Why do we need mass immigration again?

[CdnFox]

29 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I don't think all conservatives believe that but it is why so many of you are so wiling to lick Hitler's bag.

You have some pretty weird sex fantasies.  Why is every leftie on this board obsessed with licking guys bags, anal porn, and man-vaginas?  Don't ANY of you get laid? 

Anyway, conservatives pretty much hate all the leftie dictators, hitler, stalin, Mao ... tho now that i think about it there WAS a major politican in canada who not long ago said how much he really admired china's dictatorship.  Who was that again? It was a conservative right? No? hmmm

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

tho now that i think about it there WAS a major politican in canada who not long ago said how much he really admired china's dictatorship.  Who was that again? It was a conservative right? No? hmmm

May as well be from my perspective.

The unassailable fact remains that whatever else Hitler was he attained power because he was always one of yours.

The conservative elite and the Nazi Party had a common enemy – the political left.

 

[CdnFox]

45 minutes ago, eyeball said:

May as well be from my perspective.

 

Ahhh you think justin is a right winger   Liar  

And what must  you think of the NDP propping up a radical right winger like that? How shocking! 

This is what it looks like when even left wingers realize the left wing is utter garbage but they don't know how to cope  

 

Quote

The unassailable fact remains that whatever else Hitler was he attained power because he was always one of yours.

Sure  he was one of ours in the same way that trudeau is a radical right winger   LOLOLOLOL

Hitler is a fine example of why the left ands socialism is so wrong.  Hitler, stalin, mussolini, mao, .... you lefties are a pretty brutal and violent type. 

[eyeball]

17 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Ahhh you think justin is a right winger   Liar  

And what must  you think of the NDP propping up a radical right winger like that? How shocking! 

This is what it looks like when even left wingers realize the left wing is utter garbage but they don't know how to cope  

 

Sure  he was one of ours in the same way that trudeau is a radical right winger   LOLOLOLOL

Hitler is a fine example of why the left ands socialism is so wrong.  Hitler, stalin, mussolini, mao, .... you lefties are a pretty brutal and violent type. 

Sure. Get back to us when the left here has killed millions of people. But of course you already think that was in the bag during COVID so...

Your righties are ridiculous.

[Goddess]

49 minutes ago, eyeball said:

But of course you already think that was in the bag during COVID so...

We shall see.

John Beaudoin Sr. is a lawyer in the US who has been taking on vax injured clients and gov't censorship and fraudulent stats.  From millions of records, his team has found that "covid" deaths were about 80-90% fraudulent.

 

Connecticut Whistleblower Complaint filed - FRAUD/FORGERY - Grossly Over-Counted Covid Deaths, Deleted and Omitted Vaccine Deaths Certified death records show that Connecticut grossly inflated Covid death totals and hid Covid vaccine deaths from the public. John Beaudoin, Sr., President and CEO of Summa Logica LLC, obtained more than 297,000 Connecticut death records from 2015 through 2023. He compiled hundreds of materially false records from Connecticut into a Memorandum and Exhibits, then filed a § 4-61dd whistleblower complaint with the Auditors of Public Records, who have a legal duty to verify and refer to the Attorney General. Forgery § 53a-139 and Manslaughter §53a-56 are alleged to have resulted from these misrepresentations. Attached please find the Press Release. Below is a link to the two files (Memorandum, EXHIBITs) and the password to open them. https://we.tl/t-6LpHaL2JEh Password: blackdogwink

Labelling deaths as "covid" deaths was incentivized - docs and hospitals got boatloads of cash for them.

Beaudoin is in the process of trying to get the death certificates and names of the supposed 20,000 covid deaths in New York.  New York is refusing to release the information.  New York's governor was just bltchslapped by the US Senate committee for being responsible for the disastrous decisions made in NY regarding nursing homes that resulted in thousands of deaths.

It's all coming out, despite the kicking and screaming and censorship of authorities.

You are on the wrong side of this.  Waaaaay wrong side.

[Goddess]

I don't know how many times certain people here have said, "Well, if this is true, where's all the whistleblowers?"  And then every time a whistleblower comes forward, they discount it.

Odd bunch.  Like completely brainwashed to believe any lie the gov't or MSM tells them, no matter how bizarre or anti-science.

Edited August 29, 2024 by Goddess
spelling, oopsy

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Sure. Get back to us when the left here has killed millions of people.

Are you claiming the right here has killed millions of people?  Sigh.  what a dishonest and sad little person you are. 

Quote

But of course you already think that was in the bag during COVID so...

The right wasn't in power during covid.

Quote

Your righties are ridiculous.

Says the guy who just accused the right of killing millions while they weren't in power   LOLOLOL

I'm sure covid was harper's fault in your teeny tiny little mind  

[eyeball]

29 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Well, if this is true, where's all the whistleblowers?

All being the operative word. For something as humongous as this it'll take thousands upon thousands of whistleblowers...bearing video recordings and emails peppered with words like murder and deliberate.

[Goddess]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

All being the operative word. For something as humongous as this it'll take thousands upon thousands of whistleblowers...bearing video recordings and emails peppered with words like murder and deliberate.

"Thousands and thousands"

That's your requirement?  Unless everybody or almost everybody comes forward, whistleblowers can be ignored?

I think you misunderstand (deliberately) what a "whistleblower" is. 🙄

 

[Goddess]

There's been another US military whistleblower come forward.  Like Col Theresa Long (who testified in front of the US Senate) this one also is not ready to reveal their identity...... yet.

But here's his comments from the voice-disguised interview.  Make of it whatever you want.

There's been quite a few military whistleblowers come forward.  But not the tens of thousands that eyeball requires.  I'm sure everybody but him can figure out why.......

Army doctor: "I've seen a career's worth of serious medical problems in the last 2 years--it's all caused by the COVID vaccine"

Executive summary

If the COVID vaccines worked, the military doctors would be showing us the stats of how COVID deaths were at a high rate before the shots rolled out and then diminished right after the shots were deployed.

I spoke to a military doctor to learn the truth. I made just one phone call.

What I learned was absolutely stunning.

Here are some of the highlights from my conversation with a military doctor who has asked to remain anonymous so he/she can keep his job.

Conversation highlights

All are outtakes from what he told me:

 

1. Around 4,000 service members at my base.

2. Primarily young males with no history of medical problems.

3. I’ve seen more adverse events in just the last 2 years alone than I’ve seen in the past 30 years as an army doctor/medic. The rate of adverse events are up to 100X more than normal for many categories. I’ve been doing this for 30 years now and I know what normal is.

4. 

5. Today, 85 soldiers are now medically unfit to train; only 5 or 6 will be able to go back to training. So we will be 30 people short on pilots alone. That is a huge problem. They don’t realize that yet because they are thinking most of these people will be able to resume training. Normally it would only be 4 or 5 that wouldn’t be able to return to duty. 85 people in “close hold” (medical hold) is unprecedented. So 80 that don’t return vs. 4 (in a typical year) is a 20X increase in the number of disabled people. This is unsustainable.

6. The surgeon above me (my boss) asked me “Why do we have so much medical attrition?” I told him it was the shots and went through the data with him. He said, “There is no way on God’s green earth that I will convey that to the General. The vaccines are safe!”

7. When I came to this unit in 2021, the retention rate was 90%, i.e., people who opted to stay in after their service is over. Today, just 3 years later, the retention rate is 17%, due to the sickness caused by the COVID shots.

8. We aren’t going to have a fighting army in 5 years. These shots are devastating our force. It’s unsustainable.

9. Every medic in my section (20 people), would tell you “I’ve never seen anything like this.”

10. The people who do “transition assistance” (transition to non-military life) told me that they’ve never seen so many people with so many complex medical problems. Most of the soldiers tell them that the medical problems started after they were vaccinated with the COVID vaccine.

11.  

12. The high rates of serious injury is now becoming the new normal! People are going to forget how it was before the vaccines. Strokes and cardiac arrests in the enlisted members were non-existent before the COVID vaccines; now they are common place.

13. They will wipe my computer when I leave so there is no evidence left. They also prohibit any sharing of the evidence. All these emails and all these stories I’ve collected will be permanently destroyed.

14. Vaccines aren’t mandated today, but they tell you to get into line to get your vaccines. There is enormous peer pressure to comply with the request.

15. I don’t know what will happen if nobody is held accountable for what has happened.

16. Since shots rolled out, we’ve had 5 vax related deaths, all in men: one with PE, other 4 were deaths from cardiac arrest. 2 cardiac arrest cases were resuscitated; otherwise the number would be 7 dead.

17. We are still having people with ischemic strokes (3 years later). They are all ischemic strokes.

18. I’ve had 4 people with afib but they had no risk factors. These are all young 20-year-olds with no cardiac history getting afib. That’s insane. Before the shots, I might see …. cases in 10 years.

19. Many many tumors, many blood pressure issues.

20. I’ve seen 5 cases of pericarditis and 2 myocarditis cases. But they don’t want a cardiac MRI so we can’t get a definitive diagnosis. They cancel the MRI I ordered.

21. If you did a cardiac MRI on 100 pilots, I bet 20% to 30% would have scars on their heart. But they won’t do the tests. They don’t want to know. This is horrific for both the people flying the aircraft as well as the cost of losing aircraft.

22. Two years ago, the DoD sent in 34,000 VAERS reports with 119 deaths from the vaccine of servicemembers. We had only 23 active duty service members died from COVID across the whole DoD over 3 years (out of 1.2M active duty servicemembers). Think about it… 30 service members a MONTH commit suicide. COVID wasn’t even close to being in the top 10 of things killing servicemembers. Why would we risk vaccinating everyone for a problem that was so insignificant? It makes no sense. And the deaths caused by the vaccine were 5X higher than the deaths from COVID.

23. Our 23 COVID deaths are honest because there was no financial incentive to report deaths as COVID deaths.

24. I had two cases of Huntington’s in just 1 week! Normally I might see one case in a lifetime.

25. We had 2 heart attacks in just one morning in soldiers under 30. Before the vaccine, in the last 30 years, I’ve never seen a single case like that.

26. We’ve had a record number of mishaps.

27. Not a single vaccinated female has been able to give birth! 10/10 were miscarriages. Before the vaccine, I’d see only 1 miscarriage in 20 pregnancies.

28. The numbers aren’t getting better.

29. I’m seeing a lot of cancer, especially turbo cancer. So a soldier will have a clean history and all of a sudden develop stage 4 cancer. I’ve never seen this before in my medical career. For example, had one patient with both Stage 4 lymphoma + acute heart failure in a 19 year old with no previous medical conditions. That’s insane.

30. Every one of the enlisted soldiers knows someone who suffered a horrific side effect of the vaccine.

31. We had 7 soldiers with ischemic strokes in the last 2 years. This is unheard of. I’ve been doing this for 30 years now and never seen strokes in anyone under 50 before the COVID shots rolled out.

32. We had 3 soldiers go blind after getting the shots. One of them was an incredible athlete before the shots. Now his life is completely decimated. He’s on lifelong disability and they pay him just $2,000 a month compensation for what they did to him. If he speaks out, they could take that away. It is so gut wrenching what we are doing to these kids. And it’s all for no benefit because these shots actually increase the risk of getting COVID.

33. We had a just a handful of COVID cases before vax rolled out. Post rollout, 406 got COVID; but only 7 of those were unvaccinated. We had an 80% vaccination rate at the time. So there is no question that the vaccines are making it more likely that soldiers will get COVID.

34. We’ve never had a COVID death before the vaccines rolled out so what problem are we trying to solve here? We’ve killed 5 soldiers, seriously injured hundreds, and saved none from a COVID death. This is insane. How can anyone claim the benefits outweigh the risks?

35. Did you know when you enlist, they give you the entire vaccine schedule over again just to be sure, even if you’ve already been fully vaccinated?

36. They used to ridicule me when I’d bring this up at meetings. Now, when a serious adverse event occurs on the base, people just look my way and nod.

37. We had a soldier with a 12cm blood clot in his leg. He had no risk factors. All people with clots had zero risk factors.

38. We are decimating the readiness of our military with these shots and we are permanently destroying the lives of these innocent young people.

39. The soldiers know the shots are bad but are taking them because of peer pressure to “follow orders.”

40. I looked in the DMED database and vision loss is 4 to 8 standard deviations above the mean after the shots rolled out.

41. I warned a General that we’d see a pilot have a cardiac arrest while flying. Two weeks later, it happened. He now believes me, but won’t say anything because he doesn’t want to lose his job or pension. They are all scared.

42. We are treating these soldiers so badly. I’m not having my kids enlist. It’s going to be hard to recruit kids in the future after people learned how we’ve harmed these kids. The longer this keeps going, the worse it will be.

43. What they are doing is criminal. They know these shots are killing people and they just let it happen. There is no possibility they don’t know.

44. The Surgeon General of the Army is responsible for monitoring for adverse events but she said she has no responsibility to warn anyone about what she finds. She’s allowed to keep it all secret from the enlisted soldiers and the doctors.

45. They no longer require people to take the COVID jabs, so that’s a move in the right direction, but we are still paying a huge price for our earlier mistakes.

46. There is no informed consent. Soldiers are just told to take the shots and not told about the risks.

47. In normal times, just a few of these incidents would have been sufficient to halt the jabs. Yet today, there is no limit to the harm we are willing to inflict on those who choose to enlist to serve their county.

48. Summary

    You don’t need to analyze complicated datasets.

    All anyone in Congress needs to do to find the truth is talk to an honest Army doctor like I just did. All the records are there, but the military isn’t going to hand it over without a fight.

    All Joe Biden has to to learn the truth do is pick up the phone and talk to my army doctor. He would learn he made a huge mistake and caused the death of hundreds of thousands of Americans. So he’s just never going to pick up the phone and find out the truth.

[eyeball]

14 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Thousands and thousands"

That's your requirement?  Unless everybody or almost everybody comes forward, whistleblowers can be ignored?

I think you misunderstand (deliberately) what a "whistleblower" is.

I think you misunderstand the word evidence not to mention incontrovertible.

I guess a handful of video recordings of Fauci using the words murder and deliberate would probably go a long way.

[Goddess]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I guess a handful of video recordings of Fauci using the words murder and deliberate would probably go a long way.

No. I go by the data and the studies and the facts.  It's why I've been right about everything and you've been wrong about everything.

It's odd that you would accuse ME of this, since it's actually YOU that has always said (in regard to a lot of things) that unless the person or entities flat out say they are lying or committed fraud or murdered a bunch of people for profit, you won't accept ANY evidence unless the person admits it.

We've had this same damn argument over and over, eyeball.  I keep telling you that people who lie, fraud and murder rarely ADMIT it.  It's why we have a court system where evidence is presented.

You keep insisting unless they admit it, we have to take them at their word, regardless of the evidence.

I think that's insane.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

It's why we have a court system where evidence is presented.

How's that working out btw? Was it like a smoking gun or something?

Edited August 29, 2024 by eyeball

[I am Groot]

23 hours ago, taxme said:

The problem that i have with our massive immigration numbers, which are way too high, is that they are not allowing as many people from what use to be our main source of immigrants which would normally come from Britain or European countries. I have great issues with that problem and it annoys me. I really do feel that if the current trends of immigrants coming from non-white countries continues, we white folk will soon become a minority in our own white homeland. This must not be allowed to happen. Just my opinion. 😇

The problem is how we allocate visas. Each visa office is allocated a set number of immigration visas at the beginning of the year largely based on the demand from the previous few years. This means that the more people who come from somewhere, ie, India or China, the more visas the visa offices there are allocated for the following year. This tends to build on itself for obvious reasons. It's resulted in the number of visas allocated to third world countries like India being far, far higher than European countries. Which means that even when unemployment is in the middle or high teens in some European countries, only a very few people will be allowed to immigrate from there. 

Yet Immigration Canada's own figures show immigrants from Europe and the US earning far higher, mostly double what immigrants from other places earn. They also integrate better and are not a security concern. So it is demonstrably better for us to get immigrants from Europe and the US and other Western countries. Our system does not work on logic, though, nor what is best for Canada. It's largely a political tool of the party in power designed to win votes. 

Edited August 29, 2024 by I am Groot

[Goddess]

10 minutes ago, eyeball said:

How's that working out btw?

Mostly quite well.  We've lost a few cases but won quite a few precedent setting ones.

 

 

[Goddess]

20 minutes ago, eyeball said:

How's that working out btw?

The US Supreme Court threw out one of the censorship of social media cases, saying it couldn't be proven that Biden demanded Facebook censor.

But now that Zuckerburg has come out and admitted the Biden administration DID demand censorship of them, I'm not sure how that will play out now.

Too bad he didn't come forward when the case was being considered.

He likely sees which way the wind is blowing with the US elections and decided it might be a good time to come clean and join the freedom of speech train.

Edited August 29, 2024 by Goddess

[Michael Hardner]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

But now that Zuckerburg has come out and admitted the Biden administration DID demand censorship of them, I'm not sure how that will play out now.

Nothing will happen.

Just look at what you're saying "Biden administration demanded censorship" ... If the government was doing this illegally then there's likely no traceability.  If not, then there's an order and likely some legal rationale.  Back to the courts if that is the case.

But this word "Censorship" is being overused these days.

On a private platform you have zero right to express yourself.  Is it 'censorship' if FOX doesn't give me time on their network to speak my "truths" ?  The word might be apt, in terms of English usage, but if that's we're talking about it's really a big nothing.  These people stifle all kinds of voices for various reasons all the time.  Every platform does it daily for many different reasons, ultimately legal liability and/or money are at the root of it

And likewise, the platforms have ironclad rationales do do what they want to do, whether that means compliance or not.

If we walk around in mock shock mouthing "Zuckerberg censored somebody" then it comes across to me as beyond naive. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

All being the operative word. For something as humongous as this it'll take thousands upon thousands of whistleblowers...bearing video recordings and emails peppered with words like murder and deliberate.

So in other words nothing would be enough to convince you. 

Well. There you go. 

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

Nothing will happen.

Just look at what you're saying "Biden administration demanded censorship" ... If the government was doing this illegally then there's likely no traceability.  If not, then there's an order and likely some legal rationale.  Back to the courts if that is the case.

But this word "Censorship" is being overused these days.

On a private platform you have zero right to express yourself.  Is it 'censorship' if FOX doesn't give me time on their network to speak my "truths" ?  The word might be apt, in terms of English usage, but if that's we're talking about it's really a big nothing.  These people stifle all kinds of voices for various reasons all the time.  Every platform does it daily for many different reasons, ultimately legal liability and/or money are at the root of it

And likewise, the platforms have ironclad rationales do do what they want to do, whether that means compliance or not.

If we walk around in mock shock mouthing "Zuckerberg censored somebody" then it comes across to me as beyond naive. 

I get what you're saying.  But, respectfully, I can tell you haven't really looked into what's been going on beyond what the MSM has fed you.

I follow many of the lawyers involved in the censorship issue.  Although the issue of censorship ties in with doctors and scientists being censored during covid, I do have less interest in that issue than what the latest medical studies and datasets are. 

The world's top epidemiologists, virologists and biologists from places like Oxford, Harvard and Yale were de-platformed and censored and that is NOT good for science.  I'm sure you disagree with that last statement.

[Michael Hardner]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

1. I get what you're saying.  But, respectfully, I can tell you haven't really looked into what's been going on beyond what the MSM has fed you.

2. I follow many of the lawyers involved in the censorship issue.  Although the issue of censorship ties in with doctors and scientists being censored during covid, I do have less interest in that issue than what the latest medical studies and datasets are.  The world's top epidemiologists, virologists and biologists from places like Oxford, Harvard and Yale were de-platformed and censored and that is NOT good for science.  I'm sure you disagree with that last statement.

1. I find it odd that people assume I only listen to the MSM.  Why do you think that ?  Because I disagree with you?  It's like me accusing you of watching FOX news.  I have no idea where you get your information.  I get most of mine on here.

2. Yes, I realize that.  I made my mind up about this issue a long time ago.  I did look at counter evidence, most recently when Nationalist (I think) posted that Invermectin Study.  The claims that I have seen don't usually hold up to close scrutiny.

Anyway, I don't think there's much for us to discuss here.  We don't agree.

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Why do you think that ?

I guess because you use mainly MSM talking points and have never been too interested in counterarguments, often dismissing them out of hand.

4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Anyway, I don't think there's much for us to discuss here.  We don't agree.

Yes.  I disagree strongly that science should be censored by the gov't.

[Michael Hardner]

6 minutes ago, Goddess said:

1. I guess because you use mainly MSM talking points and have never been too interested in counterarguments, often dismissing them out of hand.

1. I can dismiss some, if it's a repetitive argument.  I gave them all their due, including the one I cited.

I get zero credit for that, presumably because I come to a different conclusion than you.

So I have to be marked deficient.  Isn't that what you say your opponents do?

[eyeball]

48 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The US Supreme Court threw out one of the censorship of social media cases, saying it couldn't be proven that Biden demanded Facebook censor.

But now that Zuckerburg has come out and admitted the Biden administration DID demand censorship of them, I'm not sure how that will play out now.

Too bad he didn't come forward when the case was being considered.

He likely sees which way the wind is blowing with the US elections and decided it might be a good time to come clean and join the freedom of speech train.

When did Fauci confess?

[eyeball]

43 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So in other words nothing would be enough to convince you. 

Well. There you go. 

What convinced you Fauci is a serial mass murderer?

[Goddess]

15 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I get zero credit for that, presumably because I come to a different conclusion than you.

Sorry if I missed your comments on that.

I don't have a problem with well-informed different conclusions.  It's the ones who strongly disagree but have nothing to base that conclusion on other than something they saw on CBC 4 years ago.