  

Except… Trump wasn’t prosecuted and convicted by the DOJ, he was prosecuted by the New York City District Attorney. Which isn’t the DOJ. 

Edited August 22, 2024 by Rebound

[Nationalist]

37 minutes ago, Rebound said:

WOW. You are a serious legal genius. Yup, you’re right… no prosecutor would prosecute the case until prosecutors prosecuted the case. You figured it out! You cracked the code.  All by yourself.  

Except… Trump wasn’t prosecuted and convicted by the DOJ, he was prosecuted by the New York City District Attorney. Which isn’t the DOJ. 

Keep telling that story. Let's see how it plays with the voters.

Good luck with that.

[Five of swords]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

They should execute you for having the idea that we should execute people for their ideas.  We have a First Amendment in the United States.  

There is no first ammendment in the usa, and there won't be a usa for long. China is the future.

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, Rebound said:

They should execute you for having the idea that we should execute people for their ideas.  We have a First Amendment in the United States.  

Anyone who believes violence is a solution should be shot. 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

WOW. You are a serious legal genius. Yup, you’re right… no prosecutor would prosecute the case until prosecutors prosecuted the case. You figured it out! You cracked the code.  All by yourself.  

Except… Trump wasn’t prosecuted and convicted by the DOJ, he was prosecuted by the New York City District Attorney. Which isn’t the DOJ. 

Let's get real. That prosecutor worked for Biden and the democrats until a month or so before these charges were laid. Then he was magically transferred to help with this case. The judges daughter made a crap ton of money off of this case selling the fact that it was her father and that if donors wanted to see more of this they should give money. She's a fundraiser.

There's never been a case like this before in the history of American law, none of this would have even been remotely illegal outside of that specific jurisdiction, they refuse to transfer to a less bias judge and or prosecutor, there is an endless endless litany here.

This was a politically motivated case that was orchestrated by the democrats and their supporters for the purposes of suppressing a political opponent. Even democrats supporters agree with this statement, they just think it was justified because it was trump.

Pretending otherwise just makes you look like a child. This is what happened. Now you can either justify it or explain it or condemn it or whatever you like but you can't pretend that's not what happened